Impact of Types of Moisturizer and Humidity on the Residual Weight and Viscosity of Liquid and Gel Oral Moisturizers

Trehalose versus carboxymethylcellulose oral spray for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trehalose oral spray to relieve radiation-induced xerostomia on a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

Prior to RCT, the effect of trehalose (5-20%) on the epithelial growth of fetal mouse salivary gland (SG) explants was evaluated to confirm if 10% trehalose exerted the best epithelial outcomes. Participants who completed radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment were enrolled in a double-blind RCT, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria as per the CONSORT statement. The experimental group (n = 35) received 10% trehalose spray, while the control group (n = 35) received carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) spray to apply intra-orally 4 times/day for 14 days. Salivary pH and unstimulated salivary flow rate were recorded pre- and post-interventions. The Xerostomia-related Quality of Life scale (XeQoLs) was filled, and scores assessed post-interventions.

RESULTS

In the SG explant model, pro-acinar epithelial growth and mitosis was supported by 10% topical trehalose. As for RCT outcomes, salivary pH and unstimulated salivary flow rate were significantly improved after use of 10% trehalose spray when compared to CMC (p < 0.05). Participants reported an improvement of XeQoLs dimension scores after using trehalose or CMC oral sprays in terms of physical, pain/discomfort, and psychological dimensions (p < 0.05), but not social (p > 0.05). When comparing between CMC and trehalose sprays, XeQoLs total scores were not statistically different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10% trehalose spray improved salivary pH, unstimulated salivary flow rate, and the quality-of-life dimensions linked with physical, pain/discomfort, and psychological signs. The clinical efficacy of 10% trehalose spray was equivalent with CMC-based saliva substitutes for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia; therefore, trehalose may be suggested in alternative to CMC-based oral spray.(Thai Clinical Trials Registry; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ TCTR20190817004).

Effects of Storage Temperature and pH on the Antifungal Effects of Commercial Oral Moisturizers against Candida Albicans and Candida Glabrata

Background and objectives: Oral moisturizers have been used to treat dry mouth. This study aimed to investigate the effects of storage temperature and pH on the antifungal effects of oral moisturizers against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one oral moisturizers and amphotericin B (AMPH-B) were stored at 25 and 37 °C for 1 week. Subsequently, they were added to cylindrical holes in 50% trypticase soy agar plates inoculated with C. albicans and C. glabrata (10⁷ cells/ml). The antifungal effects were evaluated based on the sizes of the growth-inhibitory zones formed. Two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of storage temperature and pH on the growth-inhibitory zones. Results: Significant differences in the effects of storage temperature and pH of the moisturizers were observed against C. albicans and C. glabrata. The growth-inhibitory zones of samples stored at 37 °C and with neutral pH were significantly larger than those stored at 25 °C and with acidic pH, respectively. The sizes of the zones formed by most of the oral moisturizers were larger than those formed by AMPH-B (concentration, 0.63 µg/ml). Conclusion: The antifungal effects of oral moisturizers against C. albicans and C. glabrata were affected by their storage temperature and pH.

Hardness, Cohesiveness, and Adhesiveness of Oral Moisturizers and Denture Adhesives: Selection Criteria for Denture Wearers

The mechanical properties of seven denture adhesives and eight oral moisturizers, all of which are commercially available, were evaluated using a texture profile analysis. A new assessment chart is proposed for the selection criteria of denture adhesive and oral moisturizers using a radar chart with three axes: hardness, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness.