Comparing factors affecting dental-implant loss between age groups: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a growing interest in factors leading to implant failure in older people as the population aged 65 years or older continues to expand.

PURPOSE

We sought to identify differences of results in the implant survival rate and the influence of certain factors on implant failure in the older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent their first dental-implant surgery between July 2008 and June 2018 were included. Data on age, sex, smoking habits, medical conditions, implant location, implant size, and the presence and type of bone graft and membrane were collected and analyzed according to age group. Moreover, cumulative survival rates of implants (by Kaplan-Meier analysis) and hazard ratios (HR) of each factor (using Cox regression analysis with shared frailty) in each group were assessed and results compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 628 implants in 308 patients and 1904 implants in 987 patients in the older and younger groups, respectively, were assessed, with failure rates of 3.9% and 3.4%. Per Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 11-year patient-level cumulative survival rate of implant treatment was 95.3% (95% CI: 0.91-0.97) in the older and 93.9% (95% CI: 0.88-0.97) in the younger group. The HR for implant failure of the variables, except diameter of dental implants, were not statistically significant in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of implant treatment were not considerably different between the age groups.

Twenty-year analysis of implant treatment in an Australian public dental clinic

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study reviewed dental implant treatment completed at the Adelaide Dental Hospital over a 20-year period.

METHODS

The database of implant treatment completed between 1996 and 2015 was analysed for patient, implant, prosthesis and operator specifics together with known implant status.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty patients (mean age, 51.50 years) were treated with 527 implants. One hundred and eighty-four female patients received 296 implants and 136 males received 231 implants. Three hundred implants were restored with single crowns, 147 implants were restored with 63 mandibular implant overdentures, five implants were restored with two maxillary implant overdentures and 67 implants were restored with 20 full-arch fixed prostheses. The overall known implant survival rate was 87.67%. Mandibular implant overdentures had a risk of implant failure four times that of single implant-retained crowns that was statistically significant (P = 0.0100).

CONCLUSIONS

Implant treatment completed in this public sector clinic using finite resources and a defined system of patient and restorative selection criteria demonstrated a high known implant survival rate. Utilizing a structured and maintained patient recall protocol, it would be ideal to investigate further parameters of interest, particularly those that could improve treatment delivery and longevity.