Automatic Digital Design of the Occlusal Anatomy of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Compared to Dental Technicians' Digital Waxing: A Controlled Clinical Trial

An experimental study of flexural strength and hardness of zirconia and their relation to crown failure loads

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Dental zirconia is often marketed and selected for restorative use based upon the biaxial flexural strength of prefabricated specimens (disks) without considering other mechanical and physical properties.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to test whether 4-point flexural strength, biaxial flexural strength, and/or hardness may correlate with failure loads for crowns made of different zirconia materials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three brands of zirconia (BruxZir, Cercon, and Katana) were used to fabricate anatomically contoured crowns, rectangular bars, and circular disks. The sample size was n=15 specimens per zirconia brand and specimen shape. The bars were tested for 4-point flexural strength by using the 4-point bending (4PB) test and Vickers hardness (VH), while the disks were tested for biaxial flexural strength by using a piston-on-3 ball (POB) test. Crowns were attached to resin abutments and compressed with a steel spherical indenter through a polyethylene sheet to assess the failure loads by using the "crunch the crown" (CTC) test. One-way ANOVA (α=.05) was used to test for statistically significant differences between groups, and Weibull analysis was used to assess the variability of the measured flexural strengths, failure load, and hardness.

RESULTS

Statistical differences (P<.001) were found in comparing Cercon, BruxZir, and Katana ([4260 N=4186 N]>3195 N, respectively) with the CTC test and (396 MPa>[281 MPa=275 MPa], respectively) the 4PB test. No statistical differences (P=.084) were found among the zirconia brands (Cercon [384 MPa]=Bruxzir [359 MPa]=Katana [416 MPa]) for the POB test. No significant correlations (P>.05) were found between the 4PB, POB, or VH tests and the corresponding CTC test. The Weibull modulus varied for the different specimen geometries.

CONCLUSIONS

The piston-on-3 ball, 4-point bending, and Vickers hardness test results were not correlated with the corresponding crunch-the-crown test.

Retrospective clinical study of 1472-unit monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins realized with digital workflow

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical performance of monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins fabricated by digital impressions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All participants that present monolithic zirconia restorations with feather-edge margins realized with digital workflow were evaluated during scheduled periodontal maintenance between February and September 2022 according to predetermined inclusion criteria. Clinical performance was assessed using the modified USPHS and periodontal parameters. Overall survival was calculated for monolithic zirconia restorations. Technical and biologic complications were reported. Descriptive statistical analysis and life-table analyses were performed for all data.

RESULTS

A total of 1472 monolithic zirconia FDPs (1279 on abutments and 193 on pontics) placed in 1189 patients (982 males and 490 females) from February 2017 to September 2020 were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 44 months (range 36-61 months), and the overall survival rate was 98.5%. There were 931 single crowns, 96 were 3-unit FDPs, 33 were 4-unit FDPs, 11 were 5-unit FDPs, and 6-unit FDPs. Three single crowns had irreparable cracks, and 6 single crowns and one 4-unit FDP were fractured. One 3-unit FDP failed due to tooth fracture and 5 single crowns failed due to endodontic failure. The loss of retention was noted in 25 monolithic zirconia FDPs and hypersensitivity in 44 single crowns. Biologic complications were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results and its limitations, the monolithic zirconia FPDs and digital impressions represent a favorable prosthetic treatment similar to that reported with other margin designs CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Monolithic zirconia restorations on vertical-margin abutments fabricated using a digital workflow demonstrate excellent clinical performance. The digital clinical workflow without the use of a cast means a reduction in costs, steps, and operating time.

Comparison between Occlusal Errors of Single Posterior Crowns Adjusted Using Patient Specific Motion or Conventional Methods

Recently, digital technology has been used in dentistry to enhance accuracy and to reduce operative time. Due to advances in digital technology, the integration of individual mandibular motion into the mapping of the occlusal surface is being attempted. The Patient Specific Motion (PSM) is one such method. However, it is not clear whether the occlusal design that is adjusted using PSM could clinically show reduced occlusal error compared to conventional methods based on static occlusion. In this clinical comparative study including fifteen patients with a single posterior zirconia crown treatment, the occlusal surface after a clinical adjustment was compared to no adjustment (NA; design based on static occlusion), PSM (adjusted using PSM), and adjustment using a semi-adjustable articulator (SA) for the assessment of occlusal error. The root mean square (RMS; μm), average deviation value (±AVG; μm), and proportion inside the tolerance (in Tol; %) were calculated using the entire, subdivided occlusal surface and the out of tolerance area. Using a one-way ANOVA, the RMS and +AVG from the out of tolerance area showed a statistical difference between PSM (202.3 ± 39.8 for RMS, 173.1 ± 31.3 for +AVG) and NA (257.0 ± 73.9 for RMS, 210.9 ± 48.6 for +AVG). For the entire and subdivided occlusal surfaces, there were no significant differences. In the color-coded map analysis, PSM demonstrated a reduced occlusal error compared to NA. In conclusion, adjustment occlusal design using PSM is a simple and effective method for reducing occlusal errors that are difficult to identify in a current computer-aided design (CAD) workflow with static occlusion.