Incorporating Digital Dentures into Clinical Practice: Flexible Workflows and Improved Clinical Outcomes

Comparing the accuracy of occlusal vertical dimension transfer in CAD-CAM dentures

PURPOSE

There are different methods to transfer occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) when fabricating complete dentures, but it is not clear which method yields the most accurate transfer. This study investigated the accuracy of transferring the OVD of the maxillary/mandibular relationship when designing and fabricating digital dentures by evaluating two commonly used workflows: duplicate dentures (DDs) and occlusion rims (ORs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mounted edentulous casts were used to simulate a completely edentulous patient. These casts were used in two workflows: (1) DD workflow where complete dentures were fabricated and relined (n = 15), and (2) OR where final impressions and ORs were constructed (n = 15). Relined dentures and ORs with fiduciary markers were then scanned and virtually articulated, then exported as STL files. A scan of the articulated casts (simulated patients) with fiduciary markers embedded was also exported as an STL file and used as a control. STL files for each workflow were superimposed over the control and analyzed in 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems, NC) for deviations (mm) at three different locations. Average 3D deviations were compared among the groups using a two-way ANOVA (α-0.05).

RESULTS

The average deviation for OR was significantly larger than DD at all locations of measurement [F = 46.00, p < 0.0001]. The majority of the measurements (98.9%) had a positive deviation value, indicating increased OVD. The overall deviation for the OR group from the control was 0.72 ± 0.13 mm versus 0.45 ± 0.23 mm for the DD group. There was no difference in deviation between the points of measurement and no interaction between the location and method [F = 0.02, p < 0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

The DD workflow exhibited less deviation in the transfer of OVD than the OR workflow. However, the deviation was small and may not be clinically significant.

Accuracy of tooth positioning in 3D-printing aided manufactured complete dentures: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

In this study, we propose a 3D printing-aided method for manufacturing complete dentures and evaluate its accuracy of artificial tooth positioning.

METHODS

Complete dentures were designed and 3D printed and put on a plaster cast; and pack and press technique was used to fabricate the final denture during which artificial teeth were inserted in the teeth holes formed by the printed denture. In this study, fused deposition moulding (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA) techniques were used to fabricate complete dentures (10 pairs of maxillary and mandibular dentures each). After 3D scanning the final dentures, 3D comparison between the scanned teeth on the denture and its computer-aided design (CAD) data was made and single-tooth deflection angles were measured to evaluate the tooth position. Values were compared using independent-sample t-tests or the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In the result of 3D comparison, the root mean square values of artificial teeth were 0.107 ± 0.018 mm (SLA group) and 0.136 ± 0.023 mm (FDM group; P < 0.05). In the result of single-tooth deflection angles, the mandibular anterior teeth demonstrated the maximum deflection angle, followed by the molars, premolars, and maxillary anterior teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to fabricate complete dentures using 3D-printed complete dentures as prototypes and combine conventional methods. The accuracy of the final denture fabricated using SLA printing was better than that of dentures produced using the FDM method.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The 3D printing-aided manufacturing for complete dentures refers to using the 3D-printed dentures as a prototype along with the traditional process to fabricate final dentures and is an effective alternative when the dentures cannot be directly processed using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM).

Comparison of treatment outcomes and time efficiency between a digital complete denture and conventional complete denture: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

The authors of this study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and time efficiency between digital and conventional complete denture restorations and propose suggestions for clinical use.

METHODS

The authors used digital (functionally suitable digital complete denture [FSD]) and conventional complete denture restorations to make 2 dentures each for 10 edentulous patients. All the operations of both techniques before denture delivery were completed in the first 4 visits, and then 2 dentures were delivered successively for the patients. The clinical and laboratory times were recorded to evaluate the time efficiency; treatment outcomes were evaluated via scoring the denture satisfaction of the dentist and patients in a double-blind manner.

RESULTS

The satisfaction scores of FSDs (7.6-9.6 [dentist's scores], 8.4-10 [patients' scores]) were higher than those of conventional dentures (7.2-9.7 [dentist's score], 7.4-9.8 [patients' scores]), but there were no significant differences. The clinical and laboratory operation times of the FSD group were less than those of the conventional group, saving an average of 28.0 minutes and 64.3 minutes in the clinic and laboratory, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FSD technology can improve the efficiency of clinical and laboratory operations and shorten the manufacturing cycle of dentures. The occlusion stability of FSDs was statistically better than that of traditional dentures, but there was no statistical difference in other clinical indicators.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

FSD technology is low cost and easy to operate and has several applications. Compared with conventional complete denture restoration technology, FSDs can save time and have a comparable clinical effect. This clinical trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR1900021722.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2021 dental literature in restorative dentistry to inform busy dentists regarding noteworthy scientific and clinical progress over the past year. Each member of the committee brings discipline-specific expertise to coverage of this broad topical area. Specific subject areas addressed, in order of the appearance in this report, include COVID-19 and the dental profession (new); prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; implant dentistry; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence daily dental treatment decisions with an emphasis on future trends in dentistry. With the tremendous volume of dentistry and related literature being published daily, this review cannot possibly be comprehensive. Rather, its purpose is to update interested readers and provide important resource material for those interested in pursuing greater details on their own. It remains our intent to assist colleagues in negotiating the extensive volume of important information being published annually. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in successfully managing the patients and dental problems they encounter.

Is the Number of Appointments for Complete Denture Fabrication Reduced with CAD-CAM? A Literature Review

One of the key arguments in favor of digitally produced complete dentures (CDs) is the requirement for less patient visits in comparison to the conventional workflow. However, it is not yet clear if this argument is accurate; nor, if indeed the insertion of the complete dentures is achieved in fewer appointments, how many are required. The purpose of this literature review was to investigate the reported number of required patient visits for the production of digitally fabricated CDs. An electronic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE using three groups of keywords: “complete dentures”, “CAD/CAM”, and “Appointments” with their alternative forms. Out of the initial 157 results, 36 articles were automatically selected utilizing exclusion keywords. After consensus between the two examiners, eight articles were finally analyzed and presented in a table. The majority (75%) of the reports came from institutions, and the average number of appointments up to complete denture insertion was 4.1, not always including try-in dentures. In this study, it can be concluded that, with a digital workflow, the insertion appointment is reached in fewer visits than the conventional five-visit procedure which is commonly taught in dental schools.

Innovative subtractive production of a digital removable complete denture from start to finish: a JPD Digital video presentation

This JPD Digital video presentation presents the clinical treatment from start to finish in which a dual-shaded bi-coloured monolithic disk was used for the fabrication of an immediate digital complete denture followed by the delivery of a definitive digital complete denture. The treatment plan included extraction of the remaining maxillary and mandibular teeth followed by an esthetic evaluation with digital smile design. The digital definitive complete dentures were milled from a monolithic dual-shaded disk.

Evaluation of functional suitable digital complete denture system based on 3D printing technology

PURPOSE

To improve the clinical effects of complete denture use and simplify its clinical application, a digital complete denture restoration workflow (Functional Suitable Digital Complete Denture System, FSD) was proposed and preliminary clinical evaluation was done.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty edentulous patients were enrolled, of which half were treated by a prosthodontic chief physician, and the others were treated by a postgraduate student. Based on the primary impression and jaw relation obtained at the first visit, diagnostic denture was designed and printed to create a definitive impression, jaw relation, and esthetic confirmation at the second visit. A redesigned complete denture was printed as a mold to fabricate final denture that was delivered at the third visit. To evaluate accuracy of impression made by diagnostic denture, the final denture was used as a tray to make impression, and 3D comparison was used to analyze their difference. To evaluate the clinical effect of FSD, visual analogue scores (VAS) were determined by both dentists and patients.

RESULTS

Two visits were reduced before denture delivery. The RMS values of 3D comparison between the impression made via diagnostic dentures and the final dentures were 0.165 ± 0.033 mm in the upper jaw and 0.139 ± 0.031 mm in the lower jaw. VAS ratings were between 8.5 and 9.6 in the chief physician group, while 7.7 and 9.5 in the student group; there was no statistical difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

FSD can simplify the complete denture restoration process and reduce the number of visits. The accuracy of impressions made by diagnostic dentures was acceptable in clinic. The VASs of both dentists and patients were satisfied.