Cost-effective Analyses of an Urban Public School District's Classroom Breakfast Program

Alternative School Breakfast Service Models and Associations with Breakfast Participation, Diet Quality, Body Mass Index, Attendance, Behavior, and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review

The United States (US) School Breakfast Program provides Breakfast After The Bell (BATB) to alleviate hunger, provide nutrition, and ensure students have a healthy start to the day. This study aims to review the evidence regarding the impact of BATB on students' diet and academic outcomes, including participation, diet quality and consumption, body mass index (BMI) and weight status, attendance, classroom behavior, and academic performance. The articles were extracted from three electronic databases and published since the start of the literature through December 2022. Studies were peer-reviewed; quantitative research articles or government reports; and conducted in public or private elementary, middle, and high schools. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirty-seven studies were included in this review. This review found BATB increased school breakfast participation, improved diet quality, and improved classroom behavior particularly among students from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds and students eligible for free or reduced-price meals. The impact of BATB on BMI and weight status, academic achievement and attendance was mixed. This review is particularly timely given free school meals and updated school nutrition standards are being prioritized over the next decade in the US. Thus, it is important to evaluate the nutritional and educational outcomes of BATB. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021289719).

Key determinants to school breakfast program implementation in Philadelphia public schools: Implications for the role of SNAP-Ed

Background

Policies addressing food insecurity are only effective if they are implemented successfully, serving those most at risk. Universal school meals provide a key intervention to schools that serve predominantly low-income families by providing free school breakfast and lunch to all. Unfortunately, low uptake of such provisions among students is concerning especially regarding school breakfast, warranting key implementation support for schools to ensure student nutrition needs are met. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the determinants of implementing two different school breakfast programs and pragmatic strategies for serving breakfast in ways that maximize student participation.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted between 2018 and 2020 within the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) comprising surveys, interviews, and observations to assess contextual determinants of two distinctive breakfast models: Breakfast in the Classroom (BIC) and Cafeteria after the Bell (CAB). Principals and lead kitchen staff completed surveys to assess determinants of breakfast model adoption. Principals, lead kitchen staff, classroom teachers, climate (i.e., social emotional wellbeing), and facilities staff subsequently participated in interviews to discuss implementation determinants (i.e., facilitators and challenges) and strategies for maximizing student participation. Observations provided rich data to triangulate interviews and survey data. Survey data were analyzed using frequency analysis, and observation and interview data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Presentation of themes was framed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

Results highlighted several positive determinants to participation including addressing student and family needs, making data-informed decisions, and providing hot meals and fruit based on student tastes. Negative determinants to implementation comprised challenges to SNAP-Ed-funded policy changes to promote student breakfast participation, lack of communication between administration, and staff and turnover among food service staff. Strategies included modifying school entrance procedures and combining breakfast with other education-related tasks to minimize instructional time lost through breakfast after the bell schedules.

Discussion

Data highlight the need to include implementation partner expertise when designing interventions for increasing reach and effectiveness of school meal programs. Future research that directly tests implementation strategies and key outcomes of reach/participation, among others, is critical to bridging the policy to practice gap in school nutrition programs.

Breakfast and School-Related Outcomes in Children and Adolescents in the US: A Literature Review and its Implications for School Nutrition Policy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To identify and review the latest research on the connections between breakfast and school-related outcomes in children and adolescents in the US, and to explore the implications of this research on US school nutrition policy, particularly as it applies to students experiencing or at risk for food insecurity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although school personnel, parents, and students have positive attitudes about breakfast and its benefits for learning, recent research finds mixed evidence for the role of breakfast in improving objectively measured grades and test scores. Few recent studies examined behavioral outcomes, limiting the ability to draw clear conclusions about breakfast and school behavior. Several studies observed improved attendance with increased school breakfast access and participation, especially when schools offered breakfast at no cost to all students. There are many challenges to studying the connections between breakfast and learning. The recent research on breakfast and academic outcomes is mixed, but there is a growing body of evidence that eliminating fees for both school breakfast and lunch has promise for improving school-related outcomes.

Breakfast in the Classroom Initiative Does Not Improve Attendance or Standardized Test Scores among Urban Students: A Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Breakfast in the Classroom (BIC), a common approach to implementing the federal School Breakfast Program, is advocated as a method to improve students' academic performance. However, the impacts of BIC on academic outcomes are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a BIC initiative which provided free, universal BIC on attendance and standardized test performance over 2.5 years, versus free universal breakfast served in the cafeteria before school, among students in an urban school district serving a low-income population.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted between 2013 and 2016; sixteen kindergarten through 8^th grade public schools in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania were enrolled and randomized to condition. Baseline data for 1,362 4^th through 6^th grade students were provided by the school district. Midpoint data were collected after 1.5 years and endpoint data after 2.5 years.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Schools were eligible if ≥50% of students qualified for free/reduced-priced meals, did not offer BIC, and received programming as part of the USDA's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Parents consented for their children to participate.

INTERVENTION

Intervention schools provided BIC and breakfast-related nutrition promotion activities. Control schools provided breakfast in the cafeteria before the school day.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Student attendance and standardized exam scores.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Weighted generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in outcomes between conditions at midpoint and endpoint.

RESULTS

The BIC initiative did not impact attendance (Beta (SE) = 0.004 (0.06), P = 0.94) or standardized reading exam scores (Beta (SE) = 0.02 (0.06), P = 0.79) after 2.5 years. Students in BIC initiative schools had lower standardized math exam scores than those in control schools although this difference was small (Beta (SE) = -0.20 (0.07), P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

BIC did not improve academic outcomes among students attending low-income, urban schools.