1
|
Middleton BF, Danchin M, Fathima P, Bines JE, Macartney K, Snelling TL. Review of the health impact of the oral rotavirus vaccine program in children under 5 years in Australia: 2006 - 2021. Vaccine 2023; 41:636-648. [PMID: 36529591 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Oral rotavirus vaccines were incorporated into the National Immunisation Program (NIP) for all Australian infants in July 2007. Initially each of the eight jurisdictions implemented Rotarix or RotaTeq rotavirus vaccine, however from July 2017 all states and territories have administered Rotarix only. This review evaluates the health impact of the oral rotavirus vaccine program for Australian children less than 5 years old over the first 15 years of the rotavirus vaccine program, observing long-term changes in rotavirus-related health care attendances, public health notifications, and vaccine effectiveness and safety data for both Rotarix and RotaTeq rotavirus vaccines. We searched Medline for studies published between January 2006 and May 2022 using the search terms 'rotavirus', 'rotavirus vaccine' and 'Australia'. Of 491 items identified, 76 items - 36 peer-reviewed articles and 40 reports - were included in the review. We found evidence that the introduction of the oral rotavirus vaccine program in Australia was associated with a prompt reduction in rotavirus-coded and all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisations of vaccine-eligible children. In the context of less complete coverage, reduced vaccine timeliness and lower vaccine effectiveness, a less substantial and inconsistent reduction in severe rotavirus disease was observed among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, particularly those living in rural and remote northern Australia. Additional studies report no evidence for the emergence of non-vaccine serotypes and/ or replacement serotypes in Australia during the vaccine era. While the health impact for young children and consequent cost-savings of the oral rotavirus vaccine program have been high, it is important to find strategies to improve rotavirus vaccine impact for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations to ensure health benefits for all Australian children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca F Middleton
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
| | - Margie Danchin
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Parveen Fathima
- Health and Clinical Analytics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie E Bines
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristine Macartney
- Department of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas L Snelling
- Health and Clinical Analytics, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Azor-Martinez E, Garcia-Fernandez L, Strizzi JM, Cantarero-Vallejo MD, Jimenez-Lorente CP, Balaguer-Martinez JV, Torres-Alegre P, Yui-Hifume R, Sanchez-Forte M, Gimenez-Sanchez F. Effectiveness of a hand hygiene program to reduce acute gastroenteritis at child care centers: A cluster randomized trial. Am J Infect Control 2020; 48:1315-1321. [PMID: 32303373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational and hand hygiene program in daycare centers (DCCs) and homes on acute gastroenteritis (AGE) incidence in children attending DCCs. METHODS A randomized, controlled, and open study of 911 children aged 0-3 years attending 24 DCCs in Almería (Spain) with an 8-month follow-up was employed. Two intervention groups of DCCs families performed educational and hand hygiene measures, 1 with soap and water (soap and water group; n = 274), another with hand sanitizer (hand sanitizer group [HSG]; n = 339), and the control group (CG; n = 298) followed usual handwashing procedures. We compared AGE episode rates with Poisson regression model. RESULTS seven hundred fourteen AGE episodes were registered, significant differences between HSG and CG children were found during December and January. A multivariate model was applied and the adjusted incidence rate ratios by rotavirus vaccination found significant differences when children were previously vaccinated, the children in the soap and water group had a higher risk of AGE episodes (incidence rate ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval:1.0-1.64), compared with those in the HSG. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that hand hygiene programs that included hand sanitizer were most effective in the winter months. Further, the largest reduction of AGE episodes occurred in the children that followed hand hygiene programs including hand sanitizer and educational measures for DCC staff, parents, and children, and were vaccinated for rotavirus.
Collapse
|
3
|
Reyes JF, Wood JG, Beutels P, Macartney K, McIntyre P, Menzies R, Mealing N, Newall AT. Beyond expectations: Post-implementation data shows rotavirus vaccination is likely cost-saving in Australia. Vaccine 2017; 35:345-352. [PMID: 27916411 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Universal vaccination against rotavirus was included in the funded Australian National Immunisation Program in July 2007. Predictive cost-effectiveness models assessed the program before introduction. METHODS We conducted a retrospective economic evaluation of the Australian rotavirus program using national level post-implementation data on vaccine uptake, before-after measures of program impact and published estimates of excess intussusception cases. These data were used as inputs into a multi-cohort compartmental model which assigned cost and quality of life estimates to relevant health states, adopting a healthcare payer perspective. The primary outcome was discounted cost per quality adjusted life year gained, including or excluding unspecified acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalisations. RESULTS Relative to the baseline period (1997-2006), over the 6years (2007-2012) after implementation of the rotavirus program, we estimated that ∼77,000 hospitalisations (17,000 coded rotavirus and 60,000 unspecified AGE) and ∼3 deaths were prevented, compared with an estimated excess of 78 cases of intussusception. Approximately 90% of hospitalisations prevented were in children <5years, with evidence of herd protection in older age groups. The program was cost-saving when observed changes (declines) in both hospitalisations coded as rotavirus and as unspecified AGE were attributed to the rotavirus vaccine program. The adverse impact of estimated excess cases of intussusception was far outweighed by the benefits of the program. CONCLUSION The inclusion of herd impact and declines in unspecified AGE hospitalisations resulted in the value for money achieved by the Australian rotavirus immunisation program being substantially greater than predicted bypre-implementation models, despite the potential increased cases of intussusception. This Australian experience is likely to be relevant to high-income countries yet to implement rotavirus vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Reyes
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - J G Wood
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P Beutels
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - K Macartney
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases (NCIRS), Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - P McIntyre
- Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases (NCIRS), Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - R Menzies
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - N Mealing
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A T Newall
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant PA, Hopper SM. Alternatives to ward admission from the emergency department. J Paediatr Child Health 2016; 52:237-40. [PMID: 27062630 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 12/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
There is ever-increasing pressure on hospital resources in general and emergency departments (ED) in particular. At the same time, there is increasing recognition that traditional inpatient ward-based care is not necessary for the majority of children presenting to the ED with acute illness, and that there are patient, family and hospital benefits to pursuing other options. Here, we describe alternative pathways for children presenting to the ED, including short stay and observational medicine, hospital-in-the-home and non-admission enhanced care, in other words, additional management practices or pathways for children who are discharged from the ED. We discuss the principles, models and practical considerations involved in each of these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope A Bryant
- Departments of General Medicine and, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,RCH@Home, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandy M Hopper
- Emergency Department, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davey HM, Muscatello DJ, Wood JG, Snelling TL, Ferson MJ, Macartney KK. Impact of high coverage of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine on Emergency Department presentations for rotavirus gastroenteritis. Vaccine 2015; 33:1726-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|