Joint hypermobility and oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: What relationship?

Effect of joint hypermobility on outcomes of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is common in pediatric rheumatology. Despite treatment, many patients experience persistent disease activity. Joint hypermobility (JH), defined by an excessive range of motion across multiple joints, is prevalent in children and adolescents and may influence disease outcomes in JIA.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the impact of JH on symptoms in youth and young adults with JIA.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the PR-COIN network and included patients under 21 years old with a diagnosis of JIA. Patients with JIA and JH were matched with those having JIA-only based on age, sex assigned at birth, JIA subtype, and medication exposure. Clinical data, including disease activity measures, patient well-being, and pain ratings, were collected at baseline and follow-up visits.

RESULTS

The sample included 420 patients with JIA + JH and 2100 with JIA only. The JIA + JH group exhibited higher disease activity at baseline, more active arthritis joints, elevated physician global assessment of disease activity scores, and worse patient-reported well-being. These differences persisted over time. The JIA + JH group had a 19-20% greater likelihood of maintaining high disease activity scores and worsening over subsequent visits, indicating a significant impact of JH on disease progression.

CONCLUSION

JH in youth with JIA is associated with higher and persistent disease activity, suggesting that JH significantly contributes to the disease burden in patients with JIA and should be considered in treatment strategies. Future research should further explore the mechanisms by which JH influences disease activity and investigate comprehensive management approaches to improve outcomes for this population. Key Points • Children with JIA and joint hypermobility (JH) exhibit significantly higher disease activity at baseline compared to those with JIA only, including more active arthritis joints and elevated physician global assessment scores. • The presence of JH in JIA patients is associated with poorer patient-reported well-being and higher overall disease activity scores, which persist over time despite treatment. • JIA + JH patients have a 19-20% greater likelihood of maintaining high disease activity and worsening over subsequent visits, indicating a significant impact of JH on disease progression. • The study suggests that JH should be considered an important clinical factor in the management of JIA, with targeted interventions needed to address the increased disease activity and improve overall patient outcomes.

Relapses of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in adulthood: A monocentric experience

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to describe a monocentric cohort of young adult patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), assessing the risk of relapse after transition to adult care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study and collected clinical, serological, and demographic data of young adult patients (18-30 years old) referred to the Transition Clinic of a single Italian centre between January 2020 and March 2023. Patients with systemic-onset JIA were excluded. Primary outcome was disease relapse, defined by Wallace criteria. Risk factors were analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with age 18-30 years old were enrolled in the study and followed for a median 30 months. The median disease duration at transition was 15 years. Twenty (40%) patients were on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and 38 (76%) were on biological DMARDs through adulthood. Twenty-three patients relapsed after transitioning to adult care for a median 9-month follow-up (IQR 0-46.5). Most relapses involved the knees (69.6%). The univariate analysis identified monoarthritis (HR 4.67, CI 1.069-20.41, p value = 0.041) as the main risk factor for relapse within the first 36 months of follow-up. Early onset, ANA positivity, past and ongoing treatment with csDMARDs or bDMARDs, therapeutic withdrawal, and disease activity within 12 months before transition did not significantly influence the risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

In JIA patients, the risk of relapse after transitioning to adult care remains high, irrespective of disease subtype and treatment. The main risk factor for the early occurrence of articular activity is monoarticular involvement.

Monoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis as a distinct clinical entity A proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Currently, monoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (monoJIA) is included in the ILAR classification as oligoarticular subtype although various aspects, from clinical practice, suggest it as a separate entity.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical characteristics of persistent monoJIA.

METHODS

Patients with oligoJIA and with at least two years follow-up entered the study. Those with monoarticular onset and persistent monoarticular course were compared with those with oligoJIA. Variables considered were: sex, age at onset, presence of benign joint hypermobility (BJH), ANA, uveitis, therapy and outcome. Patients who had not undergone clinical follow-up for more than 12 months were contacted by structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

Of 347 patients with oligoJIA, 196 with monoarticular onset entered the study and 118 (60.2%), identified as persistent monoJIA, were compared with 229 oligoJIA. The mean follow-up was 11.4 years. The switch from monoarticular onset to oligoarticular course of 78 patients (38.8%) occurred by the first three years from onset. In comparison with oligoJIA, the most significant features of monoJIA were later age at onset (6.1 vs. 4.7 years), lower female prevalence (70.3 vs. 83.4%), higher frequency of BJH (61.9 vs. 46.3%), lower frequency of uveitis (14.4 vs. 34.1%) and ANA+ (68.6 vs. 89.5%) and better long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

MonoJIA, defined as persistent arthritis of unknown origin of a single joint for at least three years, seems to be a separate clinical entity from oligoJIA. This evidence may be taken into consideration for its possible inclusion into the new classification criteria for JIA and open new therapeutic perspectives.

Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review

BACKGROUND

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are debilitating conditions. Diagnosis is currently clinical in the absence of biomarkers, and criteria developed for adults are difficult to use in children and biologically immature adolescents. Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a prerequisite for hEDS and generalized HSD. Current literature identifies a large proportion of children as hypermobile using a Beighton score ≥ 4 or 5/9, the cut off for GJH in adults. Other phenotypic features from the 2017 hEDS criteria can arise over time. Finally, many comorbidities described in hEDS/HSD are also seen in the general pediatric and adolescent population. Therefore, pediatric specific criteria are needed. The Paediatric Working Group of the International Consortium on EDS and HSD has developed a pediatric diagnostic framework presented here. The work was informed by a review of the published evidence.

OBSERVATIONS

The framework has 4 components, GJH, skin and tissue abnormalities, musculoskeletal complications, and core comorbidities. A Beighton score of ≥ 6/9 best identifies children with GJH at 2 standard deviations above average, based on published general population data. Skin and soft tissue changes include soft skin, stretchy skin, atrophic scars, stretch marks, piezogenic papules, and recurrent hernias. Two symptomatic groups were agreed: musculoskeletal and systemic. Emerging comorbid relationships are discussed. The framework generates 8 subgroups, 4 pediatric GJH, and 4 pediatric generalized hypermobility spectrum disorders. hEDS is reserved for biologically mature adolescents who meet the 2017 criteria, which also covers even rarer types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome at any age.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework allows hypermobile children to be categorized into a group describing their phenotypic and symptomatic presentation. It clarifies the recommendation that comorbidities should be defined using their current internationally accepted frameworks. This provides a foundation for improving clinical care and research quality in this population.

Pediatric uveitis: A comprehensive review

Pediatric uveitis accounts for 5-10% of all uveitis. Uveitis in children differs from adult uveitis in that it is commonly asymptomatic and can become chronic and cause damage to ocular structures. The diagnosis might be delayed for multiple reasons, including the preverbal age and difficulties in examining young children. Pediatric uveitis may be infectious or noninfectious in etiology. The etiology of noninfectious uveitis is presumed to be autoimmune or autoinflammatory. The most common causes of uveitis in this age group are idiopathic and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. The stepladder approach for the treatment of pediatric uveitis is based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multidisciplinary panels. Uveitis morbidities in pediatric patients include cataract, glaucoma, and amblyopia. Pediatric patients with uveitis should be frequently examined until remission is achieved. Once in remission, the interval between follow-up visits can be extended; however, it is recommended that even after remission the child should be seen every 8-12 weeks depending on the history of uveitis and the medications used. Close follow up is also necessary as uveitis can flare up during immunomodulatory therapy. It is crucial to measure the impact of uveitis, its treatment, and its complications on the child and the child's family. Visual acuity can be considered as an acceptable criterion for assessing visual function. Additionally, the number of cells in the anterior chamber can be a measure of disease activity. We review different aspects of pediatric uveitis. We discuss the mechanisms of noninfectious uveitis, including autoimmune and autoinflammatory etiologies, and the risks of developing uveitis in children with systemic rheumatologic diseases. We address the risk factors for developing morbidities, the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria for timing and anatomical classifications, and describe a stepladder approach in the treatment of pediatric uveitis based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multi-disciplinary panels. In this review article, We describe the most common entities for each type of anatomical classification and complications of uveitis for the pediatric population. Additionally, we address monitoring of children with uveitis and evaluation of Quality of Life.

Incorporating joint pain screening into the pediatric dermatologic examination

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Joint manifestations are a feature of many pediatric skin disorders, among them psoriasis, autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases, hypermobility disorders, and as an adverse effect of certain medications. Identifying joint disease early is important for intervention and prevention of chronic damage. However, pediatric musculoskeletal complaints are common and determining whether symptoms warrant a rheumatology referral for arthritis can be challenging.

METHODS

Pediatric dermatologists were surveyed for their comfort in screening for joint disease. Through literature review and interviews with three pediatric rheumatologists, key joints involved in disorders with skin manifestations and arthritis were identified and the essential evaluations were determined.

RESULTS

Of 100 surveyed practicing board-certified pediatric dermatologists, 79% did not feel confident in their ability to perform a joint-focused physical examination, a key step in screening for joint disease. A rapid joint examination technique (R-JET) was developed, along with an accompanying three-question survey and body diagram for patient self-report of symptoms. A video demonstration of the R-JET was created as a teaching tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching and incorporation of a rapid screening examination for arthritis by pediatric dermatologists has the potential to identify pediatric arthritis earlier, facilitate referral, and reduce the risk of progressive joint disease. These instruments can easily be incorporated into a pediatric dermatology office visit.

Epidemiological and advanced therapeutic approaches to treatment of uveitis in pediatric rheumatic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite the low prevalence of uveitis in pediatric rheumatic diseases, potential problems as well as high disease burden can complicate its management. In this review, we systematically assessed the epidemiological, etiological, and managerial aspects of uveitis in pediatric rheumatic diseases.

Methods

This current study was conducted in accordance with the established methods and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). We searched the manuscript databases, including Medline, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane for all eligible studies in line with the considered keywords. We also conducted the statistical analysis using the Stata software.

Results

Considering studies focusing on uveitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) yielded a pooled prevalence of 11.8% (95%CI: 11.2 to 12.4%) for uveitis following JIA. In this regard, the prevalence rate of uveitis related to Behçet^,s disease and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE( was estimated to be 15.0 and 0.8%, respectively. The pooled response rate to Adalimumab and Infliximab was estimated to be 68.0% (95%CI: 65.4 to 70.6%), 64.7% (95%CI: 59.8 to 69.3%), respectively. The documents for the systematical assessment of other biological medications (e.g. Tocilizumab, Daclizumab and Rituximab) were inadequate; however, the mean response rate for these drugs was 59, 75 and 80%, respectively. Our meta-analysis showed a pooled response rate of 40.0% (95%CI, 36.0% to 44.2) to Methotrexate. Significant heterogeneity and significant diffusion bias were demonstrated by reviewing studies.

Conclusions

The pooled prevalence of uveitis in pediatric rheumatic diseases widely varied based on the underlying disease requiring more investigations in different subtypes of rheumatic diseases. The biologic medications, especially Adalimumab are the most effective treatments for uveitis in pediatric rheumatic diseases; however, a combination of the safe, available alternatives is preferred to achieve the most desirable treatment response.