Ear, nose and throat surgery: All you need to know about the surgical approach to the management of middle-ear effusions in Australian Indigenous and non-Indigenous children

Comparative study on wound healing and infection between open and minimally invasive surgical methods in pediatric otolaryngology surgery

Pediatric otolaryngology surgeries are crucial interventions requiring careful consideration of surgical methods to optimize outcomes. The choice between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches in this context warrants thorough investigation. While both methods aim to address ear, nose, and throat conditions in children, a comparative study assessing their impact on crucial factors such as intraoperative parameters, wound healing, complications, and postoperative pain is essential. This study aims to compare the effects of open and minimally invasive surgical methods on wound healing and infection in pediatric otolaryngology surgery, and provide a scientific basis for the selection of surgical methods. Two groups of patients were selected, with 90 people in each group. One group received open surgery and the other received minimally invasive surgery. Recording the intraoperative time, anesthesia time, and intraoperative blood loss; the number of days required for wound healing; the occurrence of wound-related complications; the comparison of pain on postoperative Days 1, 3, and 7; and the factors influencing postoperative wound healing were analyzed. In the minimally invasive surgery group, the intraoperative time was shorter, the anesthesia time was relatively reduced, and the amount of bleeding was significantly reduced. Wounds also take fewer days to heal and have lower rates of wound-related complications. When comparing the pain on 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery, the minimally invasive surgery group had relatively mild pain. Analysis of postoperative wound healing factors showed that minimally invasive surgical methods have a positive impact on healing. In pediatric otolaryngology surgery, minimally invasive surgery performs better than open surgery in terms of intraoperative operation time, anesthesia time, blood loss, wound healing time, complication rate, and postoperative pain. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery may be a safer and more effective surgical method.

Ear disease and hearing loss: a descriptive study of Aboriginal children living in metropolitan South Australia

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to describe the rates of middle ear disease in Aboriginal children living in metropolitan Adelaide.

METHODS

Data from the Under 8s Ear Health Program (population-based outreach screening) were analysed to identify rates of ear disease and the referral outcomes for children identified with ear conditions during screening.

RESULTS

In total, 1598 children participated in at least one screening between May 2013 and May 2017. Males and females were equally represented; 73.2% had one or more abnormal findings on otoscopy at the first screening visit, 42% had abnormal tympanometry, and 20% registered a "fail" on otoacoustic emission testing. The referral pathway for children with abnormal findings included referrals to their GP, Audiology, and Ear Nose Throat (ENT) Departments. Also, 35% (562/1598) of the children screened required referral either to a GP or Audiology, and 28% of those referred (158/562) or 9.8% (158/1598) of the total number of children screened required further ENT management.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of ear disease and hearing problems in urban Aboriginal children were detected in this study. Existing social, environmental, and clinical interventions need to be evaluated. Closer monitoring including data linkage may assist to better understand the effectiveness, timeliness, and challenges of public health interventions and follow-up clinical services to a population-based screening program.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

Aboriginal-led population-based outreach programs such as the Under 8s Ear Health Program augmented by seamless integration with education, allied health and tertiary health services should be prioritised for expansion and continued funding.