Hospital readmissions in paediatric trauma patients: A 10-year Australian review

Hospital service use following an injury hospitalisation for young males and females in a population-level matched retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Children and young people who sustain injuries resulting in a hospital admission may experience adverse effects for months or years following the event. Understanding the attributable burden and health service needs is vital for public health planning as well as individual care provision. This study aims to identify the hospitalised morbidity associated with injury among young people by sex using a population-level matched cohort.

METHOD

A population-level matched case-comparison retrospective cohort study of young people aged ≤18 years hospitalised for an injury during 2005-2018 in New South Wales, Australia using linked birth, health, and mortality records. The comparison cohort was matched on age, gender and residential postcode. Adjusted rate ratios (ARR) were calculated for age group, injury severity and nature of injury by sex.

RESULTS

There were 122,660 (60.9%) males and 78,712 (39.1%) females aged ≤18 years hospitalised after sustaining an injury. Males (ARR 2.89; 95%CI 2.81-2.97) and females (ARR 2.79; 95%CI 2.68-2.90) who were hospitalised after an injury had a higher risk of subsequent hospital admission than their matched peers. Males (ARR 3.38; 95%CI 2.81-4.05) and females (ARR 3.41; 95%CI 2.72-4.26) with serious injuries had a higher risk of admission compared to peers. Males with dislocations, sprains and strains (ARR 3.40; 95%CI 3.03-3.82), burns (ARR 3.37; 95%CI 2.99-3.80), and fractures (ARR 3.20; 95%CI 3.07-3.33), and females with burns (ARR 3.84; 95%CI 3.40-4.33), dislocations, sprains and strains (ARR 3.54; 95%CI 2.96-4.23), and traumatic brain injury (ARR 3.39; 95%CI 3.01-3.82) had the highest risk of subsequent hospitalisation compared to peers.

CONCLUSION

Patient management and care extends beyond the injury admission as many young people face high levels of contact with health services in the months and years following injury. These findings will inform health service planning and trauma care management for young people and families affected by injury.

Prediction of 7-Day Readmission Risk for Pediatric Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients admitted for trauma may have unique risk factors of unplanned readmission and require condition-specific models to maximize accuracy of prediction. We used a multicenter data set on trauma admissions to study risk factors and predict unplanned 7-day readmissions with comparison to the 30-day metric.

METHODS

Data from 28 hospitals in the United States consisting of 82,532 patients (95,158 encounters) were retrieved, and 75% of the data were used for building a random intercept, mixed-effects regression model, whereas the remaining were used for evaluating model performance. The variables included were demographics, payer, current and past health care utilization, trauma-related and other diagnoses, medications, and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Certain conditions such as poisoning and medical/surgical complications during treatment of traumatic injuries are associated with increased odds of unplanned readmission. Conversely, trauma-related conditions, such as trauma to the thorax, knee, lower leg, hip/thigh, elbow/forearm, and shoulder/upper arm, are associated with reduced odds of readmission. Additional predictors include the current and past health care utilization and the number of medications. The corresponding 7-day model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.737 (0.716, 0.757) on an independent test set and shared similar risk factors with the 30-day version.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with trauma-related conditions have risk of readmission modified by the type of trauma. As a result, additional quality of care measures may be required for patients with trauma-related conditions that elevate their risk of readmission.

Identifying areas for improvement in paediatric trauma care in NSW Australia using a clinical, system and human factors peer-review tool

BACKGROUND

There is known variability in the quality of care delivered to injured children. Identifying where care improvement can be made is critical. This study aimed to review paediatric trauma cases across the most populous Australian State to identify factors contributing to clinical incidents.

METHODS

Medical records from three New South Wales Paediatric Trauma Centres were reviewed for children <16 years requiring intensive care; with an injury severity score of ≥9, or who died following injury between July 2015 and September 2016. Records were peer-reviewed by nurse surveyors who identified cases that might not meet the expected standard of care or where the child died following the injury. A multidisciplinary panel conducted the peer-review using a major trauma peer-review tool. Records were reviewed independently, then discussed to establish consensus.

RESULTS

A total 535 records were reviewed and 41 cases were peer-reviewed. The median (IQR) age was 7 (2-12) years, the median ISS was 25 (IQR 16-30). The peer-review identified a combination of clinical (85%), systems (51%) and communication (12%) problems that contributed to difficulties in care delivery. In 85% of records, staff actions were identified to contribute to events; with medical task failure the most frequently identified cause (89%).

CONCLUSION

The peer-review of paediatric trauma cases assisted in the identification of contributing factors to clinical incidents in trauma care resulting in 26 recommendations for change. The prioritisation and implementation of these recommendations, alongside a uniform State-wide trauma case review process with consistent criteria (definitions), performance indicators, monitoring and reporting would facilitate improvement in health service delivery to children sustaining severe injury.