Periprocedural analgesia and sedation in air enema reduction for intussusception: A retrospective Australian cohort study

Intussusception reduction methods in daily practice-a survey by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Abdominal Imaging Taskforce

BACKGROUND

Image-guided intussusception reduction has been practised internationally for many decades. The use of different modalities, delayed repeat attempts, and sedation/anaesthesia are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To survey the practice of image-guided intussusception reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 20-point questionnaire created by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) Abdominal Imaging Taskforce was distributed via the ESPR members' mailing list and shared on social media between 28 March and 1 May 2023.

RESULTS

There were 69 responses from 65 worldwide institutions, with a mean of 18 intussusception reductions performed per year: 55/69 (80%) from 52 European institutions and 14/69 (20%) from 13 institutions outside of Europe. European centres reported using 19/52 (37%) fluoroscopy, 18/52 (35%) ultrasound, and 15/52 (28%) a mixture of both, with 30/52 (58%) offering a delayed repeat at 15 min to 24 h. Non-European centres reported using 5/13 (39%) fluoroscopy, 6/13 ultrasound (46%), and 2/13 (15%) a mixture of both, with 9/13 (69%) offering a delayed repeat attempt. Sedation or analgesia was used in 35/52 (67%) of European and 2/13 (15%) non-European institutions.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in how image-guided intussusception reduction is performed, and in the use of sedation/anaesthesia.

Effects of sedatives on radiologic enema reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In children with ileocolic intussusception, sedatives such as midazolam, ketamine and propofol may facilitate radiologic enema reduction, but studies on their separate and joint effects remain controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically analyze studies for the effects of sedatives on the radiologic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science from database inception through March 2023 for articles that enrolled children with ileocolic intussusception who underwent non-operative pneumatic or hydrostatic enema reduction under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance with or without the use of sedatives. The primary and secondary outcomes were success rate in radiologic reduction of ileocolic intussusception and risk of perforation, respectively. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman log-odds random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was checked using Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 2094 participants were included in the final review, of which 15 were included in the meta-analysis. Nine studies reported on the success rate of radiologic reduction performed under sedation in all participants, while six studies compared the success rate in two patient groups undergoing the procedure with or without sedation. The pooled success rate of non-operative reduction under sedation was 87 % (95 % CI: 80-95 %), P = 0.000 with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 85 %). A higher success rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 88-99 %) and homogeneity (I2 = 12 %) were found in studies with pneumatic enema reduction. Among comparative studies, the odds of success of non-operative reduction were increased when the procedure was performed under sedation, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.41 (95 % CI: 1.27-4.57), P = 0.010 and moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 60 %). In a sensitivity analysis, homogeneity was found between analyzed studies when two outliers were excluded (I2 = 0.73 %). The risk of perforation was not significantly different (OR 1.52, 95 % CI: 0.09-23.34), P = 0.764 indicating small study effects. No publication, bias was detected on visual inspection of the funnel plots or the Begg's and Egger's bias tests. Most studies were categorized as having a low risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patient groups, sedation can increase the success rate of radiologic enema reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception without evidence of increased risk of perforation. Systematic review protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42023404887.

Ultrasound guided hydrostatic enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception: a safe and effective technique

BACKGROUND

Currently, the primary management of ileocolic intussusception in children is usually by non-operative image-guided enema reduction. In most centres around the world especially in Australasia the predominant technique is the pneumatic reduction under fluoroscopic guidance. At our institution, we have been performing ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction since 2012.This is an audit to determine the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction for intussusception.

METHODS

Following ethics approval, a retrospective review of all patients presenting to our institution with intussusception and subsequently undergoing hydrostatic reduction over a period of 9 years (2012 to-2020) was performed. The parameters studied included (i) successful reduction, (ii) recurrence, (iii) need for surgery and (iv) lead point at surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age at presentation was 12 months. One hundred and eight children were diagnosed to have ileocolic intussusception. One hundred and six underwent ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction with successful reduction in 96 (90.5%) patients. Reduction was unsuccessful in 10 patients (9.5%). Of these eight were noted to have a pathological lead point (four-Meckel's diverticulum and four-Lymphoma) at the time of the surgery. The intussusception recurred in six patients (6.25%) within 24 h. No reduction related perforation occurred during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction is a safe and effective technique for managing intussusception as it allows continuous monitoring of the reduction of the intussusception without exposing the children to ionizing radiation.

Reduction of ileocolic intussusception under sedation or anaesthesia: a systematic review of complications

BACKGROUND

Despite the increased use of sedation in children undergoing stressful procedures, reduction of ileocolic intussusception (RII) is usually performed on awake children without any form of sedation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of severe complications of RII under sedation or anaesthesia.

DESIGN

A systematic review including English language original articles of any date.

PATIENTS

Children undergoing RII (pneumatic or hydrostatic) under sedation or anaesthesia.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Embase, Scopus, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the internet search engine Google Scholar.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three authors independently reviewed each article for eligibility. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incidence of intestinal perforation during RII. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of sentinel adverse events defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, permanent neurological deficit and pulmonary aspiration syndrome.

RESULTS

The search yielded 368 articles. Nine studies with 1391 cases were included in the analysis. Of the nine studies, six had a score of ≤6 stars in the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment, indicating low-to-moderate quality. Propofol-based sedation was used in 849 (59.2%) cases; 5 (0.6%) had intestinal perforation. Intestinal perforation was not reported in patients who were sedated with other sedatives. One patient had pulmonary aspiration syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although caution remains warranted, current data suggest that the incidence of severe complications due to RII under sedation or anaesthesia is low. Due to the lack of prospective data, it is difficult to ascertain the exact incidence of severe complications.