Does detection of fetal growth restriction improve neonatal outcomes?

Texture-Based Classification of Fetal Growth Restriction From Intrauterine Neurosonographic Image

OBJECTIVE

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a condition where fetuses fail to reach their genetic potential for growth, posing a significant health challenge for newborns. The aim of this research was to explore the efficacy of texture-based analysis of neurosonographic images in identifying FGR in fetuses, which may provide a promising tool for early assessment of FGR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis collected 100 intrauterine neurosonographic images from 50 FGR and 50 gestational age-appropriate fetuses. Using MaZda software, approximately 300 texture features were extracted from occipital white matter (OWM) and cerebellum of intrauterine neurosonographic images, respectively. Then 10 optimal features were separately selected by 3 algorithms, including the Fisher coefficient method, the method of minimizing classification error probability and average correlation coefficients, and the mutual information coefficient method. Further, the 10 statistically most significant features were selected from these sets to form the mixed feature set. After nonlinear discriminant analysis was performed to reduce feature dimensionality, the artificial neural network (ANN) classifier was conducted, respectively.

RESULTS

For OWM and cerebellum, a total of 11 and 14 statistically significant features were selected. When the mixed feature sets of OWM and cerebellum were applied to ANN classifier, classification accuracy were 90.00% (κ = 0.800; P < .001) and 93.00% (κ = 0.860; P < .001), and the receiver operating characteristic curve for identifying FGR showed an area under the curve of 0.82 and 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

Texture analysis of fetal intrauterine neurosonographic images is a feasible and noninvasive strategy for evaluating FGR fetuses.

Does fetal growth restriction induce neuropathology within the developing brainstem?

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a complex obstetric issue describing a fetus that does not reach its genetic growth potential. The primary cause of FGR is placental dysfunction resulting in chronic fetal hypoxaemia, which in turn causes altered neurological, cardiovascular and respiratory development, some of which may be pathophysiological, particularly for neonatal life. The brainstem is the critical site of cardiovascular, respiratory and autonomic control, but there is little information describing how chronic hypoxaemia and the resulting FGR may affect brainstem neurodevelopment. This review provides an overview of the brainstem-specific consequences of acute and chronic hypoxia, and what is known in FGR. In addition, we discuss how brainstem structural alterations may impair functional control of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. Finally, we highlight the clinical and translational findings of the potential roles of the brainstem in maintaining cardiorespiratory adaptation in the transition from fetal to neonatal life under normal conditions and in response to the pathological environment that arises during development in growth-restricted infants. This review emphasises the crucial role that the brainstem plays in mediating cardiovascular and respiratory responses during fetal and neonatal life. We assess whether chronic fetal hypoxaemia might alter structure and function of the brainstem, but this also serves to highlight knowledge gaps regarding FGR and brainstem development.

Birth weight and gestational age distributions in a rural Kenyan population

BACKGROUND

With the increased availability of access to prenatal ultrasound in low/middle-income countries, there is opportunity to better characterize the association between fetal growth and birth weight across global settings. This is important, as fetal growth curves and birthweight charts are often used as proxy health indicators. As part of a randomized control trial, in which ultrasonography was utilized to establish accurate gestational age of pregnancies, we explored the association between gestational age and birthweight among a cohort in Western Kenya, then compared our results to data reported by the INTERGROWTH-21st study.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 8 geographical clusters across 3 counties in Western Kenya. Eligible subjects were nulliparous women carrying singleton pregnancies. An early ultrasound was performed between 6 + 0/7 and 13 + 6/7 weeks gestational age. At birth, infants were weighed on platform scales provided either by the study team (community births), or the Government of Kenya (public health facilities). The 10th, 25th, median, 75th, and 90th BW percentiles for 36 to 42 weeks gestation were determined; resulting percentile points were plotted, and curves determined using a cubic spline technique. A signed rank test was used to quantify the comparison of the percentiles generated in the rural Kenyan sample with those of the INTERGROWTH-21st study.

RESULTS

A total of 1291 infants (of 1408 pregnant women randomized) were included. Ninety-three infants did not have a measured birth weight. The majority of these were due to miscarriage (n = 49) or stillbirth (n = 27). No significant differences were found between subjects who were lost to follow-up. Signed rank comparisons of the observed median of the Western Kenya data at 10th, 50th, and 90th birthweight percentiles, as compared to medians reported in the INTERGROWTH-21st distributions, revealed close alignment between the two datasets, with significant differences at 36 and 37 weeks. Limitations of the current study include small sample size, and detection of potential digit preference bias.

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of birthweight percentiles by gestational age estimation, among a sample of infants from rural Kenya, revealed slight differences as compared to those from the global population (INTERGROWTH-21st).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This is a single site sub-study of data collected in conjunction with the Aspirin Supplementation for Pregnancy Indicated Risk Reduction In Nulliparas (ASPIRIN) Trial, which is listed at  ClinicalTrials.gov ,  NCT02409680 (07/04/2015).

Diagnostic Tests in the Prediction of Neonatal Outcome in Early Placental Fetal Growth Restriction

Background and Objectives: Monitoring pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR) presents a challenge, especially concerning the time of delivery in cases of early preterm pregnancies below 32 weeks. The aim of our study was to compare different diagnostic parameters in growth-restricted preterm neonates with and without morbidity/mortality and to determine sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic parameters for monitoring preterm pregnancies with early preterm fetal growth restriction below 32 weeks. Materials and Methods: Our clinical study evaluated 120 cases of early preterm deliveries, with gestational age ≤ 32 + 0 weeks, with prenatally diagnosed placental FGR. All the patients were divided into three groups of 40 cases each based on neonatal condition,: I-Neonates with morbidity/mortality (NMM); II-Neonates without morbidity with acidosis/asphyxia (NAA); III-Neonates without neonatal morbidity/acidosis/asphyxia (NWMAA). Results: Amniotic fluid index (AFI) was lower in NMM, while NWMAA had higher biophysical profile scores (BPS). UA PI was lower in NWMAA. NWMAA had higher MCA PI and CPR and fewer cases with CPR <5th percentile. NMM had higher DV PI, and more often had ductus venosus (DV) PI > 95th‱ or absent/reversed A wave, and pulsatile blood flow in umbilical vein (UV). The incidence of pathological fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) was higher in NMM and NAA, although the difference was not statistically significant. ROC calculated by defining a bad outcome as NMM and a good outcome as NAA and NWMAA showed the best sensitivity in DV PIi. ROC calculated by defined bad outcome in NMM and NAA and good outcome in NWMAA showed the best sensitivity in MCA PI. Conclusions: In early fetal growth restriction normal cerebral blood flow strongly predicts good outcomes, while pathological venous blood flow is associated with bad outcomes. In fetal growth restriction before 32 weeks, individualized expectant management remains the best option for the optimal timing of delivery.

Fetal size classified using gestational days rather than gestational weeks improves correlation with stillbirth risk: A statewide population study

Objective

Many growth charts provide single centile cutoffs for each week of gestation, yet fetuses gain weight throughout the week. We aimed to assess whether using a single centile per week distorts the proportion of infants classified as small and their risk of stillbirth across the week.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Victoria, Australia.

Population

Singleton, non-anomalous infants born from 2005–2015 (529,261).

Methods

We applied growth charts to identify small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses on week-based charts (single centile per gestational week) and day-based charts (centile per gestational day).

Main outcome measures

Proportions <10th centile by each chart, and stillbirth risk amongst SGA infants.

Results

Using week-based charts, 12.1% of infants born on the first day of a gestational week were SGA, but only 7.8% on the final day; ie. an infant born at the end of the week was 44% less likely to be classed as SGA (p<0.0001). The relative risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants born on the final day of the week compared with the first was 1.47 (95%CI 1.09–2.00, p = 0.01). Using day charts, SGA proportions were similar and stillbirth risk equal between the beginning and end of the week (9.5% vs 9.9%).

Conclusions

Growth standards using a single cutoff for a gestational week overestimate the proportion of infants that are small at the beginning of the week and underestimate the proportion at the end. This distorts the risk of stillbirth amongst SGA infants based on when in the week an infant is born. Day-based charts should be used.

Association Between Iatrogenic Delivery for Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction and Childhood School Outcomes

IMPORTANCE

Timely delivery of infants suspected of having fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a balance between preventing stillbirth and minimizing prematurity, particularly because many infants with suspected FGR have normal growth.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between iatrogenic delivery for suspected FGR and childhood school outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective whole-population cohort study linking perinatal data from births 32 weeks' or more gestation between January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2013, to developmental and educational test scores at preparatory school, and at school grades 3, 5, and 7 in Victoria, Australia. Follow-up was concluded in 2019.

EXPOSURES

Suspicion or nonsuspicion of FGR, presence or absence of iatrogenic delivery (defined as early induction of labor or cesarean delivery prior to labor) for suspected FGR, and presence or absence of small for gestational age (SGA).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The coprimary outcomes were being in the bottom 10th percentile on 2 or more of 5 developmental domains at school entry and being below the national minimum standard on 2 or more of 5 educational domains in grades 3, 5, or 7.

RESULTS

In the birth population of 705 937 infants, the mean gestation at birth was 39.1 (SD, 1.5) weeks and the mean birth weight was 3426 (SD, 517) grams. The birth population linked to 181 902 children with developmental results and 425 717 children with educational results. Compared with infants with severe SGA (birth weight <3rd percentile) not suspected of having FGR, infants with severe SGA delivered for suspected FGR were born earlier (mean gestation, 37.9 weeks vs 39.4 weeks). They also had a significantly increased risk of poor developmental outcome at school entry (16.2% vs 12.7%; absolute difference, 3.5% [95% CI, 0.5%-6.5%]); adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.36 [95% CI, 1.07-1.74]) and poor educational outcomes in grades 3, 5, and 7 (for example, in grade 7: 13.4% vs 10.5%; absolute difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.4%-5.5%]); aOR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70]). There was no significant difference between infants with normal growth (birth weight ≥10th percentile) delivered for suspected FGR and those not suspected of having FGR in developmental outcome (8.6% vs 8.1%; absolute difference, 0.5% [95% CI, -1.1% to 2.0%]); aOR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.95-1.45]) or educational outcome in grade 3, 5 or 7, despite being born earlier (mean gestation, 38.0 weeks vs 39.1 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this exploratory study conducted in Victoria, Australia, iatrogenic delivery of infants with severe SGA due to suspected FGR was associated with poorer school outcomes compared with infants with severe SGA not suspected of having FGR. Iatrogenic delivery of infants with normal growth due to suspected FGR was not associated with poorer school outcomes compared with infants with normal growth not suspected of having FGR.

Should singleton birth weight standards be applied to identify small-for-gestational age twins?: analysis of a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Twin birth weight percentiles are less popular in clinical management among twin pregnancies compared with singleton ones in China. This study aimed to compare the incidence and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age (SGA) twins between the use of singleton and twin birth weight percentiles.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 3,027 pregnancies with liveborn twin pairs at gestational age of > 28 weeks. The newborns were categorized as SGA when a birthweight was less than the 10th percentile based on the singleton and twin references derived from Chinese population. Logistic regression models with generalized estimated equation (GEE) were utilized to evaluate the association between SGA twins and neonatal outcomes including neonatal unit admission, neonatal jaundice, neonatal respiratory distress (NRDS), neonatal asphyxia, ventilator support, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), culture-proven sepsis, neonatal death within 28 days after birth as well as the composite outcome.

RESULTS

The incidence of SGA was 33.1 % based on the singleton reference and 7.3 % based on the twin reference. Both of SGA newborns defined by the singleton and twin references were associated with increases in neonatal unit admission, neonatal jaundice and ventilator support. In addition, SGA newborns defined by the twin reference were associated with increased rates of BPD (aOR, 2.61; 95 % CI: 1.18-5.78) as well as the severe composite outcome (aOR, 1.93; 95 % CI: 1.07-3.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of singleton birth weight percentiles may result in misdiagnosed SGA newborns in twin gestations and the twin birth weight percentiles would be more useful to identify those who are at risk of adverse outcomes.

Developing Novel Tests to Screen for Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major determinant of global morbidity and mortality. There is an unmet need for methods to stratify the pregnant population on the basis of FGR risk. Despite evolutionary divergence in mammalian reproduction, studies of genetically modified mice have identified biomarkers that have been validated in women, and a systematic screen for genes that control fetal growth in animals could help identify novel clinical biomarkers. Current approaches to biomarker identification using human samples include both targeted and discovery approaches (omics). Application of omic methods to the placenta and maternal blood has yielded promising results, but comes with logistical, experimental, and analytical challenges and all studies are limited by the lack of a gold standard for disease.

Preventing harm: A balance measure for improving the detection of fetal growth restriction

BACKGROUND

Increasing the detection of fetal growth restriction (FGR), while reducing stillbirth, also leads to unnecessary early intervention, and associated morbidity, for normally grown babies who are incorrectly suspected of FGR.

AIMS

We sought to design a balance measure that addresses the specificity of FGR detection.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on all singleton births ≥32 weeks gestation in 2016 and 2017 in Victoria. We compared two balance measures for the detection of FGR, defined as the proportion of all babies iatrogenically delivered before 39 weeks gestation for suspected FGR that had a birthweight ≥10th centile (balance measure 1) or ≥25th centile (balance measure 2). Hospital level performance on each balance measure was derived and compared to an existing performance measure for severe FGR detection in Victoria.

RESULTS

Of the 38 hospitals analysed, 12 (32%) had a favourable performance on an existing indicator of FGR detection, seven (18%) hospitals had a favourable performance on balance measure 1, and 15 (39%) had a favourable performance on balance measure 2. There was a moderate correlation between hospital performance on the existing indicator and on balance measure 1 (r = 0.447, P = 0.005) but not balance measure 2 (r = -0.063, P = 0.71). There was no difference in perinatal mortality between high performing hospitals and low performing hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Introducing a balance measure into routine reporting may bring greater awareness to the unintended harm associated with increased detection of FGR.