Prevalence of non-cavitated lesions and progression, regression, and no change from age 9 to 23 years

Evidence-based approaches and considerations for nonrestorative treatments within modern caries management: Integrating science into practice

BACKGROUND

A high level of scientific evidence supports several nonrestorative strategies for the control of caries, with the goal of reducing progression of mineral loss and arresting existing lesions. The authors provide an overview of evidence for nonrestorative caries control and considerations in the decision making for selecting nonrestorative options.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors discuss findings from existing reviews, systematic reviews, and evidence-based guidelines (particularly from the American Dental Association) describing the effectiveness of nonrestorative strategies available in the US market for remineralization and arrest of caries lesions.

RESULTS

Studies support a wide range of products for arresting caries lesions, such as fluorides, sealants, infiltration resins, and chlorhexidine varnish, among others, depending on the tooth surface, primary or permanent dentition, and whether lesions are noncavitated or cavitated. Decisions should be based on appropriate detection, diagnosis, and risk assessment.

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Effective nonrestorative strategies should be used to manage active, noncavitated caries lesions in primary and permanent teeth, and can be considered for managing active cavitated lesions when restorative intervention is not feasible. These lesion-centered interventions should be part of the required overall management of the caries disease process and existing modifiable risk variables at the patient level. They must be monitored over time and reapplied periodically, as needed.

Adoption and Effect of Sealants for Occlusal Noncavitated Caries in a Large Dental Network in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Dental sealants applied to occlusal pit-and-fissure surfaces have been shown to prevent caries and arrest occlusal noncavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends that oral healthcare providers apply sealants on occlusal NCCLs. Though the evidence is clear that sealants are effective, few studies have examined the adoption of the ADA guideline by dentists and the duration of protection provided by sealants in a large real-world setting.

METHODS

This study used observational electronic health record (EHR) data from a network of dental clinics to follow teeth over a 2 year time period from when they were diagnosed as having an occlusal NCCL until either they were treated with a restoration or the time period ended with no restoration. The objectives of the study were to determine: (1) the degree to which dentists adopted the guideline, (2) whether the duration of protection was different for teeth that received a sealant from teeth that did not receive a sealant, and (3) whether dentists' experience placing sealants was associated with the duration of protection.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 7,299 teeth in the sample. Of those, dentists restored 591 teeth and applied sealants on 164. The sealant application rate for eligible teeth was 2.2%. Sealant application was associated with provider, with 1.9% of providers placing more than half of the sealants. By the end of the observation period, the proportion of teeth progressing to restorations was 8.2% for teeth that had not received a sealant and 3.0% for teeth that had received one (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.88; p = 0.02). Multilevel survival analysis showed that teeth that had not received a sealant were restored sooner than teeth that had received a sealant (aHR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.03-0.36; p < 0.01). Overall, teeth that received a sealant had an 89% reduced hazard of restoration within 2 years compared with teeth that did not receive sealants.

CONCLUSION

This study found that by arresting decay, the presence of sealants led to fewer restorations and delayed restorations compared with teeth not receiving a sealant or restoration in the 2 years following diagnosis of occlusal NCCL in clinical settings.

Near-infrared imaging in orthodontic intraoral scanners for early interproximal caries detection

INTRODUCTION

Intraoral scanners commonly used in orthodontic offices now offer near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology, advertised as a screening tool to identify interproximal caries. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of NIRI detection of interproximal carious lesions in a common intraoral scanner (iTero Element 5D; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with and without bitewing radiograph complement, compared with a microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) reference standard.

METHODS

Extracted human posterior teeth (premolars and molars) were selected for early (noncavitated) interproximal carious lesions (n = 39) and sound control surfaces (n = 47). The teeth were scanned via micro-CT for evaluation by 2 blinded evaluators using consensus scoring. The teeth were mounted to simulate anatomic interproximal contacts and underwent a NIRI scan using iTero Element 5D and bitewing radiographs. Two trained, calibrated examiners independently evaluated (1) near-infrared images alone with clinical photograph, (2) bitewing radiograph alone with clinical photograph, and (3) near-infrared images with bitewing radiograph and clinical photograph in combination, after at least a 10-day washout period between each evaluation.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was highest for NIRI alone (k = 0.533) compared with bitewing radiograph alone (k = 0.176) or in combination (k = 0.256). NIRI alone showed high specificity (0.83-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (0.42-0.63) compared with a micro-CT reference standard. Dentin lesions were significantly more reliably detected than enamel lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

After rigorous training and calibration, NIRI can be used with moderate reliability, high specificity, and moderate sensitivity to detect noncavitated interproximal carious lesions.

The effect of nano silver fluoride, self-assembling peptide and sodium fluoride varnish on salivary cariogenic bacteria: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the antibacterial effect of Nanosilver Fluoride varnish (NSF) varnish, P11-4 and Sodium Fluoride (NaF) varnish against salivary Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli.

METHODS

66 patients aged 10-24 years old were randomly assigned to receive single application of NSF, P11-4 or NaF varnish. Baseline unstimulated saliva samples were collected before the agents were applied and S.mutans and Lactobacilli colony forming units (CFU) were counted. After one, three and six months, microbiological samples were re-assessed. Groups were compared at each time point and changes across time were assessed. Multivariable linear regression compared the effect of P11-4 and NSF to NaF on salivary S. mutans and Lactobacilli log count at various follow up periods.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in salivary S. mutans log count after 1 month between P11-4 (B= -1.29, p = 0.049) and NaF but not at other time points nor between NSF and NaF at any time point. The significant reduction in bacterial counts lasted up to one month in all groups, to three months after using P11-4 and NaF and returned to baseline values after six months.

CONCLUSION

In general, the antimicrobial effect of P11-4 and NSF on salivary S. mutans and Lactobacilli was not significantly different from NaF varnish. P11-4 induced greater reduction more quickly than the two other agents and NSF antibacterial effect was lost after one month.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NSF varnish and P11-4 have antimicrobial activity that does not significantly differ from NaF by 3 months. P11-4 has the greatest antibacterial effect after one month with sustained effect till 3 months. The antibacterial effect of NSF lasts for one month. NaF remains effective till 3 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was prospectively registered on the clinicaltrials.gov registry with ID: NCT04929509 on 18/6/2021.