Impact of safety-related regulation on use of parenteral ketorolac in a nationally representative population

Using real-world evidence for pharmacovigilance and drug safety-related decision making by a resource-limited health authority: 10 years of experience in Taiwan

PURPOSE

Real-world evidence has become increasingly relevant in regulatory decision making. Compared to large regulatory bodies, the national pharmacovigilance system in Taiwan is still under development, and the aim of this study is to demonstrate how a resource-limited health authority utilizes real-world evidence in decision making.

METHODS

We described different sources of real-world data available in Taiwan and illustrated the structural framework that integrates real-world evidence into Taiwan's national pharmacovigilance system. Additionally, we reviewed real-world studies conducted in the past 10 years and provided examples to show how these studies influenced drug safety-related decision making in Taiwan.

RESULTS

During the past 10 years, real-world evidence used when making drug safety-related regulatory decisions in Taiwan was mainly generated from nationwide claims databases, but other sources of real-world data, such as national registries and large electronic hospital databases, also became available recently. Different types of real-world evidence, including drug utilization studies, risk evaluation studies, and risk minimization measure evaluation studies, have been used to support regulatory decisions in Taiwan.

CONCLUSIONS

Through collaborations between the government and academics, Taiwan has started to integrate real-world evidence into the national pharmacovigilance system. However, future efforts, including linkages between different sources of real-world data and improvements in procedural and methodological practices, are needed to generate more regulatory-quality real-world evidence.

Do drug-related safety warnings have the expected impact on drug therapy? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The need for drug-related safety warnings is undisputed, and their impact should also be evaluated. This systematic review investigates and assesses the impact of safety warnings on drug therapy.

METHODS

Studies published in English between January 1998 and December 2018 were searched in EMBASE and MEDLINE, complemented by manual search. Randomised controlled trials, cohort studies with a before/after component, and case-control studies were included, selected to predefined criteria, and assessed for their reporting and methodological quality.

RESULTS

Out of 7454 references identified, 72 studies were included. A total of 28/72 (39%) studies described the impact of safety warnings on drug therapy as being effective, whereas 12/72 (17%) studies did not. Further, 26/72 (36%) studies described a partial implementation of the warnings (one part of the warning had an impact on drug therapy and another did not). Unintended effects were investigated in 6/72 (8%) studies. While 34 (47%) studies examined safety warnings on psychotropic drugs using an interrupted time series (ITS) design (53%), a before/after (26%), and a time series design (21%), 38 (53%) studied other substances using an ITS design (34%), a before/after (40%), and a time series design (26%). The proportion of an effective impact on drug therapy was lower in the "psychotropic drugs" group (23%) than in the "others" group (53%).

CONCLUSION

Drug-related safety warnings induce intended and unintended effects. The included studies are of broadly varying methodological quality. To better compare their effectiveness, studies should be conducted using standardised procedures.