Translation and psychometric testing of a decision-making scale

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the positive and negative social exchange scale in older adults with disabilities in China

PURPOSE

This study translated the Positive and Negative Social Exchange (PANSE) scale into Chinese, examined its psychometric characteristics, and explored its feasibility for use among older adults with disabilities from China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-stage study procedure was employed. In the first stage, the English version of the PANSE scale was translated and cross-culturally adapted. In the second stage, the reliability and validity of the scale were assessed based on item-total correlation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, structural validity, concurrent criterion validity, and known group validity.

RESULTS

A total of 357 older adults with disabilities participated in the survey. The Chinese version of the PANSE scale consisted of two parts, the Positive Social Exchange Scale and the Negative Social Exchange Scale. Exploratory factor analysis extracted six communal factors. The cumulative contribution of the two parts of the scale was 69.90% and 77.88%, respectively. The item-total correlation was 0.353 to 0.802, the internal consistency of the PANSE was 0.653 to 0.886. The PANSE demonstrated good content validity and it was correlated with the SSRS scale.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the PANSE is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing social exchange in Chinese older adults with disabilities.Implication for rehabilitationDespite the growing number of older adults with disabilities being a concern in China, the lack of tools to measure the type of social support limits research related to the health status of these people.This study cross-culturally adapted, translated into Chinese and validated the Positive and Negative Social Exchange (PANSE) scale as the measurement tool to be used in the cultural context of China.The two subscales of PANSE were validated in the Chinese population of older adults with disabilities.The PANSE scale measures social exchange among older adults with disabilities in China, which can guide the development of interventions to address issues in the social exchange of these people.

Shared decision-making in the treatment of adolescents diagnosed with depression: A cross-sectional survey of mental health professionals in China

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: SDM improves clinical outcomes by increasing attendance and treatment adherence in adolescents diagnosed with depression. SDM could reduce treatment disagreements and enhance consumers' and their families' satisfaction with mental healthcare services. Healthcare professionals are a critical part of SDM. However, MHPs' practices of SDM in the daily management of adolescents diagnosed with depression need to be clarified. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: From the viewpoints of MHPs, SDM was not extensively applied in the daily management of adolescents diagnosed with depression. MHPs who trust their consumers and have received training related to SDM are more likely to practice SDM in the daily management of adolescents diagnosed with depression. The positive preferences for providing information and family involvement in treatment decision-making are facilitators; working in closed inpatient mental health wards and open inpatient mental health wards are hindering factors for MHPs' practices of SDM. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: MHPs should encourage information sharing with consumers and their family members to help them participate in treatment decision-making actively. A trusting and friendly therapeutic relationship with consumers should be maintained in the daily management of adolescents diagnosed with depression. SDM-related training should be encouraged for MHPs to promote widespread SDM.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making (SDM) is an ideal model for a therapeutic relationship that can improve health outcomes. Healthcare professionals are a critical part of SDM, and they play an important role in the practices of SDM in the clinical setting. Evidence suggests that adolescents diagnosed with depression can benefit substantially from SDM. However, mental health professionals' (MHPs) practices of SDM for adolescents diagnosed with depression in China are not well-documented.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the practices of SDM for adolescents diagnosed with depression from the viewpoints of MHPs in China.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, we recruited a total of 581 MHPs by convenience sampling. The Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) was used to evaluate the MHPs' practices of SDM for adolescents diagnosed with depression.

RESULTS

The mean SDM-Q-Doc was 80.47 (±16.31). Within the six specific decision-making situations, most MHPs selected non-SDM (52.7%-71.6%). Substantial numbers of respondents believed that MHPs made the final decision, especially with regard to the development (37%) and adjustment of medication regimens (42%). The practice of SDM was predicted by MHPs' preference for providing information, their trust in consumers, preference for family involvement in treatment decision-making, working in an outpatient clinic and receiving SDM training (F = 23.582; p = .000; R2  = .198; adjusted R2  = .189).

DISCUSSION

Although the MHPs' self-rated score of SDM-Q-Doc was high, SDM was not extensively applied in the daily management of adolescents diagnosed with depression. Thus, SDM needs to be further promoted by enhancing SDM-related training for MHPs, thereby actively promoting the involvement of families, facilitating the information sharing for consumers and families, and building an active, trusting consumer-practitioner relationship.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

MHPs should prioritise information sharing with consumers and families, as well as build trusting and friendly therapeutic relationships. Family involvement in treatment decisions should be encouraged when adolescents diagnosed with depression are in need. Actively participating in training related to SDM is also important. Future high-quality evidence is still needed to explore the facilitators and barriers to SDM practices from a tripartite perspective of MHPs, adolescents diagnosed with depression and their families.