Care in the Community: Home Care Use Among Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Over Time

Stage IV breast, colorectal, and lung cancer at diagnosis in adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a leading cause of death among people living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). Although studies have documented lower cancer screening rates, there is limited epidemiological evidence quantifying potential diagnostic delays. This study explores the risk of metastatic cancer stage for people with IDD compared to those without IDD among breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients in Canada.

METHODS

Separate population-based cross-sectional studies were conducted in Ontario and Manitoba by linking routinely collected data. Breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients were included (Manitoba: 2004-2017; Ontario: 2007-2019). IDD status was identified using established administrative algorithms. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance models estimated associations between IDD status and the likelihood of being diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Adjusted relative risks were pooled between provinces using random-effects meta-analyses. Potential effect modification was considered.

RESULTS

The final cohorts included 115,456, 89,815, and 101,811 breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients, respectively. Breast (female) and colorectal cancer patients with IDD were 1.60 and 1.44 times more likely to have metastatic cancer (stage IV) at diagnosis compared to those without IDD (relative risk [RR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.20; RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24-1.67). This increased risk was not observed in lung cancer. Significant effect modification was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

People with IDD were more likely to have stage IV breast and colorectal cancer identified at diagnosis compared to those without IDD. Identifying factors and processes contributing to stage disparities such as lower screening rates and developing strategies to address diagnostic delays is critical.

The interRAI Suite of Mental Health Assessment Instruments: An Integrated System for the Continuum of Care

The lives of persons living with mental illness are affected by psychological, biological, social, economic, and environmental factors over the life course. It is therefore unlikely that simple preventive strategies, clinical treatments, therapeutic interventions, or policy options will succeed as singular solutions for the challenges of mental illness. Persons living with mental illness receive services and supports in multiple settings across the health care continuum that are often fragmented, uncoordinated, and inadequately responsive. Appropriate assessment is an important tool that health systems must deploy to respond to the strengths, preferences, and needs of persons with mental illness. However, standard approaches are often focused on measurement of psychiatric symptoms without taking a broader perspective to address issues like growth, development, and aging; physical health and disability; social relationships; economic resources; housing; substance use; involvement with criminal justice; stigma; and recovery. Using conglomerations of instruments to cover more domains is impractical, inconsistent, and incomplete while posing considerable assessment burden. interRAI mental health instruments were developed by a network of over 100 researchers, clinicians, and policy experts from over 35 nations. This includes assessment systems for adults in inpatient psychiatry, community mental health, emergency departments, mobile crisis teams, and long-term care settings, as well as a screening system for police officers. A similar set of instruments is available for child/youth mental health. The instruments form an integrated mental health information system because they share a common assessment language, conceptual basis, clinical emphasis, data collection approach, data elements, and care planning protocols. The key applications of these instruments include care planning, outcome measurement, quality improvement, and resource allocation. The composition of these instruments and psychometric properties are reviewed, and examples related to homeless are used to illustrate the various applications of these assessment systems.

Behavioral health and new models of service delivery for an aging world: Public/private partnerships to develop best practices of care for older adults

Individual and societal initiatives in areas of research, education, and health care policy have resulted in unprecedented gains in life expectancy. It is true that today more people in the world are living longer and have opportunities for higher quality lives than ever before. However, the resulting rapid rise in number of older adults has become a source of concern: Experts of many countries, in anticipation of looming problems, such as overburdened health care and pension systems, are now seeking opportunities to work together to find common solutions for globally-shared problems. The good news is that while all countries are experiencing change brought on by aging populations, the rate of change varies substantially from country to country; differences in historical events have produced differences in demographic profiles. Some countries have relatively large numbers of older adults, comprising large percentages of their populations; others have fewer older adults, with slower growth in numbers and percentages of older adults relative to other age groups. These differences have led to variations for the type and pace of response mounted by individual countries for problems associated with increasingly large older adult populations. In turn, these variations in response provide opportunities for countries to learn from one another. This brief review will outline potential issues associated with aging populations and discuss strengths and challenges for the integration of primary medical care with behavioral health as an innovative, best practices approach to the provision of care for aging persons of the world.

Once frail, always frail? Frailty transitions in home care users with intellectual and developmental disabilities

AIM

Frailty is understood as a dynamic non-linear process, and used to indicate age-related decline. Recent work has shown that adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities experience higher rates of frailty at much earlier ages than the general population. The present study describes transitions in frailty status (i.e. non-frail, pre-frail, frail) over 1 year, and explores the association between baseline frailty status and worsening/death over time.

METHODS

Results are based on secondary analysis of 2893 individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities receiving community-based home care services in Ontario (Canada). Frailty status is based on a validated 42-item frailty index (FI); where FI ≤0.21 indicates non-frail, 0.21 < FI ≤ 0.3 indicates pre-frail and FI >0.30 indicates frail. Baseline characteristics of frailty groups at baseline were compared using the χ² -test/analysis of variance. Relative risk of worsening/dying was calculated using a modified Poisson regression model.

RESULTS

Initially, 67.0% of participants were non-frail, 16.2% were pre-frail and 16.8% were frail. Of those non-frail at baseline, 84.3% remained non-frail, 11.8% worsened and 3.9% died. Among those initially pre-frail, 37.0% remained stable, 35.3% improved, 18.2% worsened and 9.6% died. Although similar proportions of frail individuals improved (37.4%) or remained stable (36.8%), 25.9% had died. After controlling for other factors, being pre-frail at baseline was associated with an increase in the risk of worsening or death (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

While many experience worsening of frailty status, stability and improvement are viable goals of care. Future research should examine the rate at which non-frail, pre-frail and frail individuals accumulate deficits, as well as the impact of home care services on frailty. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 547-553.