Examining Family Quality of Life Within the Context of a Participant-Directed ASD Funding Program in British Columbia, Canada

"Don't Promise Something You can't Deliver:" Caregivers' Advice for Improving Services to Adolescents and Young Adults with Autism

Approximately 50,000 youths with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) exit U.S. high schools yearly to enter adult systems of care, many of whom remain dependent on family for day-to-day care and service system navigation. As part of a larger study, 174 family caregivers for adolescents or young adults with ASD were asked what advice they would give service providers about how to improve services for youth with ASD. Reflexive thematic analysis identified a framework of five directives: (1) provide a roadmap to services; (2) improve service access; (3) fill gaps to address unmet needs; (4) educate themselves, their families, and society about autism; and (5) operate from a relationship-building paradigm with families. Education, health, and social service providers, as well as policymakers, can use these directives to better assist youth with ASD and their families in the transition to adulthood.

Terminology and descriptions of navigation and related practices for children with neurodisability and their families: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Children with neurodisability (ND) represent a significant population with a demonstrated need for coordinated support. Patient navigation has a primary focus on: facilitating access to and connection amongst fragmented systems; as well as the provision of educational and emotional support. Given the distinct needs of children with ND and their families, programs built upon such core concepts could be of great benefit. The diversity of terminology encompassing navigation-related concepts and activities (e.g., care coordination, case management, family support), however, presents challenges to both practice and research. This scoping review examined the terminology and descriptions provided within published articles on navigation-type models for children with ND and their families.

METHODS

The scoping review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A preliminary search was completed on PubMed (NCBI), MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) to identify initial search terms, upon which a full search strategy was developed and executed in MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO). After screening records according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, a full-text review of relevant articles was conducted and data extracted using a researcher-developed tool. Under close supervision by the research team, study selection was primarily performed by one author.

RESULTS

Of the 2597 papers identified, 33 were included in the final review. From the included papers, a total of 49 terms were extracted, 20 of which were unique. Across the diversity of terminology observed, articles provided detailed and rich descriptions characterized by four central domains, namely: (i) what navigation-related resources, supports and services aim to facilitate and (ii) provide; (iii) descriptions of their intended outcomes; as well as (iv) guiding principles.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review addresses a gap in our knowledge related to the specification of patient navigation and related supports as applied to the specific context of children with ND and their families. Given the particular needs of this population, we propose an empirically-informed integrative model that synthesizes the findings from this scoping review. We suggest that this framework can be used as a guide to the mindful characterization of how supports aiming to connect children and families to needed service are termed and described within future research and in practice.

Exploring the terminology and descriptions of services that connect children with neurodisability and their families to needed support in the community: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to fill a gap in knowledge on terminology and descriptions of services that connect children with neurodisability and their families to needed support in the community.

INTRODUCTION

Children with neurodisability represent a significant population with a demonstrated need for coordinated support. Patient navigation is a concept that was founded on the principle of coordinating care for patients based on individual needs. Despite the history of patient navigation, a definition for the concept itself is lacking. Moreover, children with neurodisability and their families are not often the target population of such initiatives. It is not known whether existing terminology and descriptions encompass the particular needs of children with neurodisability and their families.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will examine published, peer-reviewed articles related to navigation-type resources, support, and services within the community as intended for children under the age of 18 years with neurodisability, and their families. All eligible studies pertaining to this context will be examined.

METHODS

A preliminary search was completed to find initial search terms, upon which a full search strategy was developed. Search results yielded from PubMed (NCBI), MEDLINE (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO) were screened to ensure articles were peer-reviewed, published in English from 1990 onward, and relevant to both children with neurodisability/their families and navigation-related resources. A full-text review of relevant articles will be conducted and data extracted using the included extraction tool. Extracted terminology and concepts will be analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach, which will inform a working definition of navigational services and related terms.

SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/cbvy9.

Service adequacy and the relation between child behavior problems and negative family impact reported by primary caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental conditions

BACKGROUND

Raising a child with a neurodevelopmental disorder or disability (NDD/D) presents unique challenges to the family, and presence of behavior problems has been identified as a critical risk factor for a broad range of family outcomes.

AIMS

The current study examines whether caregivers' perceptions of child and family service adequacy mediate or moderate the relation between children's behavioral difficulties and negative family impact.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Caregivers provided data for 215 children with NDD/D (M = 8.16 years), completing measures of child behavior problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), perceived child and family service inadequacy (Supports and Services Questionnaire), and family impact (Family Impact of Childhood Disability Scale).

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Both child and family service inadequacy partially mediated, but did not moderate the association between child behavior problems and perceived negative family impact.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The current study highlights that all families of children with NDD/D are in need of support, irrespective of the severity of their child's behavioral difficulties. Furthermore, the findings reinforce that access to a range of supports serving both the child and family is critical to ameliorating negative perceptions regarding the impact of a child's disability on family life.

A psychometric study of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale among families of children with autism spectrum disorder

Background

The family system represents a critical context within which children develop. Although raising a child with a disability may represent a challenge to this dynamic system, research demonstrates that families have the capacity to demonstrate both maladaptation and resilience in the face of related stressors. In the current study, we examined the psychometric properties of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS) among families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This tool is the only measure of family resilience that seeks to identify within-family protective factors, including the extent to which they rely on adaptive belief systems, organizational patterns, and communication processes. Identifying protective processes utilized by those who show resilience is critical within both clinical practice and research, as it aligns with a strength-based perspective that builds on what families are doing well.

Methods

Participants included 174 caregivers of individuals with ASD (84% mothers). Caregivers completed the FRAS, as well as the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. The 54-item FRAS was submitted to an exploratory factor analysis, using the iterated principal factor method with a promax rotation.

Results

Fifty-one items across 3 factors (Family Communication and Problem Solving, Utilizing Social and Economic Resources, Family Spirituality) were retained, explaining 52% of the total variance. The final scale demonstrated convergent validity with the Family Quality of Life assessment tool.

Conclusions

It is our hope that identifying the optimal scale structure will encourage other researchers to utilize this measure with families of children with ASD, thus continuing to advance the study of family resilience within this unique context.