Food hardness can regulate orthodontic tooth movement in mice

Linking the Mechanics of Chewing to Biology of the Junctional Epithelium

The capacity of a tissue to continuously alter its phenotype lies at the heart of how an animal is able to quickly adapt to changes in environmental stimuli. Within tissues, differentiated cells are rigid and play a limited role in adapting to new environments; however, differentiated cells are replenished by stem cells that are defined by their phenotypic plasticity. Here we demonstrate that a Wnt-responsive stem cell niche in the junctional epithelium is responsible for the capability of this tissue to quickly adapt to changes in the physical consistency of a diet. Mechanical input from chewing is required to both establish and maintain this niche. Since the junctional epithelium directly attaches to the tooth surface via hemidesmosomes, a soft diet requires minimal mastication, and consequently, lower distortional strains are produced in the tissue. This reduced strain state is accompanied by reduced mitotic activity in both stem cells and their progeny, leading to tissue atrophy. The atrophied junctional epithelium exhibits suboptimal barrier functions, allowing the ingression of bacteria into the underlying connective tissues, which in turn trigger inflammation and mild alveolar bone loss. These data link the mechanics of chewing to the biology of tooth-supporting tissues, revealing how a stem cell niche is responsible for the remarkable adaptability of the junctional epithelium to different diets.

Contact ratio and adaptations in the maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar joints in rats and human clinical analogs

Spatial maps of function-based contact areas and resulting mechanical strains in bones of intact fibrous joints in preclinical small-scale animal models are limited. Functional imaging in situ on intact dentoalveolar fibrous joints (DAJs) in hemimandibles and hemimaxillae harvested from 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats (N = 5 at 12 weeks, N = 5 at 20 weeks) was performed in this study. Physical features including bone volume fraction (BVF), bone pore diameter and pore density, and cementum fraction (CF) of the molars in the maxillary and mandibular joints were evaluated. Biomechanical testing in situ provided estimates of joint stiffness, changes in periodontal ligament spaces (PDL-space) between the molar and bony socket, and thereby localization of contact area in the respective joints. Contact area localization revealed mechanically stressed interradicular and apical regions in the joints. These anatomy-specific contact stresses in maxillary and mandibular joints were correlated with the physical features and resulting strains in interradicular and bony socket compartments. The mandibular joint spaces, in general, were higher than maxillary, and this trend was consistent with age (younger loaded: Mn - 134 ± 55 μm, Mx - 110 ± 47 μm; older loaded: Mn - 122 ± 49 μm, Mx - 105 ± 48 μm). However, a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in mandibular and maxillary joint spaces with age (younger unloaded: Mn - 147 ± 51 μm; Mx - 125 ± 42 μm; older unloaded: Mn - 134 ± 46 μm; Mx - 116 ± 44 μm) was observed. The bone volume fraction (BVF) of mandibular interradicular bone (IR bone) increased significantly with age (P < 0.05) with the percent porosity of coronal mandibular bone lower than its maxillary counterpart. The contact ratio (contact area to total surface area) of maxillary teeth was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than mandibular teeth; both maxillary interradicular and apical contact ratios (IR bone: 41%, 56%; Apical bone: 4%, 12%) increased with age, and were higher than the mandibular (IR bone: 19%, 44%; Apical bone: 1%, 4%) counterpart. Resulting higher but uniform strains in maxillary bone contrasted with lower but higher variance in mandibular strains at a younger age. Anatomy-specific colocalization of physical properties and functional strains in bone provided insights into form-guided adaptive dominance of the maxilla compared to material property-guided adaptive dominance of the mandible. These age-related trends from the preclinical animal model paralleled with age- and tooth position-specific variabilities in mandibular craniofacial bones of adolescent and adult patients following orthodontic treatment.