Trauma in Veterans With Substance Use Disorder: Similar Treatment Need Among Urban and Rural Residents

Urban vs. rural differences in psychiatric diagnoses, symptom severity, and functioning in a psychiatric sample

OBJECTIVE

Identifying whether certain groups of people experience elevated rates or severities of psychiatric symptoms provides information to guide healthcare allocation. People living in urban areas have higher rates of some psychiatric disorders relative to people living in rural settings, however, it is unclear if psychiatric severity is more elevated in urban vs. rural settings. This study investigates the urban vs. rural differences in rates of psychiatric disorders and severity of psychiatric symptoms.

METHOD

A cohort of patients (63% women, 85% White) presenting to an outpatient psychiatric treatment center in the U.S. completed patient-reported outcomes at all clinic visits as part of standard care. Rurality was determined by municipality population density. Sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnoses, trauma exposure, psychiatric symptom severity, functioning, and suicidality were compared by rural vs. urban municipality.

RESULTS

There were virtually no differences between patients living in rural vs. urban municipalities on rates of psychiatric disorders, severity of psychiatric symptoms, functional impairment, and suicidality (ps≥.09). The only difference was that patients living in rural municipalities had higher exposure to serious accidents than patients living in urban municipalities (p < .01); exposure to nine other traumatic events did not differ between groups (p≥.07).

CONCLUSIONS

People living in urban and rural municipalities have a similar need for mental health treatment. Access to care may be one explanatory factor for the occasional rural-urban differences in rates of psychiatric disorders. In other words, if people living in rural areas can access care, their symptom presentations appear unlikely to differ from those of people living in urban areas.

Behavioural health outcomes in veterans compared to nonveterans by rural and urban areas in Alabama, 2015-2018

In the United States, tobacco use, alcohol consumption and substance use disorders are more prevalent among veterans when compared to nonveterans. This is also seen in Alabama, which led the researchers to review county level data to examine possible links between substance use, mental health and suicide by veteran status. This study sought to evaluate behavioural health outcomes and impacting factors for military veterans and nonveterans living in rural and urban areas of Alabama. In phase one, we developed Alabama-specific behavioural health outcomes at the state and county level for military veterans and nonveterans. In phase two, we examined county-level correlates of behavioural health outcomes among veterans and nonveterans. The data were retrieved from the 2015-2018 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and the United States Census Bureau. Regarding tobacco use rates at the county level, nonveteran rates ranged from 23.93% to 34.56% while veteran rates ranged from 24.47% to 38.56%. Nonveteran illicit drug use rates ranged from 9.40% to 13.15% while veteran illicit drug use rates ranged from 5.50% to 10.67%. Nonveteran heavy alcohol use rates ranged from 4.54% to 7.92% while veteran heavy alcohol use rates ranged from 4.59% to 8.41%. Lastly, nonveteran suicidal ideation rates ranged from 3.64% to 4.60% while veteran suicidal ideation rates ranged from 3.16% to 4.51%. Veterans have a significantly higher potential of having suicidal ideations. We showed that illicit drug use and suicidal ideation have increased in Alabama among veterans and nonveterans. Behavioural health programmes and policies aimed at eliminating disparities between veterans and nonveterans are needed in Alabama.