1
|
Leach MJ, Veziari Y, Flanagan C, Schloss J. Prevalence of Complementary Medicine Use in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Health Care 2024; 38:505-519. [PMID: 38260926 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this systematic review was to determine the global prevalence of complementary medicine (CM) use among children and adolescents. METHOD Seven databases and the reference lists of included studies were searched for pertinent observational studies. Studies were limited to those published in English from July 1, 2013. Included studies were appraised using the JBI checklist for prevalence studies. RESULTS Twenty studies were eligible for inclusion (385,527 participants). Most studies were assessed as having low risk of bias. Meta-analyses revealed a 23.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.226-0.234; 17 studies) short-term (≤ 12 month) prevalence and a 77.7% (95% confidence interval, 0.760-0.794; six studies) lifetime prevalence of CM use in children and adolescents. Differences in CM use were evident across countries and regions. DISCUSSION The findings of this review indicate that the use of CM in children and adolescents is high and widespread and may be increasing.
Collapse
|
2
|
Steel A, Redmond R, Schloss J, Cramer H, Goldenberg J, Leach MJ, Harnett JE, Van de Venter C, McLintock A, Bradley R, Hawrelak J, Cooley K, Leung B, Adams J, Wardle J. International prevalence of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056075. [PMID: 35879017 PMCID: PMC9328102 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Naturopathy is a traditional medicine system informed by codified philosophies and principles, and an emphasis on non-pharmacologic therapeutic interventions. While naturopathy is practised by approximately 75 000-100 000 000 naturopathic practitioners in at least 98 countries, little is known about the international prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies describing the global prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. SETTING The included literature was identified through a systematic search of eight databases between September and October 2019, as well as the grey literature. PARTICIPANTS Studies were included if they reported the prevalence rate of consultations with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population. INTERVENTIONS Survey items needed to report consultations with a naturopathic practitioner as defined in the country where data was collected, and not combine naturopathic consultations with other health services or only report consulations for illness populations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary measures used for the analysis was consultations in the previous 12 months. Other prevalence timeframes were reported as secondary measures. METHODS Meta-analysis of prevalence data was conducted using random effects models based on individual countries and WHO world regions. RESULTS The literature search identified eight manuscripts summarising 14 studies reporting prevalence for inclusion in the review. All included studies had a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the included studies by world region found the 12-month prevalence of history of naturopathy consultations ranged from 1% in the Region of the Americas to 6% in the European and Western Pacific Regions. CONCLUSIONS There are up to sixfold differences in the prevalence of naturopathy consults over 12 months between and within world regions, which may be driven by a range of policy, legislative and social factors. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020145529.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie Steel
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Redmond
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet Schloss
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Holger Cramer
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Joshua Goldenberg
- Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Matthew J Leach
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanna Elizabeth Harnett
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claudine Van de Venter
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andy McLintock
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ryan Bradley
- Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Kieran Cooley
- Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brenda Leung
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jon Adams
- Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jon Wardle
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leach MJ, Walsh S, Muyambi K, Gillam M, Jones M. Expressed Demand for Health Care Services in Regional South Australia: A Cross-sectional Study. J Rural Health 2020; 37:645-654. [PMID: 32602978 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accessibility and availability of health care services/providers is an increasing concern for many regional communities, particularly regional South Australia. Assessing the level of health service/provider utilization within a region (ie, expressed demand) can be useful in determining health care need and health service/workforce demand. METHODS The regional South Australia health (RESONATE) survey aimed to determine the expressed demand for health care services and the health workforce in a regional South Australian population. The study was open to adults living in regional South Australia and was promoted using a comprehensive multimodal recruitment campaign. Data were collected between April 2017 and March 2018 using the consumer utilization, expectations and experiences of healthcare instrument. FINDINGS A total of 3,926 adults completed the questionnaire. Participants reported using 47 different health care providers in the previous 12 months. Whilst almost all (92.9%) participants had seen a general practitioner in the past 12 months, yoga instructors, chiropractors, pharmacists, and physiotherapists were visited most frequently. Proportionally fewer participants in more remote locations received conventional services/treatments, though a significantly greater proportion of those in more remote locations had received complementary medicine services/treatments (relative to inner regional areas). CONCLUSIONS Findings of the RESONATE survey point to a high level of expressed demand for conventional and complementary health care services among study participants, possibly higher than that reported in the general population. Examining the extent to which the health needs of this and other regional populations are met should be the focus of further research to better inform future health workforce/services planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Leach
- National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, East Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sandra Walsh
- Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kuda Muyambi
- Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia
| | - Marianne Gillam
- Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia
| | - Martin Jones
- Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|