Chlamydia trachomatis infection is related to premature ejaculation in chronic prostatitis patients: results from a cross-sectional study

Efficacy Analysis of Physical Therapy in Treating Chronic Prostatitis: Unblocking Obstructed Glandular Ducts Could Be a Novel Treatment Strategy

Objective

This study investigates the efficacy of physical therapy in treating chronic prostatitis grounded on the glandular duct blockage theory.

Methods

The study includes patients who were diagnosed and treated for chronic prostatitis between November 2022 and July 2023 at Renhui clinic in Jiangmen, Guangdong and Renhui frontline clinic in Shenzhen Guangdong. The recorded data includes the frequency of physical therapies including prostate massages, rectal probe high-frequency vibration treatment, and low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT). Post-treatment urine sediment was collected for microscopic examination, and the scores of each patient on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) were recorded pre- and post-treatment in order to calculate the effectiveness rate.

Results

The study involved a total of 48 patients, of which 26 were diagnosed with premature ejaculation. On average, each patient received 2.1 prostate massages, underwent 4.1 rectal probe high-frequency vibration treatments, and 8.3 Li-ESWT sessions. Following treatment, the initial microscopic examination of the urine sediment revealed aged white blood cell clusters, prostate calculi clusters, and inactive sperm clusters, all appearing in the shape of glandular tubes. The mean NIH-CPSI scores pre- and post-treatment were 27.2±6.9 and 18.0±6.6, respectively, indicating an effectiveness rate of 81.3%. The average PEDT scores pre- and post-treatment were 14.5±3.5 and 10.5±4.2, respectively, with an effectiveness rate of 53.8%.

Conclusion

Unblocking obstructed glandular ducts might provide a novel therapeutic strategy for treating chronic prostatitis.

Pharmacological Interventions for Bacterial Prostatitis

Prostatitis is a common urinary tract condition but bring innumerable trouble to clinicians in treatment, as well as great financial burden to patients and the society. Bacterial prostatitis (acute bacterial prostatitis plus chronic bacterial prostatitis) accounting for approximately 20% among all prostatitis have made the urological clinics complain about the genital and urinary systems all over the world. The international challenges of antibacterial treatment (emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria, bacterial biofilms production and the shift in bacterial etiology) and the transformation of therapeutic strategy for classic therapy have attracted worldwide attention. To the best of our knowledge currently, there is not a single comprehensive review, which can completely elaborate these important topics and the corresponding treatment strategy in an effective way. This review summarizes the general treatment choices for bacterial prostatitis also provides the alternative pharmacological therapies for those patients resistant or intolerant to general treatment.

Current Knowledge of the Potential Links between Inflammation and Prostate Cancer

Inflammation is inherent in prostatic diseases and it is now accepted that it may facilitate cellular proliferation in both benign and malignant conditions. The strong relationship between prostatic inflammation and pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is supported by epidemiologic, histopathologic and molecular evidence. Contrariwise, the role of inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis is still controversial, although current data indicate that the inflammatory microenvironment can regulate prostate cancer (PCa) growth and progression. Knowledge of the complex molecular landscape associated with chronic inflammation in the context of PCa may lead to the introduction and optimization of novel targeted therapies. In this perspective, evaluation of the inflammatory component in prostate specimens could be included in routine pathology reports.

Chlamydia trachomatis versus common uropathogens as a cause of chronic bacterial prostatitis: Is there any difference? Results of a prospective parallel-cohort study

Purpose

The role of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection in chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) is well known. What is unclear is whether there are any differences in the course or clinical outcome of the disease when the cause is CT or other uropathogens.

Materials and Methods

A series of 311 patients affected by CBP due to CT (cohort A) was compared with a group of 524 patients affected by CBP caused by common uropathogen bacteria (cohort B). All participants completed the following questionnaires: National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index, International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function-15 erectile function domain (IIEF-15-EFD), Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. All patients were followed with clinical and microbiological evaluations.

Results

After a mean follow-up time of 42.3 months, the number of symptomatic episodes was significantly higher in patients in cohort A than in cohort B (4.1±1.1 vs. 2.8±0.8, p<0.001), and the mean time to first symptomatic recurrence was shorter in cohort A than in cohort B (3.3±2.3 months vs. 5.7±1.9 months, p<0.001). Moreover, scores on the SF-36 tool were significantly lower in cohort A (96.5±1.0 vs. 99.7±1.9, p<0.001) at the first symptomatic recurrence. Cohort A also showed significantly lower scores on the IIEF-15-EFD and PEDT questionnaires at the end of the follow-up period (26.8±2.9 vs. 27.3±3.3, p=0.02 and 11.5±2.3 vs. 4.5±2.8, p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients affected by CBP due to CT infection have a higher number of symptomatic recurrences with a more severe impact on quality of life.

Rhodiola rosea, folic acid, zinc and biotin (EndEP®) is able to improve ejaculatory control in patients affected by lifelong premature ejaculation: Results from a phase I-II study

The therapeutic armamentarium currently available for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE) is not highly satisfactory. However, phytotherapeutics appear to be an interesting option for PE management. The present study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of a phytotherapeutic combination of Rhodiola rosea, folic acid, biotin and zinc (EndEP^®) in the treatment of patients affected by lifelong PE. All patients affected by lifelong PE who were attending three Urological Institutions from July to December 2014 were enrolled in this prospective, multicentre, phase I–II study. All patients were assigned to receive oral tablets of EndEP^® (one tablet per day) for 90 days. Clinical and instrumental analyses were carried out at enrolment and at the end of the study. International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15, Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaires were used. The intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) for each event was also evaluated using the stop-watch technique. The main outcome measure was the difference from baseline in PEDT questionnaire and mean IELT at the end of the follow-up period. In total, 91 patients (mean age, 32.3±5.6 years) were analysed. The baseline questionnaires mean scores were 1.1±1.6, 26.1±2.9, 15.3±3.4 and 98.2±0.5, for IPSS, IIEF-15, PEDT and SF-36, respectively. The mean IELT at baseline was 73.6±46.9s. At the follow-up examination (90 days after the start of treatment), no statistically significant differences were identified in terms of IPSS (1.4±1.5) or IIEF-15 (26.3±3.1) compared with the pre-treatment values (P=0.19 and P=0.64, respectively). A statistically significant difference was detected between the mean IELT at enrolment and after treatment (73.6±46.9 vs. 102.3±60.0; P<0.001) and SF-36 questionnaire (98.2±0.5 vs. 99.4±0.1; P<0.001). Fifty-five patients reported improvement in the control of ejaculation (60.4%). Very few adverse events were reported (4.4%). In conclusion, it was found that EndEP^® significantly improved ejaculatory control and the quality of sexual life in patients affected by lifelong PE, with a very low rate of adverse events.

Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) by conducting a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Relevant publications were searched using PubMed, Embase, CBM, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang databases up to August 2015. Studies that reported the prevalence of erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation and total sexual dysfunction in men with CP/CPPS were included.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies involving 11,189 men were included. Overall prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with CP/CPPS was 0.62 (95 % CI 0.48-0.75), while the prevalence of erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation was 0.29 (95 % CI 0.24-0.33) and 0.40 (95 % CI 0.30-0.50), respectively. From 1999 to 2010, the prevalence of sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation was 0.65 (95 % CI 0.45-0.83), 0.27 (95 % CI 0.22-0.33) and 0.41 (95 % CI 0.27-0.55), respectively. From 2011 to 2014, the prevalence of sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation was 0.50 (95 % CI 0.22-0.75), 0.35 (95 % CI 0.29- 0.40) and 0.39 (95 % CI 0.37-0.41), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of sexual dysfunction in men with CP/CPPS was high, even though overall sexual dysfunction demonstrated a slightly decreasing trend. Furthermore, erectile dysfunction prevalence rate had an increasing trend in recent years. More prospective studies are needed to evaluate sexual dysfunction improvement with better management of CP/CPPS.