Consensual intercourse resulting in an extensive rectovaginal tear: an extremely rare occurrence

Pelvic Floor Disorders Due to Anal Sexual Activity in Men and Women: A Narrative Review

Recent evidence shows that consensual anal penetrative intercourse has become more prevalent, not only limited to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men but also for women who are in a sexual relationship with men. The aim of this review was to study the influence of consensual anal intercourse on pelvic floor function and the role of pelvic floor physical therapy treatment in preventing or treating consensual anal intercourse-induced anodyspareunia and/or fecal incontinence. We reviewed 68 references that showed that anal penetrative intercourse is a risk factor for anodyspareunia and fecal incontinence in both men and women. This risk of anal intercourse may increase with emotional discomfort, an overactive pelvic floor, lack of lubrication, frequency of anal penetrative intercourse, and hard practice (BDSM: bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism, and masochism). It seems that pelvic floor physical therapists play an essential role in preventing and treating pelvic floor dysfunctions due to anal intercourse, which can lead to anodyspareunia and fecal incontinence; the treatment includes education, pelvic floor training with and without biofeedback, electric stimulation, manual therapy, and dilatators. Further studies are warranted to enhance our understanding of the causes and treatment efficacy of pelvic floor dysfunctions due to anal penetrative intercourse.

Strangulated bowel obstruction caused by vaginal perforation due to vaginal cancer in a patient with chronic uterine prolapse

A woman in her 90s with chronic uterine prolapse presented with abdominal pain and a vaginal mass. The patient had generalised peritonitis and a strangulated bowel obstruction originating from a perforated posterior vagina. We performed partial intestinal resection and a total hysterectomy, including excision of the perforation of the vaginal site and the adnexa. The patient died on postoperative day 8 due to worsening systemic sepsis. The pathological diagnosis revealed an invasive carcinoma in the perforated area of the vagina. Obstetric factors are the most frequent cause of female genital tract perforation, and chronic uterine prolapse is associated with this condition; however, vaginal cancer has never been reported as a cause of perforation. Therefore, close collaboration in gynaecology should be considered to investigate whether vaginal perforation and uterine prolapse are related to cancer.

Postcoital Vaginal Laceration in a Nursing Mother: A Rarely Reported Entity

Postcoital vaginal injury is an uncommon entity in parous women, although it is a commonly encountered problem in virgins. Herein, we present a case of postcoital vaginal injury after consensual intercourse in a seven-month postpartum lactating woman, leading to a 5 cm laceration between the left lateral vaginal wall and posterior vaginal fornix. There was no evidence of colporrhexis. Ultrasonography was done to rule out any intraperitoneal collection or any broad ligament hematoma. The vaginal laceration was repaired in double layers. Postoperatively, the patient had an uneventful recovery. It should be emphasized that, even though uncommon, postcoital vaginal injuries can also occur in parous women.

Traumatic rectovaginal fistula after sexual intercourse following a non-consensual anal penetration: a case report and a review of the literature

Rectovaginal fistulas are rare genital lesions, often due to obstetric causes. More rarely they are a consequence of sexual intercourse. We present the case of a 36-year-old woman who presented to a gynecological emergency department with pelvic pain and feces coming from the vagina. This symptomatology appeared after non-consensual anal intercourse following consensual penile vaginal penetration. She was treated for a perforation of the rectovaginal septum. On the basis of our results, we reviewed the cases published in the literature, with a summary of the elements that may favor the appearance of this lesion, such as "virginity", obstetrics and gynecological history, or coitus position, its classification by size and localization, and the therapeutic indications (suture repair of the wall or a colostomy). Better knowledge of this type of lesion would improve the practice of forensic pathologists for screening and management.

Postcoital Vaginal Perforation and Evisceration in Women with No Prior Pelvic Surgery: Laparoscopic Management and Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective: to evaluate risk factors, causes, management and surgical therapy of postcoital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery. Data sources: We used MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science for our research. Our review includes all reports from 1980 to November 2020. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: (intercourse) AND (coitus) AND (vaginal perforation). Methods of study selection: we report a case of vaginal evisceration after consensual intercourse in a young and healthy woman. In addition, we performed a systematic review of vaginal perforations with or without evisceration in women without prior surgery or any other predisposing disease. All studies identified were listed by citation, title, authors and abstract. Duplicates were identified by an independent manual screening, performed by one researcher and then removed. For the eligibility process, two authors independently screened the title and abstracts of all non-duplicated papers and excluded those not pertinent to the topic. Tabulation, integration and results: We have followed the PRISMA guidelines. Five manuscripts were detected through the references of the works that had been identified with the research on MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. We found 16 cases between 1980 and 2020. The young age and the virginal status represent the principal risk factors and all the lacerations occurred in the posterior vaginal fornix. The most common surgical technique was the laparotomic approach and, in the remaining cases, the laparoscopic and vaginal route was performed. Conclusions: Post-coital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery is a rare condition in the clinical practice and, when it is associated with evisceration it is a surgical emergency. Usually, these injuries are not life-threatening conditions but, a delay in diagnosis, can lead to severe complications. In consideration of the high heterogeneity of the data in the literature, it is essential to define a diagnostic–therapeutic management for the patients with vaginal perforation. With our review, we try to identify the associated risk factors, the best and fastest diagnosis, and the best surgical approach. We believe that a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach can be the best surgical treatment, useful to diagnose injuries of the abdominal organs and to improve postoperative outcome.

Vaginal postcoital injuries requiring surgical intervention: a case series and literature review

This case series describes clinical features and management of women who required surgical repair of vaginal injuries following consensual intercourse in our institution during the last decade. As a secondary aim, we reviewed the literature on the topic. We searched our institution's database for procedures coded as "Suture of Vagina," excluding trauma not related to consensual sexual activity: between January 2008 and December 2017, 20 women underwent hemostatic suturing for vaginal injuries following intercourse. Mean age was 27.6 ± 12.5 (range, 16-63) years, 5 (25%) women were parous, 13 (65%) women used no contraception, and 1 (5%) used birth control pills. Three patients (15%) were postmenopausal. Eight injuries (40%) occurred following first-time intercourse, two (10%) occurred after intercourse with a new partner. Median time from bleeding onset to admission was 12 (range, 2-24) h. One patient (5%) was hemodynamically unstable and required treatment with packed cells. Median time from admission to surgery was 56 (range, 15-540) min. The laceration site was identified at the vaginal fornix in nine (45%) patients, at mid-vagina in four (20%), at the hymenal ring, or the posterior fourchette in six (30%). Tear of a longitudinal vaginal septum was identified in one patient (5%). To conclude, vaginal postcoital injuries are a rare occurrence, nevertheless they may involve significant blood loss and therefore require prompt evaluation and treatment. Once the patient is hemodynamically stable, psychosexual assessment and support should be offered to the patient and her partner.