Therapeutic antibiotic serum concentrations by two blood collection methods within the pediatric patient: A comparative effectiveness trial

A comparison of aminoglycoside antibiotic serum concentrations collected by peripheral veins and peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) are frequently hospitalized for treatment of pulmonary exacerbation. The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Pulmonary Guidelines support the use of intravenous aminoglycosides with therapeutic drug monitoring for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbation due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Serum intravenous tobramycin concentrations are commonly collected by peripheral venipuncture (PV). Discomfort associated with collection of samples by PV prompts collection via PICC, but the accuracy of intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PICC has not been documented in adult PwCF. The primary study objective was to evaluate the difference between intravenous tobramycin serum levels collected by PV and PICC in adult PwCF.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective case-control study of adult PwCF admitted to University of Utah Health for a pulmonary exacerbation receiving tobramycin by a single lumen PICC. The authors compared tobramycin peak and random serum levels collected by PV and PICC using a detailed flush and waste protocol.

RESULTS

The authors analyzed a total of 19 patients with peripheral and PICC samples. The mean tobramycin peak collected by PV (27.2 mcg/mL) was similar to the mean peak collected by PICC (26.9 mcg/mL) (paired samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = .94). The correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI = 0.85-0.91, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Tobramycin serum samples collected by PICC appear to be similar in value to PV collections. Collecting aminoglycoside levels by PICC rather than PV may reduce patient discomfort and improve quality of life. Additional multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

Aminoglycoside dosing and monitoring for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during acute pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis

Aminoglycosides are commonly used for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) in the setting of acute pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). There are controversies and practice differences between institutions related to aminoglycoside dosing and monitoring strategies. The purpose of this review article is to summarize the currently available literature and identify gaps in the literature related to pharmacokinetic parameter goals, aminoglycoside dosing strategies, and methods for monitoring serum aminoglycoside concentrations for treatment of PsA in CF PEx, and throughout will discuss anticipated changes with the increasing availability of highly effective CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators. This review focuses on tobramycin, as it is the most commonly used aminoglycoside in CF PEx, and will briefly discuss special circumstances surrounding use of amikacin and gentamicin.

Recent Advances in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Voriconazole, Mycophenolic Acid, and Vancomycin: A Literature Review of Pediatric Studies

The review includes studies dated 2011-2021 presenting the newest information on voriconazole (VCZ), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and vancomycin (VAN) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in children. The need of TDM in pediatric patients has been emphasized by providing the information on the differences in the drugs pharmacokinetics. TDM of VCZ should be mandatory for all pediatric patients with invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Wide inter- and intrapatient variability in VCZ pharmacokinetics cause achieving and maintaining therapeutic concentration during therapy challenging in this population. Demonstrated studies showed, in most cases, VCZ plasma concentrations to be subtherapeutic, despite the updated dosages recommendations. Only repeated TDM can predict drug exposure and individualizing dosing in antifungal therapy in children. In children treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), similarly as in adult patients, the role of TDM for MMF active form, MPA, has not been well established and is undergoing continued debate. Studies on the MPA TDM have been carried out in children after renal transplantation, other organ transplantation such as heart, liver, or intestine, in children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or cord blood transplantation, and in children with lupus, nephrotic syndrome, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, and other autoimmune diseases. MPA TDM is based on the area under the concentration-time curve; however, the proposed values differ according to the treatment indication, and other approaches such as pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic biomarkers have been proposed. VAN is a bactericidal agent that requires TDM to prevent an acute kidney disease. The particular group of patients is the pediatric one. For this group, the general recommendations of the dosing may not be valid due to the change of the elimination rate and volume of distribution between the subjects. The other factor is the variability among patients that concerns the free fraction of the drug. It may be caused by both the patients' population and sample preconditioning. Although VCZ, MMF, and VAN have been applied in pediatric patients for many years, there are still few issues to be solve regarding TDM of these drugs to ensure safe and effective treatment. Except for pharmacokinetic approach, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics have been more often proposed for TDM.

Preanalytical Challenges During Capillary Fingerstick Sampling Preclude Its Widespread Use in Adult Hospitalized Patients

OBJECTIVES

Patient compliance with laboratory testing is one of the most underrecognized challenges in developing a treatment plan for acute and chronically ill patients. The ability to offer alternatives to standard venipuncture blood draws would greatly increase a laboratory's ability to provide testing to patients and health care providers.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study on paired venous and fingerstick capillary blood samples from admitted patients undergoing vancomycin therapy. Paired specimens were analyzed for vancomycin and a basic metabolic panel (BMP: calcium, carbon dioxide, chloride, potassium, sodium, creatinine, glucose, serum urea nitrogen) on the core laboratory's automated chemistry and immunochemistry platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 59 paired fingerstick and venous blood specimens from 56 unique inpatients were analyzed. Paired samples were comparable for all the analytes tested with the exception of bicarbonate and potassium, which were significantly different among the capillary sample group. Patients required multiple fingers be lanced in 15% of cases to obtain sufficient blood to carry out the testing. Capillary sample rejection rates due to insufficient volumes were as high as 30% in the initial 30 patients enrolled in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin and the BMP, with the exception of potassium and bicarbonate, were determined to be analytically comparable. However, significant preanalytical issues should preclude laboratories and providers from more widespread adoption of fingerstick-derived capillary blood as an alternative sampling method except in the most extenuating of circumstances.

Cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring: Evaluation of agreement between peripheral and central venous blood sampling

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring for cefepime is increasingly being performed because of the potential relation between exposure and neurotoxicity. An in vitro pilot study suggested significant carryover of cefepime from central venous catheters when blood sampling is carried out via the same catheter used for administration of cefepime. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate carryover of cefepime in a real-life clinical setting.

METHODS

A prospective single-center study was conducted at the hematology department of the University Hospitals Leuven. Patients treated with cefepime, and having a central venous catheter, were included. Cefepime trough samples were taken simultaneously via the central venous catheter and peripheral venepuncture.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included in this study, resulting in 28, 11 and 5 paired samples for tunnelled catheters, implantable port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters, respectively. No statistically nor clinically significant difference was found between cefepime concentrations measured in centrally versus peripherally obtained blood samples, overall and for all three types of central venous catheters separately. Of note, four paired samples showed a difference larger than 10%, with lower central concentrations probably reflecting a dilution error.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant carryover of cefepime from long-term central venous catheters. Cefepime samples can be drawn reliably via the central venous catheter, after flushing and discarding the first blood sample. Although, flushing and discard volumes should be standardized to avoid potential dilution errors.