Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate reverses apixaban-associated bleeding in a rabbit model of acute hemorrhage

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is not inferior to andexanet alfa for the reversal or oral factor Xa inhibitors: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Andexanet alfa (AA) is the only FDA-approved reversal agent for apixaban and rivaroxaban (DOAC). There are no studies comparing its efficacy with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). This study aimed to compare PCC to AA for DOAC reversal, hypothesizing noninferiority of PCC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, noninferiority multicenter study of adult patients admitted from July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, who had taken a DOAC within 12 hours of injury, were transfused red blood cells (RBCs) or had traumatic brain injury, and received AA or PCC. Primary outcome was PRBC unit transfusion. Secondary outcome with intensive care unit length of stay. MICE imputation was used to account for missing data and zero-inflated Poisson regression was used to account for an excess of zero units of RBC transfused. Two units difference in RBC transfusion was selected as noninferior.

RESULTS

Results: From 263 patients at 10 centers, 77 (29%) received PCC and 186 (71%) AA. Patients had similar transfusion rates across reversal treatment groups (23.7% AA vs. 19.5% PCC) with median transfusion in both groups of 0 RBC. According to the Poisson component, PCC increases the amount of RBC transfusion by 1.02 times (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.33) compared with AA after adjusting for other covariates. The average amount of RBC transfusion (nonzero group) is 6.13. Multiplying this number by the estimated rate ratio, PCC is estimated to have an increase RBC transfusion by 0.123 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.02) units compared with AA.

CONCLUSION

PCC appears noninferior to AA for reversal of DOACs for RBC transfusion in traumatically injured patients. Additional prospective, randomized trials are necessary to compare PCC and AA for the treatment of hemorrhage in injured patients on DOACs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Clinical Relevance of Preclinical and Clinical Studies of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Treatment of Bleeding Related to Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and stroke. When emergency reversal of DOAC-related anticoagulation is required, specific DOAC reversal agents are recommended, including idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa for apixaban and rivaroxaban reversal. However, specific reversal agents are not always available, andexanet alfa has not been approved for urgent surgery, and clinicians need to know the patient's anticoagulant medication before administering these treatments. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are recognized as nonspecific, alternative hemostatic agents for treatment of DOAC-related bleeding. Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies shows that they may reduce the anticoagulant effects of DOACs and may help control DOAC-related bleeding. However, randomized controlled trials are lacking, and most data are from retrospective or single-arm prospective studies in bleeding associated with activated factor X inhibitors. There are no clinical data showing the efficacy of 4F-PCC for the treatment of bleeding in dabigatran-treated patients. This review focuses on the current evidence of 4F-PCC use in controlling bleeding associated with DOACs and provides an expert opinion on the relevance of these data for clinical practice. The current treatment landscape, unmet needs, and future directions are also discussed.

Reversing direct factor Xa or thrombin inhibitors: Factor V addition to prothrombin complex concentrate is beneficial in vitro

Background

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is a human plasma‐derived mixture of partially purified vitamin K‐dependent coagulation factors (VKCF). Current therapeutic indication is treatment and perioperative prophylaxis of bleeding in acquired VKCF deficiency. Off‐label uses include treatment of direct factor Xa‐ or thrombin inhibitor‐associated bleeds, treatment of trauma‐induced coagulopathy, and hemorrhagic complications in patients with liver disease.

Objective

Considering PCC as a general prohemostatic drug, we argued that its clinical efficacy can benefit from supplementation with coagulation factors that are absent in the current PCC formulation. In this study, we focused on factor V.

Methods

We mimicked a coagulopathy in vitro by spiking whole blood or derived plasma with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rivaroxaban or dabigatran. We studied DOAC reversal by PCC and factor V concentrate (FVC) using a thrombin generation assay, thromboelastography, fibrin generation clot lysis test, and microfluidic thrombus formation under flow.

Results

In DOAC‐treated plasma, PCC increased the amount of thrombin generated. The addition of FVC alone or in combination with PCC caused a partial correction of the thrombin generation lag time and clotting time. In DOAC‐treated whole blood, the combination of PCC and FVC synergistically improved clotting time under static conditions, whereas complete correction of fibrin formation was observed under flow. Clot strength and clot resistance toward tissue plasminogen activator‐induced lysis were both increased with PCC and further enhanced by additional FVC.

Conclusion

Our in vitro study demonstrates a beneficial effect of the combined use of PCC and FVC in DOAC reversal.

Retrospective Comparison of Andexanet Alfa and 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex for Reversal of Factor Xa-Inhibitor Related Bleeding

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex (4F-PCC) for reversal of factor Xa (FXa)-inhibitor bleeding. Patients that received andexanet alfa for reversal were included. An equivalent number of patients administered 4F-PCC for FXa-inhibitor bleeding were randomly selected as historical controls. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis achievement within 12 h, defined using ANNEXA-4 criteria. Thromboembolic events and mortality within 30 days were also evaluated. A total of 32 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between andexanet alfa (n = 16) and 4F-PCC (n = 16). Intracranial bleeding was the primary reversal indication in 43.8% versus 62.5% of patients, respectively. Effective hemostasis was reached in 75.0% of andexanet alfa patients compared to 62.5% of 4F-PCC patients (P = .70). Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 (25.0%) patients and 3 (18.8%) patients, respectively (P = .99). Mortality incidence was 12.5% and 31.3%, respectively (P = .39). Andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC attained hemostasis in a majority of patients. A high, but a similar rate of thromboembolic events was seen with both treatments. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate comparative risks and benefits of the 2 agents.

Reversing Rivaroxaban Anticoagulation as Part of a Multimodal Hemostatic Intervention in a Polytrauma Animal Model

BACKGROUND

Life-threatening bleeding requires prompt reversal of the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors. This study investigated the effectiveness of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in treating trauma-related hemorrhage with rivaroxaban-anticoagulation in a pig polytrauma model. This study also tested the hypothesis that the combined use of a low dose of prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate could improve its subtherapeutic effects.

METHODS

Trauma (blunt liver injury and bilateral femur fractures) was induced in 48 anesthetized male pigs after 30 min of rivaroxaban infusion (1 mg/kg). Animals in the first part of the study received prothrombin complex concentrate (12.5, 25, and 50 U/kg). In the second part, animals were treated with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid or plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate. The primary endpoint was total blood loss postinjury. The secondary endpoints (panel of coagulation parameters and thrombin generation) were monitored for 240 min posttrauma or until death.

RESULTS

The first part of the study showed that blood loss was significantly lower in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,541 ± 269 ml) and 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (1,464 ± 108 ml) compared with control (3,313 ± 634 ml), and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate (2,671 ± 334 ml, all P < 0.0001). In the second part of the study, blood loss was significantly less in the 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate (1,836 ± 556 ml, P < 0.001) compared with 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid (2,910 ± 856 ml), and there were no early deaths in the 25 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, 50 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate, and 12.5 U/kg prothrombin complex concentrate plus tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate groups. Histopathologic analyses postmortem showed no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Prothrombin complex concentrate effectively reduced blood loss, restored hemostasis, and balanced thrombin generation. A multimodal hemostatic approach using tranexamic acid plus fibrinogen concentrate enhanced the effect of low doses of prothrombin complex concentrate, potentially reducing the prothrombin complex concentrate doses required for effective bleeding control.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Comparison of high- and low-dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the emergent reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitors

Even though there are several reversal strategies available for oral Factor Xa inhibitor associated coagulopathies, 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is used commonly as the primary reversal agent at many institutions. A dose of 50 units/kg is recommended as safe and effective with growing data suggesting that a lower dosing strategy may be sufficient. This retrospective study included adult patients who received either high-dose (50 units/kg; maximum dose: 5000 units) or low-dose (25 units/kg; maximum dose: 2500 units) 4F-PCC for the emergent reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitor-related life threatening bleeding. The primary outcome was the attainment of hemostatic effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were rates of thromboembolic events and inpatient mortality. 47 patients were included in the analysis of which 24 patients received high-dose and 23 patients received low-dose 4F-PCC. Overall hemostatic effectiveness was 87.5% in the high-dose group and 91.3% in the low-dose group. Thromboembolic event rate was 8.3% in the high-dose group compared to 4.4% within the low-dose group and inpatient mortality rate was 8.3% in the high-dose group and 4.4% in the low-dose group. Low-dose 4F-PCC (25 units/kg, maximum dose: 2500 units) for the reversal of oral Factor Xa inhibitors is a cost-effective alternative to high-dose 4F-PCC (50 units/kg; maximum dose: 5000 units) and provides effective hemostasis without increased rates of thromboembolic events or inpatient mortality.

Comparison of Low- Versus High-Dose Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (4F-PCC) for Factor Xa Inhibitor-Associated Bleeding: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Although andexanet alfa was recently approved as a specific reversal agent for apixaban and rivaroxaban, some providers still elect to administer 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) instead, due to concerns surrounding efficacy, thrombotic risk, administration logistics, availability, and cost. Previous studies have described success with 4F-PCC doses ranging from 25 to 35 U/kg, with some guidelines recommending 50 U/kg.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare hemostasis between patients receiving low- (20-34 U/kg) versus high-dose (35-50 U/kg) 4F-PCC for the urgent reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at a level one trauma center and comprehensive stroke center between January 2015 and December 2018. Main exclusion criteria included patients receiving less than 20 U/kg or if postreversal imaging were unavailable. Outcomes assessed included hemostasis for critical bleeding associated with apixaban or rivaroxaban and postoperative bleeding for reversal for emergent procedures.

RESULTS

The low-dose strategy was administered to n = 57 (57.6%) patients at a mean dose of 26.6 U/kg. The high-dose strategy was used in n = 42 (42.4%) patients at a mean dose of 47.6 U/kg. There was no difference in hemostasis by dosing strategy (75.4% vs 78.6%, P = .715) or hospital mortality (19.3% vs 35.7%, P = .067). No difference was found for secondary end points, including thrombotic events (5.3% vs 2.4%, P = .635) and hospital length of stay (11.3 vs 12.5 days, P = .070).

CONCLUSIONS

Our comparison addresses a gap in the literature surrounding optimal dosing and supports a similar efficacy profile between dosing low- versus high-dose treatment.

Management of Patients with Acute Subdural Hemorrhage During Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy is a major risk factor for unfavorable patient outcomes following (traumatic) intracranial hemorrhage. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Data on patients treated for acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH) during anticoagulation therapy with DOAC are limited.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of consecutive patients treated at our institution for acute SDH during anticoagulation therapy with DOAC or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) during a period of 30 months. Patient characteristics such as results of imaging and laboratory studies, treatment modalities and short-term patient outcomes were included.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients with preadmission DOAC (n = 65) or VKA (n = 63) intake were compared. The overall 30-day mortality rate of this patient cohort was 27%, and it did not differ between patients with DOAC or VKA intake (26% vs. 27%; p = 1.000). Similarly, the rates of neurosurgical intervention (65%) and intracranial re-hemorrhage (18%) were comparable. Prothrombin complex concentrates were administered more frequently in patients with VKA intake than in patients with DOAC intake (90% vs. 58%; p < 0.0001). DOAC treatment in patients with acute SDH did not increase in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates compared to VKA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the favorable safety profile of DOAC in patients, even in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage. However, the availability of specific antidotes to DOAC may further improve the management of these patients.

Four-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Management of Patients Receiving Direct Oral Activated Factor X Inhibitors

Factor Xa inhibitors prevent thrombosis but are associated with severe or life-threatening bleeding. Here, the authors present data on four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates in management of anticoagulation-associated bleeding and restoring hemostasis, including recent results from the UPRATE study.

A Low-Dose 4F-PCC Protocol for DOAC-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage

Purpose:

Current guidelines favor 4F-PCC over plasma for reversal of warfarin. Uncertainty remains on the hemostatic effectiveness and thrombotic risk of 4F-PCC for direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), particularly in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a lower dose protocol of 25 units/kg 4F-PCC for the management of DOAC-associated ICH in a real-world setting.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective study of adult patients who received at least one dose of 4F-PCC from March 2014 to December 2015 for DOAC-associated ICH. The primary outcome was hemostatic effectiveness within 24 hours. The secondary outcome was thromboembolic events within 14 days.

Results:

Twenty-two patients received 4F-PCC for DOAC-associated ICH and were included in the analysis. Hemostasis was evaluable in 19 patients with post-4F-PCC imaging available and occurred in 18/19 (94.7%) patients. Thromboembolism occurred in 2 out of 22 patients (9.1%).

Conclusions:

The use of a lower dose protocol of 25 units/kg of 4F-PCC resulted in high rates of hemostasis in patients with DOAC-associated ICH. Two patients developed thrombotic events within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration.

Evaluation of combined idarucizumab and prothrombin complex concentrate treatment for bleeding related to dabigatran in a lethal porcine model of double trauma

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab (IDA) is approved for emergency reversal of dabigatran; prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are recommended in the absence of specific antidote. The combined effects of IDA and PCC in trauma-related bleeding are unknown. The efficacy and safety of combined IDA + PCC were assessed in a lethal porcine model of double trauma under dabigatran anticoagulation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Male pigs (n = 28) received oral dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days; a non-dabigatran control group (n = 7) received placebo. On Day 4, dabigatran-treated animals were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo + placebo (dabigatran-treated control), IDA + PCC (60 mg/kg + 50 IU/kg), PCC + IDA, or IDA + IDA. Trauma was induced at t = 0 (bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury) and t = 60 minutes (second blunt liver injury). Study treatment was administered 15 minutes after each trauma. Animals were monitored for 5 hours or until death.

RESULTS

Total blood loss in IDA + PCC, PCC + IDA, and IDA + IDA was 1673 ± 370, 1981 ± 361, and 1417 ± 135 mL, respectively, with 100% survival at 5 hours. Blood loss in dabigatran-treated controls was 4427 ± 162 mL with 100% mortality. With IDA + IDA, plasma coagulation parameters and thrombin generation were similar to non-dabigatran control group levels after the second dose and remained stable over time. In the IDA + PCC and PCC + IDA groups, thrombin generation and d-dimer levels after the second dose were higher than with IDA + IDA. No thromboembolic complications were found.

CONCLUSION

IDA and PCC are effective in treating trauma-related bleeding with dabigatran anticoagulation. IDA is preferable for emergency reversal of dabigatran, but PCC may be valuable when the anticoagulant is unknown.

The impact of prothrombin complex concentrates when treating DOAC-associated bleeding: a review

Background

Bleeding complications are a risk associated with all anticoagulants. Currently, the treatment options for the management of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated bleeding are limited. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have been proposed as a potential therapeutic option, and evidence regarding their use is increasing.

Review

Many studies supporting PCC have used preclinical models and healthy volunteers; however, more recently, observational studies have further improved insight into current DOAC reversal strategies. Multiple clinical practice guidelines now specifically suggest use of PCCs for this indication. Specific reversal agents for Factor Xa inhibitors may become available in the near future, but data on their efficacy are still emerging.

Conclusions

Ultimately, a multimodal approach may be the optimal strategy to restore haemostasis in patients presenting with DOAC-associated coagulopathy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-018-0215-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hyperacute management of intracerebral haemorrhage

Intracerebral haemorrhage causes 1 in 10 strokes, but has the worst overall outcomes of all stroke subtypes. Baseline haematoma volume is a key prognostic factor and early complications - such as haematoma expansion, obstructive hydrocephalus and perihaematomal oedema - may worsen outcome. There is evidence that withdrawal of care may occur more often in intracerebral haemorrhage than ischaemic stroke independent of premorbid health and stroke severity. However, recent evidence shows that reversal of anticoagulants, intensive blood pressure lowering and surgery in carefully selected cases may improve outcomes. Ongoing research may also provide evidence for new medical treatments and minimally invasive approaches to surgery. Effective implementation of evidence-based care to intracerebral haemorrhage patients can be difficult but quality improvement methodology can help to achieve maximal benefit.

Hyperacute management of intracerebral haemorrhage

Intracerebral haemorrhage causes 1 in 10 strokes, but has the worst overall outcomes of all stroke subtypes. Baseline haematoma volume is a key prognostic factor and early complications - such as haematoma expansion, obstructive hydrocephalus and perihaematomal oedema - may worsen outcome. There is evidence that withdrawal of care may occur more often in intracerebral haemorrhage than ischaemic stroke independent of premorbid health and stroke severity. However, recent evidence shows that reversal of anticoagulants, intensive blood pressure lowering and surgery in carefully selected cases may improve outcomes. Ongoing research may also provide evidence for new medical treatments and minimally invasive approaches to surgery. Effective implementation of evidence-based care to intracerebral haemorrhage patients can be difficult but quality improvement methodology can help to achieve maximal benefit.

Pharmacological reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants-A comprehensive review of the literature

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Although DOAC-associated bleeding events are less frequent as compared to vitamin K antagonists, there is significant concern surrounding physicians' ability to evaluate and manage DOAC-associated bleeding when it does occur. Idarucizumab is a specific reversal agent for dabigatran and is the agent of choice for dabigatran reversal in the setting of major bleeding or urgent surgery/procedures. There are no commercially available specific reversal agents for the direct Xa inhibitors. Although they have not been rigorously studied in DOAC-treated patients requiring urgent anticoagulant reversal, limited evidence from in vitro studies, animal bleeding models, human volunteer studies (in vivo and in vitro) and case series suggest that coagulation factor replacement with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and activated PCC (FEIBA) may contribute to hemostasis. However, the safety and efficacy of these agents and the optimal dosing strategies remain uncertain.

Reversal of apixaban anticoagulation by four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates in healthy subjects: a randomized three-period crossover study

Essentials Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) may reverse the effect of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors. We conducted an open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study in 15 subjects. Both PCCs rapidly reversed apixaban-mediated decreases in mean endogenous thrombin potential. Four-factor PCC administration had no effect on apixaban pharmacokinetics or anti-FXa activity.

SUMMARY

Background Currently, there is no approved reversal agent for direct activated factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors; however, several agents are under investigation, including prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs). Objective This open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover study assessed the effect of two four-factor PCCs on apixaban pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in 15 healthy subjects. Methods Subjects received apixaban 10 mg twice daily for 3 days. On day 4, 3 h after apixaban, subjects received a 30-min infusion of 50 IU kg-1 Cofact, Beriplex P/N (Beriplex), or saline. Change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), measured with a thrombin generation assay (TGA), was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in other TGA parameters, prothrombin time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-FXa activity, apixaban pharmacokinetics, and safety. Results Apixaban-related changes in ETP and several other pharmacodynamic measures occurred following apixaban administration. Both PCCs reversed apixaban's effect on ETP; the differences in adjusted mean change from pre-PCC baseline to end of infusion were 425 nm min (95% confidence interval [CI] 219.8-630.7 nm min; P < 0.001) for Cofact, and 91 nm min (95% CI - 31.3 to 212.4 nm min; P > 0.05) for Beriplex. Both PCCs returned ETP to pre-apixaban baseline levels 4 h after PCC infusion, versus 45 h for placebo. For both PCCs, mean ETP peaked 21 h after PCC initiation, and then slowly decreased over the following 48 h. Both PCCs reversed apixaban's effect on TGA peak height, PT, and INR. Apixaban pharmacokinetic and anti-FXa profiles were consistent across treatments. Conclusions Cofact and Beriplex reversed apixaban's steady-state effects on several coagulation assessments.

Management of rivaroxaban- or apixaban-associated major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrates: a cohort study

PCCs for the management of major bleeding in patients on rivaroxaban or apixaban is an effective strategy in most cases. The thromboembolic complication rate in this setting is low and comparable with that of anticoagulation discontinuation without reversal.

The Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Animal Models

Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors, have been approved as alternatives to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. As with any anticoagulant, DOAC use carries a risk of bleeding. In patients with major bleeding or needing urgent surgery, reversal of DOAC anticoagulation may be required, presenting a clinical challenge. The optimal strategy for DOAC reversal is being refined, and may include use of hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs; a source of concentrated clotting factors), or DOAC-specific antidotes (which bind their target DOAC to abrogate its activity). Though promising, most specific antidotes are still in development.Preclinical animal research is the key to establishing the efficacy and safety of potential reversal agents. Here, we summarize published preclinical animal studies on reversal of DOAC anticoagulation. These studies (n = 26) were identified via a PubMed search, and used rodent, rabbit, pig, and non-human primate models. The larger of these animals have the advantages of similar blood volume/hemodynamics to humans, and can be used to model polytrauma. We find that in addition to varied species being used, there is variability in the models and assays used between studies; we suggest that blood loss (bleeding volume) is the most clinically relevant measure of DOAC anticoagulation-related bleeding and its reversal.The studies covered indicate that both PCCs and specific reversal agents have the potential to be used as part of a clinical strategy for DOAC reversal. For the future, we advocate the development and use of standardized, clinically, and pharmacologically relevant animal models to study novel DOAC reversal strategies.

Current knowledge on assessing the effects of and managing bleeding and urgent procedures with direct oral anticoagulants

PURPOSE

Current knowledge on managing major bleeding events with available hemostatic agents, including their combined use with potential reversal agents, in patients taking direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Over the past five years, a new generation of oral agents, the DOACs, has emerged as commonly used anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and treatment or secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Management of a bleeding event in the setting of DOAC therapy should take into account the relative risks of bleeding and thrombosis, which will determine the degree of anticoagulant reversal required. In the setting of a major (critical) bleeding event associated with notable blood loss, management may include transfusions of blood products to sustain the function of organ systems, and the availability of specific reversal agents will provide additional options for bleeding management. Beyond withholding the DOAC and providing supportive management that addresses any factors contributing to the bleeding event, clinicians may desire to expedite the removal of any anticoagulation effects. In general, this is accomplished by either removing or neutralizing the anticoagulant or by independently establishing hemostasis.

CONCLUSION

With or without reversal agents, patients may require supportive management such as mechanical pressure, volume support, transfusions of blood products, and, depending on the situation, surgery to repair the bleeding source. Specific reversal agents are currently under development or have recently been approved for the urgent management of bleeding events or the facilitation of invasive procedures in patients receiving DOACs.

Bleeding with Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin: Clinical Experience

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Bleeding with direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin: clinical experience

The risk of bleeding in the setting of anticoagulant therapy continues to be re-evaluated following the introduction of a new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Interruption of DOAC therapy and supportive care may be sufficient for the management of patients who present with mild or moderate bleeding, but in those with life-threatening bleeding, a specific reversal agent is desirable. We review the phase 3 clinical studies of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, in the context of bleeding risk and management.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate reverses apixaban-associated bleeding in a rabbit model of acute hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Apixaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease. There is a lack of data regarding its reversal in cases of acute bleeding or prior to emergency surgery that needs addressing.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed whether a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC; Beriplex(®) /Kcentra(®) , CSL Behring) can effectively reverse apixaban-associated bleeding in an in vivo rabbit model and evaluated the correlations between in vivo hemostasis and in vitro coagulation parameters.

METHODS

For dose-finding purposes, anesthetized rabbits were treated with a single intravenous dose of apixaban (800-1600 μg kg(-1) ) and, following a standardized kidney incision, volume of blood loss and time to hemostasis were measured. In a subsequent study phase, anesthetized rabbits were treated with apixaban 1200 μg kg(-1) followed by 4F-PCC (6.25-100 IU kg(-1) ), and the effects on the same bleeding parameters were assessed. In parallel, coagulation parameters were monitored.

RESULTS

Dose-dependent increases in time to hemostasis and total blood loss were observed post apixaban administration. Preincision treatment with 4F-PCC resulted in a statistically significant reversal in bleeding time (all doses) and volume (doses ≥ 12.5 IU kg(-1) ). Of the coagulation parameters measured, thrombin generation initiated using the RD reagent (phospholipids only) was the most sensitive to in vivo measures of 4F-PCC's hemostatic efficacy, although some correlations were also observed for prothrombin time and whole blood clotting time.

CONCLUSIONS

In this rabbit model of acute hemorrhage, 4F-PCC showed potential for reversing the bleeding effects of apixaban. Clinical data in apixaban-treated patients are needed to confirm these results.