Variation in baseline factor VIII concentration in a retrospective cohort of mild/moderate hemophilia A patients carrying identical F8 mutations

Genotype-Dependent Response to Desmopressin in Hemophilia A and Proposal of a Predictive Response Score

BACKGROUND

 Desmopressin (DDAVP) is used in patients with moderate/mild hemophilia A (PWMHs) to increase their factor VIII (FVIII) level and, if possible, normalize it. However, its effectiveness varies between individuals. The GIDEMHA study aims to investigate the influence of F8 gene variants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 The study collected the trajectory of FVIII levels from therapeutic intravenous DDAVP tests in four French hemophilia treatment centers. A pharmacological analysis was performed associated with efficacy scores according to F8 variants: absolute and relative responses, as well as new scores: absolute duration (based on duration with FVIII ≥ 0.50 IU.mL-1) and relative duration (based on half-life).

RESULTS

 From enrolled 439 PWMHs, 327 had a hot-spot F8 variant (with ≥5 PWMHs). For these, the median (min-max) basal and peak FVIII were 0.20 (0.02-0.040) and 0.74 (0.14-2.18) IU.mL-1 respectively, with FVIII recovery being 3.80 IU.ml-1 (1.15-14.75). The median FVIII half-life was 3.9 hours (0.7-15.9 hours). FVIII was normalized (≥0.50 IU.mL-1) in 224/327 PWMHs (69%) and the median time with normalized FVIII was 3.9 hours (0.0-54.1 hours). Following the response profiles to DDAVP defined by the four efficacy scores, four groups of F8 variants were isolated, and then compared using survival curves with normalized FVIII (p < 0.0001): "long-lastingly effective" [p.(Glu739Lys), p.(Ser2030Asn), p.(Arg2178His), p.(Gln2208Glu), and T-stretch deletion in intron 13]; "moderately effective" [p.(Ser112Phe), p.(Ala219Thr), p.(Thr2105Ile), p.Phe2146Ser), and p.(Asp2150Asn)]; "moderately ineffective" [p.Ala81Asp), p.(Gln324Pro), p.(Tyr492His), p.(Arg612Cys), p.(Met701Val), p.(Val2035Asn), and p.(Arg2178Cys)]; and "frequently ineffective" [c.-219C > T, p.(Cys2040Tyr), p.(Tyr2169His), p.(Pro2319Leu), and p.(Arg2326Gln)].

CONCLUSION

 In view of our data, we propose indications for DDAVP use in PWMH based on F8 variants for minor and major invasive procedures.

Deciphering conundrums of adeno-associated virus liver-directed gene therapy: focus on hemophilia

Adeno-associated virus gene therapy has been the subject of intensive investigation for monogenic disease gene addition therapy for more than 25 years, yet few therapies have been approved by regulatory agencies. Most have not progressed beyond phase 1/2 due to toxicity, lack of efficacy, or both. The liver is a natural target for adeno-associated virus since most serotypes have a high degree of tropism for hepatocytes due to cell surface receptors for the virus and the unique liver sinusoidal geometry facilitating high volumes of blood contact with hepatocyte cell surfaces. Recessive monogenic diseases such as hemophilia represent promising targets since the defective proteins are often synthesized in the liver and secreted into the circulation, making them easy to measure, and many do not require precise regulation. Yet, despite initiation of many disease-specific clinical trials, therapeutic windows are often nonexistent, resulting in excess toxicity and insufficient efficacy. Iterative progress built on these attempts is best illustrated by hemophilia, with the first regulatory approvals for factor IX and factor VIII gene therapies eventually achieved 25 years after the first gene therapy studies in humans. Although successful gene transfer may result in the production of sufficient transgenic protein to modify the disease, many emerging questions on durability, predictability, reliability, and variability of response have not been answered. The underlying biology accounting for these heterogeneous responses and the interplay between host and virus is the subject of intense investigation and the subject of this review.

Unravelling the effect of blood group on FVIII:C levels and response to DDAVP in 20 males with a single genotype (Twillingate Variant) causing Haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The genetic variant responsible for haemophilia A (HA) significantly impacts endogenous coagulant factor VIII (FVIII:C) level, thus impacting DDAVP responsiveness. Blood group (BG) also impacts FVIII:C levels, but this is difficult to evaluate in a genetically heterogeneous population. Canada has a large cohort of mild-moderate HA due to a single point variant: c.6104T>C, p.Val2035Ala-the Twillingate variant.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of BG on endogenous FVIII:C levels and DDAVP responsiveness in a single genotype of mild-moderate HA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-centre study. BG and FVIII:C levels were obtained for males with the Twillingate variant. One-hour absolute and fold increases in FVIII:C post-DDAVP were calculated. T-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare FVIII:C levels and DDAVP challenge variables between individuals according to BGs (O vs. non-O).

RESULTS

Twenty males were included. There were significant differences between BGs (O vs. non-O) in their lowest FVIII:C level at age <12 years (medians: 0.05 vs. 0.08 IU/mL; P = .05). Fifteen subjects underwent DDAVP challenges. Mean 1-h FVIII:C were 0.29 (O BG) versus 0.41 IU/mL (non-O BG); P = .04. There were no significant differences between BGs (O vs. non-O) in mean absolute FVIII:C increase (0.20 vs. 0.27 IU/mL; P = .10) and FVIII:C fold increase (3.3-fold vs. 3.8-fold; P = .51).

CONCLUSION

In HA subjects with an identical genotype, BG significantly impacts baseline FVIII:C levels and FVIII:C levels post-DDAVP, but does not impact absolute and fold increases in FVIII:C with DDAVP.

Applicability of the Thrombin Generation Test to Evaluate the Hemostatic Status of Hemophilia A Patients in Daily Clinical Practice

Hemophilia A (HA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency due to various genetic mutations in the F8 gene. The disease severity inversely correlates with the plasma levels of functional FVIII. The treatment of HA patients is based on FVIII replacement therapy, either following a prophylactic or on-demand regime, depending on the severity of the disease at diagnosis and the patient’s clinical manifestations. The hemorrhagic manifestations are widely variable amongst HA patients, who may require monitoring and treatment re-adjustment to minimize bleeding symptoms. Notably, laboratory monitoring of the FVIII activity is difficult due to a lack of sensitivity to various FVIII-related molecules, including non-factor replacement therapies. Hence, patient management is determined mainly based on clinical manifestations and patient–clinician history. Our goal was to validate the ST Genesia^® automated thrombin generation analyzer to quantify the relative hemostatic status in HA patients. We recruited a cohort of HA patients from the Principality of Asturias (Spain), following treatment and at a stable non-bleeding phase. The entire cohort (57 patients) had been comprehensively studied at diagnosis, including FVIII and VWF activity assays and F8 genetic screening, and then clinically monitored until the Thrombin Generation Test (TGT) was performed. All patients were recruited prior to treatment administration, at the maximum time-window following the previous dose. Interestingly, the severe/moderate patients had a similar TGT compared to the mild patients, reflecting the non-bleeding phase of our patient cohort, regardless of the initial diagnosis (i.e., the severity of the disease), treatment regime, and FVIII activity measured at the time of the TGT. Thus, TGT parameters, especially the peak height (Peak), may reflect the actual hemostatic status of a patient more accurately compared to FVIII activity assays, which may be compromised by non-factor replacement therapies. Furthermore, our data supports the utilization of combined TGT variables, together with the severity of patient symptoms, along with the F8 mutation type to augment the prognostic capacity of TGT. The results from this observational study suggest that TGT parameters measured with ST Genesia^® may represent a suitable tool to monitor the hemostatic status of patients requiring a closer follow-up and a tailored therapeutic adjustment, including other hemophilia subtypes or bleeding disorders.

Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec (AAV5-hFVIII-SQ) is an adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5)-based gene-therapy vector containing a coagulation factor VIII complementary DNA driven by a liver-selective promoter. The efficacy and safety of the therapy were previously evaluated in men with severe hemophilia A in a phase 1-2 dose-escalation study.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, single-group, multicenter, phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of valoctocogene roxaparvovec in men with severe hemophilia A, defined as a factor VIII level of 1 IU per deciliter or lower. Participants who were at least 18 years of age and did not have preexisting anti-AAV5 antibodies or a history of development of factor VIII inhibitors and who had been receiving prophylaxis with factor VIII concentrate received a single infusion of 6×1013 vector genomes of valoctocogene roxaparvovec per kilogram of body weight. The primary end point was the change from baseline in factor VIII activity (measured with a chromogenic substrate assay) during weeks 49 through 52 after infusion. Secondary end points included the change in annualized factor VIII concentrate use and bleeding rates. Safety was assessed as adverse events and laboratory test results.

RESULTS

Overall, 134 participants received an infusion and completed more than 51 weeks of follow-up. Among the 132 human immunodeficiency virus-negative participants, the mean factor VIII activity level at weeks 49 through 52 had increased by 41.9 IU per deciliter (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.1 to 49.7; P<0.001; median change, 22.9 IU per deciliter; interquartile range, 10.9 to 61.3). Among the 112 participants enrolled from a prospective noninterventional study, the mean annualized rates of factor VIII concentrate use and treated bleeding after week 4 had decreased after infusion by 98.6% and 83.8%, respectively (P<0.001 for both comparisons). All the participants had at least one adverse event; 22 of 134 (16.4%) reported serious adverse events. Elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels occurred in 115 of 134 participants (85.8%) and were managed with immune suppressants. The other most common adverse events were headache (38.1%), nausea (37.3%), and elevations in aspartate aminotransferase levels (35.1%). No development of factor VIII inhibitors or thrombosis occurred in any of the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe hemophilia A, valoctocogene roxaparvovec treatment provided endogenous factor VIII production and significantly reduced bleeding and factor VIII concentrate use relative to factor VIII prophylaxis. (Funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical; GENEr8-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03370913.).

The factor VIII treatment history of non-severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

In patients with non-severe hemophilia A, we lack detailed knowledge on the timing of treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. This knowledge could provide information about the expected treatment timing in patients with severe hemophilia A treated with non-replacement therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the FVIII treatment history in patients with non-severe hemophilia A.

METHODS

Patients with non-severe hemophilia (baseline FVIII activity [FVIII:C] 2-40 IU/dL) were included from the INSIGHT study. The primary outcome was median age at first FVIII exposure (ED1). In a subgroup of patients for whom more detailed information was available, we analyzed the secondary outcomes: median age at first 20 EDs, annualized bleeding rate for all bleeds (ABR), joint bleeds (AJBR), and major spontaneous bleeds (ASmBR).

RESULTS

In the total cohort (n = 1013), median baseline FVIII activity was 8 IU/dL (interquartile range [IQR] 4-15) and the median age at ED1 was 3.7 years (IQR 1.4-7.7). Median age at ED1 rose from 2.5 years (IQR 1.2-5.7) in patients with FVIII:C 2-5 IU/dL to 9.7 years (IQR 4.8-16.0) in patients with FVIII:C 25-40 IU/dL. In the subgroup (n = 104), median age at ED1, ED5, ED10, and ED20 was 4.0 years (IQR 1.4-7.6), 5.6 years (IQR 2.9-9.3), 7.5 years (IQR 4.4-11.3), and 10.2 years (IQR 6.5-14.2), respectively. Median ABR, AJBR, and ASmBR were 1.1 (IQR 0.5-2.6), 0.3 (IQR 0.1-0.7), and 0 (IQR 0-0), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that in non-severe hemophilia A, the age at first FVIII exposure increases with baseline FVIII:C and that major spontaneous bleeds rarely occur.

X Chromosome inactivation: a modifier of factor VIII and IX plasma levels and bleeding phenotype in Haemophilia carriers

Haemophilia A and B are X-linked hemorrhagic disorders caused by gene variants in the F8 and F9 genes. Due to recessive inheritance, males are affected, while female carriers are usually asymptomatic with a wide range of factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) levels. Bleeding tendency in female carriers is extremely variable and may be associated with low clotting factor levels. This could be explained by F8 or F9 genetic variations, numerical or structural X chromosomal anomalies, or epigenetic variations such as irregular X chromosome inactivation (XCI). The aim of the study was to determine whether low FVIII or FIX coagulant activity in haemophilia carriers could be related to XCI and bleeding symptoms. HUMARA assay was performed on 73 symptomatic carriers with low clotting activity ≤50 IU/dL. Bleeding Assessment Tool (BAT) from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) was used to describe symptoms in the cohort of carriers. In 97% of haemophilia carriers, a specific gene variant in heterozygous state was found, which alone could not justify their low FVIII or FIX levels (≤50 IU/dL). A statistical association between XCI pattern and FVIII and FIX levels was observed. Moreover, female carriers with low coagulant activity (≤20 IU/dL) and high degree of XCI ( ≥ 80:20) had a higher ISTH-BAT score than the carriers with the opposite conditions (>20 IU/dL and <80:20). In our cohort of haemophilia carriers, XCI was significantly skewed, which may contribute to the low expression of clotting factor levels and bleeding symptoms.

Hemophilia without prophylaxis: Assessment of joint range of motion and factor activity

BACKGROUND

Recurrent joint bleeding in hemophilia results in arthropathy and functional impairment. The relationship of arthropathy development and factor activity (FA) has not been reported in patients with FA levels <15%-20%.

METHODS

During the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Universal Data Collection, joint range-of-motion (ROM) measurements were taken at each comprehensive visit. Data were extracted from male patients with hemophilia (PWH) age ≥2 years with baseline factor activity levels ≤40%, excluding those prescribed prophylaxis, and used to calculate a proportion of normal ROM (PN-ROM) measure. Data were analyzed using regression models.

RESULTS

There were 6703 eligible PWH with 30 102 visits. PN-ROM declined with increasing age, and was associated with hemophilia severity, race/ethnicity, obesity, and viral illnesses. PWH ≥30 years old with fFA ≤2% and those ≥50 years old with FA ≤5% had mean PN-ROM values >10% less than controls; those ≥40 years old with FA <1% had values >20% less than controls. In the multivariable analysis, subjects with <1% FA had a 0.43% greater decrease (-0.49 to -0.37, 95% confidence interval) in PN-ROM each year relative to those with 16%-40% factor activity. A less pronounced effect was seen with 1%-5% or 6%-9% FA.

CONCLUSION

The effect of FA on ROM loss is far greater than that of any of the other characteristics, especially with FA <10%. This emphasizes the need to maintain a high index of suspicion for arthropathy in individuals with moderate and low-mild hemophilia.

Different Clinical Phenotypes Caused by Three F8 Missense Mutations in Three Chinese Families with Moderate Hemophilia A

In families with a monogenic disorder, the causal mutation usually cosegregates with the disease phenotype. In rare cases, however, individuals carrying the same mutation within a family may show various phenotypes. This study aimed to analyze the discrepancy between genotype and phenotype in three families with moderate hemophilia A (HA) caused by missense mutation in the F8 gene. Among the 67 noninversion moderate HA families in our cohort, incomplete penetrance was found in three families. In these three families, the grandfathers were asymptomatic, whereas the probands had different clinical phenotypes. Apart from one mutation in the VWF gene (c.1330 G>A) found in one grandfather, only one missense mutation (c.5837A>T, c.6679G>A, and c.6506G>A, in the respective families) in the F8 gene was identified in each proband and their grandfathers. Subsequent Sanger sequencing results combined with bioinformatic analysis indicated that the three missense mutations in the F8 gene were the causative mutations. Our study demonstrated incomplete penetrance of missense mutation within HA families in China. Therefore, genetic counseling and management of such cases need to be reappraised.

Influence of blood group, von Willebrand factor levels, and age on factor VIII levels in non-severe haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Data on the effect of ABO blood group (ABO), von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels, and age on factor VIII (FVIII) in non-severe haemophilia A (HA) is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if ABO, VWF levels, and age have an influence on the variability of FVIII levels and consequently on the assessment of severity in non-severe HA.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with non-severe HA and 82 healthy controls were included. Data on ABO was collected and FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) with one-stage clotting assay (FVIII:C OSA) and chromogenic substrate assay (FVIII:C CSA), FVIII antigen (FVIII:Ag) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and activity (VWF:Act) were determined.

RESULTS

In HA, FVIII:C OSA and CSA and FVIII:Ag were not different between non-O (n = 42, median 15.5, interquartile range 10.4-24.0; 10.0, 6.8-26.0 and 15.2, 10.7-24.9) and O (n = 47, 14.1, 9.0-23.0; 10.0, 5.0-23.0 and 15.2, 9.3-35.5), whereas in healthy controls, non-O individuals had significantly higher FVIII levels.

FVIII

C showed no relevant correlation with VWF levels in HA, but we observed strong correlations in healthy controls. Age had only a minor influence in HA, but had a considerable impact on FVIII:C in healthy controls. In multivariable regression analysis ABO, VWF:Ag and age were not associated with FVIII:C in HA, whereas this model explained 61.3% of the FVIII:C variance in healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in non-severe HA ABO and VWF levels do not substantially influence the variability of FVIII levels and age has only minor effects on it, which is important information for diagnostic procedures.

Multiyear Follow-up of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy is under investigation as a therapeutic option for persons with hemophilia A. Efficacy and safety data include 3 years of follow-up after a single administration of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ.

METHODS

We report durable efficacy, long-term safety, and clinical and biologic results in 15 adults with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII level, ≤1 IU per deciliter) who had received a single infusion of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ at various dose levels. We evaluated the factor VIII level, annualized rate of bleeding events, use of factor VIII, safety, expression kinetics, and biologic markers of AAV transduction for up to 3 years.

RESULTS

Three years after infusion, two participants (one who had received 6×10¹² vector genomes [vg] per kilogram of body weight and one who had received 2×10¹³ vg per kilogram) had factor VIII expression of less than 1 IU per deciliter, as assessed on chromogenic assay. Seven participants (who had received 6×10¹³ vg per kilogram) had a median factor VIII expression of 20 IU per deciliter; the median number of annualized treated bleeding events was 0, and the median use of exogenous factor VIII was reduced from 138.5 infusions to 0 infusions per year. Bleeding in all target joints (major joints with ≥3 bleeding events within 6 months) in this cohort resolved (≤2 bleeding events within 12 months). Two years after infusion, six participants (who had received 4×10¹³ vg per kilogram) had a median factor VIII expression of 13 IU per deciliter; the median annualized rate of bleeding events was 0, and the median use of factor VIII was reduced from 155.5 infusions to 0.5 infusions per year. Bleeding in target joints resolved in five of six participants. The factor VIII pharmacodynamic profiles reflected cellular turnover in the blood and molecular events leading to episomal DNA stabilization for persistent expression, findings that are consistent with previous observations in two model systems. Transgene-derived human factor VIII (hFVIII) protein activity mirrored native hFVIII in hemostatic ability. No inhibitor development, thromboses, deaths, or persistent changes in liver-function tests were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene therapy with AAV5-hFVIII-SQ vector in participants with hemophilia A resulted in sustained, clinically relevant benefit, as measured by a substantial reduction in annualized rates of bleeding events and complete cessation of prophylactic factor VIII use in all participants who had received 4×10¹³ vg per kilogram or 6×10¹³ vg per kilogram of the gene therapy. (Funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02576795; EudraCT number, 2014-003880-38.).

Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: Towards precision medicine

Patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) experience spontaneous limb- or life-threatening bleedings which are prevented by regular prophylactic intravenous infusions of the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX). Prophylaxis with subcutaneous long-acting non-factor products that improve in vivo thrombin generation is now under intensive investigation (concizumab, fitusiran) or successfully employed (emicizumab) in haemophilia patients. Both haemophilia patients with/without inhibitors take advantage of non-factor products employed alone. In those who also need bypassing agents (or FVIII concentrates) for breakthrough bleeds, thromboembolic events and/or thrombotic microangiopathy may occur. By enhancing thrombin generation, prothrombotic mutations co-segregating with FVIII/FIX gene mutations may trigger thrombotic episodes in HA patients carrying acquired thrombogenic factors (e.g. venous catheters). A thorough knowledge of individual needs increasingly contributed to improve comprehensive care and personalize treatments in haemophilia. Integrating genomics, lifestyle and environmental data is expected to be key to: 1) identify which haemophilia patients are less likely to benefit from a given intervention; 2) define optimal dosing and scheduling of bypassing agents (or FVIII) to employ in combination with non-factor products; 3) establish tests to monitor in vivo thrombin generation; 4) improve communication and deliver results to individuals. As individual outcomes will be improved and the risk of adverse events minimized, non-factor products will come into wider use within the haemophilia community, and patients will hopefully have no more risks of breakthrough bleeds. The risks of a normal life for a "former haemophilia patient" is likely to change the treatment landscape and the structure of haemophilia Centers.

The frequency of joint hemorrhages and procedures in nonsevere hemophilia A vs B

Data are needed on minimal factor activity (FA) levels required to prevent bleeding in hemophilia. We aimed to evaluate associations between hemophilia type and FA level and joint bleeding and orthopedic procedures using longitudinal data. Data were collected over an 11-year period on males with nonsevere hemophilia A or B without inhibitors who were receiving on-demand factor replacement therapy. Data on the number of joint bleeds in the previous 6 months and data on procedures from clinical records were analyzed using regression models. Data were collected on 4771 patients (hemophilia A, 3315; hemophilia B, 1456) from 19 979 clinic visits. Ages ranged from 2 to 91 years and baseline FA level ranged from 1% to 49% with a mean of 9.4%. Joint bleeding rates were heterogeneous across the FA range and were highest among men age 25 to 44 years. Adjusted for FA level, the mean number of joint bleeds per 6 months was 1.4 and 0.7 for patients with hemophilia A and B, respectively (P < .001). Regression models predicted 1.4 and 0.6 bleeds per year for hemophilia A and B patients, respectively, at an FA level of 15%. Patients with hemophilia B were 30% less likely than those with hemophilia A to have undergone an orthopedic procedure. We conclude that joint bleed rates for any given FA level were higher among hemophilia A than hemophilia B patients, and target FA levels of 15% are unlikely to prevent all joint bleeding in US males with hemophilia.

Advances in the Treatment of Hemophilia: Implications for Laboratory Testing

BACKGROUND

Until recently, clinical laboratories have monitored hemophilia treatment by measuring coagulation factors before/after infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Substantial changes are expected in the near future based on new therapeutic approaches that have been or are being developed.

CONTENT

Hemophilia treatment includes replacement therapy with human-derived/recombinant factors or treatment with bypassing agents for patients without or with inhibitors, respectively. Accordingly, laboratory methods for monitoring include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays meant to measure either factor VIII/IX or global coagulation tests to measure the effect of bypassing agents. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced for which discrepant results may be expected when measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are under development and are being tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods and therefore laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future.

SUMMARY

From the analysis of the current practice and literature, we draw the following conclusions: (a) Thrombin generation or thromboelastometry are the logical candidate assays to monitor bypassing agents. (b) Considerable differences are expected when measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, depending on whether one-stage or chromogenic assays are used. Although no definitive conclusions can presently be drawn, chromogenic assays are probably more suitable than one-stage clotting. (c) Novel drugs not based on coagulation factors such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab that are entering the market do require alternative methods that are not yet well established.

Desmopressin in moderate hemophilia A patients: a treatment worth considering

Desmopressin increases endogenous factor VIII levels in hemophilia A. Large inter-individual variation in the response to desmopressin is observed. Patients with a lower baseline factor VIII activity tend to show a reduced response, therefore, desmopressin is less frequently used in moderate hemophilia A patients (baseline factor VIII activity 1-5 international units/deciliter), even though factor VIII levels may rise substantially in some of them. We aim to describe the response to desmopressin in moderate hemophilia A patients and to identify predictors. We selected data on 169 patients with moderate hemophilia from the multicenter Response to DDAVP In non-severe hemophilia A patients: in Search for dEterminants (RISE) cohort study. Adequate response to desmopressin was defined as a peak factor VIII level ≥ 30, and excellent response as ≥ 50 international units/deciliter after desmopressin administration. We used univariate and multiple linear regression techniques to analyze predictors of the peak factor VIII level. Response was considered adequate in 68 patients (40%), of whom 25 showed excellent response (15%). Intravenous administration, age, pre-desmopressin factor VIII activity and von Willebrand factor antigen, peak von Willebrand factor activity and desmopressin-induced rise in von Willebrand factor antigen were significant predictors of peak factor VIII level and explained 65% of the inter-individual variation. In 40% of moderate hemophilia A patients, desmopressin response was adequate, thus it is important not to with-hold this group of patients from desmopressin responsiveness. Among the six predictors that we identified for desmopressin-induced factor VIII rise, factor VIII activity and desmopressin-induced rise in von Willebrand factor antigen had the strongest effect.

Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A

The evolution of hemophilia treatment and care is a fascinating one but has been fraught with many challenges at every turn. Over the last 50 years or so patients with hemophilia and providers have witnessed great advances in the treatment of this disease. With these advances, there has been a dramatic decrease in the mortality and morbidity associated with hemophilia. Even with the remarkable advancements in treatment, however, new and old challenges continue to plague the hemophilia community. The cost of factor replacement and the frequency of infusions, especially in patients with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis, remains a significant challenge for this population. Other challenges include obtaining reliable venous access, especially in younger patients, and the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). The development of extended half-life products, a bispecific antibody which mimics the coagulation function of factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibition of anticoagulation proteins such as antithrombin with antibodies, aptamers or RNA interference technology have offered novel therapeutic approaches to overcome some of these existing challenges. Additionally, ongoing gene therapy research offers a way to possibly cure hemophilia. These novel treatment tools in conjunction with the establishment of an increasing number of comprehensive hemophilia centers and worldwide advocacy efforts have continued to push the progress of hemophilia care to new frontiers. This review highlights and summarizes these novel therapeutic approaches and the current clinical progress of hemophilia A.