1
|
Martín-Oliveros A, Plaza Zamora J, Monaco A, Anitua Iriarte J, Schlageter J, Ducinskiene D, Donde S. Multidose Drug Dispensing in Community Healthcare Settings for Patients With Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2024; 61:469580241274268. [PMID: 39373170 PMCID: PMC11526267 DOI: 10.1177/00469580241274268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
Multidose drug dispensing (MDD) is the dispensing of different drugs in dose bags containing one, some, or all units of medicine that a patient needs to take at specific times. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the literature describing the use of MDD systems in community healthcare settings in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. A literature search identified 14 studies examining adherence, medication knowledge, quality of drug prescription (including inappropriate drug use, drug-drug interactions), medication incidents, and drug changes after MDD initiation, as well as healthcare professional (HCP) and patient perspectives. There are limited data on MDD in community healthcare settings, particularly on outcomes such as adherence. Studies are mostly from Northern Europe. Patients selected for MDD are more likely to be older, female, cognitively impaired, and have a higher number of disease diagnoses and drugs than those who do not receive drugs through MDD. MDD is generally initiated for patients who have decreased capacity for medication management. Several advantages of MDD have been reported by patients and HCPs, and studies indicate that MDD can be improved by medication review, defining clear roles and responsibilities of HCPs in the medication management chain, and comprehensive follow-up of patients. Future development, implementation, and assessment of MDD systems in community healthcare should be designed in collaboration with HCPs and patients, to identify ways to optimize the systems and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Plaza Zamora
- Spanish Society of Clinical, Family and Community Pharmacy (SEFAC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Komen JJ, Pottegård A, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Forslund T, Hjemdahl P, Wettermark B, Hellfritzsch M, Hallas J, Olesen M, Bennie M, Mueller T, Voss A, Schink T, Haug U, Kollhorst B, Karlstad Ø, Kjerpeseth LJ, Klungel OH. Persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation across five Western European countries. Europace 2021; 23:1722-1730. [PMID: 34096584 PMCID: PMC8576279 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in five Western European healthcare settings. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a multi-country observational cohort study, including 559 445 AF patients initiating NOAC therapy from Stockholm (Sweden), Denmark, Scotland, Norway, and Germany between 2011 and 2018. Patients were followed from their first prescription until they switched to a vitamin K antagonist, emigrated, died, or the end of follow-up. We measured persistence and adherence over time and defined adequate adherence as medication possession rate ≥90% among persistent patients only. RESULTS Overall, persistence declined to 82% after 1 year and to 63% after 5 years. When including restarters of NOAC treatment, 85% of the patients were treated with NOACs after 5 years. The proportion of patients with adequate adherence remained above 80% throughout follow-up. Persistence and adherence were similar between countries and was higher in patients starting treatment in later years. Both first year persistence and adherence were lower with dabigatran (persistence: 77%, adherence: 65%) compared with apixaban (86% and 75%) and rivaroxaban (83% and 75%) and were statistically lower after adjusting for patient characteristics. Adherence and persistence with dabigatran remained lower throughout follow-up. CONCLUSION Persistence and adherence were high among NOAC users in five Western European healthcare settings and increased in later years. Dabigatran use was associated with slightly lower persistence and adherence compared with apixaban and rivaroxaban.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris J Komen
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Healthcare Development, Stockholm Region, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anton Pottegård
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tomas Forslund
- Department of Healthcare Development, Stockholm Region, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul Hjemdahl
- Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Björn Wettermark
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology & Social Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maja Hellfritzsch
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jesper Hallas
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Morten Olesen
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marion Bennie
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.,Public Health and Intelligence Strategic Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanja Mueller
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Annemarie Voss
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Tania Schink
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.,Faculty of Human and Life Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Bianca Kollhorst
- Department of Biometry and Data Management, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Øystein Karlstad
- Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars J Kjerpeseth
- Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olaf H Klungel
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mertens BJ, Kwint H, Belitser SV, van der Meer FJM, van Marum RJ, Bouvy ML. Effect of multidose drug dispensing on the time in therapeutic range in patients using vitamin-K antagonists: A randomized controlled trial. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18:70-78. [PMID: 31469508 PMCID: PMC6972487 DOI: 10.1111/jth.14625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high number of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) users have a low proportion of time in therapeutic range (TTR) resulting in a high number of bleeding and thromboembolism events. OBJECTIVE Can the quality of anticoagulation be improved by dispensing VKAs via multidose drug dispensing (MDD). METHOD A randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. Patients who used VKAs, ≥65 years of age with a TTR <65% were eligible for inclusion. All oral drugs were dispensed via MDD. In MDD systems, all oral chronic medication intended for one dosing moment is packed in plastic disposable pouches. Controls received VKAs by manual dispensing. The difference in TTR between the 6 months after- and 6 months before the index date. A mixed-effects model with the intervention, TTR before the index date, MDD system at baseline as covariates, and pharmacy as random effect. A per-protocol analysis was performed with all patients who completed the study as intended. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included. Mean age was 80.0 (SD 6.9) years. Mean TTR during the study was 79.2 ± 18.0% in the intervention group and 72.5 ± 20.1% in the control group. The intervention resulted in a 5.6% (95% CI: 0.1-11.1) increase in TTR compared to the control group. Per-protocol analysis resulted in an 8.3% (95% CI: 0.99-15.61) increase in TTR compared to the control group. No differences in reduction were observed between the intervention and control group. CONCLUSION The quality of anticoagulation can be improved with the use of MDD systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram J. Mertens
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and PolicyLeidenthe Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical PharmacologyUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Henk‐Frans Kwint
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and PolicyLeidenthe Netherlands
| | - Svetlana V. Belitser
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical PharmacologyUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| | | | - Rob J. van Marum
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care MedicineEMGO Institute for Health and Care ResearchVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Marcel L. Bouvy
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and PolicyLeidenthe Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical PharmacologyUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity UtrechtUtrechtthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|