Examining international practices in the management of pregnant women with von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. The disorder is characterized by excessive mucocutaneous bleeding. The most common bleeding manifestations of this condition include nosebleeds, bruising, bleeding from minor wounds, menorrhagia or postpartum bleeding in women as well as bleeding after surgery. Other less frequent symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding, haematomas or haemarthroses. VWD pathophysiology is complex and results from defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein. Quantitative deficiencies are responsible for type 1 VWD with a partial decrease of VWF and type 3 with the complete absence of VWF. Qualitative abnormalities cause type 2 VWD, being further divided into types 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N. Although common, VWD is at risk of misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis owing to several factors, including complex diagnosis, variability of bleeding symptoms, presence of external variables (blood groups and other physiological modifiers such as exercise, thyroid hormones, oestrogens, and ageing), and lack of disease awareness among non-specialist health-care providers. Establishing the correct VWD diagnosis requires an array of specialized phenotypic assays and/or molecular genetic testing of the VWF gene. The management of bleeding includes increasing endogenous VWF levels with desmopressin or infusion of exogenous VWF concentrates (plasma-derived or recombinant). Fibrinolytic inhibitors, topical haemostatic agents and hormonal therapies are used as effective adjunctive measures.

Hemostatic management of von Willebrand disease during childbirth with a plasma-derived von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrate

BACKGROUND

Females with von Willebrand disease (VWD) do not show the same increases in von Willebrand factor and factor (F)VIII levels during pregnancy as females without VWD and are at higher risk of excessive bleeding associated with childbirth. Data on hemostatic management for childbirth in VWD patients are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the dosing, efficacy, and safety of plasma-derived von Willebrand factor/FVIII (wilate) for prevention of excessive bleeding associated with childbirth in females with any type of VWD.

METHODS

Data for females with VWD who received wilate for hemostatic coverage for childbirth during 2 prospective clinical studies were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ten females with VWD and a mean age at enrolment of 29.6 years were treated with wilate to prevent excessive bleeding associated with childbirth. Two patients had type 1, 4 had type 2 (2 2A, 1 2B, and 1 2M), and 4 had type 3 VWD. Of the 10 deliveries, 5 were by cesarean section. Patients received a mean of 9.5 infusions of wilate over 6.8 exposure days, with a mean total dose of 234 IU/kg per delivery and 25 IU/kg per infusion. Hemostatic management for all deliveries was rated excellent or good, with no excessive bleeding during delivery and no postpartum bleeding during the period of wilate treatment in any patient. Two patients experienced 8 possible or probable treatment-related adverse events; all were mild or moderate and resolved. No thromboembolic events were observed.

CONCLUSION

The results of this case series indicate that wilate provided effective hemostatic cover for childbirth in females with VWD during delivery and postpartum.

Targeting a higher plasma VWF level at time of delivery in pregnant individuals with von Willebrand disease: Outcomes at a single-institution cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines on the management of pregnant individuals with von Willebrand disease (VWD) at the time of delivery recommend that von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII:C (FVIII:C) levels be ≥50% to prevent postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). Yet, high PPH rates persist despite these levels or with prophylactic factor replacement therapy to achieve these levels.

AIMS

The current practice at our centre has been to target peak plasma VWF and FVIII:C levels of ≥100 IU/dL at time of delivery. The objective of this study was to describe obstetric outcomes in pregnant individuals with VWD who were managed at our centre.

METHODS

Demographics and outcomes on pregnant individuals with VWD who delivered between January 2015 and April 2023 were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-seven singleton deliveries (among 41 individuals) resulting in 46 live births and one foetal death were included. Twenty-one individuals had at least one prior birth by the start date of this study, of which 11 (52.4%) self-reported a history of PPH. Early PPH occurred in 12.8% (6/47) of deliveries. Two individuals required blood transfusion, of which one also had an unplanned hysterectomy and transfer to ICU. There were no thrombotic events reported.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of targeting higher peak plasma VWF and FVIII:C levels (≥100 IU/dL) at the time of delivery may be effective in reducing the risk of delivery-associated bleeding complications in VWD patients. Yet, the rate of early PPH remains unsatisfactory compared to the non-VWD population.

Beyond the guidelines: how we approach challenging scenarios in the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease

Although von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its diagnosis and management are often challenging. Clinical practice guidelines, developed through systematic review of the medical literature and considering the best available evidence, provide guidance for common clinical scenarios. However, in the clinical setting, patients often present with characteristics and nuances that may fall outside the realm of available evidence and guidelines, and hence, shared decision-making will be essential in the evaluation and management of these patients. The challenges in the diagnosis of VWD are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the disorder, limitations of laboratory assays, and the significant impact of various physiologic processes on von Willebrand factor. The impact of physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor, which may occur in various settings such as pregnancy, inflammation, or aging, remains uncertain, as is the optimal management in these scenarios. Multidisciplinary and individualized care, based on evolving evidence supported by clinicians, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders, will be needed to ensure the highest quality care for those who live with VWD.

Challenges in the management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period: evidence from literature and data from an international registry and physicians' survey-communication from the Scientific and Standardization Committees of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

BACKGROUND

Management of women with type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) during pregnancy is challenging because of dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and the complexity resulting from discrepant VWF/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) levels, impaired platelet-dependent VWF activity, progressive thrombocytopenia, and risks associated with the use of desmopressin. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examined the current diagnostic and management approaches and outcomes in women with VWD during pregnancy.

METHODS

Data were collected via 3 avenues: literature review, an international registry, and an international survey on physicians' practices for the management of pregnancy in women with VWD. The registry and survey were supported by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

RESULTS

Data on clinical and laboratory features, management and bleeding complications, and pregnancy outcomes of a total of 55 pregnancies from 49 women across the globe (literature: 35, registry: 20) and data reported by 112 physicians were analyzed. We describe the largest dataset on pregnancies in women with type 2B VWD available to date. The data highlight the following key issues: a) bleeding complications remain a concern in these patients, b) the target safe VWF level and the ideal monitoring approach are unknown, c) there is a wide range of hemostatic management practices in the type and timing of treatment, and d) physicians have diverse views on the mode of delivery and use of neuraxial anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that an international consensus and guidance are critically required for better care and improved outcomes in this patient cohort.

What have we learned about the patient's experience of von Willebrand disease? A focus on women

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder (IBD), disproportionately affects females, given the hemostatic challenges they may encounter throughout their lifetimes. Despite this, research about VWD remains grossly underrepresented, particularly compared to hemophilia, which is historically diagnosed in males. Structural sexism, stigmatization of menstrual bleeding, delayed diagnosis, and a lack of timely access to care result in an increased frequency of bleeding events, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and a decreased quality of life. However, we are only beginning to recognize and acknowledge the magnitude of the burden of this disease. With an increasing number of studies documenting the experiences of women with IBDs and recent international guidelines suggesting changes to optimal management, a paradigm shift in recognition and treatment is taking place. Here, we present a fictional patient case to illustrate one woman's history of bleeding. We review the evidence describing the impact of VWD on quality of life, normalization of vaginal bleeding, diagnostic delays, and the importance of access to multidisciplinary care. Furthermore, we discuss considerations around reproductive decision-making and the intergenerational nature of bleeding, which often renders patients as caregivers. Through incorporating the patient perspective, we argue for an equitable and compassionate path to overcome decades of silence, misrecognition, and dismissal. This path moves toward destigmatization, open dialogue, and timely access to specialized care.

Managing Pregnant Women with Hemophilia and von Willebrand Disease: How Do We Provide Optimum Care and Prevent Complications?

The challenge of pregnancy can be significant to the point of being life-threatening in a woman with a bleeding disorder. Additionally there can be a risk to the fetus and the neonate. A hemostatic defect can affect the course of the pregnancy, but the impact is most feared around delivery in the immediate and the extended post partum period, requiring rapid identification and prompt referral to a hematologist for assistance in management. Identifying the type of congenital bleeding disorder and knowing its inheritance pattern is crucial during counseling prior to conception and in preparation for delivery. A comprehensive approach by a specialized and experienced team in a tertiary care center with access to adequate laboratory monitoring and therapies can facilitate the process. The multidisciplinary team should include a hematologist, an obstetrician, a pediatric hematologist, an anesthesiologist, and in select cases a clinical geneticist and a maternal fetal medicine specialist. In this review article, we will detail the diagnostic path and management of pregnancy and delivery in women with some inherited bleeding disorders, in particular those affected by hemophilia A (HA), hemophilia B (HB), and von Willebrand disease (VWD).

JTH in Clinic - Obstetric bleeding: VWD and other inherited bleeding disorders

Individuals with inherited bleeding disorders (IBDs) have higher bleeding risk during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. Clinical management requires recognition of the IBD as high risk for postpartum hemorrhage and a personalized multidisciplinary approach that includes the patient in decision making. When the fetus is known or at risk to inherit a bleeding disorder, fetal and neonatal bleeding risk also need to be considered. In pregnant IBD patients, it is common for providers to need to make decisions in the absence of high level of certainty evidence. We here present the case of a pregnant von Willebrand disease patient that reached multiple decision points where there is currently clinical ambiguity due to a lack of high level of certainty evidence. For each stage of her care, from diagnosis to the postpartum period, we discuss current literature and describe our approach. This is followed by a brief overview of considerations in other IBDs and pregnancy.