Dose tapering to withdrawal stage and long-term efficacy and safety of hetrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: Results from an open-label extension study

Switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia: a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized phase III trial

While studies have explored the feasibility of switching between various thrombopoietin receptor agonists in treating immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), data on the switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag remains scarce. This post-hoc analysis of a phase III hetrombopag trial aimed to assess the outcomes of ITP patients who switched from eltrombopag to hetrombopag. In the original phase III trial, patients initially randomized to the placebo group were switched to eltrombopag. Those who completed this 14-week eltrombopag were eligible to switch to a 24-week hetrombopag. Treatment response, defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L, and safety were evaluated before and after the switch. Sixty-three patients who completed the 14-week eltrombopag and switched to hetrombopag were included in this post-hoc analysis. Response rates before and after the switch were 66.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Among those with pre-switching platelet counts below 30 × 109/L, eight out of 12 patients (66.7%) responded, while eight out of nine patients (88.9%) with pre-switching platelet counts between 30 × 109/L and 50 × 109/L responded post-switching. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 50.8% of patients during eltrombopag treatment and 38.1% during hetrombopag treatment. No severe adverse events were noted during hetrombopag treatment. Switching from eltrombopag to hetrombopag in ITP management appears to be effective and well-tolerated. Notably, hetrombopag yielded high response rates, even among patients who had previously shown limited response to eltrombopag. However, these observations need to be confirmed in future trials.

Hetrombopag plus recombinant human thrombopoietin for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common hematological complication in patients with cancer. Hetrombopag is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has shown an additive effect in stimulating platelet production when combined with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO).

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag plus rhTPO compared with rhTPO alone for CIT.

METHODS

A total of 294 patients with solid tumors and CIT (platelet count, <50 × 109/L) who received either rhTPO plus hetrombopag (146 patients) or rhTPO alone (148 patients) at 3 centers from January to December 2022 were included in the study. The primary outcome was a platelet count at least 50 × 109/L higher than the baseline value within 14 days. Chemotherapy dose reductions/delays, bleeding, and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (82.2%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group vs 100 patients (67.6%) in the rhTPO group achieved the primary outcome (P = .005). This significant difference persisted in adjusted analysis (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.12-3.60). A total of 115 patients (78.8%) in the rhTPO-hetrombopag group and 101 patients (68.2%) in the rhTPO group avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/delays (P = .041). There was no significant difference in bleeding rates, and adverse events were mild and similar between the 2 groups. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Compared to rhTPO alone, our findings suggest that the combination of hetrombopag and rhTPO is safe and more effective in patients with CIT.

Recent progress in ITP treatment

In this review, the recently approved drugs avatrombopag and fostamatinib, which were not extensively covered within 2019 international recommendations for ITP, will be discussed in some detail. Avatrombopag appears more convenient than eltrombopag as it does not require dietary restrictions or subcutaneous administration like romiplostim. However, data on quality of life (QoL) are lacking and the rate of thromboembolic events in exposed patients is not negligible. Efficacy of fostamatinib, an inhibitor of macrophagic activity, is supported by placebo-controlled trials in patients refractory to several therapies, including TPO-RA. While hypertension and diarrhea have been reported, only one minor thrombotic event occurred in 146 exposed patients. In addition, several new treatment combinations and new agents entered clinical investigation in recent years. In a UK trial, combining mycophenolate mofetil with corticosteroids as first line therapy was more effective than corticosteroids alone, but at the cost of worse QoL. No combination, including oseltamivir or all-trans retinoic acid or danazol, resulted in convincing evidence of superior efficacy and safety when used in first or later lines of treatment. Agents targeting specific mechanisms are also discussed: sutimlimab (complement inhibitor); rilzabrutinib (BTK inhibitor) and efgartigimod (modified Fc fragment inhibiting FcRn). Only efgartigimod has completed phase 3 investigation.

A bibliometric analysis of primary immune thrombocytopenia from 2011 to 2021

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. This bibliometric analysis was applied to identify the characteristics of global scientific output, the hotspots, and frontiers of ITP over the past 10 years. We retrieved publications from 2011 to 2021 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometrix package, VOSviewer, and Citespace were used to analyse and visualize the trend, distribution, and hotspots of research on ITP. Altogether, there were 2084 papers, written by 9080 authors from 410 organizations in 70 countries/regions, published in 456 journals with 37 160 co-cited references. In the last decades, the most productive journal was British Journal of Haematology, China was the most productive country. and the most cited journal was Blood. Shandong University was the most productive institution in the field of ITP. NEUNERT C, 2011, BLOOD, CHENG G, 2011, LANCET, and PATEL VL, 2012, BLOOD were the top three most cited documents. "Thrombopoietin receptor agonist", "regulatory T cell" and "sialic acid" were three hotspots of the last decade. And "immature platelet fraction", "Th17", and "fostamatinib" would be research frontiers in the feature. The present study provided a novel insight for future research directions and scientific decision-making.

Novel Therapies to Address Unmet Needs in ITP

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder that causes low platelet counts and subsequent bleeding risk. Although current corticosteroid-based ITP therapies are able to improve platelet counts, up to 70% of subjects with an ITP diagnosis do not achieve a sustained clinical response in the absence of treatment, thus requiring a second-line therapy option as well as additional care to prevent bleeding. Less than 40% of patients treated with thrombopoietin analogs, 60% of those treated with splenectomy, and 20% or fewer of those treated with rituximab or fostamatinib reach sustained remission in the absence of treatment. Therefore, optimizing therapeutic options for ITP management is mandatory. The pathophysiology of ITP is complex and involves several mechanisms that are apparently unrelated. These include the clearance of autoantibody-coated platelets by splenic macrophages or by the complement system, hepatic desialylated platelet destruction, and the inhibition of platelet production from megakaryocytes. The number of pathways involved may challenge treatment, but, at the same time, offer the possibility of unveiling a variety of new targets as the knowledge of the involved mechanisms progresses. The aim of this work, after revising the limitations of the current treatments, is to perform a thorough review of the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and development stage of the novel ITP therapies under investigation. Hopefully, several of the options included herein may allow us to personalize ITP management according to the needs of each patient in the near future.

A multicenter phase II study on the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag in patients with severe aplastic anemia refractory to immunosuppressive therapy

Background:

In this single-arm phase II study (NCT03557099), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of hetrombopag, a small molecule thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who were refractory to standard first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST).

Methods:

SAA patients who were refractory to standard first-line IST were given hetrombopag orally at an initial dose of 7.5 mg once daily to a maximum of 15 mg once daily, for a total of 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving hematologic responses in ⩾1 lineage at week 18.

Results:

A total of 55 eligible patients were enrolled and received hetrombopag treatment. This study met its primary endpoint, with 23 [41.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 28.7–55.9] patients achieving hematologic response in ⩾1 lineage at week 18 after initiation of hetrombopag treatment. Twenty-four (43.6%, 95% CI = 30.3–57.7) and 27 (49.1%, 95% CI = 35.4–62.9) of the 55 patients responded in ⩾1 lineage at weeks 24 and 52, respectively. Median time to initial hematologic response was 7.9 weeks (range = 2.0–32.1). The responses were durable, with a 12-month relapse-free survival rate of 82.2% (95% CI = 62.2–92.2). Adverse events occurred in 54 (98.2%) patients, and 28 (50.9%) patients had treatment-related adverse events. Seventeen (30.9%) patients had adverse events of grade ⩾3. Serious adverse events occurred in 15 (27.3%) patients and three deaths (5.5%) were reported.

Conclusion:

Hetrombopag showed encouraging efficacy with durable hematologic responses in patients with SAA who were refractory to IST. Hetrombopag was well tolerant and safe for long-term use.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

NCT03557099