Predicting bleeding after liver biopsy using comprehensive clinical and laboratory investigations: A prospective analysis of 302 procedures

What is the Safe Observation Period for Image-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsies?

PURPOSE

Current observation period post-liver biopsy is typically 4 h. This study investigates the safety of reducing the observation period after percutaneous liver biopsy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in the Radiology Department of a tertiary centre were included in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patient demographics, procedure details and complication data were collected from the electronic medical records. Complications were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification. Conditional survival probabilities were calculated for the 4-h observation period.

RESULTS

Among 1125 patients, 275 complications were seen; 255 grade 1, 15 grade 2 and five grade 3. Post-procedural pain represented 93% (256) of complications, whereas post-procedural haemorrhage occurred in 17 (6%) patients: 13 were of grade 2 severity requiring prolonged observation, and 4 were of grade 3 severity. Of these grade 3 complications, two required blood transfusion whereas two required embolization. A total of 215 (78%) complications occurred within 1 h, 244 (89%) within 2 h of observation. 16 (94%) of 17 post-procedural haemorrhages occurred within 2 h post-biopsy. If complication-free after 2 h, the probability of experiencing a complication within the next 2 h was 4%.

CONCLUSION

The majority of complications were identified within 2 h of observation. Complications recognised after this period were largely pain-related, with only one grade 3 complication seen (post-procedural haemorrhage).Our findings suggest 2 h of post-procedural observation may be safe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2B, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Rotational thromboelastometry predicts future bleeding events in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis of the liver are in a delicate state of rebalanced haemostasis and are at risk of developing both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Conventional haemostatic tests are unable to predict bleeding and thrombosis in these patients. We aimed to explore the role of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in predicting bleeding and thrombotic events in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two metropolitan hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis and were then followed to record any bleeding and thrombotic events. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore associations with bleeding and thrombotic events.

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 162 patients recruited experienced a bleeding event within one year of ROTEM analysis. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in patients who had a bleeding event, compared to those who did not (50 mm vs. 57 mm, p < 0.01 and 48 mm vs. 54 mm, p < 0.01, respectively). In addition, on univariate analysis, clotting time (CT) in the INTEM test was prolonged in the bleeding group (214 s vs. 198 s, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, only MCFEX was a significant predictor of bleeding events. In contrast, there was no association found between ROTEM parameters and development of thrombosis within a one-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

ROTEM may provide a useful tool in predicting future bleeding events in patients with cirrhosis. Larger studies are required to further validate this finding and explore its application in clinical practice.

Expert opinion on bleeding risk from invasive procedures in cirrhosis

Background & Aims

Despite several recent international guidelines, no consensus exists on the bleeding risk nor haemostatic parameter thresholds that define the safety of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to establish a position paper on the bleeding risk associated with invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis among the experts involved in various guidelines.

Methods

All experts involved in recent guidelines on the management of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis were invited to classify 80 procedures as "high risk" or "low risk" with respect to bleeding. Procedures were considered high risk when the estimated risk of major bleeding was 1.5% or more, or when even minor bleeding might lead to significant morbidity or death. The experts were also asked to choose safety thresholds for laboratory test values at which elective invasive procedures could be safely performed. The predetermined threshold considered as "consensus" was ≥75% agreement.

Results

Fifty-two experts participated in the study. Out of 80 procedures, a consensus opinion was reached for 52 procedures (65%): 17 procedures were classified as "high risk", primarily interventional endoscopic procedures, percutaneous organ biopsies, or procedures involving the central nervous system; and 35 as "low risk", primarily "diagnostic" procedures. The lowest platelet counts at which performance of a low-risk procedure or a high-risk procedure/surgery were deemed acceptable were 30 × 109/L and 50 × 109/L, respectively. Experts did not believe that international normalised ratio should be considered before performing low-risk procedures; 71% also indicated that it should not be considered before performing high-risk procedures.

Conclusions

This experience-based classification may be helpful to refine future study designs and to guide clinical decision making regarding invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis.

Impact and implications

Several risk classifications and management guidelines for invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis have been proposed, but with conflicting recommendations. By providing a position paper, based on the opinion of a broad panel of experts, on the bleeding risk associated with 52 invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis, this survey will help to provide a framework for future study design. The consensus on platelet count, international normalised ratio, fibrinogen and activated partial thromboplastin time identified in this survey will inform physicians regarding the laboratory test values considered acceptable by the experts prior to the performance of an elective invasive procedure in patients with cirrhosis.

Treating periprocedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis are known to have an abnormal coagulation status, which is a particular concern when planning invasive procedures in which blood loss is possible or predictable. Careful consideration must be given to the bleeding risk for each individual patient and coagulation management strategies should be established in advance of procedural interventions, where possible. Perioperative clinical decision-making should utilize viscoelastic testing in addition to usual assessments, where possible, and focus on the well-established three pillars of patient blood management: optimization of erythropoiesis, minimization of bleeding and blood loss, and management of anemia. Restrictive transfusion policies, careful hemostatic monitoring, and a proactive approach to predicting and preventing bleeding on an individual patient basis should be central to managing perioperative bleeding in the fragile patient population with cirrhosis. This review discusses coagulation assessments and bleeding management techniques necessary before, during, and after surgical interventions in patients with cirrhosis, and provides expert clinical opinion and physician experience on the perioperative management of these patients.

Whole blood thrombin generation shows a significant hypocoagulable state in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with cirrhosis have a normal to increased thrombin generation (TG) capacity in platelet-poor plasma (PPP). By reflecting the contribution of all circulating blood cells, whole blood (WB) TG may allow a more physiological assessment of coagulation.

OBJECTIVES

We compared WB-TG vs PPP-TG in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Assessment of coagulation included routine tests, factor VIII, natural anticoagulants, PPP-TG, and WB-TG. TG assays were performed with and without thrombomodulin. Twenty-five healthy subjects were included as controls.

RESULTS

We included 108 patients (Child-Pugh A/B/C, 44/24/40). Compared with controls, patients had significantly lower platelet count, longer international normalized ratio, higher FVIII, and lower levels of protein C/S and antithrombin. Regarding thrombomodulin-modified TG assays, in compensated cirrhosis, both PPP-TG and WB-TG indicated an increased TG capacity, as reflected by an endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) significantly higher than controls. In contrast, in decompensated cirrhosis, PPP-TG indicated a hypercoagulable state with increased ETP, higher peak height, and shorter time-to-peak than controls, whereas WB-TG revealed a progressive impairment of TG kinetics and total capacity, ultimately resulting in a profound hypocoagulable state in patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (ie, significant prolongation of lag time and time-to-peak with reduction of both ETP and peak height). In decompensated patients, bacterial infections and severity of anemia were associated with a further reduction of both ETP and peak height.

CONCLUSION

Compensated cirrhosis is associated with an increased TG capacity. In decompensated cirrhosis, contrary to PPP-TG, which indicates hypercoagulability, WB-TG shows a significant hypocoagulable state. The clinical value of these findings deserves further investigation.

The evolving knowledge on primary hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis: A comprehensive review

Patients with cirrhosis develop complex alterations in primary hemostasis that include both hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable features. This includes thrombocytopenia, multiple alterations of platelet function, and increased plasma levels of von Willebrand factor. Contrary to the historical view that platelet dysfunction in cirrhosis might be responsible for an increased bleeding tendency, the current theory posits a rebalanced hemostasis in patients with cirrhosis. Severe thrombocytopenia is not indicative of the bleeding risk in patients undergoing invasive procedures and does not dictate per se the need for pre-procedural prophylaxis. A more comprehensive and individualized risk assessment should combine hemostatic impairment, the severity of decompensation and systemic inflammation, and the presence of additional factors that may impair platelet function, such as acute kidney injury and bacterial infections. Although there are multiple, complex alterations of platelet function in cirrhosis, their net effect is not yet fully understood. More investigations evaluating the association between alterations of platelet function and bleeding/thrombosis may improve risk stratification in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Besides hemostasis, the assessment of von Willebrand factor Ag and ADP-induced, whole-blood platelet aggregation normalized by platelet count (VITRO score and PLT ratio) are promising biomarkers to predict the risk of hepatic decompensation and survival in both compensated and decompensated patients. Further investigations into the in vivo interplay between platelets, circulating blood elements, and endothelial cells may help advance our understanding of cirrhotic coagulopathy. Here, we review the complex changes in platelets and primary hemostasis in cirrhosis and their potential clinical implications.

How to manage hemostasis in patients with liver disease during interventions

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease (CLD) often need procedures to both treat and prevent complications of portal hypertension such as ascites or gastrointestinal bleeding. Abnormal results for hemostatic tests, such as prolonged prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and/or thrombocytopenia, are commonly encountered, raising concerns about increased bleeding risk and leading to transfusion to attempt to correct prior to interventions. However hemostatic markers are poor predictors of bleeding risk in CLD, and routine correction, particularly with fresh frozen plasma and routine platelet transfusions, should be avoided. This narrative review discusses the hemostatic management of patients with CLD using 2 case descriptions.

Transjugular liver biopsy: enlarge the indications for liver biopsy with reliable diagnostic quality

BACKGROUND

Complications and diagnostic efficiency for liver biopsy are main concerns for clinicians. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) compared with percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) when patients had equal level of liver function and number of passes, using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

The clinical and pathological data of patients who received TJLB or PLB between January 2012 and October 2022 were collected. Matching factors included age, gender, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, liver function, creatinine, number of passes, hemodialysis, history of anti-coagulation and anti-platelet, and comorbidities. Coagulation indexes were not considered as matching factors due to different indications of the two techniques.

RESULTS

2711 PLBs and 30 TJLBs were evaluated. By PSM, 75 patients (50 PLBs, 25 TJLBs) were matched. The complication rates for TJLB and PLB were 4.0% (1/25) and 10.0% (5/50) (P > 0.05). Two PLBs had hepatic hemorrhage, one of which required only close monitoring (Grade 1) and the other needed hemostasis and rehydration therapy (Grade 2). The other 3 cases presented with mild abdominal pain (Grade 1). And only one TJLB presented with mild pain. The median number of complete portal tracts were 6.0 and 10.0 for TJLBs and PLBs (P < 0.05). Moreover, the median length of sample for TJLBs and PLBs were 10.0 and 16.5 mm (P < 0.05). The diagnostic efficiency of hepatopathy of unknown etiology of TJLB versus PLB groups before and after matching were 96.4% vs. 94.1% and 95.7% vs. 93.2%, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TJLB is an effective invasive diagnostic procedure that expands indications for liver biopsy with reliable diagnostic quality.

[Structural, procedural, and personnel requirements for cross-sectoral provision of endoscopic gastroenterological procedures]

Gastroenterology has made crucial advances in diagnostic and interventional endoscopic procedures, opening up improvements in the treatment of many patients. Thus, organ-preserving treatments are increasingly being made possible, replacing more invasive organ resecting surgical procedures. At the same time, the degree of complexity and risks varies widely between different endoscopic procedures. In many cases, simpler endoscopic procedures are now offered on an outpatient basis. Further potential for cross-sectoral performance of endoscopic procedures exists in the case of complex endoscopic procedures, which, however, require special structural, procedural and personnel requirements in order to provide quality-assured treatment, enable post-interventional monitoring and, if necessary, take measures to ensure the success of the treatment. We summarize the essential prerequisites and limitations for cross-sector performance of endoscopic procedures in gastroenterology.

Bleeding and Thrombotic Complications in Patients With Cirrhosis: A State-of-the-Art Appraisal

Much has evolved over the past 25 years regarding our understanding of the coagulopathy of liver disease. Paradoxically, this form of coagulopathy is relatively hypercoagulability despite the common clinical impression of a hemorrhagic tendency. The latter is largely driven by portal-mesenteric venous pressure (ie, portal hypertension) and has little to do with hemostatic pathways. It cannot be emphasized enough that the INR does not offer a meaningful measure in this situation and may lead to interventions such as fresh frozen plasma that can actually worsen portal pressure and hence pressure-driven bleeding. With regard to procedure-related bleeding, we point out substantial differences in the definition of high-risk procedures and propose a new operational definition dependent on the applicability of local hemostatic measures, although this requires further investigation. The common occurrence of venous thrombosis in these patients requires careful consideration of hemostatic pathways and overall risk and benefit of intervention. The decision regarding anticoagulation therapy needs to be driven not only by a global assessment including history of non-portal hypertensive-related bleeding, but also by fall risk which can result in head trauma in patients prone to encephalopathy. This is probably best estimated by frailty but has yet to be adequately investigated. In the background of these concerns, several superimposed and complex conditions including infections and renal dysfunction should be taken into account. Inherited forms of thrombophilia in the setting of cirrhosis perhaps do not outweigh the thrombophilia inherent to liver disease but warrant further consideration.

Predicting bleeding after liver biopsy using comprehensive clinical and laboratory investigations: A prospective analysis of 302 procedures

BACKGROUND

Liver biopsy carries a small risk of bleeding complications. No validated clinical or laboratory tool helps predict liver biopsy-related bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether global hemostasis tests and/or a clinical questionnaire could identify patients at risk of liver biopsy-related bleeding.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Consecutive patients scheduled for liver biopsy with an overnight hospital stay were prospectively included. Before liver biopsy, routine hemostasis tests, Platelet Function Analyzer 100, thromboelastometry, thrombin generation assay, plasma clot lysis time, and a clinical questionnaire were performed. Bleeding was defined as a liver hematoma or new free fluid on a systematic ultrasound performed 24 h after liver biopsy or a decrease in hemoglobin level of 2 g/dL or more in patients with pre-existing free fluid in the abdominal cavity.

RESULTS

Three hundred two patients were included: 173 underwent percutaneous and 129 transjugular liver biopsy. There were 21 bleeding episodes (7%); 20 based on ultrasonographic criteria, 1 on laboratory criteria. None of the hemostasis tests and no item of the clinical questionnaire were associated with liver biopsy-related bleeding in the overall study group. Same results were obtained in subgroup analyses focusing on patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy, transjugular liver biopsy, or on patients with cirrhosis. Pain 2 h after liver biopsy was more frequent in patients with liver biopsy-related bleeding (55% vs. 23% p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

An extensive hemostasis workup, including global hemostasis assays, does not improve prediction of liver biopsy-related bleeding. Pain 2 h after liver biopsy should alert the clinician to the possibility of procedure-related bleeding.