Re-treatment for severe hepatitis flare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: An appraisal with combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics

Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Risks and Benefits

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major threat to global public health, affecting 296 million people worldwide. Although there is no curative treatment for CHB today, the virus can be effectively controlled with current antiviral treatment strategies. Since HBsAg loss can rarely (1%) be achieved with current nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) options, lifelong treatment is usually required in HBeAg-negative patients. In recent years, guidelines have stated that long-term NA treatments can be discontinued for HBeAg-negative patients without achieving HBsAg loss. There is no general consensus on how discontinuation of NA can be included in the treatment approach. This review aimed to evaluate the current literature regarding the discontinuation of NA treatment in HBeAg-negative patients. Patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who have a higher chance of response after discontinuation of NA therapy can be defined as non-cirrhotic patients who have low HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels at the discontinuation of treatment and accept close follow-up. The management of relapses that develop after NA discontinuation in patients is also unclear. The agent used in NA treatment itself may also affect the pattern of relapse development. Relapse after NA treatment occurs significantly slower and less frequently with entecavir compared to other regimens, including tenofovir dipivoxil. Prospective studies are needed in order to maintain the chance of HBsAg clearance in case of exacerbation and to treat acute exacerbations that can be fatal in a timely manner. Algorithms to be developed for use after discontinuation of NA treatment will help the clinician manage the patient safely.

Safety considerations for withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B: First, do no harm

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are widely used to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but they cannot eradicate the virus and treatment duration can be lifelong if the endpoint is set at seroclearance of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). As an alternative strategy, finite NA therapy without the prerequisite of HBsAg seroclearance has been proposed to allow treatment cessation in patients with sustained undetectable HBV viremia for two to three years. However, reactivation of viral replication almost always follows NA withdrawal. Whereas HBV reactivation might facilitate HBsAg seroclearance in some, it could lead to serious acute flare-ups in a certain proportion of patients. Occurrence and consequences of NA withdrawal flares are complicated with various factors involving the virus, host, and treatment. Accurate risk prediction for severe flares following NA cessation is essential to ensure patient safety. The risks of life-threatening flares in patients who discontinued NA according to the stopping rules of current guidelines or local reimbursement policies have recently been quantitatively estimated in large-scale studies, which also provided empirical evidence to help identify vulnerable patients at risk of devastating outcomes. Moreover, risk predictors were further explored and validated to hopefully aid in patient selection and management. In this narrative review with a focus on patient safety, we summarize and discuss current literature on the incidence of severe flares following NA cessation, risk stratification for candidate selection, rules of posttreatment monitoring, and indications for treatment resumption. We also share our thoughts on the limitations of existing knowledge and suggestions for future research.

Past, present, and future of long-term treatment for hepatitis B virus

The estimated world prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is 316 million. HBV infection was identified in 1963 and nowadays is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite universal vaccination programs, and effective antiviral therapy. Long-term administration of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) has been the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis B during the last decades. The NA has shown a good safety profile and high efficacy in controlling viral replication, improving histology, and decreasing the HCC incidence, decompensation, and mortality. However, the low probability of HBV surface antigen seroclearance made necessary an indefinite treatment. The knowledge, in recent years, about the different phases of the viral cycle, and the new insights into the role of the immune system have yielded an increase in new therapeutic approaches. Consequently, several clinical trials evaluating combinations of new drugs with different mechanisms of action are ongoing with promising results. This integrative literature review aims to assess the knowledge and major advances from the past of hepatitis B, the present of NA treatment and withdrawal, and the future perspectives with combined molecules to achieve a functional cure.

Hepatitis B flare: the good, the bad and the ugly

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B flare, defined as an event of abrupt ALT elevation to >5x ULN, is a frequent episode during the natural course or during/after antiviral therapy of chronic HBV infection, in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B or liver cirrhosis.

AREAS COVERED

The definition, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and management of hepatitis B flares in the published literature were reviewed. Hepatitis B flares have been considered as a result of the robust immune response of the patient to an upsurging HBV/HBV-antigen(s). 'Host-dominating flares,' reflect effective immune response, may resolve with ALT normalization and decline of HBV/ antigen(s). Contradictorily, 'virus-dominating flares,' reflect ineffective immune response, are usually followed by persistent/intermittent hepatitis and may even develop hepatic decompensation/failure.

EXPERT OPINION

Not all hepatitis B flares require antiviral therapy, and close observation with combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics along the ascending ALT during hepatitis flare may differentiate hepatitis flares for an appropriate treatment/retreatment decision. More studies are needed to verify this proposal. Further immunologic studies using multiple samples during hepatitis B flare are important to clarify the precise underlying mechanisms as the basis for further improvement in the management of hepatitis flare.

Robust antiviral responses in severe hepatitis flare persist after early retreatment cessation and lead toward hepatitis B surface antigen loss: A proof-of-concept study

AIM

Hepatitis B flare has been interpreted as result of immune response against upsurging hepatitis B virus (HBV) and its antigen(s) that may lead to HBV decline/clearance spontaneously. It has been speculated that antiviral therapy could halt the effective immune response with viral persistent as a consequence. A proof-of-concept study was conducted to investigate this issue.

METHODS

Serial biochemical, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) assays were performed in four patients with severe hepatitis flare who had achieved precipitous HBsAg decline within 4 weeks of antiviral therapy.

RESULTS

TNF-α and IFN-γ were found to be elevated in parallel to upsurging HBV DNA and HBsAg levels in all patients. Higher levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ and levels relative to qHBsAg were observed during and after early termination of therapy within 4 weeks in two patients and were followed by further HBsAg decline to <5 IU/ml and even achieved HBsAg loss in one patient. The patient who had stopped therapy on day 44 showed minimal HBsAg decline afterward and the patient who continued therapy showed a 10-fold rebound of qHBsAg from its nadir. The subsequent IFN-γ and TNF-α activity of these two patients was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that patients with severe hepatitis flare who achieved precipitous HBsAg decline may have robust immune response to clear the virus, and early termination of antiviral therapy may allow the protective immune response to continue and accelerate HBV decline toward HBsAg loss.

Current Trend in Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

Since active hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication is the key driver of hepatic necroinflammation and disease progression, the treatment aim of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to suppress HBV replication permanently to prevent hepatic decompensation, liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma and prolong survival. Currently, pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN), entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are the first-line drugs of choice. Peg-IFN therapy has been used rarely due to its subcutaneous injection and significant side effect profile. Once daily oral ETV, TDF and TAF can suppress HBV DNA profoundly but have no direct action on cccDNA of the HBV-infected hepatocytes, hence continuing long-term therapy is usually needed to maintain HBV suppression, but the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss was rarely achieved (10 year 2%). In addition, long-term NUC therapy comes with several concerns such as increasing cost, medication adherence and loss-to-follow-up. Studies, mainly from Taiwan, have shown that finite NUCs therapy of two to three years in HBeAg-negative patients is feasible, safe and has a great benefit of much increasing HBsAg loss rate up to 30%/5 year. These have led an emerging paradigm shift to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients globally. However, off-NUC relapse with hepatitis B flares may occur and have a risk of decompensation or even life-threatening outcomes. Therefore, proper monitoring, assessment, and retreatment decisions are crucial to ensure safety. Ideally, retreatment should be not too late to ensure safety and also not too early to allow further immune response for further HBsAg decline toward HBsAg loss. Assessment using combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics during hepatitis flare is better than biochemical markers alone to make a right retreatment decision. The strategy of finite NUC therapy has set a benchmark of high HBsAg loss rate to be achieved by the new anti-HBV drugs which are under preclinical or early phase study.

Highly significant differences in HBsAg kinetics among patients with two types of hepatitis B flare, with and without retreatment

BACKGROUND

Off-therapy hepatitis flare may be detrimental or, conversely, facilitate hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline. Retreatment decisions are crucial.

METHODS

HBsAg was quantified before and during flares, at peak/retreatment start and at Months 6 and 12 in 336 entecavir/tenofovir-retreated and 105 non-retreated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. Increasing HBsAg during ALT flare defined a 'virus-dominating flare' and decreasing HBsAg a 'host-dominating flare'.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-eight retreated patients with a virus-dominating flare showed greater 1 year HBsAg decline (-1.0 versus -0.01 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001), more frequent rapid decline (69.8% versus 8.3%; P < 0001) and higher 3 year incidence of HBsAg < 100 IU/mL (32% versus 12%; P = 0.026) than 48 patients with a host-dominating flare, of whom 16 (33.3%) showed 3.8-fold (2 to 52-fold) HBsAg rebound on retreatment (versus 2/288; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retreated controls, 1 year HBsAg decline was greater (-1.0 versus -0.47 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001) and faster (69.8% versus 42.5%; P < 0.0001) in patients with a virus-dominating flare, whereas 1 year HBsAg decline (-0.01 versus -0.16 log10 IU/mL) and 3 year HBsAg loss rate (0% versus 21%; P = 0.009) were lower in patients with a host-dominating flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir/tenofovir retreatment effectively decreases HBsAg level in patients with a virus-dominating flare but is ineffective/worse in patients with a host-dominating flare. These results support the use of combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics for the decision to retreat patients with a virus-dominating flare and withhold retreatment for patients with a host-dominating flare.

Discontinuation of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC) are the first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) recommended by most current guidelines. NUC therapy decreases progression of liver disease, reduces the risk of liver-related complications, and improves the quality of life of patients with CHB. Although indefinite or long-term NUC therapy is usually recommended, this strategy raises several concerns, such as side-effects, adherence, costs, and patient willingness to stop therapy. Recent data showed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of stopping antiviral therapy in carefully selected CHB patients, leading to its incorporation in international guidelines. Patients who discontinue NUC have a higher likelihood of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss compared to patients who continue on therapy. Recommendations pertaining endpoints allowing safety discontinuation of NUC therapy differ among international guidelines. For hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, durable HBeAg seroconversion is considered an acceptable treatment endpoint. For HBeAg-negative patients, some guidelines propose undetectability hepatitis B virus DNA for at least 2 or 3 years, while others consider HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint. CHB patients who stop therapy should remain under strict clinical and laboratorial follow-up protocols to detect and manage relapses in a timely manner. No reliable predictor of relapse has been consistently identified to date, although quantitative HBsAg has been increasingly studied as a reliable biomarker to predict safe NUC discontinuation.

Perspectives on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) is the current first line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), recommended by most of the current guidelines. NAs prevent disease progression, liver failure, decrease the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and have favorable safety profiles. However, low rates of on-therapy functional cure (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] loss), which is regarded as the optimal end point, prevent many patients from stopping NA therapy with the need for a lifelong treatment. The higher likelihood of HBsAg loss associated with stopping as compared to continuing NAs has got a lot of attention recently. Recommendations regarding endpoints allowing for safely stopping NA therapy differ between international guidelines. Whereas in HBeAg-positive patients, HBeAg seroconversion with at least one year of consolidation therapy is an acceptable endpoint of treatment, the recommendations for HBeAg-negative ones differ. Some guidelines propose ≥3 years of HBV DNA undetectability to stop NA while others regard HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint. Stopping NA can lead to substantial rates of virologic relapses and consequent ALT flares in some cases. Moreover, no reliable predictor(s) of post-NA relapses have been identified so far. Quantitative HBsAg is becoming an increasingly promising marker to predict safe NA cessation. On the other hand, investigating the role of the immune system in mediating sustained virologic responses after NA withdrawal is needed to suggest immunological biomarkers to safely stop NA. In this article, we will review relevant literature regarding NA stopping strategy and discuss promising viral and immunological biomarkers to predict antiviral responses and thus to help identify patients who are more likely to achieve HBsAg seroclearance.

A hook-effect-free homogeneous light-initiated chemiluminescence assay: is it reliable for screening and the quantification of the hepatitis B surface antigen?

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a threat to global public health. As a hallmark of HBV infection, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been used to screen for HBV infection for decades, and quantitative assays are also being clinically rejuvenated to predict the disease outcome and monitor the antiviral response. Herein, we developed and evaluated a hook-effect-free homogeneous quantitative HBsAg assay based on the light-initiated chemiluminescence immunoassay (LICA).

Methods

A hook-effect-free LICA algorithm was established by measuring the relative light units (RLUs) of two time points during the immunoreaction. The precision was assessed using low- and high-level controls. Consecutive clinical serum samples were tested using the LICA and Abbott Architect assay; samples producing inconsistent results were retested using supplementary assays including the HBsAg neutralization, HBV DNA, and Roche Elecsys HBsAg assays for further confirmation. The consistency, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. For the quantitative results, the correlation was analyzed. The coverage of different genotypes and mutations by the LICA was evaluated. Moreover, serial on-treatment and follow-up samples from chronic hepatitis B patients were also measured using the two assays.

Results

The LICA had better within-run and within-laboratory precisions than the Architect assay. In total, 5,176 clinical samples were tested. The two assays showed a consistency of 99.63%. The LICA showed greater specificity (99.95% vs. 99.77%) and PPV (99.75% vs. 98.77%) than the Architect assay, whereas the Architect assay showed greater sensitivity (100.00% vs. 99.01%) and NPV (100.00% vs. 99.82%). The two assays displayed an excellent correlation independent of genotypes and mutations. The LICA hook-free algorithm recognized 100% of the underestimated results. Furthermore, similar HBsAg dynamics were demonstrated using the LICA and Architect HBsAg assay.

Conclusions

The hook-free LICA provides a reliable tool for screening for HBV infection and quantifying HBsAg.