Evolution of estimated glomerular filtration rate in human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients receiving sofosbuvir-based direct-acting antivirals and antiretroviral therapy

Evolution of estimated glomerular filtration rate in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who received direct-acting antivirals: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The short-term impact of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) on renal function in patients with HIV/HCV-coinfection remains controversial.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to sequentially record the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, end of therapy (EOT), 12 weeks off-treatment (SVR12), and at time points after SVR12 (post-SVR12) and to identify the factors associated with an eGFR decline to <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving DAAs. The evolution of mean eGFRs between different ART and DAAs combinations among patients of different HIV transmission routes were compared using a generalized linear mixed effects model. The periods between baseline and EOT, between EOT and post-SVR12, and between baseline and post-SVR12 were defined as the on-treatment, post-treatment, and all-course periods, respectively. Acute kidney disease (AKD) was defined as a decline of eGFR to <60 ml/min/1.73 m2.

RESULT

A total of 445 patients with baseline eGFRs >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were included. We found that eGFRs declined during the on-treatment period in the tenofovir-containing ART and SOF-based DAA groups. There were no differences in the slope coefficient during the on-treatment and post-treatment periods among all risk groups except for people who inject drug. Increasing age and plasma HIV RNA >20 copies/ml before DAA treatment were factors independently associated with AKD during the on-treatment period while increasing age was independently associated with AKD during the all-course period.

CONCLUSION

Only increasing age was an independent factor associated with AKD among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients during and after DAA treatments.

Long-term Evolution of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Antiviral Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data regarding the long-term evolution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients receiving antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus are limited.

METHODS

A total of 1987 patients with eGFR ≥15 mL/min/1.73m² who received interferon or direct-acting antiviral treatment were prospectively enrolled in this cohort study. The eGFR was assessed biannually by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation from the time point of sustained virologic response (SVR₁₂). Multivariate generalized estimated equation was used to assess the association between the factors of interest and evolution of eGFR following antiviral treatment. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the relative risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m².

RESULTS

Patients who achieved SVR₁₂ (adjusted slope coefficient difference: 2.36 mL/min/1.73 m²/year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50 to 3.32; P < .001) were associated with eGFR improvement, compared with those who did not achieve SVR₁₂. Among patients who achieved SVR₁₂, the eGFR evolution was comparable (adjusted slope coefficient difference: 0.31 mL/min/1.73m²/year; 95% CI, -0.34 to 0.96; P = .35) in those treated with interferon or direct-acting antiviral. The incidence rates of ESRD in patients who achieved and did not achieve SVR₁₂ were 0.06 per 100 person-years and 0.37 per 100 person-years. Patients who achieved SVR₁₂ were associated with a lower risk of ESRD (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-0.68; P = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term eGFR evolution and risk of ESRD are significantly improved in patients who achieve SVR₁₂ with anti- hepatitis C virus treatment.

Safety considerations in the management of hepatitis C and HIV co-infection

INTRODUCTION

Both HCV and HIV are highly prevalent infections with current estimates of 57 and 38 million people infected worldwide, respectively. Oral antivirals can be curative for HCV and rescue HIV patients from disease progression. Dual therapy in coinfected patients requires expertise.

AREAS COVERED

Four major issues challenge dual HCV and HIV treatment, including overlapping drug-related side effects, hepatitis B reactivation, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes (IRIS), and drug-drug interactions (DDI). A search was conducted in PubMed from January 2010 to March 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The advent of second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DDA) that depict higher antiviral potency, fewer side effects, pangenotypic activity and are co-formulated has expanded the indication of HCV therapy and particularly in HIV-coinfected individuals. Sequential initiation of antiretrovirals (ARV) followed by DAA is generally preferred to start dual treatment concomitantly. Close monitoring of rare episodes of HBV reactivation and IRIS is warranted. The most frequent DDI between DAA and ARV affect drug metabolism by CYP450 induction/inhibition, leading to abnormal drug exposures. Throughout this mechanism interact most HCV and HIV protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors. Exposure to some HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide analogues (e.g. tenofovir and sofosbuvir, respectively) is subject to induction/inhibition of drug transporters and requires special attention in patients with renal insufficiency.

Serial changes in renal indices in chronic HCV patients with and without HIV co-infection receiving sofosbuvir and tenofovir-based therapies

Background

Sofosbuvir (SOF) is authorized for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. The nephrotoxicity of SOF on HCV mono-infected and HCV–human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains controversial.

Methods

A prospective study including 159 HCV mono-infected and 124 HCV–HIV individuals (47 were ART naïve and 77 were tenofovir [TDF]-based ART) who presented with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline and were treated with SOF–daclatasvir for 12 weeks. The eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation over the study period.

Results

HCV patients had a progressive decline in median levels of eGFR compared with HCV–HIV patients who were ART naïve and those receiving TDF-based ART during and after discontinuing SOF–DAC treatment (96, 109 and 114 at baseline vs 94, 117 and 108 at the end of treatment [EOT]) vs 95, 114 and 115 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 12 weeks after treatment [SVR12], respectively). Moreover, the rate of eGFR stage worsening was more pronounced in HCV mono-infected compared with HCV–HIV individuals who were ART naïve and those receiving TDF-based ART (21.4% vs 8.5% and 14.3% at EOT; 21.4% vs 2.1% and 6.5% at SVR12, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis showed that baseline variables were not independent predictors of eGFR stage worsening either at EOT or SVR12.

Conclusions

Because the changes in eGFR were minimal and not of clinical significance, and TDF was not associated with an increase in renal dysfunction, SOF-based direct-acting antivirals could be safely used in HCV mono-infected and HCV–HIV individuals, even in those on TDF-based ART.

Sofosbuvir and risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline or end-stage renal disease in patients with renal impairment

BACKGROUND

Sofosbuvir, a prodrug nucleoside inhibitor of hepatitis C virus, has a predominant circulating metabolite that is renally eliminated. Whether sofosbuvir is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression is not well understood.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30-89 mL/min/1.73 m2 treated with sofosbuvir in 76 Phase 2/3 registrational trials. We evaluated eGFR at each study visit. Separately, we performed a retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IQVIA PharMetrics Plus™) to compare the risk of incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with the use of sofosbuvir or non-sofosbuvir regimens among patients with CKD using propensity score methods. Exposure, CKD status and outcomes were determined using diagnosis and medication claim codes. Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate ESRD risk.

RESULTS

Among 4642 trial participants with baseline stage 2 CKD (eGFR 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) and 682 trial participants with stage 3 CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) mean (SD) eGFR improved from baseline to 4 weeks post-treatment (+0.7 [9.3] and +2.6 [8.8] ml/min/1.73 m2 , respectively; p < 0.001 each). In the second analysis, among 2042 patients with CKD receiving sofosbuvir-based regimens compared to 431 receiving non-sofosbuvir-based regimens, after adjusting for baseline covariates and weighting based on treatment propensity scores, there was no significant difference in risk of ESRD (adjusted HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.51-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial participants with CKD did not experience worsening eGFR during sofosbuvir-based treatment, and sofosbuvir was not associated with an increased risk of ESRD in patients with CKD in a nationally-representative administrative claims database.

Recently acquired hepatitis C virus infection among people living with human immunodeficiency virus at a university hospital in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the engagement in hepatitis C virus (HCV) care and completion of HCV treatment in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) who have HCV coinfection in the Asia-Pacific region. Examining the HCV care cascade can identify barriers to the completion of HCV treatment and facilitate achievement of HCV micro-elimination in PLWH.

AIM

To investigate the care cascade of incident HCV infections among PLWH in Taiwan.

METHODS

PLWH with incident HCV infections, defined as HCV seroconversion, were retrospectively identified by sequential anti-HCV testing of all archived blood samples at National Taiwan University Hospital between 2011 and 2018. All PLWH with incident HCV infections were followed until December 31, 2019. The care cascade of HCV examined included all incident HCV-infected patients, the percentages of anti-HCV antibodies detected by HIV-treating physicians in clinical care, plasma HCV RNA load tested, HCV RNA positivity diagnosed, referral to treatment assessment made, anti-HCV treatment initiated, and sustained virologic response achieved. Those who had HCV seroconversion during the interferon (IFN) era (2011–2016) and the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era (2017–2018) were analyzed separately. The duration of HCV viremia—from the date of seroconversion to viral clearance by treatments or until the end of observation—and the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during the HCV viremic period were estimated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 287 of 3495 (8.2%) PLWH (92.3% being men who have sex with men) who were HCV-seronegative at baseline developed HCV seroconversion by retrospective testing of all archived blood samples. Of the 287 incident HCV infections, 277 (96.5%) had anti-HCV antibodies detected by HIV-treating physicians, 270 (94.1%) had plasma HCV RNA determined and 251 (87.5%) tested positive for HCV RNA. Of those with HCV viremia, 226 (78.7%) were referred to treatment assessment, 215 (74.9%) initiated anti-HCV treatment, and 202 (70.4%) achieved viral clearance. Compared with that in the IFN era, the median interval from HCV seroconversion by retrospective testing to detection of HCV seropositivity by HIV-treating physicians was significantly shorter in the DAA era {179 d [interquartile range (IQR) 87-434] vs 92 d (IQR 57-173); P < 0.001}. The incidence rate of STIs in the DAA vs the IFN era was 50.5 per 100 person-years of follow-up (PYFU) and 38.5 per 100 PYFU, respectively, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.77), while the duration of HCV viremia was 380 d (IQR 274-554) and 735 d (IQR 391-1447) (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

While anti-HCV therapies are effective in achieving viral clearance, our study suggests more efforts are needed to expedite the linkage of PLWH diagnosed with incident HCV infections to HCV treatment.