Long-term renal safety between patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir vs. entecavir therapy: A multicenter study

Renal dysfunction during treatment of chronic hepatitis B with tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate and associated risk factors

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the evolution of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the presence of renal tubular dysfunction during the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and to determine the risk factors involved.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort observational study of adults with chronic hepatitis B. Exclusion: hepatitis C virus-HBV coinfection, diabetes, baseline GFR less than 60 ml/min. Measurements of serum and urinary creatinine and phosphate; urinary albumin, retinol-binding protein (RBP) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses tracked factors associated with worsening GFR.

RESULTS

A total of 120 individuals were included: 35% NAÏVE (G1); 49.2% HBV using TDF (G2); 15.8% HBV-HIV using TDF (G3); 63.3% men; 60.8% white; 30% hypertensive. Average age was 50.5 years (SD ± 12.9 years). Reactive HBeAg predominated in G3 ( P  < 0.001) and cirrhosis in G2 ( P  < 0.036). NGAL was elevated in 5.3% of cases (G1 = 3.2%; G2 = 8.7%; G3 = 0%; P  = 0.582), RBP in 6.7% (G1, G3 = 0%; G2 = 13.6%; P  = 0.012), urinary phosphate/creatinine ratio in 16.2% (G1 = 15.2%; G2 = 14.5%; G3 = 23.5%; P  = 0.842) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio in 12.9% (G1 = 12.2%; G2 = 10.7%; G3 = 21.1%; P  = 0.494). Worsening of renal function occurred in 22.5% of the population (G1 = 11.9%; G2 = 28.8%; G3 = 26.3%; P  = 0.122), independently associated only with systemic arterial hypertension [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.14; P  = 0.008], but not to TDF (AOR = 2.66; P  = 0.110) or male sex (AOR = 2.39; P  = 0.135). However, the concomitance of these variables generated a high estimated risk for this outcome (51%).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal tubular dysfunction was uncommon according to NGAL, RBP or urinary phosphate/creatinine ratio. TDF was not an independent factor for worsening renal function, significantly associated only with systemic arterial hypertension. However, in hypertensive men, the use of TDF should be monitored.

Longitudinal changes in renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B on antiviral treatment

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) often experience renal function decline. Conflicting results regarding the impact of NUC use and renal function have recently been reported.

AIM

To examine longitudinal changes in renal function according to the NUC treatment type compared with untreated patients METHODS: From 2014 to 2022, we retrospectively analysed 10,642 patients with CHB. The primary outcome was chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, which was defined as a minimum one-stage elevation. We applied propensity score (PS) matching for outcome comparisons.

RESULTS

In the PS-matched cohort of 1996 pairs, the NUC-treated group (7.6/100 person-years [PYs]) had a significantly higher CKD progression risk than the untreated group (4.4/100 PYs), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.70 (p < 0.001). The tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-treated group (7.9/100 PYs) showed a 1.76-fold increased CKD progression risk compared with the untreated group (4.5/100 PYs) in the PS-matched cohort (p < 0.001). Both the entecavir- and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-treated groups showed CKD progression risks comparable to those of the untreated group in the PS-matched cohorts of 755 and 426 pairs, respectively (p = 0.132 and p = 0.120, respectively). No significant CKD progression risk was found between the entecavir- (6.0/100 PYs) and TAF-treated (5.2/100 PYs) groups in the PS-matched cohort of 510 pairs (p = 0.118).

CONCLUSIONS

NUC-treated patients, especially those on TDF, faced a higher CKD progression risk than untreated patients. Entecavir- and TAF-treated patients had comparable CKD progression risks to untreated patients. No difference was observed between entecavir and TAF in the risk of CKD progression.

Renal Safety of Long-term Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

Background

Data on renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment among individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are inconsistent. The current study aimed to assess the effect of long-term TDF treatment on renal outcomes in adult patients with CHB.

Methods

From a CHB cohort in Ethiopia, we included 233 patients treated with TDF and 126 untreated controls. Levels of creatinine and creatinine clearance over time were described in patients with and without TDF treatment. Linear mixed effects models with a treatment × time interaction were used to investigate the effect of TDF on creatinine and creatinine clearance. In treated patients only, change in creatinine and creatinine clearance was estimated separately in the first year as compared with subsequent years via linear mixed effects models.

Results

Median follow-up in the treated group was 51 months (IQR, 27-72), and 75% of patients were male (median age, 33 years; IQR, 26-40). Median follow-up in the untreated group was 69 months (IQR, 66-72), and 48% of participants were male (median age, 33 years; IQR, 27-41). We found no change in creatinine over time in TDF-treated patients as compared with a slight increase in untreated patients (P interaction = .003). There was a decrease in creatinine clearance over time in both groups, which was stronger in patients without TDF treatment (P interaction = .007). In TDF-treated patients, changes in creatinine and creatinine clearance occurred mainly within the first 12 months after treatment initiation.

Conclusions

This study showed no evidence of long-term renal toxicity of TDF treatment in patients with CHB.

TACE versus TACE + entecavir versus TACE + tenofovir in the treatment of HBV associated hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

At present, there are a variety of antiviral drugs for HBV in clinical practice, but there is no standard scheme for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) combined with antiviral drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TACE must be combined with antiviral therapy in patients of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Meanwhile, the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with entecavir and TACE combined with tenofovir in the treatment of HBV-related HCC were compared.

METHOD

This study included 536 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent TACE in Union Hospital from March 2017 to March 2020, and they met the criteria. They were divided into three groups: control group (N = 212): TACE alone; Entecavir group (N = 220): TACE combined with entecavir; and Tenofovir group (N = 228): TACE combined with tenofovir. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the efficacy and safety of the three groups of patients.

RESULTS

Objective response rate(ORR): 29.2% in control group, 54.1% in entecavir group, and 63.2% in tenofovir group (P < 0.05). Disease control rate(DCR): 63.7% in control group, 80.9% in entecavir group, and 88.1% in tenofovir group (P < 0.05). Median overall survival(mOS): control group, 12.2 months; entecavir group, 17.3 months; tenofovir group, 22.5 months (p < 0.05). Median progression-free survival (mPFS): control group, 9.3 months; entecavir group, 15.5 months; tenofovir group, 16.6 months (p < 0.05). At 6 months, there was an increase in creatinine(Cr) and a decrease in glomeruar filtration rate(GFR) in tenofovir group, which were statistically different from control and entecavir groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with entecavir and TACE combined with tenofovir had higher ORR and DCR, longer OS and PFS than TACE alone. The OS of TACE combined with tenofovir was higher than that of TACE combined with entecavir. TACE combined with tenofovir is a safe strategy, but we cannot completely ignore the impact of tenofovir on renal function.

Comparison of renal safety and bone mineral density of tenofovir and entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are recommended as first-line treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the safety of these two drugs remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate and compare renal function and bone mineral density in CHB patients who took TDF or ETV.

METHODS

The electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched. The key words were: "CHB," "tenofovir," and "entecavir". Heterogeneity and subgroups were analyzed.

RESULTS

16 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine levels between the TDF and the ETV group. There was a significant standardized mean difference in serum estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between months (12 months: SMD [95%CI] = -0.07 [-0.12, -0.01]; 18-24 months: SMD [95%CI]=-0.11[-0.17],-0.05]), but no significant difference emerged in the long-term drug use for over 24 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis (I²=41%, RR [95%CI]=1.29[0.93,1.77], p=0.13>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the ETV group, a greater reduction in eGFR and serum phosphorus levels was observed in the TDF group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis between the two groups.