Opsonization but not pretreatment of equine macrophages with hyperimmune plasma nonspecifically enhances phagocytosis and intracellular killing of Rhodococcus equi

Impact of surface receptors TLR2, CR3, and FcγRIII on Rhodococcus equi phagocytosis and intracellular survival in macrophages

The virulence-associated protein A (VapA) produced by virulent Rhodococcus equi allows it to replicate in macrophages and cause pneumonia in foals. It is unknown how VapA interacts with mammalian cell receptors, but intracellular replication of avirulent R. equi lacking vapA can be restored by supplementation with recombinant VapA (rVapA). Our objectives were to determine whether the absence of the surface receptors Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), complement receptor 3 (CR3), or Fc gamma receptor III (FcγRIII) impacts R. equi phagocytosis and intracellular replication in macrophages, and whether rVapA restoration of virulence in R. equi is dependent upon these receptors. Wild-type (WT) murine macrophages with TLR2, CR3, or FcγRIII blocked or knocked out (KO) were infected with virulent or avirulent R. equi, with or without rVapA supplementation. Quantitative bacterial culture and immunofluorescence imaging were performed. Phagocytosis of R. equi was not affected by blockade or KO of TLR2 or CR3. Intracellular replication of virulent R. equi was not affected by TLR2, CR3, or FcγRIII blockade or KO; however, avirulent R. equi replicated in TLR2-/- and CR3-/- macrophages but not in WT and FcγRIII-/-. rVapA supplementation did not affect avirulent R. equi phagocytosis but promoted intracellular replication in WT and all KO cells. By demonstrating that TLR2 and CR3 limit replication of avirulent but not virulent R. equi and that VapA-mediated virulence is independent of TLR2, CR3, or FcγRIII, our study provides novel insights into the role of these specific surface receptors in determining the entry and intracellular fate of R. equi.

Differential Effects of Rhodococcus equi Virulence-Associated Proteins on Macrophages and Artificial Lipid Membranes

Virulence-associated protein A (VapA) of Rhodococcus equi is a pathogenicity factor required for the multiplication of virulent R. equi strains within spacious macrophage vacuoles. The production of VapA is characteristic for R. equi isolates from pneumonic foals. VapB and VapN proteins in R. equi isolates from infected pig (VapB) and cattle (VapN) have amino acid sequences very similar to VapA and consequently have been assumed to be its functional correlates. Using model membrane experiments, phagosome pH acidification analysis, lysosome size measurements, protein partitioning, and degradation assays, we provide support for the view that VapA and VapN promote intracellular multiplication of R. equi by neutralizing the pH of the R. equi-containing vacuole. VapB does not neutralize vacuole pH, is not as membrane active as VapA, and does not support intracellular multiplication. This study also shows that the size of the sometimes enormous R. equi-containing vacuoles or the partitioning of purified Vaps into organic phases are not features that have predictive value for virulence of R. equi, whereas the ability of Vaps to increase phagosome pH is coupled to virulence. IMPORTANCE Rhodococcus equi is a major cause of life-threatening pneumonia in foals and occasionally in immunocompromised persons. Virulence-associated protein A (VapA) promotes R. equi multiplication in lung macrophages, which are the major host cells during foal infection. In this study, we compare cellular, biochemical, and biophysical phenotypes associated with VapA to those of VapB (typically produced by isolates from pigs) or VapN (isolates from cattle). Our data support the hypothesis that only some Vaps support multiplication in macrophages by pH neutralization of the phagosomes that R. equi inhabit.

Transfusion of hyperimmune plasma for protecting foals against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia

The bacterium Rhodococcus equi causes pneumonia in foals that is prevalent at breeding farms worldwide. In the absence of an effective vaccine, transfusion of commercial plasma from donor horses hyperimmunised against R. equi is used by many farms to reduce the incidence of pneumonia among foals at farms where the disease is endemic. The effectiveness of hyperimmune plasma for controlling R. equi pneumonia in foals has varied considerably among reports. The purposes of this narrative review are: 1) to review early studies that provided a foundational basis for the practice of transfusion of hyperimmune plasma that is widespread in the US and in many other countries; 2) to summarise current knowledge of hyperimmune plasma for preventing R. equi pneumonia; 3) to provide an interpretive summary of probable explanations for the variable results among studies evaluating the effectiveness of transfusion of hyperimmune plasma for reducing the incidence of R. equi pneumonia; 4) to review mechanisms by which hyperimmune plasma might mediate protection; and 5) to consider risks of transfusing foals with hyperimmune plasma. Although the weight of evidence supports the practice of transfusing foals with hyperimmune plasma to prevent R. equi pneumonia, many important gaps in our knowledge of this topic remain including the volume/dose of hyperimmune plasma to be transfused, the timing(s) of transfusion, and the mechanism(s) by which hyperimmune plasma mediates protection. Transfusing foals with hyperimmune plasma is expensive, labour-intensive, and carries risks for foals; therefore, alternative approaches for passive and active immunisation to prevent R. equi pneumonia are greatly needed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Rhodococcus equi Foal Pneumonia: Update on Epidemiology, Immunity, Treatment, and Prevention

Pneumonia in foals caused by the bacterium Rhodococcus equi has a worldwide distribution and is a common cause of disease and death for foals. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise recent developments pertaining to the epidemiology, immune responses, treatment, and prevention of rhodococcal pneumonia of foals. Screening tests have been used to implement earlier detection and treatment of foals with presumed subclinical R. equi pneumonia to reduce mortality and severity of disease. Unfortunately, this practice has been linked to the emergence of antimicrobial resistant R. equi in North America. Correlates of protective immunity for R. equi infections of foals remain elusive, but recent evidence indicates that innate immune responses are important both for mediating killing and orchestrating adaptive immune responses. A macrolide antimicrobial in combination with rifampin remains the recommended treatment for foals with R. equi pneumonia. Great need exists to identify which antimicrobial combination is most effective for treating foals with R. equi pneumonia and to limit emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains. In the absence of an effective vaccine against R. equi, passive immunisation remains the only commercially-available method for effectively reducing the incidence of R. equi pneumonia. Because passive immunisation is expensive, labour-intensive, and carries risks for foals, great need exists to develop alternative approaches for passive and active immunisation.