Long-term outcome of dogs recovering from acute kidney injury: 132 cases

International renal interest society best practice consensus guidelines for intermittent hemodialysis in dogs and cats

Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is an advanced adjunctive standard of care for severe acute kidney injury (AKI) and other indications. Most animals with AKI are managed medically, however, when the disease is severe, medical management may not control the consequences of the disease, and animals with a potential for renal recovery may die from the consequences of uremia before recovery has occurred. Extracorporeal therapies aid the management of AKI by expanding the window of opportunity for recovery of sufficient kidney function to become dialysis independent. Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) was introduced into veterinary medicine over 50 years ago, however, updated guidelines for the delivery of IHD have not been published for several decades. To that end, the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) constituted a Working Group to establish best practice guidelines for the safe and effective delivery of IHD to animals with indications for dialytic intervention. The IRIS Working Group generated 60 consensus statements and supporting rational for a spectrum of prescription and management categories required for delivery of IHD on designated intermittent dialysis platforms (i.e., AKI, chronic hemodialysis and intoxications). A formal consensus method was used to validate the recommendations by a blinded jury of 12 veterinarians considered experts in extracorporeal therapies and actively performing IHD. Each vote provided a level of agreement for each recommendation proposed by the Working Group. To achieve a consensus, a minimum of 75% of the voting participants had to "strongly agree" or "agree" with the recommendation.

International Renal Interest Society best practice consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury in cats and dogs

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as an injury to the renal parenchyma, with or without a decrease in kidney function, as reflected by accumulation of uremic toxins or altered urine production (i.e., increased or decreased). AKI might result from any of several factors, including ischemia, inflammation, nephrotoxins, and infectious diseases. AKI can be community- or hospital-acquired. The latter was not previously considered a common cause for AKI in animals; however, recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of hospital-acquired AKI is increasing in veterinary medicine. This is likely due to a combination of increased recognition and awareness of AKI, as well as increased treatment intensity (e.g., ventilation and prolonged hospitalization) in some veterinary patients and increased management of geriatric veterinary patients with multiple comorbidities. Advancements in the management of AKI, including the increased availability of renal replacement therapies, have been made; however, the overall mortality of animals with AKI remains high. Despite the high prevalence of AKI and the high mortality rate, the body of evidence regarding the diagnosis and the management of AKI in veterinary medicine is very limited. Consequently, the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) constructed a working group to provide guidelines for animals with AKI. Recommendations are based on the available literature and the clinical experience of the members of the working group and reflect consensus of opinion. Fifty statements were generated and were voted on in all aspects of AKI and explanatory text can be found either before or after each statement.

Retrospective evaluation of 22 dogs with leptospirosis treated with extracorporeal renal replacement therapies (2018-2021)

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of dogs with acute kidney injury secondary to leptospirosis (AKI-L) treated using renal replacement therapies (RRT) are poorly characterized.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

Describe survival to discharge, short (≤30 days) and long-term (≥6 months) outcomes of AKI-L dogs receiving RRT and determine if there is a significant difference in maximum blood urea nitrogen (maxBUN), maximum creatinine (maxCr), maximum bilirubin (maxBili) and the number of body systems affected between survivors and non-survivors.

ANIMALS

Twenty-two client-owned dogs with AKI-L receiving RRT.

METHODS

Retrospective medical record review of dogs with AKI-L that received RRT between 2018 and 2021.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 22 (73%) dogs survived to discharge. Of the survivors, 13 (81%) were alive >30 days from discharge and 12 (75%) were alive at 6 months from discharge. Factors significantly higher in non-survivors included number of body systems affected (survivors: 1 (19%), 2 (50%), 3 (25%) and 4 (6%) vs non-survivors: 3 (33.3%), and 4 (66.7%); P = .01) and median maxBili (survivors: 1.9 mg/dL; range, 0.1-41.6 vs non-survivors: 21.0 mg/dL; range, 12.3-38.9; P = .02). There was no significant difference in median maxBUN (survivors: 153.0 mg/dL; range, 67-257 vs non-survivors: 185.5 mg/dL; range, 102-218; P = .44) and median maxCr (survivors: 9.8 mg/dL; range, 6.2-15.9 vs non-survivors: 9.8 mg/dL; range, 8.4-13.5; P = .69) between survivors and non-survivors.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Regardless of azotemia severity, dogs with AKI-L receiving RRT have a good survival rate to discharge. The number of body systems affected and hyperbilirubinemia might be associated with worse outcomes.

Evaluation of the clinical outcome of hypercalcemia of malignancy and concurrent azotemia in dogs with lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hypercalcemia of malignancy (HM) secondary to lymphoma in dogs has the potential to cause renal injury.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

Characterize outcomes related to acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to HM. We hypothesized that dogs do suffer AKI regardless of HM severity at the time of lymphoma diagnosis or relapse.

ANIMALS

Retrospective study. Twenty-nine dogs with lymphoma, HM, and azotemia (International Renal Interest Society [IRIS] grade II or higher AKI) that underwent chemotherapy were identified at 2 veterinary institutions.

METHODS

Logistic regression and descriptive statistical analysis were performed to evaluate data for potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After initiating treatment, resolution of hypercalcemia and azotemia occurred in 100% (29/29) and 79.3% (23/29) of dogs, respectively. Resolution of azotemia was influenced by serum creatinine concentration (odds ratio [OR], 0.148; Confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.734; P = .02) and total hypercalcemia (OR, 0.36; CI, 0.14-0.93; P = .04) at diagnosis, whereas blood urea nitrogen concentration, IRIS grade, sex, and whether or not dogs were hospitalized were not significant factors. At data analysis, 13.8% (4/29) of dogs were alive or lost to follow-up. Of those dead, 4 dogs (15%) had renal disease at the time of death, 2/4 having concurrent lymphoma progression.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Although AKI may be of clinical concern in dogs with HM secondary to lymphoma at diagnosis, death secondary to renal impairment appears to be infrequent.