Alterations in activated T-cell cytokine expression in healthy dogs over the initial 7 days of twice daily dosing with oral cyclosporine

Perspectives on pharmacologic strategies in the management of meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin in dogs

There are many non-infectious inflammatory diseases, assumed to be immune-mediated in origin, recognized to affect the nervous system in canine patients. Concentrating on meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin, we will discuss the medications used to treat the underlying disease process, focusing on their adverse effects, therapeutic monitoring when necessary and effectiveness. The literature overwhelmingly supports the use of a steroid/ Cytosar® or steroid/ cyclosporine treatment protocol with the steroid tapered after the acute phase of the disease, leaving the secondary medication to control the disease long term. The decision on when and how quickly to taper the steroid is clinician dependent as a best practices has not been established in the literature. Also discussed will be the supportive care treatments often needed in the acute phase of these patients' diagnosis and treatment such as anti-edema and anti-epileptic agents.

Medical Management of Canine Chronic Ulcerative Stomatitis Using Cyclosporine and Metronidazole

Canine chronic ulcerative stomatitis (CCUS) is a spontaneously occurring, painful, and often debilitating condition of the oral cavity, with a suspected immune-mediated component. The response to pharmacological treatment is generally poor, thus the need to identify more effective medical therapies for this condition. This article describes a prospective clinical trial that was designed to evaluate the efficiency of a combination of cyclosporine and metronidazole in managing CCUS. The hypothesis was that a combination of cyclosporine and metronidazole would effectively minimize clinical signs associated with CCUS. Ten client-owned dogs with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis consistent with CCUS were prescribed cyclosporine (5 mg/kg) for 1 week, followed by the addition of metronidazole (15-20 mg/kg), both administered orally once daily. The cyclosporine dosage interval was lengthened over time. Dogs were observed for a 6-month period and evaluated using a 32-point Canine Ulcerative Stomatitis Disease Activity Index (CUSDAI). Regular cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring was also conducted by the measurement of whole blood cyclosporine levels and the pharmacodynamic assessment of the T-cell expression of IL-2. The results demonstrated that a combination of cyclosporine and metronidazole was effective in minimizing the clinical signs of CCUS and in reducing CUSDAI scores. Neither blood cyclosporine levels nor the T-cell expression of IL-2 predicted improvement in clinical signs and CUSDAI scores, although there was a correlation between blood drug concentrations and the suppression of T-cell IL-2 expression. The evaluation of clinical signs and CUSDAI scores appears to be the most effective means of assessing response to therapy, and therapeutic drug level monitoring does not appear to be routinely indicated.

Effects of oral administration of 5 immunosuppressive agents on activated T-cell cytokine expression in healthy dogs

BACKGROUND

Dogs are often adminstered >1 immunosuppressive medication when treating immune-mediated diseases, and determining whether these different medications affect IL-2 expression would be useful when performing pharmacodynamic monitoring during cyclosporine therapy.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of 5 medications (prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and leflunomide) on activated T-cell expression of the cytokines IL-2 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ).

ANIMALS

Eight healthy dogs.

METHODS

Randomized, cross-over study comparing values before and after treatment, and comparing values after treatment among drugs. Dogs were administered each drug at standard oral doses for 1 week, with a washout of at least 21 days. Activated T-cell expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Blood drug concentrations were measured for cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and leflunomide metabolites.

RESULTS

Least squares means (with 95% confidence interval) before treatment for IL-2 (2.91 [2.32-3.50] ΔCt) and IFN-γ (2.33 [1.66-3.00 ΔCt]) values were significantly lower (both P < .001) than values after treatment (10.75 [10.16-11.34] and 10.79 [10.11-11.46] ΔCt, respectively) with cyclosporine. Similarly, least squares means before treatment for IL-2 (1.55 [1.07-2.02] ΔCt) and IFN-γ (2.62 [2.32-2.92] ΔCt) values were significantly lower (both P < .001) than values after treatment (3.55 [3.06-4.00] and 5.22 [4.92-5.52] ΔCt, respectively) with prednisone. Comparing delta cycle threshold values after treatment among drugs, cyclosporine was significantly different than prednisone (IL-2 and IFN-γ both P < .001), with cyclosporine more suppressive than prednisone.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Prednisone and cyclosporine both affected expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ, suggesting that both have the ability to influence results when utilizing pharmacodynamic monitoring of cyclosporine treatment.

Effects of cyclosporine and dexamethasone on canine T cell expression of interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma

Cyclosporine and glucocorticoids are powerful immunosuppressive agents used to treat many inflammatory diseases in dogs. Cyclosporine inhibits calcineurin-dependent pathways of T cell activation and resultant T cell cytokine production, and glucocorticoids directly inhibit genes coding for cytokines. Little work has been done comparing the effects of these agents on T cell cytokine production in dogs. Our study measured T cell interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production using flow cytometry and T cell IL-2 and IFN-γ gene expression using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in activated canine T cells incubated with cyclosporine and dexamethasone in vitro. For flow cytometric assays, diluted whole blood was cultured for 7 h in the presence of cyclosporine (10, 100, 500, and 1000 ng/mL) or dexamethasone (10 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, 1 μg/mL, and 10 μg/mL). For qRT-PCR, whole blood was cultured for 5 h with the same drugs at the same concentrations, and RNA was then extracted from leukocytes. Flow cytometry and qRT-PCR both demonstrated inhibition of IL-2 and IFN-γ that was concentration-dependent in response to cyclosporine, and was more variable for dexamethasone. Quantitative RT-PCR but not flow cytometry documented significant reduction of IL-2 expression after dexamethasone treatment, while both methods showed concentration-dependent suppression of IFN-γ. Quantitative RT-PCR also revealed additional cytokine suppression at higher cyclosporine concentrations, an effect not found using flow cytometry, and may therefore be the preferred method for cytokine determination in dogs. Suppression of IL-2 and IFN-γ in activated T cells may have potential as an indicator of the efficacy of cyclosporine and glucocorticoids in suppressing canine T cell function in vivo, and may therefore be of value for characterizing the immunosuppression induced by these drugs in clinical patients.