New insights in the management of Hepatocellular Adenoma

Hepatocellular adenoma update: diagnosis, molecular classification, and clinical course

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) are acquired focal liver lesions, that occur mainly in young-to-middle-aged women who are on long-term estrogen-containing contraceptives or young men after prolonged use of anabolic steroids. Furthermore, distinct underlying diseases, such as obesity, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, glycogen storage disease, etc. are considered risk factors. The 2017 Bordeaux classification, in particular Nault et al, divided HCAs into eight subtypes according to their pheno- and genotypic characteristics. This includes HCAs with hepatocyte-nuclear-factor (HNF1-alpha mutation), HCAs with β-catenin mutation, and HCAs without either of these genetic mutations, which are further subdivided into HCAs with and without inflammatory cells. HCAs should no longer be classified as purely benign without histologic workup since three of the eight subtypes are considered high-risk lesions, requiring adequate management: malignant transformation of the pure (ßex3-HCA) and mixed inflammatory/β-catenin exon 3 (ßex3-IHCA) adenomas, as well as potential bleeding of the sonic hedgehog HCA and pure (ßex7/8-HCA) and mixed inflammatory/β-catenin exon 7/8 (ßex7/8-IHCA). Elective surgery is recommended for any HCA in a male, or for any HCA exceeding 5 cm. Although MRI can classify up to 80% of adenomas, if findings are equivocal, biopsy remains the reference standard for adenoma subtype.

WFUMB Review Paper. Incidental Findings in Otherwise Healthy Subjects, How to Manage: Liver

An incidental focal liver lesion (IFLL) is defined as a hepatic lesion identified in a patient imaged for an unrelated reason. They are frequently encountered in daily practice, sometimes leading to unnecessary, invasive and potentially harmful follow-up investigations. The clinical presentation and the imaging aspects play an important role in deciding if, and what further evaluation, is needed. In low-risk patients (i.e., without a history of malignant or chronic liver disease or related symptoms), especially in those younger than 40 years old, more than 95% of IFLLs are likely benign. Shear Wave liver Elastography (SWE) of the surrounding liver parenchyma should be considered to exclude liver cirrhosis and for further risk stratification. If an IFLL in a low-risk patient has a typical appearance on B-mode ultrasound of a benign lesion (e.g., simple cyst, calcification, focal fatty change, typical hemangioma), no further imaging is needed. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) should be considered as the first-line contrast imaging modality to differentiate benign from malignant IFLLs, since it has a similar accuracy to contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI. On CEUS, hypoenhancement of a lesion in the late vascular phase is characteristic for malignancy. CE-CT should be avoided for characterizing probable benign FLL and reserved for staging once a lesion is proven malignant. In high-risk patients (i.e., with chronic liver disease or an oncological history), each IFLL should initially be considered as potentially malignant, and every effort should be made to confirm or exclude malignancy. US-guided biopsy should be considered in those with unresectable malignant lesions, particularly if the diagnosis remains unclear, or when a specific tissue diagnosis is needed.

[Prophylactic surgery for hepatic and biliary tumors]

Benign tumors of the liver and biliary tract are rare entities, and some of them require surgical management to prevent their malignant transformation. Tumors from the biliary tract with malignant potential are treated either by hepatic resection, for mucinous cystic neoplasm and ciliated hepatic foregut cysts, or by biliary resections, for biliary papillary neoplasm and type I and IV choledochal cysts. The pathologies requiring prophylactic cholecystectomy are polyps larger than 10 mm, porcelain gallbladder and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Finally, hepatocellular adenoma over 5cm, occurring in male patients, or exon 3 mutated beta-catenin, should lead to prophylactic resection by hepatic segmentectomy. This article describes these different pathologies and their management.

Liver imaging and pregnancy: what to expect when your patient is expecting

Liver diseases in pregnancy can be specific to gestation or only coincidental. In the latter case, the diagnosis can be difficult. Rapid diagnosis of maternal-fetal emergencies and situations requiring specialized interventions are crucial to preserve the maternal liver and guarantee materno-fetal survival. While detailed questioning of the patient and a clinical examination are highly important, imaging is often essential to reach a diagnosis of these liver diseases and lesions. Three groups of liver diseases may be observed during pregnancy: (1) diseases related to pregnancy: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy; (2) liver diseases that are more frequent during or exacerbated by pregnancy: acute herpes simplex hepatitis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia, hepatocellular adenoma, portal vein thrombosis, and cholelithiasis; (3) coincidental conditions, including acute hepatitis, incidental focal liver lesions, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver abscesses and parasitosis, and liver transplantation. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, for adequate follow-up, and to avoid adverse consequences in both the mother and the fetus.Critical relevance statement Pregnancy-related liver diseases are the most important cause of liver dysfunction in pregnant patients and, in pregnancy, even common liver conditions can have an unexpected turn. Fear of radiations should never delay necessary imaging studies in pregnancy.Key points• Pregnancy-related liver diseases are the most frequent cause of liver dysfunction during gestation.• Fear of radiation should never delay necessary imaging studies.• Liver imaging is important to assess liver emergencies and for the diagnosis and follow-up of any other liver diseases.• Common liver conditions and lesions may take an unexpected turn during pregnancy.• Pregnancy-specific diseases such as pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome must be rapidly identified. However, imaging should never delay delivery when it is considered to be urgent for maternal-fetal survival.

Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differentiation between Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Benign Liver Lesions

A differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and benign liver lesions is required. The aim of the study was to perform an analysis of the time of enhancement of focal liver lesions in a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination. The curves of enhancement and the homogeneity of the tumor enhancement were assessed. The study included 52 patients with diagnoses of hepatocellular adenoma (18), focal nodular hyperplasia (11) and HCC (28). The study included magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography and a comparison of the obtained information with CEUS. In the benign lesions groups after 20-30 s, the enhancement was similar to the liver parenchyma. In the HCC group, the enhancement was slightly less intense compared to the liver parenchyma and the benign lesions. The difference of the enhancement in the arterial phase (benign lesions vs. HCC) was p = 0.0452, and the difference of enhancement in the late venous phase (benign lesions vs. HCC) was p = 0.000003. The homogeneity of the enhancement (benign lesions vs. HCC), respectively, was p = 0.001 in the arterial phase, p = 0.0003 in the portal venous phase and p = 0.00000007 in the late venous phase. Liver tumors can be classified as benign when they are homogenous in the arterial phase and don't present washout. HCC in the arterial phase is inhomogeneous and washout is observed in the venous phases. When radiological symptoms suggest malignant lesion, CEUS can be used to select the best biopsy access.

Hepatocellular Adenomas: Molecular Basis and Multimodality Imaging Update

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are a family of liver tumors that are associated with variable prognoses. Since the initial description of these tumors, the classification of HCAs has expanded and now includes eight distinct genotypic subtypes based on molecular analysis findings. These genotypic subtypes have unique derangements in their cellular biologic makeup that determine their clinical course and may allow noninvasive identification of certain subtypes. Multiphasic MRI performed with hepatobiliary contrast agents remains the best method to noninvasively detect, characterize, and monitor HCAs. HCAs are generally hypointense during the hepatobiliary phase; the β-catenin-mutated exon 3 subtype and up to a third of inflammatory HCAs are the exception to this characterization. It is important to understand the appearances of HCAs beyond their depictions at MRI, as these tumors are typically identified with other imaging modalities first. The two most feared related complications are bleeding and malignant transformation to hepatocellular carcinoma, although the risk of these complications depends on tumor size, subtype, and clinical factors. Elective surgical resection is recommended for HCAs that are persistently larger than 5 cm, adenomas of any size in men, and all β-catenin-mutated exon 3 HCAs. Thermal ablation and transarterial embolization are potential alternatives to surgical resection. In the acute setting of a ruptured HCA, patients typically undergo transarterial embolization with or without delayed surgical resection. This update on HCAs includes a review of radiologic-pathologic correlations by subtype and imaging modality, related complications, and management recommendations. ^© RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

The case of a liver adenoma that looked like a hemangioma

Benign focal liver lesions are among the most frequent findings on ultrasound. Liver hemangiomas are often easily recognizable on ultrasound examination and are characterized by a clear benign prognosis. In some cases, hemangiomas display an atypical appearance both on B-mode and on contrast-enhanced ultrasound, thus raising concerns for differential diagnosis both with adenomas and with lesions of malignant nature. We report here the case of a patient who presented with a liver lesion with all signs suggestive for hemangioma on B-mode, but it showed atypical features on contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination and final diagnosis of liver adenoma.

Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma by subtype and hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver by fractal analysis of perfusion MRI

Background

To investigate whether fractal analysis of perfusion differentiates hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-cirrhotic liver by quantifying perfusion chaos using four-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (4D-DCE-MRI).

Results

A retrospective population of 63 patients (47 female) with histopathologically characterized HCA and HCC in non-cirrhotic livers was investigated. Our population consisted of 13 hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1α-inactivated (H-HCAs), 7 β-catenin-exon-3-mutated (b^ex3-HCAs), 27 inflammatory HCAs (I-HCAs), and 16 HCCs. Four-dimensional fractal analysis was applied to arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases of 4D-DCE-MRI and was performed in lesions as well as remote liver tissue. Diagnostic accuracy of fractal analysis was compared to qualitative MRI features alone and their combination using multi-class diagnostic accuracy testing including kappa-statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Fractal analysis allowed quantification of perfusion chaos, which was significantly different between lesion subtypes (multi-class AUC = 0.90, p < 0.001), except between I-HCA and HCC. Qualitative MRI features alone did not allow reliable differentiation between HCA subtypes and HCC (κ = 0.35). However, combining qualitative MRI features and fractal analysis reliably predicted the histopathological diagnosis (κ = 0.89) and improved differentiation of high-risk lesions (i.e., HCCs, b^ex3-HCAs) and low-risk lesions (H-HCAs, I-HCAs) from sensitivity and specificity of 43% (95% confidence interval [CI] 23–66%) and 47% (CI 32–64%) for qualitative MRI features to 96% (CI 78–100%) and 68% (CI 51–81%), respectively, when adding fractal analysis.

Conclusions

Combining qualitative MRI features with fractal analysis allows identification of HCA subtypes and HCCs in patients with non-cirrhotic livers and improves differentiation of lesions with high and low risk for malignant transformation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01223-6.

Hepatocellular adenoma: Where are we now?

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a benign hepatocellular neoplasm, commonly occurs in young women with a history of oral contraceptive use. Complications including hemorrhage and malignant transformation necessitate the need for a thorough understanding of the underlying molecular signatures in this entity. Recent molecular studies have significantly expanded our knowledge of HCAs. The well-developed phenotype-genotype classification system improves clinical management through identifying “high risk” subtype of HCAs. In this article, we attempt to provide updated information on clinical, pathologic and molecular features of each subtype of HCAs.

A Scoping Review of the Classification, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatic Adenomas

BACKGROUND

Hepatic adenomas (HA), or hepatocellular adenomas, are benign, solid liver lesions that develop in otherwise normal livers, often in the setting of increased estrogen levels. While considered a benign tumor, there is a risk for substantial complications such as hemorrhage and malignant transformation. We review the diagnosis, classification, and potential therapeutic management options for patients with HA.

METHODS

A scoping narrative review was conducted based on recent literature regarding classification, diagnosis, and management of HA.

RESULTS

While HAs are typically considered benign, complications such as hemorrhage and malignant transformation may occur in approximately 25% and 5% of patients, respectively. Recent advances in imaging and molecular profiling have allowed for the classification of HAs into subtypes allowing for patient risk stratification that helps guide management. Surgical resection should be considered in asymptomatic patients who are male, have an adenoma ≥5 cm in diameter, or have the β-catenin-activated subtype due to an increased risk of hemorrhage and/or malignant transformation.

CONCLUSION

Molecular profiling has aided in the stratification of patients relative to the risk of complications to predict better the potential behavior of HAs.

An Extreme Case of Liver Adenomatosis: Are They All the Same?

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a rare and benign liver tumor that affects predominantly young and middle-aged women, especially between 30–40 years old. Liver adenomatosis (LA) is defined as the presence of 10 or more HCA. There are authors that report eight different subtypes of HCA, that correlates with clinical and histopathological features, being the inflammatory subtype the most common. We present a case of a 32-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of self-limited episodes of right abdominal pain and an abdominal ultrasound with multiple hypoechogenic liver nodules, suspected of metastasis. She was taking combined oral contraceptive for 6 years. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) disclosed around 40 nodules, suggestive of HCA. Liver biopsy confirmed HCA, inflammatory subtype. Oral contraceptive was stopped and control MRI 6 months later disclosed reduction of nodules’ dimensions. Management of patients with LA should be based on the size of the largest tumor, as clinical presentation and risk of bleeding or malignancy do not differ between patients with single or multiple HCAs. However, even with biopsy, there is a risk of missampling, raising concern about the real risk of bleeding and malignant potential in patients with different subtypes coexisting in the same liver.

Risk factors for bleeding hepatocellular adenoma in a United States cohort

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Known risk factors for hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) bleeding are size >5 cm, growth rate, visible vascularity, exophytic lesions, β-catenin and Sonic Hedgehog activated HCAs. Most studies are based on European cohorts. The objective of this study is to identify additional risk factors for HCA bleeding in a US cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed on patients diagnosed with HCA on magnetic resonance imaging (n = 184) at an academic tertiary institution. Clinical, pathological, and imaging data were collected. Primary outcomes measured were HCA bleeding and malignancy. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4 using Chi-Square, Fisher's exact test, sample t test, non-parametric Wilcoxon test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

After excluding patients whose pathology showed focal nodular hyperplasia and non-adenoma lesions, follow-up data were available for 167 patients. 16% experienced microscopic or macroscopic bleeding and 1.2% had malignancy. HCA size predicted bleeding (P < .0001) and no patients with lesion size <1.8 cm bled. In unadjusted analysis, hepatic adenomatosis (≥10 lesions) trended towards 2.8-fold increased risk of bleeding. Of patients with a single lesion that bled, 77% bled from a lesion >5 cm. In patients with multiple HCAs that bled, 50% bled from lesions <5 cm. In patients with multiple adenomas, size (P = .001) independently predicted bleeding and hepatic steatosis trended towards increased risk of bleeding (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large US cohort, size predicted increased risk of HCA bleeding while hepatic adenomatosis trended towards increased risk of bleeding. In patients with multiple HCAs, size predicted bleeding and hepatic steatosis trended toward increased risk of bleeding.

Hepatocellular adenoma initially diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma with resistance to proton beam radiotherapy - A case report

Introduction and importance

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is a rare liver tumor. We report a case of a radio-resistant liver tumor that was removed surgically and found to be HCA.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old Japanese man was incidentally diagnosed with a liver tumor. He had no history of viral hepatitis nor metabolic disorders. MRI revealed a tumor enhancing in arterial phase, followed by washout in late phase, and hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase. A diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was made and surgery was advised. However, the patient chose proton beam radiotherapy. Although the tumor initially shrunk, it increased in size thereafter. Therefore, anterior sectionectomy was performed. Histology revealed proliferation of hepatocytes without cytologic atypia. On immunohistochemistry, CRP, SAA, GS, L-FABP, and nuclear expression of β-catenin were positive. A final diagnosis of mixed inflammatory and β-catenin activated HCA was made.

Clinical discussion

HCA is associated with obesity. The present case was a slightly obese man without history of viral hepatitis. In such cases, HCA should be considered. In the present case, proton beam radiotherapy was performed for a diagnosis of HCC. However, the tumor was radio-resistant.

Conclusion

HCA shows an almost equal male to female ratio in the Asian population. Molecular classification is vital in the management of HCA. HCC and HCA are often difficult to differentiate; tumor biopsy is necessary for patients with atypical imaging findings and in younger patients without underlying liver disease. Since the effectiveness of radiation therapy on HCA has not been reported, surgery should be preferred.

•

HCA is more prevalent in women in the western countries, while equal gender distribution in Asian countries

•

Subgroups show different imaging findings. I-HCA, atoll sign; b-HCA, iso-hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase

•

In the present case, the tumor showed resistance to radiation

Unclassified hepatocellular adenoma with beta-catenin mutation: a case report

Background

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes are considered as risk factors for malignant transformation; thus, an accurate diagnosis is important. We report a case of resected HCA previously diagnosed as unclassified HCA using immunohistochemistry, subsequently discovered to harbor a mutation in exon 3 of the beta (β)-catenin gene using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing.

Case presentation

The patient was a 26-year-old woman who was referred to our hospital because of a 150-mm tumor in the right lobe of the liver. Considering the possibility of malignancy, we performed right lobe hepatectomy. Based on the histopathological and immunohistochemical findings, the tumor was diagnosed as an unclassified HCA. Next, we performed sequencing of DNA isolated from the tumor and identified a mutation in exon 3 of β-catenin, suggesting that the tumor contained an activating mutation of the β-catenin gene.

Conclusion

β-Catenin mutations in HCA cannot be detected by immunohistochemistry alone, and molecular analysis is required to accurately diagnose and evaluate its prognosis.