1
|
Yagound B, Sarma RR, Edwards RJ, Richardson MF, Rodriguez Lopez CM, Crossland MR, Brown GP, DeVore JL, Shine R, Rollins LA. Is developmental plasticity triggered by DNA methylation changes in the invasive cane toad ( Rhinella marina)? Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e11127. [PMID: 38450317 PMCID: PMC10917582 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Many organisms can adjust their development according to environmental conditions, including the presence of conspecifics. Although this developmental plasticity is common in amphibians, its underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Exposure during development to either 'cannibal cues' from older conspecifics, or 'alarm cues' from injured conspecifics, causes reduced growth and survival in cane toad (Rhinella marina) tadpoles. Epigenetic modifications, such as changes in DNA methylation patterns, are a plausible mechanism underlying these developmental plastic responses. Here we tested this hypothesis, and asked whether cannibal cues and alarm cues trigger the same DNA methylation changes in developing cane toads. We found that exposure to both cannibal cues and alarm cues was associated with local changes in DNA methylation patterns. These DNA methylation changes affected genes putatively involved in developmental processes, but in different genomic regions for different conspecific-derived cues. Genetic background explains most of the epigenetic variation among individuals. Overall, the molecular mechanisms triggered by exposure to cannibal cues seem to differ from those triggered by alarm cues. Studies linking epigenetic modifications to transcriptional activity are needed to clarify the proximate mechanisms that regulate developmental plasticity in cane toads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Yagound
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Roshmi R. Sarma
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| | - Richard J. Edwards
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biotechnology and Biomedical SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Minderoo OceanOmics Centre at UWA, Oceans InstituteDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| | - Mark F. Richardson
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
- Minderoo OceanOmics Centre at UWA, Oceans InstituteDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
- Deakin Genomics Research and Discovery FacilityDeakin University, Locked BagGeelongVICAustralia
| | - Carlos M. Rodriguez Lopez
- Deakin Genomics Research and Discovery FacilityDeakin University, Locked BagGeelongVICAustralia
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research InstituteThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Environmental Epigenetics and Genetics Group, Department of HorticultureCollege of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Michael R. Crossland
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research InstituteThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondSouth AustraliaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Gregory P. Brown
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research InstituteThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondSouth AustraliaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jayna L. DeVore
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research InstituteThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondSouth AustraliaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- UMR 241 EIOUniversity of French Polynesia, IFREMER, ILM, IRDFaa’aTahitiFrench Polynesia
| | - Richard Shine
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Research InstituteThe University of AdelaideGlen OsmondSouth AustraliaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lee A. Rollins
- Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Du Y, Wang X, Ashraf S, Tu W, Xi Y, Cui R, Chen S, Yu J, Han L, Gu S, Qu Y, Liu X. Climate match is key to predict range expansion of the world's worst invasive terrestrial vertebrates. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2024; 30:e17137. [PMID: 38273500 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Understanding the determinants of the range expansion of invasive alien species is crucial for developing effective prevention and control strategies. Nevertheless, we still lack a global picture of the potential factors influencing the invaded range expansion across taxonomic groups, especially for the world's worst invaders with high ecological and economic impacts. Here, by extensively collecting data on 363 distributional ranges of 19 of world's worst invasive terrestrial vertebrates across 135 invaded administrative jurisdictions, we observed remarkable variations in the range expansion across species and taxonomic groups. After controlling for taxonomic and geographic pseudoreplicates, model averaging analyses based on generalized additive mixed-effect models showed that species in invaded regions having climates more similar to those of their native ranges tended to undergo a larger range expansion. In addition, as proxies of propagule pressure and human-assisted transportation, the number of introduction events and the road network density were also important predictors facilitating the range expansion. Further variance partitioning analyses validated the predominant role of climate match in explaining the range expansion. Our study demonstrated that regions with similar climates to their native ranges could still be prioritized to prevent the spread of invasive species under the sustained global change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanbao Du
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xuyu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China
- Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Sadia Ashraf
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Weishan Tu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yonghong Xi
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ruina Cui
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shengnan Chen
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation (Ministry of Education), China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jiajie Yu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lixia Han
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Shimin Gu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yanhua Qu
- Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xuan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|