Competencies to enable learning-focused clinical supervision: a thematic analysis of the literature

Understanding Residents' and Supervisors' Views on Developing Support-Autonomy Balance Through Supervision Methods in Postgraduate Dental Training: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Supervisors continuously need to decide when to provide clinical opportunities for unsupervised patient care to facilitate residents' development in the complex clinical learning context. The aim of this study is to explore residents' and supervisors' views and understanding of the influence of clinical supervision on affording a balanced support-autonomy from the cognitive apprenticeship (CA) theoretical lens.

METHODS

Residents and supervisors, representing all disciplines, participated in five focus groups and four semi-structured individual interviews. Purposive and convenience sampling methods were used for recruiting participants. The reflexive thematic analysis approach was used for inductive data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 residents and 8 supervisors participated in this study. All agreed that CA teaching methods can be applied across all levels. Participants experienced changes in their supervision methods and supervisor-resident interactions at different levels of training. They related the selection of supervision to task-, resident- and supervisor-related factors. Learning facilitating factors in clinical learning environment were identified and suggestions to enrich residents' learning experiences were also reported.

CONCLUSION

The current study found that a one-size-fits-all paradigm may not be effective for clinical supervision. It contributes to our understanding of how the CA model may be used to guide supervisor behaviour and how such practices can be modified to residents' level of development and competencies.

Clinical educator expertise: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Allied health clinicians supervising healthcare students in workplace learning play a key role in a learner's progression to autonomous practice, yet expert educator practice is not well understood. How expert clinical educators in allied health professions are defined, enact their role, develop educational expertise and bring value to workplace learning is unclear.

METHODS

A scoping methodology was chosen to understand what is known about clinical educator expertise in allied health, focusing on definitions, characteristics, impacts and development. Searching seven databases, the authors used an iterative, systematic approach to the selection, collation and analysis of peer-reviewed and grey literature.

RESULTS

Within 21 included papers, diverse terms and definitions were used to describe expert clinical educators across 9 allied health professions and 5 countries. Expert educator characteristics included advanced skills in facilitating learning, the ability to build positive relationships with learners and a proactive attitude to developing personal supervision skills through reflection. Impacts were identified for learners and educators, and the few sources examining educator development found that expert practice grows in a dynamic, multi-mode, non-linear fashion.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive picture of the expert clinical educator in allied health is not yet conceptualised, despite some characteristics being associated with expertise. The differences between expert and less proficient educators are unclear with little examination of the impacts, value or development of expert educator capabilities. We offer a framework for future research and advocate for focused studies that examine clinical educator expertise, to enhance approaches to professional development and recognition of excellence in clinical educator practice.

Mentoring as a complex adaptive system - a systematic scoping review of prevailing mentoring theories in medical education

BACKGROUND

Effective mentorship is an important component of medical education with benefits to all stakeholders. In recent years, conceptualization of mentorship has gone beyond the traditional dyadic experienced mentor-novice mentee relationship to include group and peer mentoring. Existing theories of mentorship do not recognize mentoring's personalized, evolving, goal-driven, and context-specific nature. Evidencing the limitations of traditional cause-and-effect concepts, the purpose of this review was to systematically search the literature to determine if mentoring can be viewed as a complex adaptive system (CAS).

METHODS

A systematic scoping review using Krishna's Systematic Evidence-Based Approach was employed to study medical student and resident accounts of mentoring and CAS in general internal medicine and related subspecialties in articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2023 in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. The included articles underwent thematic and content analysis, with the themes identified and combined to create domains, which framed the discussion.

RESULTS

Of 5,704 abstracts reviewed, 134 full-text articles were evaluated, and 216 articles were included. The domains described how mentoring relationships and mentoring approaches embody characteristics of CAS and that mentorship often behaves as a community of practice (CoP). Mentoring's CAS-like features are displayed through CoPs, with distinct boundaries, a spiral mentoring trajectory, and longitudinal mentoring support and assessment processes.

CONCLUSION

Recognizing mentorship as a CAS demands the rethinking of the design, support, assessment, and oversight of mentorship and the role of mentors. Further study is required to better assess the mentoring process and to provide optimal training and support to mentors.

Designing for student autonomy combining theory and clinical practice - a qualitative study with a faculty perspective

BACKGROUND

Although extensive research exists about students' clinical learning, there is a lack of translation and integration of this knowledge into clinical educational practice. As a result, improvements may not be implemented and thus contribute to students' learning. The present study aimed to explore the nature of clinical faculty members' learning related to how they apply research about student autonomy.

METHODS

A course, "Designing learning for students' development of autonomy in clinical practice" was conducted for faculty responsible for students' clinical education. Within the frame of the course the participants designed a project and planned how they would implement it in their clinical context. Fourteen clinical faculty members participated in the study. The participants' interpretation of the educational intervention, which combines complex theory with the equally complex clinical practice, was explored by studying how the participants' approaches and understanding of the facilitation of autonomy were manifested in their projects. The projects in the form of reports and oral presentations were analyzed using qualitative content analysis together with an abductive approach.

FINDINGS

One identified domain was "Characteristics of the design and content of the projects". This domain was signified by two themes with different foci: Preparing the soil for facilitating student autonomy; and Cultivating opportunities for students to actively strive for autonomy. A second identified domain, "Embracing the meaning of facilitating autonomy" was connected to participants understanding of theories underlying how to support the development of autonomy. This domain contained two themes: Connection between activities and autonomy is self-evident and Certain factors can explain and facilitate development of autonomy.

CONCLUSION

Education directed to strategic clinical faculty members to develop evidence-based approaches to student learning can be productive. To succeed there is a need to emphasize faculty members individual understanding of actual research as well as learning theories in general. Faculty trying to reinforce changes are dependent on their own mandate, the structure in the clinic, and recognition of their work in the clinical context. To achieve a potential continuity and sustainability of implemented changes the implementation processes must be anchored throughout the actual organization.

Exploring pharmacists' perceptions of using a clinical supervision skills competency tool to reflect and develop their supervisory practices

INTRODUCTION

To date, there are no formal self-reflection tools routinely used by pharmacists within the Australian pharmacy profession. The study involved utilizing the Clinical Supervision Skills Competency Tool (CSSCT) at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia. It explored pharmacists' perceptions of the CSSCT and its impact on their ability to self-reflect and develop their supervisory practices.

METHODS

The qualitative study involved adapting the Clinical Supervision Skills Review Tool (CSRT), a clinician-validated tool. Prior to tool completion, participants attended an orientation session on the CSSCT. Thematic analysis and an inductive approach was then applied to data collected from two semi-structured focus group sessions and an online survey, for those not able to attend the focus groups.

RESULTS

A total of 19 pharmacists were recruited and completed the CSSCT. The three major themes regarding the CSSCT identified were: feasibility of the tool, aspects of the CSSCT, and future planning. Use of rating scales and breakdown of the supervisory competencies were perceived to be helpful. Conversely, the tool's length, pharmacists' high workloads and time pressures, were identified as potential barriers to using the tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Given pharmacists internationally currently lack a formal tool to enhance their supervisory methods, the CSSCT or similar tools emerge as valuable resources for steering pharmacists towards self-reflection and goal setting. Notably, the CSSCT sheds light on previously overlooked yet critical aspects of clinical supervision in the pharmacy context, including the wellbeing and cultural sensitivity of learners.

Supervisory knowing in practice across medical specialities

Clinical supervisors play key roles in facilitating trainee learning. Yet combining that role with patient care complicates both roles. So, we need to know how both roles can effectively co-occur. When facilitating their trainees' learning through practice, supervisors draw on their skills - clinical and supervisory - and available opportunities in their practice. This process can be conceptualised as supervisory knowing in practice (or contextual knowing) and offers ways to elaborate on how facilitating trainees' learning can be optimised. The practice-based study presented and discussed here examined clinical supervisors' knowing in practice related to facilitating trainee learning, across three medical specialities. Nineteen clinical supervisors from emergency medicine, internal medicine and surgery, were interviewed about their roles and engagement with trainees. Interview transcripts were analysed in two stages. Firstly, a framework analysis, informed by interdependent learning theory was conducted, focussing on affordances and individual engagement. Secondly, drawing on practice theory, a further layer of analysis was undertaken interrogating supervisors' knowing in practice. We identified two common domains of supervisor practice used to facilitate trainee learning: (1) orientating and assessing trainees' readiness (or capabilities), (2) sequencing and enriching pedagogic practices. Yet across the speciality groups the supervisors' knowing in practice differed and were shaped by a trio of: (i) disciplinary practices, (ii) situational requirements and (iii) clinician preference. Overall, we offer a new reading of clinical supervision as practice differences generated distinct supervisory knowing in practice. These findings emphasise clinical supervision as fundamentally entwined in the speciality's practice; and reinforce alignments with patient care.

Social Dynamics of Advice-Seeking: A Network Analysis of Two Residency Programs

Phenomenon: Residents interact with their peers and supervisors to ask for advice in response to complicated situations occurring during patient care. To provide a deeper understanding of workplace learning, this study explores the structure and dynamics of advice-seeking networks in two residency programs. Approach: We conducted a survey-based social network study. To develop the survey, we conducted focus group discussions and identified three main categories of advice: factual knowledge, clinical reasoning, and procedural skills. We invited a total of 49 emergency medicine and psychiatry residents who had completed at least six months of their training, to nominate their supervisors and peer residents, as their sources of advice, from a roster. Participants identified the number of occasions during the previous month that they turned to each person to seek advice regarding the three broad categories. We calculated the density, centrality, and reciprocity measures for each advice category at each department. Findings: The response rates were 100% (n = 21) and 85.7% (n = 24) in the emergency medicine and psychiatry departments, respectively. The advice network of emergency medicine residents was denser, less hierarchical, and less reciprocated compared to the psychiatry residents' network. In both departments, PGY-1s were the top advice-seekers, who turned to PGY-2s, PGY-3s, and supervisors for advice. The "procedural skills" network had the lowest density in both departments. There was less overlap in the sources of advice for different advice types in the psychiatry department, implying more selectivity of sources. Insights: Complex social structures and dynamics among residents vary by discipline and level of seniority. Program directors can develop tailored educational interventions informed by their departments' specific network patterns to promote a timely and effective advice-seeking culture which in turn, could lead to optimally informed patient care.

Cardiology residents' attitudes towards clinical supervision: a multi-centered study

PURPOSE

Residents' gender, residency level, and hospital types might influence their attitudes towards clinical supervision (CS); however, reports of its impact on cardiology residency are nonexistent. We explore the effect of gender, residency level, and hospital location's effect on Indonesian cardiology trainees' attitudes towards CS.

METHODS

A multi-centered, cross-sectional study was conducted. We invited 490 Indonesian cardiology residents in September- October 2019 to complete the Cardiology CS Scale. Residents' attitudes, gender, university, and residency year were expressed using descriptive statistics. A Mann-Whitney test analyzed the gender and university location effect on residents' attitudes. Training year and university's impact were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test; a p-value of <0.05 reflected a significant result.

RESULTS

A total of 388 residents agreed to participate (response rate=79.18%). Most of them were male (n=229 [59,02%]), attended universities in Java Island (n=262 [67,52%]), and were in their 2nd-3rd year of training (n=95 [24.48%], each). There were no significant differences in residents' attitudes between genders (U [Nmale=229, Nfemale=159]=17,908.50, z=-0.27, p=0.78). Generally, their attitudes were significantly affected by the university (H(7)=47.38, p<0.01). However, the university location (located in Java Island or outside Java Island) does not affect residents' attitude towards CS (U [NJava=262, Nnon-Java=126]=15,237.00, z=-1.23, p=0.22). In addition, the residents' training year also affected the residents' response (H(2)=14.278, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Cardiology residents' attitudes towards CS are significantly influenced by training year and university but not gender or university location. The results might provide insightful information for further improvement of CS in cardiology training and guide further evaluation.

Exploring clinical learning experiences of novice physiotherapy students in a hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Exposure to clinical practice experiences ensures undergraduate physiotherapy students meet the clinical competencies required to graduate as autonomous practitioners. Much of the research literature has investigated the clinical experiences of medical students. While recent studies have explored physiotherapy students' experiences with simulation, few have explored their perspectives of a clinical placement in a hospital setting at the early learning stage of a four-year programme.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives of novice undergraduate physiotherapy students on a clinical placement in a real hospital setting.

METHODS

Fifteen Year 3 undergraduate physiotherapy students participated in semi-structured interviews midway through a three-week tertiary care clinical placement. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged: 1) student attributes affecting placement experience; 2) impact of the educator on student experience; and 3) effects of the clinical environment on student experiences.

CONCLUSION

The real clinical environment promotes a rich learning experience for students, while the clinical educator is pivotal to guiding student learning through provision of resources and feedback. Provision of early orientation and timely clarification of expectations is important to alleviate anxiety and allow students to prepare themselves.

Recruitment and retention of radiography clinical practice educators

INTRODUCTION

Clinical Practice Educators (CPEs) play a vital role in radiography education, fostering the development of students' clinical competence and creating positive learning experiences. In recent years, there has been a high turnover and difficulties recruiting radiography CPEs in Ireland. This is the first study to explore issues surrounding recruitment and retention of radiography CPEs.

METHOD

A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was conducted to gain a better understanding of the issues surrounding recruitment and retention of radiography CPEs. Current and former CPEs affiliated with undergraduate radiography training in Ireland were recruited. CPEs completed an online questionnaire detailing demographics and career background. Online semi-structured focus groups were conducted with current CPEs and interviews with former CPEs.

RESULTS

Nineteen current CPEs completed the questionnaire and participated in focus groups (95% response rate). Ten CPEs who had resigned within the last five years were interviewed. The main motivators for CPEs were an interest in teaching, inspiration from role models, personal learning goals and the appeal of part-time employment. Job satisfaction was influenced by efficacy in the role, professional growth, autonomy, and relationships with stakeholders. The main disincentives were the CPE grade not being commensurate with work involved, lack of protected time and lack of support from colleagues. A variety of reasons for resignation were provided, many of which related to grading of the CPE post and lack of career progression opportunities in the role.

CONCLUSION

The findings outline the key motivators for radiography CPEs and disincentives relative to recruitment and retention of radiography CPEs in Ireland.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

By understanding the disincentives relative to CPE recruitment and retention, along with the motivators, employers can devise initiatives that reduce turnover and increase CPE retention.

Radiographers' perspectives on clinical supervision of students in Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Optimising clinical education in radiography is crucial to ensure competent graduates provide safe and effective patient care. Radiographers play a vital role in student supervision undertaken in the complex clinical environment. A greater understanding of factors influencing their ability to undertake this role effectively is needed. The study aimed to explore radiographers' attitudes and perceptions of confidence in undertaking clinical supervision and perceived barriers in a 'real-life' clinical department.

METHODS

The lens of Bandura's social-cognitive theory was utilised to assist the exploration of the desired constructs. An anonymous online survey was developed and circulated among qualified radiographers in Ireland. Descriptive (frequencies and percentages) and inferential statistical testing was undertaken. Thematic analysis was conducted on optional free-text comments.

RESULTS

217 responses were received. Although most radiographers reported a positive attitude (73.3%), a significant minority reported not being confident across survey items related to the tasks required (ranging from 20.7%-29.1%). Time pressures from clinical workload, perceived lack of organisational support, and lack of guidance on expectations were highlighted challenges.

CONCLUSION

The survey has enabled first-hand identification of some challenges radiographers encounter in undertaking students' clinical supervision. Radiographers must be supported to optimise the clinical learning environment where both students and educators are valued.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings highlight impact on educational support, practice, policy and future research. Effective clinical supervision is dependent on collaborative engagement and support being evident at all levels, including the clinical department, academic and healthcare institutions, and national organisations.

"Maybe it's the first time somebody's been honest with you": exploring how residents reconcile feedback variability

BACKGROUND

Supervisors in postgraduate medical education may deliver different feedback for the same quality of performance. Residents may struggle to make sense of inconsistent and sometimes contradictory information. We sought to explore how residents experience feedback from different supervisors, how they process inconsistent information, and what factors influence their experiences.

METHODS

Eighteen residents participated in semi-structured interviews to explore their perspectives on feedback. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we engaged in iterative cycles of data collection and analysis, sampling until theoretical sufficiency was reached. Constant comparative analysis was used to identify and define themes.

RESULTS

We identified a central theme of reconciliation, which we defined as the act of processing inconsistent feedback and determining how to engage with it. This reconciliation was informed by the credibility of, and residents' relationship with, supervisors and was achieved through conversations with peers and mentors, observation of other supervisors' behavior toward their performance, and reflection on their own performance. Participants expressed a reluctance to discard feedback, even if they felt it was incongruent with previous feedback or their own self-concept and self-assessment.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that while residents are regular consumers of feedback, not all feedback is used equally. Residents actively reconcile sometimes-contradictory feedback and must work to balance a general reluctance to discard feedback, while developing an understanding of its credibility. This work reinforces the importance of pedagogical relationships and identifies that facilitated reflection that explicitly acknowledges feedback inconsistencies may be important in the reconciliation process.

Factors that enhance midwifery students' learning and development of self-efficacy in clinical placement: A systematic qualitative review

AIM

To conduct a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies to explore the significant factors that enhance midwifery students' learning experiences and development of self-efficacy in clinical placement.

BACKGROUND

Midwifery education programs leading to registration as a midwife require students to achieve academic, clinical, and professional competence. Clinical placement comprises a significant part of the program as students work and are assessed under the direct supervision of the Registered Midwife or preceptor. This learning and teaching partnership aims to enable the transfer of knowledge, skills, and behavior, i.e., competence, while providing the opportunity for students to become socialized into the midwifery practice culture. Against this background, characterized by the shortage of midwives, declining fertility rates, and a stressful environment, students learn to become a midwife and develop self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is the belief in one's ability to master challenges, which is described as a component in learning theories. There seems to be a need to identify factors that contribute to this development.

DESIGN

A qualitative systematic literature review.

METHOD

A systematic database search was conducted to identify primary peer reviewed qualitative literature published between 2000 and 2021 that has explored what enhances midwifery students' learning during their clinical placement. The databases searched included CINAHL (EBSCO), Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), JBI Joanna Briggs Institute (Ovid), SveMed+ , and Web of Science. The search yielded a total of 354 results, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria. The relevant findings from the 22 studies were thematically analyzed and presented in the results.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed two descriptive themes - 'A nurturing relationship' and 'Predictability in the learning process, contextual factors. In addition, one analytic theme emerged - 'Gaining access to and belonging in an enabling educational and working culture'.

CONCLUSION

The relationship with the preceptor is a prerequisite for midwife students learning process and achievement of self-efficacy. A learning culture appears to be the fertile ground in which midwife students thrive and where they develop the self-efficacy needed to meet the demands of clinical placement.

Learning from clinical supervision - a qualitative study of undergraduate medical students' experiences

INTRODUCTION

Clinical supervision is necessary to ensure students' learning and patient safety. There is limited research on how medical students' actions play into the dynamic of learning from clinical supervision. We aimed to explore undergraduate medical students' experiences with learning from clinical supervision, focusing on students' actions and interactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with medical students at two English and four Norwegian universities. The main topics were students' experiences with clinical supervision, what students' felt helped them learn, and how they acted. Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

22 students participated. The actions participants described performing during supervision ranged from staying quiet to initiating active participation. They described that learning was more likely to take place when they took initiative, acted on opportunities to participate, and focused their attention on learning. When they did not feel safe, they were more likely to stay quietly in the background. When participants felt concerned for patients' welfare their attention shifted away from learning. While if they were appropriately confident, they engaged in learning.

CONCLUSION

Feelings of safety, patients' being cared for, and confidence impacted on students' actions and thus learning. Our findings suggest that when students feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to act and interact during clinical supervision. One way to improve psychological safety is to foster relationships between students and supervisors.

Balancing acting and adapting: a qualitative study of medical students' experiences of early clinical placement

BACKGROUND

Clinical learning experience is an important part of medical education. In the clinical learning environment, students are exposed to various aspects of medical care and may train their skills under supervision. Supervision, in which students' learning needs and the outcomes of placements are met, is essential. The aim of this study was to explore medical students' experiences of the early stages of clinical training.

METHODS

In 2021, 18 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical students after their first clinical placements in semester 5. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Graneim and Lundman.

RESULTS

The findings resulted in an overall theme: balancing acting and adapting. Three categories described that the clinical learning environment was a big leap from campus, that personal relationships influenced learning, and that the organization of clinical placements was suboptimal. The students were encouraged to push themselves forward to practice clinical skills. This, however, did not suit all the students; the cautious ones risked becoming passive spectators. The intended learning outcomes were not frequently used; rather, the supervisors asked the students what they had learned, or the students focused on what seemed to be important on the ward. The students tried to adapt to their supervisors' working situation and not to be a burden to them.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the transition from learning on campus was sometimes abrupt, as the students had to switch to a more active learning role. Ad hoc solutions in supervision occurred, which contributed to the experience that educational responsibilities were downgraded and the opportunities for clinical training varied. Rather than trying to change the circumstances, the students opted to adapt to the busy clinical learning environment.

A tool to evaluate physiotherapy clinical education in South Africa

Background

Physiotherapy clinical education is complex. The dynamic learning milieu is fluid and multidimensional, which contributes to the complexity of the clinical learning experience. Consequently, there are numerous factors which impact the clinical learning experience which cannot be measured objectively - a gap which led to the development of our study.

Objectives

To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an assessment tool that evaluates the effectiveness and quality of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.

Method

A mixed methods approach in three phases included physiotherapy academics, clinical educators, and clinicians throughout South Africa. Phase One was a qualitative study: focus group discussions determined items and domains of the tool. Phase Two established the content and construct validity of the tool, a scoring system and a name for the tool, using the Delphi method. In Phase Three, factor analysis reduced the number of items, and the feasibility and utility of the tool was determined cross-sectionally.

Results

The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool (VN-CPET) of 58 items and six domains was developed and found to be valid, reliable (α = 0.75) and useful. The six domains of VN-CPET include governance; academic processes; learning exposure; clinical orientation; clinical supervision and quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation.

Conclusion

The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool is a valid, reliable and standardised tool, that evaluates the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.

Clinical implications

This tool can objectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes in South Africa, and other health science education programmes, both locally and globally, with minor modification.

Bridging the Gap: Using Consensus to Explore Entrustment Decisions and Feedback Receptivity in Competency-Based Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Through the Construction of a Q-Sample Incorporating a Delphi Technique

Background

Recent changes in medical education calls for a shift toward student-centered learning. Therefore, it is imperative that clinical educators transparently assess the work-readiness of their medical residents through entrustment-based supervision decisions toward independent practice. Similarly, it is critical that medical residents are vocal about the quality of supervision and feedback they receive. This study aimed to explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity by establishing a general consensus among Taiwanese clinical educators and medical residents regarding entrustment decisions and feedback uptake, respectively.

Methods

In Q-methodology studies, a set of opinion statement (i.e., the Q-sample) is generated to represent the phenomenon of interest. To explore the factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity, a Q-sample was developed using a four-step approach: (1) literature search using electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, and interviews with emergency clinical educators and medical residents to generate opinion statements, (2) thematic analysis and grouping using The Model of Trust, the Ready, Wiling, and Able model, and the theory of self-regulated learning, (3) translation, and (4) application of a Delphi technique, including two expert panels comprised of clinical educators and medical residents, to establish a consensus of the statements and validation for a subsequent Q-study.

Results

A total of 585 and 1,039 statements from the literature search and interviews were extracted to populate the sample of statements (i.e., the concourse) regarding entrustment-based supervision decisions for clinical educators and feedback receptivity emergency medicine residents, respectively. Two expert panels were invited to participate in a Delphi Technique, comprised of 11 clinical educators and 13 medical residents. After two-rounds of a Delphi technique, the panel of clinical educators agreed on 54 statements on factors that influence entrustment-based supervision decisions and were categorized into five themes defined by the Model of Trust. Similarly, a total of 60 statements on the factors that influence feedback receptivity were retained by the panel of medical residents and were categorized into five themes defined by the Ready, Willing, and Able model and the theory of self-regulated learning.

Conclusion

Though not exhaustive, the key factors agreed upon by clinical educators and medical residents reflect the characteristics of entrustment-based supervision decisions and feedback receptivity across specialties. This study provides insight on an often overlooked issue of the paths to teaching and learning in competency-based residency training programs. Additionally, incorporation of the Delphi technique further adds to the existing literature and puts emphasis as an important tool that can be used in medical education to rigorously validate Q-statements and develop Q-samples in various specialties.

Advancing clinical facilitator capability to support graduate nurses: Outputs from social learning processes embedded in action research cycles

AIM

This study in the first instance, seeks to identify encounters that commonly occur between graduates, facilitators and others; and second, to explicate skills and behaviours needed by facilitators to effectively guide graduates to perform at expected standards.

BACKGROUND

In Australia, nursing graduates are expected to assimilate quickly and adapt to workplace practices within short timeframes. Clinical facilitators are provided to support transition to the workplace. However, providing support is only understood in broad terms.

DESIGN

Two consecutive action research cycles informed by extended Vygotskian learning concepts guided the study. The first cycle recorded and categorised critical encounters with graduates which were subsequently subjected to a thematic analysis to identify common circumstances where clinical facilitators are required to provide support to graduates. The second cycle articulated behaviours useful to clinical faciltators to foster graduate nurse learning, for optimal management of challenges experienced in routine daily practice.

METHOD

Registered nurses involved in graduate clinical facilitation at a large (780 bed adult facility) and a medium (448 bed adult, paediatric, maternity) acute hospital participated in the study. This graduate facilitation team through situated learning and a series of joint activity designed an EXCEL spreadsheet on which they recorded their observations and experiences with faciltating graduates transition to practice.

RESULTS

From 1615 reported challenging interactions in the first cycle, saturation of emerging themes was reached with a random subset of 142. Six common areas of intensive needs for graduates were recorded, namely, resilience, technical support, emergent need, time management, advocate for graduate and catastrophe. The second cycle articulated processes for managing identified need areas in the form of flow charts. In practice, the flow charts provide a means for 'scaffolding' supervision and suggest conversations useful to facilitators to successfully support graduate nurses.

CONCLUSION

This research has successfully explicated a largely 'undefined' area of nursing work, that is, making the invisible work of clinical facilitators 'visible' through the construction of flow charts. Specifically, advances have been made in articulating contextual, constructive support that nurses who facilitate the assimilation of graduates need to bring to interactions with graduates.

Bidirectional learning opportunities: How GP-supervisors and trainees exchange knowledge

INTRODUCTION

Workplace-based learning conversations can be a good opportunity for supervisors and trainees to learn from each other. When both professionals discuss their specific knowledge openly with each other, learning conversations may be a useful educational tool, for instance for learning how to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the workplace. We do, however, need a better understanding of how the exchange of knowledge provides opportunities for such bidirectional learning. The aim of this study was therefore to analyse how trainees and supervisors currently handle bidirectional learning opportunities by describing in detail how supervisors respond to knowledge expressed by trainees during a learning conversation.

METHOD

We video-recorded learning conversations between supervisors and trainees in general practice (GP). Within these learning conversations, EBM discussions on medical topics were selected and transcribed. We then identified, analysed using Conversation Analysis (CA) and categorised each expression of knowledge by the trainee and the supervisor's subsequent response.

RESULTS

We found that when a trainee expresses knowledge during the learning conversation, supervisors either (a) refute the expressed knowledge, (b) immediately suggest an alternative or (c) pose (additional) questions. These responses have consequences for the learning opportunities of both trainee and supervisor: it is only when supervisors pose further questions that trainees are encouraged to elaborate on their knowledge, leading to a bidirectional learning opportunity.

DISCUSSION

Improving EBM learning opportunities for both supervisors and trainees requires more than simply instructing trainees to express knowledge-based-for instance-on recent evidence more often. Inflexible institutional roles related to historical claims of supervisors' epistemic authority hamper bidirectional learning. Posing open questions during learning conversations enhances the flexibility of institutional roles while also creating bidirectional learning opportunities.

Enhancing Quality Supervision for the Delivery of Mental Health Care Through Nonspecialist Clinicians in Resource-Limited Settings

Supervision of nonspecialist clinicians by trained mental health professionals is integral to developing capacity for providing mental health care in low-resource settings. Current supervision efforts in low-resource settings, however, are often variable in quality. Scant published literature addresses how supervision practices affect treatment outcomes; only a few studies have been published on evidence-based supervision methods. Additionally, in low-resource settings many systems-level obstacles exist in providing adequate mental health supervision to nonspecialist clinicians. This article seeks to address psychiatrists' role in providing supervision and promoting quality of care in low-resource settings. We review the literature on evidence-based supervision practices, address obstacles and current practices of providing high-quality mental health supervision in low-resource settings, and weave this knowledge with our experiences learning from the clinicians at Partners in Health in Haiti. We also discuss feasible strategies and provide recommendations for strengthening the supervision process in resource-limited settings.

Teaching domains of clinical instruction from the experiences of preceptors

Clinical teaching is vital to prepare nursing students for the role, build learning experiences, and ease transition. This study aimed at exploring the pedagogical principles that guide clinical educators in teaching undergraduate nursing students. The descriptive, qualitative, multiple-case study design, guided by the cognitive task analysis research, helped gain insights into how 18 nurse preceptors provided clinical instruction. The design entailed direct observation of preceptors while teaching students followed by interviews. Observation notes and interview data were analyzed using pattern identification and data thematization. Teaching practices of preceptors were grouped into four domains: (1) partnership, (2) competence-building, (3) nurturing, and (4) meaning-making. The domains represent the pedagogical principles that underpin the preceptors' instructional practice. While the focus of instruction was on competence-building of students, the meaning-making domain was found subordinated by most of preceptors. The findings support prior recommendations that expertise and proficiency must not be the sole agents for selecting preceptors. This study will significantly contribute to the advancement of nursing education through an improved education system that incorporates the four domains in clinical instruction in general, and preceptor preparation in specific. The emergent domains contribute to setting the framework of clinical instruction.

A Systematic Review of the Legal Considerations Surrounding Medicines Management

This study explores the legal considerations surrounding medicines management, providing a synthesis of existing knowledge. An integrative systematic review of the current international knowledge was performed. The search encompassed the online databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science using MeSH terms and relevant keywords relating to the legal considerations of medicines management in healthcare settings. The search process led to the identification of 6051 studies published between 2010 and 2020, of which six articles were found to be appropriate for data analysis and synthesis based on inclusion criteria. Research methods were varied and included qualitative interviews, mixed-methods designs, retrospective case reports and cross-sectional interrupted time-series analysis. Their foci were on the delegation of medicines management, pharmacovigilance and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) before and after legislation by nurses, physicians and pharmacists, medico-legal litigation, use of forced medication and the prescription monitoring program. Given the heterogenicity of the studies in terms of aims and research methods, a meta-analysis could not be performed and, therefore, our review findings are presented narratively under the categories of 'healthcare providers' education and monitoring tasks', 'individual and shared responsibility', and 'patients' rights'. This review identifies legal aspects surrounding medicines management, including supervision and monitoring of the effects of medicines; healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes; support and standardised tools for monitoring and reporting medicines' adverse side effects/ADRs; electronic health record systems; individual and shared perceptions of responsibility; recognition of nurses' roles; detection of sentinel medication errors; covert or non-voluntary administration of medication, and patient participation.

Rethinking clinical instruction through the zone of proximal development

BACKGROUND

The complexity of the learning environment and intricacy of nursing tasks make it difficult for students to learn without the assistance of an expert. Teaching in the zone of proximal development (ZPD) aims at positioning learners in the zone of what they can do and develop with assistance to reach full potential and independence. ZPD is deemed essential to understand how teaching and learning take place; however, its implications for clinical educators are limited and need further exploration.

OBJECTIVES

This research study aimed at exploring the instructional strategies that preceptors use to guide and support the development of undergraduate nursing students, from what they are capable of doing with assistance to what they can become and do independently.

DESIGN

The qualitative multiple case study research design was used to gain insights into the teaching experiences of 18 nurse preceptors situated in three recognized hospitals in Lebanon.

METHODS

Each preceptor was interviewed face-to-face using questions that were developed from a three-hour observation. Vygotsky's learning principles formed the reference point for this study. Analytic induction and constant comparison of preceptors' responses were applied throughout the study to unravel assisted strategies that target the potential learning zones of the student.

RESULTS

Three assumptions emerged from the data to underpin the preceptors' assistive strategies that help move learners from a cannot-do-level to can do independently. The assumptions are: (1) learning from clinical experience, (2) teaching beyond student ability, and (3) teaching for autonomy. In-depth analysis of both assumptions and strategies that focus instruction within each student's ZPD converged on a framework of three constructs: differentiated instruction, instructional scaffolding, and influencing a positive learning environment.

CONCLUSION

It is imperative that clinical educators be most receptive to instruction that targets the student's ZPD, as the zone represents a potential phase in student learning. This study provides a ZPD framework for intensifying learning gains from clinical practice.

Conflict between clinician teachers and their students: the clinician perspective

The relationship between clinician teachers and their students is of major importance in medical education. However, there is little known about the effects on clinicians when conflict occurs with their students. What do clinicians perceive to be major causes of these conflicts? How do they react when and after conflict occurs? A phenomenological inquiry exploring the lived experience of 12 clinician teachers in medical schools was performed. The clinicians were selected using purposeful sampling and snowballing techniques. The interviews revolved around discussions based on episodes of conflict with medical students that the clinicians considered significant. The analysis and emergent themes were partially constructed around and informed by theories of conflict, and conflict management. A number of themes emerged from this study. Clinicians experienced that significant psychological and behavioural problems of students had a dominant impact on the likelihood and severity of conflict; these conflicts had a significant emotional impact on clinicians; though the responses to conflict varied, "avoidance" was a mechanism commonly used by clinicians and thus the assessment of attitudinal and behavioural professional issues in the workplace was problematic. This study shows how the clinician perspective to challenging student/clinician encounters impacts on the quality of education they are able to provide. We recommend medical schools consider these issues when designing their programs in order to develop and maintain clinician-teacher engagement and participation.

International students in professional placements: supervision strategies for positive learning experiences

BACKGROUND

Professional placements are critical elements of speech-language pathology qualifying programmes that can be complex learning environments for international students. Students are supported by placement educators who facilitate their developing skills and competencies for professional practice in these placements. However, strategies that facilitate international students' learning in placements have not been identified.

AIMS

To identify strategies that are reported by speech-language pathology international students and placement educators to facilitate positive learning experiences and competency development in practice placements.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

This study used an exploratory research design to gather data from four focus groups with international students and five focus groups with placement educators. Thematic analysis was used to identify strategies, and these were interpreted using two theories of learning.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Four themes were identified that described international students' placement experiences and learning. For each theme, strategies were identified that placement educators can practically and responsively implement with international students to enable positive placement learning experiences.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

These strategies support international students to manage acculturative adjustments for the cultural and learning requirements of placements that may facilitate their successful participation, and provide structure to reduce their cognitive load. However, strategies to develop communication skills for practice were less feasible. Through fostering positive placement experiences, these strategies may also facilitate opportunities for educators and international students to share intercultural skills and knowledge that may be transferable to practice.

Health Professions Educators' System-Oriented Roles as Educational Advocate, Quality Improver, and Broker

INTRODUCTION

Health professionals have many facets to their educational role. Although the teaching and student support dimensions of health professionals' educational role are highly visible in the literature, other nontraditional elements are not. This study presents a broader conceptualization of health professionals' educational role, with a focus on the strategic dimensions of their role.

METHODS

Participants were health professionals from different clinical backgrounds and teaching settings, with a formal role in education. Data were collected using a survey (n = 41) and interviews (n = 9), and this article focuses on reporting the qualitative findings of this study. Thematic analysis was used for data interpretation.

RESULTS

Health professionals have three strategic dimensions to their educational role. The first strategic dimension is educational advocacy, which is aimed at championing education at different levels and parts of the educational system and building educational capacity. The second strategic dimension is educational quality improvement which is focused on shifting narratives around education and educational change in health service settings and leveraging educational evidence. The final strategic dimension is educational brokerage which is oriented at connecting clinical and educational communities and building trust and consensus.

DISCUSSION

Beyond the microlevel of learning and teaching, health professionals engage in strategic work that is focused on the broader educational mission within health. Continuing professional development initiatives can empower health professionals to optimize these strategic and system-focused educational roles and responsibilities.

Supervised workplace learning in postgraduate training: a realist synthesis

Context

This paper presents a realist synthesis of the literature that began with the objective of developing a theory of workplace learning specific to postgraduate medical education (PME). As the review progressed, we focused on informal learning between trainee and senior doctor or supervisor, asking what mechanisms occur between trainee and senior doctor that lead to the outcomes of PME, and what contexts shape the operation of these mechanisms and the outcomes they produce?

Methods

We followed the procedures outlined in the RAMESES Publication Standards for Realist Synthesis. We searched the English‐language literature published between 1995 and 2017 for empirical papers related to informal workplace learning between supervisor and trainee, excluding formal interventions such as workplace‐based assessment. We made a pragmatic decision to exclude general practice training to keep the review within manageable limits.

Results

We reviewed 5197 papers and selected 90. Synthesis revealed three workplace learning processes occurring between supervisors and trainees, each underpinned by a pair of mechanisms: supervised participation in practice (entrustment and support seeking); mutual observation of practice (monitoring and modelling), and dialogue during practice (meaning making and feedback). These mechanisms result in outcomes of PME, including safe participation in practice, learning skills, attitudes and behaviours and professional identity development. Contexts shaping the outcomes of these mechanisms were identified at individual, interpersonal, local and systems levels.

Conclusions

Our realist theory of workplace learning between supervisors and trainees is informed by theory and empirical research. It highlights the two‐way nature of supervision, the importance of trainees’ agency in their own learning and the deleterious effect of fragmented working patterns on supervisor–trainee learning mechanisms. Further empirical research is required to test and refine this theory. In the meantime, it provides a useful framework for the design of supportive learning environments and for the preparation of supervisors and trainees for their roles in workplace learning.

The authors describe a realist theory of learning between supervisor and postgraduate trainee in the workplace, emphasising the role of individual, interpersonal, local and systems contexts in shaping key mechanisms and their outcomes.

The supervisory encounter and the senior GP trainee: managing for, through and with

OBJECTIVE

Help-seeking supervisory encounters provide important learning experiences for trainees preparing for independent practice. Although there is a body of expert opinion and theories on how supervisor encounters should happen, supporting empirical data are limited. This is particularly true for the senior general practice (GP) trainee. Without knowing what happens during these encounters, we cannot know how to maximise their educational potential. This study aimed to understand what happens when senior GP trainees call on their supervisor when caring for patients and how learning can be enhanced when this occurs.

METHODS

This is an analysis of data from a multi-case study of five GP supervisory pairs, each with a GP registrar and their supervisor. The data are recordings of 45 supervisory encounters, 78 post-encounter reflections and six interviews. We used Wenger's communities of practice theory and rhetorical genre theory as analytical lenses.

RESULTS

The supervisory encounters followed a consistent format, which fitted the form of a genre. Within this genre, three dominant interactional patterns were identified, which we labelled 'managing for', 'managing through' and 'managing with'. Each pattern presented different opportunities and drew on different skills. The primary agenda was always developing a plan for the patient. Education agendas included acquiring knowledge, developing skills and achieving independence. Other agendas were issues of control, credibility and relationship building. Both supervisor and trainee could be purposeful in their supervisory engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

For supervisors and trainees to achieve the educational potential of their supervisory encounters they require flexibility. This depends on understanding the genre of the supervisory encounter, the agendas at play, the options they have in engaging and having the skills to utilise these options. Educators can facilitate supervisors and trainees in acquiring this understanding and these skills. We recommend further research into the genre of the supervisory encounter.

How Supervisor Experience Influences Trust, Supervision, and Trainee Learning: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Appropriate trust and supervision facilitate trainees' growth toward unsupervised practice. The authors investigated how supervisor experience influences trust, supervision, and subsequently trainee learning.

METHOD

In a two-phase qualitative inductive content analysis, phase one entailed reviewing 44 internal medicine resident and attending supervisor interviews from two institutions (July 2013 to September 2014) for themes on how supervisor experience influences trust and supervision. Three supervisor exemplars (early, developing, experienced) were developed and shared in phase two focus groups at a single institution, wherein 23 trainees validated the exemplars and discussed how each impacted learning (November 2015).

RESULTS

Phase one: Four domains of trust and supervision varying with experience emerged: data, approach, perspective, clinical. Early supervisors were detail oriented and determined trust depending on task completion (data), were rule based (approach), drew on their experiences as trainees to guide supervision (perspective), and felt less confident clinically compared with more experienced supervisors (clinical). Experienced supervisors determined trust holistically (data), checked key aspects of patient care selectively and covertly (approach), reflected on individual experiences supervising (perspective), and felt comfortable managing clinical problems and gauging trainee abilities (clinical). Phase two: Trainees felt the exemplars reflected their experiences, described their preferences and learning needs shifting over time, and emphasized the importance of supervisor flexibility to match their learning needs.

CONCLUSIONS

With experience, supervisors differ in their approach to trust and supervision. Supervisors need to trust themselves before being able to trust others. Trainees perceive these differences and seek supervision approaches that align with their learning needs.

Strategies for interprofessional facilitators and clinical supervisors that may enhance the emotional intelligence of therapy students

Emotional intelligence (EI) is a critical skill for occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech pathology students (therapy students). This article reports the findings from an analysis of interviews with therapy students (n = 24) to determine the aspects of clinical placements that therapy students perceived as influencing the changes in EI scores. This article reports the findings of the qualitative phase of a longitudinal, retrospective mixed methods design. Interviewees were selected using purposive sampling. Of those interviewed, 95% agreed that clinical placements had a significant impact on a range of EI skills with changes being both positive and negative. Content analysis showed that students perceived their EI skills had changed because of the following aspects of clinical placements: student-supervisor interactions, student interactions with patients in emotional distress and being encouraged to reflect and hear feedback on their EI skills. To support and enhance student's EI skills, interprofessional facilitators and profession-specific supervisors are recommended to utilise the following strategies with interprofessional cohorts. Supervisors and facilitators should be emotionally in-tune with students and trust students to work autonomously with patients experiencing emotional distress, pain and loss, especially those with complex needs. Importantly, interprofessional facilitators and direct supervisors should encourage students to reflect on their EI skills both individually and as a group. Supervisors should frequently evaluate and provide feedback to students on their EI skills, at the same time as providing feedback on their practical and clinical reasoning skills.

The art of preceptorship. A qualitative study

In the clinical nursing practice preceptorship is a widespread method to improve patient care by assisting nurses in developing the right clinical skills. However, little is known about how preceptorship should be practiced to achieve a positive learning outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate how preceptorship can be used in clinical practice to create learning and facilitate competence development. A qualitative study guided by a hermeneutic phenomenological approach and inspired by ethnographic fieldwork included 28 participant observations and 58 interviews. Data were analysed according to Steinar Kvale's three interpretation contexts. The findings showed three themes: Being together: Preceptee and preceptor were physically present in the same room optimising the learning situation with focus on complexity, use of senses and patient safety. Doing together: Preceptee and preceptor performed nursing together to obtain skills focusing on independence, practical skills and communication. Getting along together: Preceptee and preceptor together focused on the patient, relation, comfort and managing how to keep the balance between a professional and a personal relation. Precepetorship is situated learning where knowledge and skills are generated through participation in clinical practice. In this way, nurses develop clinical judgement and independence.