Contextual competence and collective responsibility

Set Up to Fail? Barriers Impeding Resident Communication Training in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

PURPOSE

Learning to navigate difficult clinical conversations is an essential feature of residency training, yet much of this learning occurs "on the job," often without the formative, multisource feedback trainees need. To generate insight into how on-the-job training influences trainee performance, the perspectives of parents and health care providers (HCPs) who engaged in or observed difficult conversations with Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) trainees were explored.

METHOD

The iterative data generation and analysis process was informed by constructivist grounded theory. Parents (n = 14) and HCPs (n = 10) from 2 Canadian NICUs were invited to participate in semistructured interviews informed by rich pictures-a visual elicitation technique useful for exploring complex phenomena like difficult conversations. Themes were identified using the constant comparative approach. The study was conducted between 2018 and 2021.

RESULTS

According to participants, misalignment between parents' and trainees' communication styles, HCPs intervening to protect parents when trainee-led communication went awry, the absence of feedback, and a culture of sole physician responsibility for communication all conspired against trainees trying to develop communication competence in the NICU. Given beliefs that trainees' experiential learning should not trump parents' well-being, some physicians perceived the art of communication was best learned by observing experts. Sometimes, already limited opportunities for trainees to lead conversations were further constricted by perceptions that trainees lacked the interest and motivation to focus on so-called "soft" skills like communication during their training.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents and NICU staff described that trainees face multiple barriers against learning to navigate difficult conversations that may set them up to fail. A deeper understanding of the layered challenges trainees face, and the hierarchies and sociocultural norms that interfere with teaching, may be the start of breaking down multiple barriers trainees and their clinician supervisors need to overcome to succeed.

"The Most Crushing Thing": Understanding Resident Assessment Burden in a Competency-Based Curriculum

BACKGROUND

Competency-based medical education (CBME) was expected to increase the workload of assessment for graduate training programs to support the development of competence. Learning conditions were anticipated to improve through the provision of tailored learning experiences and more frequent, low-stakes assessments. Canada has adopted an approach to CBME called Competence by Design (CBD). However, in the process of implementation, learner anxiety and assessment burden have increased unexpectedly. To mitigate this unintended consequence, we need a stronger understanding of how resident assessment burdens emerge and function.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates contextual factors leading to assessment burden on residents within the framework of CBD.

METHODS

Residents were interviewed about their experiences of assessment using constructivist grounded theory. Participants (n=21) were a purposive sample from operative and perioperative training programs, recruited from 6 Canadian medical schools between 2019 and 2020. Self-determination theory was used as a sensitizing concept to categorize findings on types of assessment burden.

RESULTS

Nine assessment burdens were identified and organized by threats to psychological needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence. Burdens included: missed opportunities for self-regulated learning, lack of situational control, comparative assessment, lack of trust, constraints on time and resources, disconnects between teachers and learners, lack of clarity, unrealistic expectations, and limitations of assessment forms for providing meaningful feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes a contextual understanding of how assessment burdens emerged as unmet psychological needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence, with unintended consequences for learner well-being and intrinsic motivation.