When I say … active learning

Going beyond the comparison: toward experimental instructional design research with impact

To design effective instruction, educators need to know what design strategies are generally effective and why these strategies work, based on the mechanisms through which they operate. Experimental comparison studies, which compare one instructional design against another, can generate much needed evidence in support of effective design strategies. However, experimental comparison studies are often not equipped to generate evidence regarding the mechanisms through which strategies operate. Therefore, simply conducting experimental comparison studies may not provide educators with all the information they need to design more effective instruction. To generate evidence for the what and the why of design strategies, we advocate for researchers to conduct experimental comparison studies that include mediation or moderation analyses, which can illuminate the mechanisms through which design strategies operate. The purpose of this article is to provide a conceptual overview of mediation and moderation analyses for researchers who conduct experimental comparison studies in instructional design. While these statistical techniques add complexity to study design and analysis, they hold great promise for providing educators with more powerful information upon which to base their instructional design decisions. Using two real-world examples from our own work, we describe the structure of mediation and moderation analyses, emphasizing the need to control for confounding even in the context of experimental studies. We also discuss the importance of using learning theories to help identify mediating or moderating variables to test.

Applying the Purpose, Autonomy, Confidence, Engrossment Model of Motivational Design to Support Motivation for Continuing Professional Development

ABSTRACT

Health professionals' motivation is a key determinant of their continuing professional development (CPD) outcomes. Therefore, CPD providers must ensure that they design CPD activities to support health professionals' motivation; this process is referred to as motivational design. The aim of this article is to introduce CPD providers to the PACE (purpose, autonomy, confidence, engrossment) model of motivational design, and describe how we applied the PACE model to create two online modules for an interprofessional audience. The PACE model builds on other available models of motivation design by offering theoretically informed strategies to support autonomous motivation, a specific quality of motivation that is associated with more effective learning processes and outcomes. Our experience suggests that CPD providers can use the PACE model to guide their motivational design efforts. We also encourage CPD researchers to test the theoretical assumptions that inform the PACE model.