Thermoregulatory responses to combined moderate heat stress and hypoxia

The nitric oxide dependence of cutaneous microvascular function to independent and combined hypoxic cold exposure

When separated from local cooling, whole body cooling elicited cutaneous reflex vasoconstriction via mechanisms independent of nitric oxide removal. Hypoxia elicited cutaneous vasodilatation via mechanisms mediated primarily by nitric oxide synthase, rather than xanthine oxidase-mediated nitrite reduction. Cold-induced vasoconstriction was blunted by the opposing effect of hypoxic vasodilatation, whereas the underpinning mechanisms did not interrelate in the absence of local cooling. Full vasoconstriction was restored with nitric oxide synthase inhibition.

Skin tattooing impairs sweating during passive whole body heating

Tattooing of the skin involves repeated needle insertions to deposit ink into the dermal layer of the skin, potentially damaging eccrine sweat glands and the cutaneous vasculature. This study tested the hypothesis that reflex increases in sweat rate (SR) and cutaneous vasodilation are blunted in tattooed skin (TAT) compared with adjacent healthy skin (CON) during a passive whole body heat stress (WBH). Ten individuals (5 males and 5 females) with a sufficient area of tattooed skin participated in the study. Intestinal temperature (T_int), skin temperature (T_skin), skin blood flow (laser Doppler flux; LDF), and SR were continuously measured during normothermic baseline (34°C water perfusing a tube-lined suit) and WBH (increased T_int 1.0°C via 48°C water perfusing suit). SR throughout WBH was lower for TAT compared with CON (P = 0.033). Accumulated sweating responses during WBH (area under curve) were attenuated in TAT relative to CON (23.1 ± 12.9, 26.9 ± 14.5 mg/cm², P = 0.043). Sweating threshold, expressed as the onset of sweating in time or T_int from the initiation of WBH, was not different between TAT and CON. Tattooing impeded the ability to obtain LDF measurements. These data suggest that tattooing functionally damages secretion mechanisms, affecting the reflex capacity of the gland to produce sweat, but does not appear to affect neural signaling to initiate sweating. Decreased sweating could impact heat dissipation especially when tattooing covers a higher percentage of body surface area and could be considered a potential long-term clinical side effect of tattooing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to assess the reflex control of sweating in tattooed skin. The novel findings are twofold. First, attenuated increases in sweat rate were observed in tattooed skin compared with adjacent healthy non-tattooed skin in response to a moderate increase (1.0°C) in internal temperature during a passive whole body heat stress. Second, reduced sweating in tattooed skin is likely related to functional damage to the secretory mechanisms of eccrine sweat glands, rendering it less responsive to cholinergic stimulation.

Influences of hypobaric hypoxia on skin blood flow and sweating responses during exercise in neutral and hot environments

Exposure to hot environments augments cutaneous vasodilation and sweating during exercise compared with these responses in cooler environments. The effects of hypobaric hypoxia on these responses are less clear, as are the effects of heat and simulated altitude combined. We evaluated the individual and potential additive effects of environmental heat and hypobaric hypoxia on skin blood flow and sweating responses during exercise. Thirteen volunteers (11 M, 2 F; age 25.3 ± 6.1 yr; height 177 ± 9 cm; weight 81.2 ± 16.8 kg) completed 30 min of steady-state (SS) exercise on a cycle ergometer at 50% V̇o_2peak during four separate conditions: 1) sea level thermoneutral (SLTN; 250 m, 20°C, 30-50% RH), 2) sea level hot (SLH; 250 m, 35°C, 30% RH), 3) simulated altitude thermoneutral (ATN; 3,000 m, 20°C, 30-50% RH), and 4) simulated altitude hot (AH; 3,000 m, 35°C, 30% RH). Skin blood flow and local sweating rate (LSR) were recorded on the ventral forearm. During exercise, SS cutaneous vascular conductance in AH (63 ± 31% peak) and SLH (52 ± 19% peak) were significantly higher than both SLTN (20 ± 9% peak, P < 0.001) and ATN (25 ± 12% peak, P < 0.05) but were not different from each other (P > 0.05). SS LSR was similarly increased in the hot environments but unaffected by simulated altitude. We propose that multiple antagonistic mechanisms during exposure to 3,000-m simulated altitude result in no net effect on skin blood flow or sweating responses during exercise in thermoneutral or hot environments.

Exercise cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory responses in normoxic, hypoxic, and hot environment following 10-day continuous hypoxic exposure

We examined the effects of acclimatization to normobaric hypoxia on aerobic performance and exercise thermoregulatory responses under normoxic, hypoxic, and hot conditions. Twelve men performed tests of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) in normoxic (NOR), hypoxic [HYP; 13.5% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)], and hot (HE; 35°C, 50% relative humidity) conditions in a randomized manner before and after a 10-day continuous normobaric hypoxic exposure [FiO2 = 13.65 (0.35)%, inspired partial pressure of oxygen = 87 (3) mmHg]. The acclimatization protocol included daily exercise [60 min at 50% hypoxia-specific peak power output (Wpeak)]. All maximal tests were preceded by a steady-state exercise (30 min at 40% Wpeak) to assess the sweating response. Hematological data were assessed from venous blood samples obtained before and after acclimatization. V̇o2max increased by 10.7% ( P = 0.002) and 7.9% ( P = 0.03) from pre-acclimatization to post acclimatization in NOR and HE, respectively, whereas no differences were found in HYP [pre: 39.9 (3.8) vs. post: 39.4 (5.1) ml·kg−1·min−1, P = 1.0]. However, the increase in V̇O2max did not translate into increased Wpeak in either NOR or HE. Maximal heart rate and ventilation remained unchanged following acclimatization. Νo differences were noted in the sweating gain and thresholds independent of the acclimatization or environmental conditions. Hypoxic acclimatization markedly increased hemoglobin ( P < 0.001), hematocrit ( P < 0.001), and extracellular HSP72 ( P = 0.01). These data suggest that 10 days of normobaric hypoxic acclimatization combined with moderate-intensity exercise training improves V̇o2max in NOR and HE, but does not seem to affect exercise performance or thermoregulatory responses in any of the tested environmental conditions.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY The potential crossover effect of hypoxic acclimatization on performance in the heat remains unexplored. Here we show that 10-day continuous hypoxic acclimatization combined with moderate-intensity exercise training can increase maximal oxygen uptake in hot conditions.

Thermoregulatory responses to exercise at a fixed rate of heat production are not altered by acute hypoxia

This study sought to assess the within-subject influence of acute hypoxia on exercise-induced changes in core temperature and sweating. Eight participants [1.75 (0.06) m, 70.2 (6.8) kg, 25 (4) yr, 54 (8) ml·kg^-1·min^-1] completed 45 min of cycling, once in normoxia (NORM; [Formula: see text] = 0.21) and twice in hypoxia (HYP1/HYP2; [Formula: see text]= 0.13) at 34.4(0.2)°C, 46(3)% RH. These trials were designed to elicit 1) two distinctly different %V̇o_2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP1: 62 (7)%] at the same heat production (H_prod) [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP1: 7.0 (0.5) W/kg]; and 2) the same %V̇o_2peak [NORM: 45 (8)% and HYP2: 48 (5)%] with different H_prod [NORM: 6.7 (0.6) W/kg and HYP2: 5.5 (0.6) W/kg]. At a fixed %V̇o_2peak, changes in rectal temperature (ΔT_re) and changes in esophageal temperature (ΔT_es) were greater at end-exercise in NORM [ΔT_re: 0.76 (0.19)°C; ΔT_es: 0.64 (0.22)°C] compared with HYP2 [ΔT_re: 0.56 (0.22)°C, P < 0.01; ΔT_es: 0.42 (0.21)°C, P < 0.01]. As a result of a greater H_prod (P < 0.01) in normoxia, and therefore evaporative heat balance requirements, to maintain a similar %V̇o_2peak compared with hypoxia, mean local sweat rates (LSR) from the forearm, upper back, and forehead were greater (all P < 0.01) in NORM [1.10 (0.20) mg·cm^-2·min^-1] compared with HYP2 [0.71 (0.19) mg·cm^-2·min^-1]. However, at a fixed H_prod, ΔT_re [0.75 (0.24)°C; P = 0.77] and ΔT_es [0.63 (0.29)°C; P = 0.69] were not different in HYP1, compared with NORM. Likewise, mean LSR [1.11 (0.20) mg·cm^-2·min^-1] was not different (P = 0.84) in HYP1 compared with NORM. These data demonstrate, using a within-subjects design, that hypoxia does not independently influence thermoregulatory responses. Additionally, further evidence is provided to support that metabolic heat production, irrespective of %V̇o_2peak, determines changes in core temperature and sweating during exercise.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a within-subject design, hypoxia does not independently alter core temperature and sweating during exercise at a fixed rate of heat production. These findings also further contribute to the development of a methodological framework for assessing differences in thermoregulatory responses to exercise between various populations and individuals. Using the combined environmental stressors of heat and hypoxia we conclusively demonstrate that exercise intensity relative to aerobic capacity (i.e., %V̇o_2max) does not influence changes in thermoregulatory responses.