Co-ordinated regulation of the extracytoplasmic stress factor, sigmaE, with other Escherichia coli sigma factors by (p)ppGpp and DksA may be achieved by specific regulation of individual holoenzymes

The transcription factor DksA exerts opposing effects on cell division depending on the presence of ppGpp

Bacterial cell size is a multifactorial trait that is influenced by variables including nutritional availability and the timing of cell division. Prior work revealed a negative correlation between concentration of the alarmone (p)ppGpp (ppGpp) and cell length in Escherichia coli, suggesting that ppGpp may promote assembly of the division machinery (divisome) and cytokinesis in this organism. To clarify this counterintuitive connection between a starvation-induced stress response effector and cell proliferation, we undertook a systematic analysis of growth and division in E. coli cells defective in ppGpp synthesis and/or engineered to overproduce the alarmone. Our data indicate that ppGpp acts indirectly on divisome assembly through its role as a global mediator of transcription. Loss of either ppGpp (ppGpp0) or the ppGpp-associated transcription factor DksA led to increased average length, with ppGpp0 mutants also exhibiting a high frequency of extremely long filamentous cells. Using heat-sensitive division mutants and fluorescently labeled division proteins, we confirmed that ppGpp and DksA are cell division activators. We found that ppGpp and DksA regulate division through their effects on transcription, although the lack of known division genes or regulators in available transcriptomics data strongly suggests that this regulation is indirect. We also found that DksA inhibits division in ppGpp0 cells, contrary to its role in a wild-type background. We propose that the ability of ppGpp to switch DksA from a division inhibitor to a division activator helps tune cell length across different concentrations of ppGpp. IMPORTANCE Cell division is a key step in the bacterial lifecycle that must be appropriately regulated to ensure survival. This work identifies the alarmone (p)ppGpp (ppGpp) as a general regulator of cell division, extending our understanding of the role of ppGpp beyond a signal for starvation and other stress. Even in nutrient-replete conditions, basal levels of ppGpp are essential for division to occur appropriately and for cell size to be maintained. This study establishes ppGpp as a "switch" that controls whether the transcription factor DksA behaves as a division activator or inhibitor. This unexpected finding enhances our understanding of the complex regulatory mechanisms employed by bacteria to coordinate division with diverse aspects of cell growth and stress response. Because division is an essential process, a better understanding of the mechanisms governing the assembly and activation of the division machinery could contribute to the development of novel therapeutics to treat bacterial infections.

The transcription factor DksA exerts opposing effects on cell division depending on the presence of ppGpp

Bacterial cell size is a multifactorial trait that is influenced by variables including nutritional availability and the timing of cell division. Prior work revealed a negative correlation between the alarmone (p)ppGpp (ppGpp) and cell length in Escherichia coli , suggesting that ppGpp may promote assembly of the division machinery (divisome) and cytokinesis in this organism. To clarify this counterintuitive connection between a starvation induced stress response effector and cell proliferation, we undertook a systematic analysis of growth and division in E. coli cells defective in ppGpp synthesis and/or engineered to overproduce the alarmone. Our data indicate that ppGpp acts indirectly on divisome assembly through its role as a global mediator of transcription. Loss of either ppGpp (ppGpp 0 ) or the ppGpp-associated transcription factor DksA led to increased average length, with ppGpp 0 mutants also exhibiting a high frequency of extremely long filamentous cells. Using heat-sensitive division mutants and fluorescently labeled division proteins, we confirmed that ppGpp and DksA are cell division activators. We found that ppGpp and DksA regulate division through their effects on transcription, although the lack of known division genes or regulators in available transcriptomics data strongly suggests that this regulation is indirect. Surprisingly, we also found that DksA inhibits division in ppGpp 0 cells, contrary to its role in a wild-type background. We propose that the ability of ppGpp to switch DksA from a division inhibitor to a division activator helps tune cell length across different concentrations of ppGpp.

Importance

Cell division is a key step in the bacterial lifecycle that must be appropriately regulated to ensure survival. This work identifies the alarmone ppGpp as a general regulator of cell division, extending our understanding of the role of ppGpp beyond a signal for starvation and other stress. Even in nutrient replete conditions, basal levels of ppGpp are essential for division to occur appropriately and for cell size to be maintained. This study establishes ppGpp as a "switch" that controls whether the transcription factor DksA behaves as a division activator or inhibitor. This unexpected finding enhances our understanding of the complex regulatory mechanisms employed by bacteria to coordinate division with diverse aspects of cell growth and stress response. Because division is an essential process, a better understanding the mechanisms governing assembly and activation of the division machinery could contribute to the development of novel therapeutics to treat bacterial infections.

Regulation of phosphate starvation-specific responses in Escherichia coli

Toxic agents added into the medium of rapidly growing Escherichia coli induce specific stress responses through the activation of specialized transcription factors. Each transcription factor and downstream regulon (e.g. SoxR) are linked to a unique stress (e.g. superoxide stress). Cells starved of phosphate induce several specific stress regulons during the transition to stationary phase when the growth rate is steadily declining. Whereas the regulatory cascades leading to the expression of specific stress regulons are well known in rapidly growing cells stressed by toxic products, they are poorly understood in cells starved of phosphate. The intent of this review is to both describe the unique mechanisms of activation of specialized transcription factors and discuss signalling cascades leading to the induction of specific stress regulons in phosphate-starved cells. Finally, I discuss unique defence mechanisms that could be induced in cells starved of ammonium and glucose.

Diverse molecular mechanisms of transcription regulation by the bacterial alarmone ppGpp

Bacteria must rapidly detect and respond to stressful environmental conditions. Guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) is a universal stress signal that, in most bacteria, drives the reprograming of transcription at a global level. However, recent studies have revealed that the molecular mechanisms utilized by ppGpp to rewire bacterial transcriptomes are unexpectedly diverse. In Proteobacteria, ppGpp regulates the expression of hundreds of genes by directly binding to two sites on RNA polymerase (RNAP), one in combination with the transcription factor, DksA. Conversely, ppGpp indirectly regulates transcription in Firmicutes by controlling GTP levels. In this case, ppGpp inhibits enzymes that salvage and synthesize GTP, which indirectly represses transcription from rRNA and other promoters that use GTP for initiation. More recently, two different mechanisms of transcription regulation involving the direct binding of transcription factors by ppGpp have been described. First, in Francisella tularensis, ppGpp was shown to modulate the formation of a tripartite transcription factor complex that binds RNAP and activates virulence genes. Second, in Firmicutes, ppGpp allosterically regulates the transcription repressor, PurR, which controls purine biosynthesis genes. The diversity in bacterial ppGpp signaling revealed in these studies suggests the likelihood that additional paradigms in ppGpp-mediated transcription regulation await discovery.

Escherichia coli segments its controls on carbon-dependent gene expression into global and specific regulations

How bacteria adjust gene expression to cope with variable environments remains open to question. Here, we investigated the way global gene expression changes in E. coli correlated with the metabolism of seven carbon substrates chosen to trigger a large panel of metabolic pathways. Coarse-grained analysis of gene co-expression identified a novel regulation pattern: we established that the gene expression trend following immediately the reduction of growth rate (GR) was correlated to its initial expression level. Subsequent fine-grained analysis of co-expression demonstrated that the Crp regulator, coupled with a change in GR, governed the response of most GR-dependent genes. By contrast, the Cra, Mlc and Fur regulators governed the expression of genes responding to non-glycolytic substrates, glycolytic substrates or phosphotransferase system transported sugars following an idiosyncratic way. This work allowed us to expand additional genes in the panel of gene complement regulated by each regulator and to elucidate the regulatory functions of each regulator comprehensively. Interestingly, the bulk of genes controlled by Cra and Mlc were, respectively, co-regulated by Crp- or GR-related effect and our quantitative analysis showed that each factor took turns to work as the primary one or contributed equally depending on the conditions.

Inducible intracellular membranes: molecular aspects and emerging applications

Membrane remodeling and phospholipid biosynthesis are normally tightly regulated to maintain the shape and function of cells. Indeed, different physiological mechanisms ensure a precise coordination between de novo phospholipid biosynthesis and modulation of membrane morphology. Interestingly, the overproduction of certain membrane proteins hijack these regulation networks, leading to the formation of impressive intracellular membrane structures in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. The proteins triggering an abnormal accumulation of membrane structures inside the cells (or membrane proliferation) share two major common features: (1) they promote the formation of highly curved membrane domains and (2) they lead to an enrichment in anionic, cone-shaped phospholipids (cardiolipin or phosphatidic acid) in the newly formed membranes. Taking into account the available examples of membrane proliferation upon protein overproduction, together with the latest biochemical, biophysical and structural data, we explore the relationship between protein synthesis and membrane biogenesis. We propose a mechanism for the formation of these non-physiological intracellular membranes that shares similarities with natural inner membrane structures found in α-proteobacteria, mitochondria and some viruses-infected cells, pointing towards a conserved feature through evolution. We hope that the information discussed in this review will give a better grasp of the biophysical mechanisms behind physiological and induced intracellular membrane proliferation, and inspire new applications, either for academia (high-yield membrane protein production and nanovesicle production) or industry (biofuel production and vaccine preparation).

Interactions between DksA and Stress-Responsive Alternative Sigma Factors Control Inorganic Polyphosphate Accumulation in Escherichia coli

Bacteria synthesize inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) in response to a variety of different stress conditions. polyP protects bacteria by acting as a protein-stabilizing chaperone, metal chelator, or regulator of protein function, among other mechanisms. However, little is known about how stress signals are transmitted in the cell to lead to increased polyP accumulation. Previous work in the model enterobacterium Escherichia coli has indicated that the RNA polymerase-binding regulatory protein DksA is required for polyP synthesis in response to nutrient limitation stress. In this work, I set out to characterize the role of DksA in polyP regulation in more detail. I found that overexpression of DksA increases cellular polyP content (explaining the long-mysterious phenotype of dksA overexpression rescuing growth of a dnaK mutant at high temperatures) and characterized the roles of known functional residues of DksA in this process, finding that binding to RNA polymerase is required but that none of the other functions of DksA appear to be necessary. Transcriptomics revealed genome-wide transcriptional changes upon nutrient limitation, many of which were affected by DksA, and follow-up experiments identified complex interactions between DksA and the stress-sensing alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE that impact polyP production, indicating that regulation of polyP synthesis is deeply entwined in the multifactorial stress response network of E. coli IMPORTANCE Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an evolutionarily ancient, widely conserved biopolymer required for stress resistance and pathogenesis in diverse bacteria, but we do not understand how its synthesis is regulated. In this work, I gained new insights into this process by characterizing the role of the transcriptional regulator DksA in polyP regulation in Escherichia coli and identifying previously unknown links between polyP synthesis and the stress-responsive alternative sigma factors FliA, RpoN, and RpoE.

Physiological effects of overexpressed sigma factors on fermentative stress response of Zymomonas mobilis

Zymomonas mobilis is a bacterium of industrial interest due to its high ethanol productivity and high tolerance to stresses. Although the physiological parameters of fermentation are well characterized, there are few studies on the molecular mechanisms that regulate the response to fermentative stress. Z. mobilis ZM4 presents five different sigma factors identified in the genome annotation, but the absence of sigma 38 leads to the questioning of which sigma factors are responsible for its mechanism of fermentative stress response. Thus, in this study, factors sigma 32 and sigma 24, traditionally related to heat shock, were tested for their influence on the response to osmotic and ethanol stress. The overexpression of these sigma factors in Z. mobilis ZM4 strain confirmed that both are associated with heat shock response, as described in other bacteria. Moreover, sigma 32 has also a role in the adaptation to osmotic stress, increasing both growth rate and glucose influx rate. The same strain that overexpresses sigma 32 also showed a decrease in ethanol tolerance, suggesting an antagonism between these two mechanisms. It was not possible to conclude if sigma 24 really affects ethanol tolerance in Z. mobilis, but the overexpression of this sigma factor led to a decrease in ethanol productivity.

Global Regulation by CsrA and Its RNA Antagonists

The sequence-specific RNA binding protein CsrA is employed by diverse bacteria in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Its binding interactions with RNA have been documented at atomic resolution and shown to alter RNA secondary structure, RNA stability, translation, and/or Rho-mediated transcription termination through a growing number of molecular mechanisms. In Gammaproteobacteria, small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) that contain multiple CsrA binding sites compete with mRNA for binding to CsrA, thereby sequestering and antagonizing this protein. Both the synthesis and turnover of these sRNAs are regulated, allowing CsrA activity to be rapidly and efficiently adjusted in response to nutritional conditions and stresses. Feedback loops between the Csr regulatory components improve the dynamics of signal response by the Csr system. The Csr system of Escherichia coli is intimately interconnected with other global regulatory systems, permitting it to contribute to regulation by those systems. In some species, a protein antagonist of CsrA functions as part of a checkpoint for flagellum biosynthesis. In other species, a protein antagonist participates in a mechanism in which a type III secretion system is used for sensing interactions with host cells. Recent transcriptomics studies reveal vast effects of CsrA on gene expression through direct binding to hundreds of mRNAs, and indirectly through its effects on the expression of dozens of transcription factors. CsrA binding to base-pairing sRNAs and novel mRNA segments, such as the 3' untranslated region and deep within coding regions, predict its participation in yet-to-be-discovered regulatory mechanisms.

Transcriptional Responses to ppGpp and DksA

The stringent response to nutrient deprivation is a stress response found throughout the bacterial domain of life. Although first described in proteobacteria for matching ribosome synthesis to the cell's translation status and for preventing formation of defective ribosomal particles, the response is actually much broader, regulating many hundreds of genes-some positively, some negatively. Utilization of the signaling molecules ppGpp and pppGpp for this purpose is ubiquitous in bacterial evolution, although the mechanisms employed vary. In proteobacteria, the signaling molecules typically bind to two sites on RNA polymerase, one at the interface of the β' and ω subunits and one at the interface of the β' secondary channel and the transcription factor DksA. The β' secondary channel is targeted by other transcription regulators as well. Although studies on the transcriptional outputs of the stringent response date back at least 50 years, the mechanisms responsible are only now coming into focus.

Sponges and Predators in the Small RNA World

Most noncoding small RNAs (sRNAs) that regulate gene expression do so by base-pairing with mRNAs, affecting their translation and/or stability. Regulators as evolutionarily distant as the trans -encoded sRNAs of bacteria and the microRNAs (miRNAs) of higher eukaryotes share the property of targeting short sequence segments that occur in multiple copies in bacterial and eukaryotic transcriptomes. This target promiscuity has major implications for sRNA function. On the one hand, it allows the sRNA to coordinately control several different targets and thus be at the center of regulatory networks. On the other hand, it allows the existence of target mimics or decoys that divert the sRNA/miRNA away from bona fide targets and thus serve as mechanisms to regulate the regulator. In addition, by competing for pairing with the same sRNA, bona fide targets establish a cross talk that can impact on each other’s expression levels. Here we review evidence that target mimicry and competition are important components of the regulatory architecture of bacterial sRNA networks.

Allosteric Effector ppGpp Potentiates the Inhibition of Transcript Initiation by DksA

DksA and ppGpp are the central players in the stringent response and mediate a complete reprogramming of the transcriptome. A major component of the response is a reduction in ribosome synthesis, which is accomplished by the synergistic action of DksA and ppGpp bound to RNA polymerase (RNAP) inhibiting transcription of rRNAs. Here, we report the X-ray crystal structures of Escherichia coli RNAP in complex with DksA alone and with ppGpp. The structures show that DksA accesses the template strand at the active site and the downstream DNA binding site of RNAP simultaneously and reveal that binding of the allosteric effector ppGpp reshapes the RNAP-DksA complex. The structural data support a model for transcriptional inhibition in which ppGpp potentiates the destabilization of open complexes by DksA. This work establishes a structural basis for understanding the pleiotropic effects of DksA and ppGpp on transcriptional regulation in proteobacteria.

DksA and ppGpp Regulate the σS Stress Response by Activating Promoters for the Small RNA DsrA and the Anti-Adapter Protein IraP

σ^S is an alternative sigma factor, encoded by the rpoS gene, that redirects cellular transcription to a large family of genes in response to stressful environmental signals. This so-called σ^S general stress response is necessary for survival in many bacterial species and is controlled by a complex, multifactorial pathway that regulates σ^S levels transcriptionally, translationally, and posttranslationally in Escherichia coli It was shown previously that the transcription factor DksA and its cofactor, ppGpp, are among the many factors governing σ^S synthesis, thus playing an important role in activation of the σ^S stress response. However, the mechanisms responsible for the effects of DksA and ppGpp have not been elucidated fully. We describe here how DksA and ppGpp directly activate the promoters for the anti-adaptor protein IraP and the small regulatory RNA DsrA, thereby indirectly influencing σ^S levels. In addition, based on effects of DksA_N88I, a previously identified DksA variant with increased affinity for RNA polymerase (RNAP), we show that DksA can increase σ^S activity by another indirect mechanism. We propose that by reducing rRNA transcription, DksA and ppGpp increase the availability of core RNAP for binding to σ^S and also increase transcription from other promoters, including PdsrA and PiraP By improving the translation and stabilization of σ^S, as well as the ability of other promoters to compete for RNAP, DksA and ppGpp contribute to the switch in the transcription program needed for stress adaptation.IMPORTANCE Bacteria spend relatively little time in log phase outside the optimized environment found in a laboratory. They have evolved to make the most of alternating feast and famine conditions by seamlessly transitioning between rapid growth and stationary phase, a lower metabolic mode that is crucial for long-term survival. One of the key regulators of the switch in gene expression that characterizes stationary phase is the alternative sigma factor σ^S Understanding the factors governing σ^S activity is central to unraveling the complexities of growth, adaptation to stress, and pathogenesis. Here, we describe three mechanisms by which the RNA polymerase binding factor DksA and the second messenger ppGpp regulate σ^S levels.

Rapid evolution of acetic acid-detoxifying Escherichia coli under phosphate starvation conditions requires activation of the cryptic PhnE permease and induction of translesion synthesis DNA polymerases

Escherichia coli incubated in phosphate-limiting minimal medium dies during prolonged incubation as a result of the production of acetic acid. Variants that consume acetic acid generally sweep through the population after three serial cultures. Evolvability may primarily result from induction of the potentially mutagenic LexA DNA damage response or from growth of preexisting mutants. Cells starved of phosphate induce the LexA regulon through a unique mechanism based on an increase in the internal pH at the approach of the stationary phase. Evolved cells resume growth on phosphorylated products as a result of the activation of the cryptic PhnE permease. Here, it is shown that first PhnE-expressing revertants swept through starved populations independently of the expression of the LexA regulon. Induction of the LexA regulon and especially of the translesion synthesis DNA polymerases Pol IV and Pol V was, however, absolutely required for the ultimate evolution of acetic acid-detoxifying mutant strains. Both growth under selection and induction of translesion synthesis DNA polymerases are therefore required for adaptive evolution under phosphate starvation conditions.

Circuitry Linking the Global Csr- and σE-Dependent Cell Envelope Stress Response Systems

CsrA of Escherichia coli is an RNA-binding protein that globally regulates a wide variety of cellular processes and behaviors, including carbon metabolism, motility, biofilm formation, and the stringent response. CsrB and CsrC are small RNAs (sRNAs) that sequester CsrA, thereby preventing CsrA-mRNA interaction. RpoE (σ^E) is the extracytoplasmic stress response sigma factor of E. coli Previous RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) studies identified rpoE mRNA as a CsrA target. Here, we explored the regulation of rpoE by CsrA and found that CsrA represses rpoE translation. Gel mobility shift, footprint, and toeprint studies identified three CsrA binding sites in the rpoE leader transcript, one of which overlaps the rpoE Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence, while another overlaps the rpoE translation initiation codon. Coupled in vitro transcription-translation experiments showed that CsrA represses rpoE translation by binding to these sites. We further demonstrate that σ^E indirectly activates the transcription of csrB and csrC, leading to increased sequestration of CsrA, such that repression of rpoE by CsrA is reduced. We propose that the Csr system fine-tunes the σ^E-dependent cell envelope stress response. We also identified a 51-amino-acid coding sequence whose stop codon overlaps the rpoE start codon and demonstrate that rpoE is translationally coupled with this upstream open reading frame (ORF51). The loss of coupling reduces rpoE translation by more than 50%. Identification of a translationally coupled ORF upstream of rpoE suggests that this previously unannotated protein may participate in the cell envelope stress response. In keeping with existing nomenclature, we named ORF51 rseD, resulting in an operon arrangement of rseD-rpoE-rseA-rseB-rseC IMPORTANCE CsrA posttranscriptionally represses genes required for bacterial stress responses, including the stringent response, catabolite repression, and the RpoS (σ^S)-mediated general stress response. We show that CsrA represses the translation of rpoE, encoding the extracytoplasmic stress response sigma factor, and that σ^E indirectly activates the transcription of csrB and csrC, resulting in reciprocal regulation of these two global regulatory systems. These findings suggest that extracytoplasmic stress leads to derepression of rpoE translation by CsrA, and CsrA-mediated repression helps reset RpoE abundance to prestress levels once envelope damage is repaired. The discovery of an ORF, rseD, translationally coupled with rpoE adds further complexity to translational control of rpoE.

Themes and variations in gene regulation by extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors

The ECF sigma family was identified 23 years ago as a distinct group of σ⁷⁰-like factors. ECF sigma factors have since emerged as a major form of bacterial signal transduction that can be grouped into over 50 phylogenetically distinct subfamilies. Advances in our understanding of these sigma factors and the signaling pathways governing their activity have elucidated conserved features as well as aspects that have evolved over time. All ECF sigma factors are predicted to share a common streamlined domain structure and mode of promoter interaction. The activity of most ECF sigma factors is controlled by an anti-sigma factor. The nature of the anti-sigma factor and the activating signaling pathways appear to be conserved within ECF families, while considerable diversity exists between different families.

Appropriate Regulation of the σE-Dependent Envelope Stress Response Is Necessary To Maintain Cell Envelope Integrity and Stationary-Phase Survival in Escherichia coli

The alternative sigma factor σ^E is a key component of the Escherichia coli response to cell envelope stress and is required for viability even in the absence of stress. The activity of σ^E increases during entry into stationary phase, suggesting an important role for σ^E when nutrients are limiting. Elevated σ^E activity has been proposed to activate a pathway leading to the lysis of nonculturable cells that accumulate during early stationary phase. To better understand σ^E-directed cell lysis and the role of σ^E in stationary phase, we investigated the effects of elevated σ^E activity in cultures grown for 10 days. We demonstrate that high σ^E activity is lethal for all cells in stationary phase, not only those that are nonculturable. Spontaneous mutants with reduced σ^E activity, due primarily to point mutations in the region of σ^E that binds the -35 promoter motif, arise and take over cultures within 5 to 6 days after entry into stationary phase. High σ^E activity leads to large reductions in the levels of outer membrane porins and increased membrane permeability, indicating membrane defects. These defects can be counteracted and stationary-phase lethality delayed significantly by stabilizing membranes with Mg²⁺ and buffering the growth medium or by deleting the σ^E-dependent small RNAs (sRNAs) MicA, RybB, and MicL, which inhibit the expression of porins and Lpp. Expression of these sRNAs also reverses the loss of viability following depletion of σ^E activity. Our results demonstrate that appropriate regulation of σ^E activity, ensuring that it is neither too high nor too low, is critical for envelope integrity and cell viability.IMPORTANCE The Gram-negative cell envelope and cytoplasm differ significantly, and separate responses have evolved to combat stress in each compartment. An array of cell envelope stress responses exist, each of which is focused on different parts of the envelope. The σ^E response is conserved in many enterobacteria and is tuned to monitor pathways for the maturation and delivery of outer membrane porins, lipoproteins, and lipopolysaccharide to the outer membrane. The activity of σ^E is tightly regulated to match the production of σ^E regulon members to the needs of the cell. In E. coli, loss of σ^E results in lethality. Here we demonstrate that excessive σ^E activity is also lethal and results in decreased membrane integrity, the very phenotype the system is designed to prevent.

The dual role of DksA protein in the regulation of Escherichia coli pArgX promoter

Gene expression regulation by the stringent response effector, ppGpp, is facilitated by DksA protein; however DksA and ppGpp can play independent roles in transcription. In Escherichia coli, the pArgX promoter which initiates the transcription of four tRNA genes was shown to be inhibited by ppGpp. Our studies on the role of DksA in pArgX regulation revealed that it can stimulate transcription by increasing the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter and the productive transcription complex formation. However, when DksA is present together with ppGpp a severe down-regulation of promoter activity is observed. Our results indicate that DksA facilitates the effects of ppGpp to drive formation of inactive dead-end complexes formed by RNA polymerase at the ArgX promoter. In vivo, ppGpp-mediated regulation of pArgX transcription is dependent on DksA activity. The potential mechanisms of opposing pArgX regulation by ppGpp and DksA are discussed. pArgX is the first reported example of the promoter stimulated by DksA and inhibited by ppGpp in vitro when an overall inhibition occurs in the presence of both regulators. A dual role is thus proposed for DksA in the regulation of the pArgX promoter activity.

Characterization of acetic acid-detoxifying Escherichia coli evolved under phosphate starvation conditions

BACKGROUND

During prolonged incubation of Escherichia coli K-12 in batch culture under aerobic, phosphate (Pi) starvation conditions, excess glucose is converted into acetic acid, which may trigger cell death. Following serial cultures, we isolated five evolved strains in two populations that survived prolonged incubation.

METHODS

We sequenced the genomes of the ancestral and evolved strains, and determined the effects of the genetic changes, tested alone and in combination, on characteristic phenotypes in pure and in mixed cultures.

RESULTS

Evolved strains used two main strategies: (1) the constitutive expression of the Trk- and Kdp-dependent K(+) transport systems, and (2) the inactivation of the ArcA global regulator. Both processes helped to maintain a residual activity of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, which decreased the production of acetic acid and eventually allowed its re-consumption. Evolved strains acquired a few additional genetic changes besides the trkH, kdpD and arcA mutations, which might increase the scavenging of organophosphates (phnE (+), lapB, and rseP) and the resistance to oxidative (rsxC) and acetic acid stresses (e14(-)/icd (+)).

CONCLUSIONS

Evolved strains rapidly acquired mutations (phnE (+) lapB rpoS trkH and phnE (+) rseP kdpD) that were globally beneficial to growth on glucose and organophosphates, but detrimental to long-term viability. The spread of these mutant strains might give the ancestral strain time to accumulate up to five genetic changes (phnE (+) arcA rsxC crfC e14(-)/icd (+)), which allowed growth on glucose and organophosphates, and provided a long-term survival. The latter strain, which expressed several mechanisms of protection against endogenous and exogenous stresses, might provide a platform for producing toxic recombinant proteins and chemicals during prolonged incubation under aerobic, Pi starvation conditions.

Why do bacteria regulate public goods by quorum sensing?-How the shapes of cost and benefit functions determine the form of optimal regulation

Many bacteria secrete compounds which act as public goods. Such compounds are often under quorum sensing (QS) regulation, yet it is not understood exactly when bacteria may gain from having a public good under QS regulation. Here, we show that the optimal public good production rate per cell as a function of population size (the optimal production curve, OPC) depends crucially on the cost and benefit functions of the public good and that the OPC will fall into one of two categories: Either it is continuous or it jumps from zero discontinuously at a critical population size. If, e.g., the public good has accelerating returns and linear cost, then the OPC is discontinuous and the best strategy thus to ramp up production sharply at a precise population size. By using the example of public goods with accelerating and diminishing returns (and linear cost) we are able to determine how the two different categories of OPSs can best be matched by production regulated through a QS signal feeding back on its own production. We find that the optimal QS parameters are different for the two categories and specifically that public goods which provide accelerating returns, call for stronger positive signal feedback.

pH dependence of the stress regulator DksA

DksA controls transcription of genes associated with diverse stress responses, such as amino acid and carbon starvation, oxidative stress, and iron starvation. DksA binds within the secondary channel of RNA polymerase, extending its long coiled-coil domain towards the active site. The cellular expression of DksA remains constant due to a negative feedback autoregulation, raising the question of whether DksA activity is directly modulated during stress. Here, we show that Escherichia coli DksA is essential for survival in acidic conditions and that, while its cellular levels do not change significantly, DksA activity and binding to RNA polymerase are increased at lower pH, with a concomitant decrease in its stability. NMR data reveal pH-dependent structural changes centered at the interface of the N and C-terminal regions of DksA. Consistently, we show that a partial deletion of the N-terminal region and substitutions of a histidine 39 residue at the domain interface abolish pH sensitivity in vitro. Together, these data suggest that DksA responds to changes in pH by shifting between alternate conformations, in which competing interactions between the N- and C-terminal regions modify the protein activity.