Evaluation of two lateral flow assays in BAL fluids for the detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: A retrospective two-centre study

Point-of-care testing for viral-associated pulmonary aspergillosis

INTRODUCTION

Over the last years, severe respiratory viral infections, particularly those caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the influenza virus, have emerged as risk factor for viral-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (VAPA) among critically ill patients. Delays in diagnosis of VAPA are associated with increased mortality. Point-of-care-tests may play an important role in earlier diagnosis of VAPA and thus improve patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The following review will give an update on point-of-care tests for VAPA, analyzing performances in respiratory and blood specimens.

EXPERT OPINION

Point-of-care tests have emerged, and particularly the IMMY Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay (LFA) shows performances comparable to the galactomannan ELISA for diagnosis of VAPA. Notably, nearly all evaluations of POC tests for VAPA have been performed in COVID-19 patients, with very limited data in influenza patients. For early diagnosis of COVID associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), the LFA has shown promising performances in respiratory samples, particularly in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and may thereby help in improving patient outcomes. In contrast, serum LFA testing may not be useful for early diagnosis of disease, except in cases with invasive tracheobronchial aspergillosis.

Microbiological diagnosis of pulmonary invasive aspergillosis in critically ill patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: a bronchoalveolar study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) can be challenging since radiological and clinical criteria in the critically ill patient are nonspecific. Microbiological diagnostic support is therefore crucial. The aim of this study was to document the incidence of aspergillosis using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) as the diagnostic method and to determine the performance of the current mycological diagnostic tests most widely used for the diagnosis of CAPA, together with evaluation of the Asp lateral flow device (LFD).

METHODS

Prospective cohort study conducted between March 2020 and June 2022. Inclusion criteria were critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Diagnostic bronchoscopy and BAL were performed at the beginning of invasive mechanical ventilation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR + and LR-) of BAL culture, direct examination with calcofluor white stain, ELISA (Platelia) and LFD (AspLFD) for detection of galactomannan (GM) were evaluated. Aspergillus-qPCR was applied when discrepancies between diagnostic tests arose.

RESULTS

Of the 244 critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to the ICU, the majority (n = 200, 82%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Diagnostic bronchoscopic procedures were performed in 160 patients (80%), who were enrolled in this study. The incidence of CAPA was 18.7% (n = 30). LFD-GM demonstrated a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 99%, PPV 94%, NPV 97%, LR(+) of 84, and LR(-) of 0.16. At GM-ELISA indices of ≥ 0.5 and ≥ 1.0, sensitivity was 92% and 79%, specificity was 95% and 99%, PPV 76% and 91%, NPV 99% and 96%, LR(+) 18 and 79, and LR(-) 0.08 and 0.21, respectively. The optimal cut-off index from the ROC curve was 0.48, with sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a diagnostic strategy based on bronchoscopy and BAL, we documented a high incidence of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Asp-LFD showed moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity, with a high PPV, and could be used for rapid diagnosis of patients with suspected CAPA.

Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis by lateral flow assay of galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

The performance of lateral flow assay (LFA) in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) has not been well demonstrated. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis assessing the overall accuracy of LFA in diagnosing IPA using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Over a systematical search and assessment of bias risk, we calculated the pooled specificity, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) to assess the diagnostic performance. Our meta-analysis included 11 studies. The combined total sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing IPA were 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71, 0.83) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.91), respectively. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.89). Our results demonstrate that LFA using galactomannan in BALF exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing IPA.

Implementation of Lateral Flow Assays for the Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis in European Hospitals: A Survey from Belgium and a Literature Review of Test Performances in Different Patient Populations

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is based on a combination of criteria, of which the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) often is decisive. To date, the most commonly used method to determine GM is an enzyme-linked immune assay (EIA). But since a few years lateral flow assays (LFAs) were introduced, providing the possibility for rapid single sample testing. More and more LFAs are entering the market, but, although often being equated, all use their own antibodies, procedures and interpretation criteria. A recent European survey revealed that about 24-33% of laboratories implemented a lateral flow assay on-site.

METHODS

We conducted a survey at 81 Belgian hospital laboratories regarding the implementation of LFAs in their centre. In addition, we performed an extensive review of all publicly available studies on the performance of lateral flow assays to diagnose invasive aspergillosis.

RESULTS

Response rate to the survey was 69%. Of the 56 responding hospital laboratories, 6 (11%) used an LFA. The Soña Aspergillus galactomannan LFA (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA) was used in 4/6 centres, while two centres used the QuicGM (Dynamiker, Tianjin, China) and one centre used the FungiXpert Aspergillus Galactomannan Detection K-set LFA (Genobio [Era Biology Technology], Tianjin, China). One centre used 2 distinct LFAs. In 3/6 centres, the sample is sent to another lab for confirmation with GM-EIA when the LFA result is positive and in 2/6 when the LFA results is negative. In one centre, a confirmatory GM-EIA is always performed in house. In three centres the LFA result is used as a complete substitute for GM-EIA. Available LFA performance studies are very diverse and results vary in function of the study population and type of LFA. Apart from the IMMY and OLM LFA, only very limited performance data are available. From two out of three LFAs used in Belgium, no clinical performance studies are published in literature.

CONCLUSIONS

A large variety of LFAs are used in Belgian Hospitals, some of which no clinical validation studies are published. These results do likely have implications for other parts of Europe and for the rest of the world as well. Due to the variable performance of LFA tests and the limited validation data available, each laboratory must check the available performance information of the specific test considered for implementation. In addition, laboratories should perform an implementation verification study.

Microbiological Non-Culture-Based Methods for Diagnosing Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in ICU Patients

The diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is crucial since most clinical signs are not specific to invasive fungal infections. To detect an IPA, different criteria should be considered. Next to host factors and radiological signs, microbiological criteria should be fulfilled. For microbiological diagnostics, different methods are available. Next to the conventional culture-based approaches like staining and culture, non-culture-based methods can increase sensitivity and improve time-to-result. Besides fungal biomarkers, like galactomannan and (1→3)-β-D-glucan as nonspecific tools, molecular-based methods can also offer detection of resistance determinants. The detection of novel biomarkers or targets is promising. In this review, we evaluate and discuss the value of non-culture-based microbiological methods (galactomannan, (1→3)-β-D-glucan, Aspergillus PCR, new biomarker/targets) for diagnosing IPA in ICU patients.

Aspergillus Lateral Flow Assay with Digital Reader for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA): A multicenter study

This multicenter study evaluated the IMMY Aspergillus Galactomannan Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) with automated reader for diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission between 03/2020 and 04/2021. A total of 196 respiratory samples and 148 serum samples (n = 344) from 238 patients were retrospectively included, with a maximum of one of each sample type per patient. Cases were retrospectively classified for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) status following the 2020 consensus criteria, with the exclusion of LFA results as a mycological criterion. At the 1.0 cutoff, sensitivity of LFA for CAPA (proven/probable/possible) was 52%, 80% and 81%, and specificity was 98%, 88% and 67%, for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), nondirected bronchoalveolar lavage (NBL), and tracheal aspiration (TA), respectively. At the 0.5 manufacturer’s cutoff, sensitivity was 72%, 90% and 100%, and specificity was 79%, 83% and 44%, for BALF, NBL and TA, respectively. When combining all respiratory samples, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) was 0.823, versus 0.754, 0.890 and 0.814 for BALF, NBL and TA, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of serum LFA were 20% and 93%, respectively, at the 0.5 ODI cutoff. Overall, the Aspergillus Galactomannan LFA showed good performances for CAPA diagnosis, when used from respiratory samples at the 1.0 cutoff, while sensitivity from serum was limited, linked to weak invasiveness during CAPA. As some false-positive results can occur, isolated results slightly above the recommended cutoff should lead to further mycological investigations.

Update on Non-Culture-Based Diagnostics for Invasive Fungal Disease

Diagnostic tests for fungi provide the mycological evidence to strengthen diagnosis of invasive fungal disease. Conventional microbiology and histopathology have their limitations. Recognizing this, there have been attempts at developing new methods to improve yield of diagnosing invasive fungal disease (IFD). The recent focus has been on non-culture-based antigen detection and molecular methods. The use of antigen detection of IFD through 1,3-β-D-glucan and galactomannan assay have been expanded, followed by development of lateral flow assays, and in combination with other diagnostic modalities to further increase diagnostic yield. The molecular diagnostic front has seen initiatives to standardize polymerase chain reaction methodologies to detect fungi and anti-fungal resistance, new platforms such as the T2Candida Biosystems and foray into fungal metagenomics. As these newer assays undergo stringent validation before incorporation into the diagnostic algorithm, the clinician needs to be mindful of their bedside utility as well as their limitation.

Serology anno 2021-fungal infections: from invasive to chronic

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing invasive or chronic fungal infections is a challenge, particularly in the immunocompromised host. Microscopy and culture remain the reference standard, but are insensitive. The use of non-culture-based techniques is recommended in conjunction with conventional methods to improve the diagnostic yield.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to provide an updated 2021 inventory of fungal antigen and serology tests for diagnosing invasive and chronic fungal infections, the key focus was set on Aspergillus, Candida and Cryptococcus species.

SOURCES

Pubmed search for publications with the key words fungal antigen tests, laboratory-based diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis, invasive fungal infections and cryptococcal infections published from 2017 to 2020.

CONTENT

Antigen assays such as the galactomannan (GM) and β-d-glucan detection systems are frequently used, but these tests vary in sensitivity and specificity, depending on the patient population involved, specimens inspected, cut-offs defined, test strategy applied and inclusion or exclusion of possible fungal case definitions. Multiple different detection systems are available, with recently introduced new point-of-care tests such as the lateral flow device and the lateral flow assay. Despite a wide heterogeneity in populations evaluated, studies indicate a better diagnostic performance of bronchoalveolar lavage GM in comparison with serum GM, and a suboptimal specificity of GM bronchoalveolar lavages (cut-off ≥1) and serum β-d-glucan in non-neutropenic individuals. Point-of-care cryptococcal antigen tests show excellent performance.

IMPLICATIONS

There are fungal antigen detection tests available with excellent to reasonable clinical performance to diagnose invasive fungal infections. Only a few assays are useful to monitor therapeutic response. There are multiple marketed IgG antibody tests to detect Aspergillus fumigatus antibodies, the titres vary widely and the performance differs significantly. In general, diagnostic tests are vulnerable to being affected by the host, the microbe and laboratory setting.