1
|
Ryder JH, Van Schooneveld TC, Lyden E, El Ramahi R, Stohs EJ. The interplay of infectious diseases consultation and antimicrobial stewardship in candidemia outcomes: A retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2019. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:1102-1107. [PMID: 36082773 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the need for mandatory infectious diseases consultation (IDC) for candidemia in the setting of antimicrobial stewardship guidance. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to December 2019. SETTING Academic quaternary-care referral center. PATIENTS All episodes of candidemia in adults (n = 92), excluding concurrent bacterial infection or death or hospice care within 48 hours. METHODS Primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included guideline-adherence and treatment choice. Guideline-adherence was assessed with the EQUAL Candida score. RESULTS Of 186 episodes of candidemia, 92 episodes in 88 patients were included. Central venous catheters (CVCs) were present in 66 episodes (71.7%) and were the most common infection source (N = 38, 41.3%). The most frequently isolated species was Candida glabrata (40 of 94, 42.6%). IDC was performed in 84 (91.3%) of 92 candidemia episodes. Mortality rates were 20.8% (16 of 77) in the IDC group versus 25% (2 of 8) in the no-IDC group (P = .67). Other comparisons were numerically different but not significant: repeat blood culture (98.8% vs 87.5%; P = .17), echocardiography (70.2% vs 50%; P = .26), CVC removal (91.7% vs 83.3%; P = .45), and initial echinocandin treatment (67.9% vs 50%; P = .44). IDC resulted in more ophthalmology examinations (67.9% vs 12.5%; P = .0035). All patients received antifungal therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship recommendations were performed in 19 episodes (20.7%). The median EQUAL Candida score with CVC was higher with IDC (16 vs 11; P = .001) but not in episodes without CVC (12 vs 11.5; P = .81). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of an active antimicrobial stewardship program and high consultation rates, mandatory IDC may not be warranted for candidemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Ryder
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Trevor C Van Schooneveld
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Elizabeth Lyden
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Erica J Stohs
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sprute R, Van Braeckel E, Flick H, Hoenigl M, Kosmidis C, Agarwal R, Davidsen JR, Laursen CB, Cornely OA, Seidel D. EQUAL CPA Score 2022: a tool to measure guideline adherence for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 78:225-231. [PMID: 36374549 PMCID: PMC9780539 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) can complicate underlying pulmonary diseases, and clinical management of CPA is challenging. Guidelines support clinicians but due to the complexity of the disease they can be difficult to adhere to. OBJECTIVES To map current guideline recommendations for the clinical management of CPA into a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify guideline adherence in clinical practice. METHODS Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of CPA presented in the current ESCMID/ERS/ECMM and CPAnet guidance documents were assembled and weighed on the basis of their strength of recommendation and level of evidence. RESULTS Twenty-seven recommendations were identified, resulting in a total maximum EQUAL CPA Score of 51. For diagnostics (ScoreMax = 27), a strong emphasis on expert consultation, culture, direct microscopy, histopathology, serology and imaging was reflected in respective points, whereas molecular techniques and susceptibility testing count into the diagnostics score to a lesser extent.Ten treatment recommendations (ScoreMax = 14), including antifungal therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring and treatment duration, were identified. Surgery, where indicated, adds three points. For refractory disease or intolerance of first-line antifungal treatment, optimal second-line treatment added another two points.During follow-up (ScoreMax = 10), response assessment via imaging gave three points, while culture and serology added two points each to the ScoreMax. CONCLUSION The EQUAL CPA Score intents to be used as a comprehensive tool for measuring guideline adherence. If adherence to current guidelines is associated with clinical outcome, this will be assessed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eva Van Braeckel
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Holger Flick
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Martin Hoenigl
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria,Biotech Med, Graz, Austria
| | - Chris Kosmidis
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ritesh Agarwal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jesper R Davidsen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Pulmonary Aspergillosis Center Denmark (PACD), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark,Department of Clinical Research, Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian B Laursen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Pulmonary Aspergillosis Center Denmark (PACD), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark,Department of Clinical Research, Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Oliver A Cornely
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), Cologne, Germany
| | - Danila Seidel
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, Germany,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, Germany,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sprute R, Bethe U, Chen SCA, Cornely OA. OUP accepted manuscript. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:1779-1784. [PMID: 35325146 PMCID: PMC9155625 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Invasive infections due to Trichosporon spp. are life-threatening opportunistic fungal infections that require complex clinical management. Guidelines assist clinicians but can be challenging to comply with. Objectives To develop a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for invasive trichosporonosis. Methods We reviewed the current guideline for managing rare yeast infections (ECMM, ISHAM and ASM). The most important recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up were assembled and weighted according to their strength of recommendation and level of evidence. Additional items considered highly relevant for clinical management were also included. Results The resulting EQUAL Trichosporon Score 2022 comprises 18 items, with a maximum score of 39 points. For diagnostics, seven or eight items, depending on whether organ involvement is present or not, apply, resulting in a maximum of 18 or 21 points. Recommendations on diagnostics include imaging, infectious diseases expert consultation, culture, microscopy, molecular techniques, histopathology, and susceptibility testing. For treatment, six recommendations with a maximum of ten points were identified, with two additional points for organ involvement and one point for second-line treatment in uncontrolled disease. Treatment recommendations include immediate initiation, source control, pharmacological treatment, therapeutic drug monitoring, treatment duration and surgical intervention. Follow-up comprises two items with five points maximum, covering follow-up blood cultures and imaging. Conclusions The EQUAL Trichosporon Score weighs and aggregates factors recommended for optimal management of Trichosporon infections. It provides a tool for antifungal stewardship as well as for measuring guideline adherence, but remains to be correlated with patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanne Sprute
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany
| | - Ullrich Bethe
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, NRW, Germany
| | - Sharon C.-A. Chen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, New South Wales Health Pathology, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Oliver A. Cornely
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), Cologne, NRW, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital MC), Cologne, Germany
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stemler J, Lackner M, Chen SCA, Hoenigl M, Cornely OA. EQUAL Score Scedosporiosis/Lomentosporiosis 2021: a European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) tool to quantify guideline adherence. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 77:253-258. [PMID: 34542613 PMCID: PMC8730684 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Invasive scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis are life-threatening fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with complex diagnostic and treatment patterns. Objectives To develop a scoring tool to facilitate and quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of invasive scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis. Methods Experts from European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) excellence centres reviewed current guidelines for scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis. Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up were summarized, assembled and weighted according to their strength of recommendation and level of evidence (strongly recommended = 3 points; moderately recommended = 2 points; marginally recommended = 1 point; recommended against = 0 points). Additional items considered of high importance for clinical management were also weighted. Results A total of 170 recommendations were identified. A 21-item tool was developed and embedded into the EQUAL score card. Nine items for diagnosis with 18 achievable points were assembled. For treatment, three general recommendation items with a maximal score of 9 were identified, while for specific antifungal treatment the two fungal pathogens were separated. Three and four items were established for scedosporiosis and lomentosporiosis, respectively, with a maximum achievable score of 3 due to the separation of different treatment options with the maximum point value of 3 for voriconazole-based treatment. Follow-up comprised two items (4 points maximum). Key recommendations for clinical outcome were weighted accordingly. Conclusions We propose the EQUAL Score Scedosporiosis/Lomentosporiosis to quantify adherence to current guideline recommendations for management of these rare infections. The score remains to be validated in real-life patient cohorts and correlated with patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannik Stemler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany
| | - Michaela Lackner
- Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Department of Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Public Health, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sharon C-A Chen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, New South Wales Health Pathology, Westmead Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Hoenigl
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Clinical and Translational Fungal Research-Working Group, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Oliver A Cornely
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Chair Translational Research, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.,German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, NRW, Germany.,University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Clinical Trials Centre Cologne (ZKS Köln), Cologne, NRW, Germany
| |
Collapse
|