Invited Review: Pathology of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours: present status, modern diagnostic approach, controversies and future perspectives from a neuropathological and clinical standpoint

Primary Pituitary Carcinoids Do Not Exist: A Reappraisal in the Era of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours

The World Health Organization classification of pituitary tumours, published in 2022, supported a change in the terminology from "pituitary adenoma" to "pituitary neuroendocrine tumour" (PitNET). The neuroendocrine cells represent an integral part of the diffuse neuroendocrine system, including, among others, thyroid C cells, the parathyroid chief cells, and the anterior pituitary. Normal and neoplastic adenohypophyseal neuroendocrine cells have light microscopic, ultrastructural features and an immunoprofile compatible with the neuroendocrine cells and neuroendocrine tumours from other organs. Moreover, neuroendocrine cells of pituitary origin express transcription factors which indicate their cell-lineage origin. Thus, pituitary tumours are now considered as a continuum with other neuroendocrine tumours. PitNETs may occasionally be aggressive. In this context, the term "pituitary carcinoid" has no specific meaning: it either represents a PitNET, or a metastasis to the pituitary gland of a neuroendocrine tumour (NET). An accurate pathological evaluation, combined where necessary with functional radionuclide imaging, can define the origin of the tumour. We recommend that clinicians liaise with patient groups to understand the terminology to define primary tumours of adenohypophyseal cells. It is incumbent upon the responsible clinician to explain the use of the word "tumour" in a given clinical context.

Analysis of risk factors of pituitary neoplasms invading the sphenoidal sinus

High-resolution computed tomography (HR-CT) can more effectively discern the relationship between pituitary neoplasms (PNs) and neighboring anatomical structures. Moreover, pathological features can facilitate a more accurate determination of the growth pattern of PNs. Consequently, integrating imaging and pathological data might enhance our predictive capability regarding the growth patterns of PNs and aid in the formulation of surgical plans. We compared HR-CT images of 54 patients and 52 volunteers. Using ITK-SNAP software, we segmented and reconstructed the anatomical features of the sphenoidal sinus (SS) and calculated its volume. A comparative analysis of the invasive attributes of the 54 PNs was carried out based on clinical features and pathological data. The average volume of the SS in the volunteer group was 11.05 (8.10) mL, significantly larger than that of the PNs group at 7.45 (4.88) mL (P = .005). The postsellar type was the most common pneumatization type, and a significantly higher proportion in the PNs group exhibited a depressed saddle base (83.3%). A notable male predominance was observed for SS invasion in the PNs group (72.7%), with the Ki-67 antigen and maximum diameter significantly higher (P < .05), showing a positive correlation. The optimal cutoff points for Ki-67 antigen and the maximum diameter of PNs were 3.25% (AUC = 0.754, Sensitivity 54.5%, Specificity 90.6%) and 24.5 mm (AUC = 0.854, Sensitivity 86.4%, Specificity 78.1%), respectively. The type of pneumatization and the morphology of the sellar-floor serve as anatomical foundations for SS invasion. Factors such as the Ki-67 antigen, the maximum diameter of PNs, and high-risk sub-types constitute risk factors for PNs invasion into the SS. These insights are of significant utility for clinicians in crafting treatment strategies for PNs.

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment

Aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are heterogeneous with regard to clinical presentation, proliferative markers, clinical course, and response to therapy. Half of them show an aggressive course only many years after the first apparently benign presentation. APTs and PCs share several properties, but a Ki67 index greater than or equal to 10% and extensive p53 expression are more prevalent in PCs. Mutations in TP53 and ATRX are the most common genetic alterations; their detection might be of value for early identification of aggressiveness. Treatment requires a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Temozolomide is the recommended first-line chemotherapy, with response rates of about 40%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as second-line treatment in PCs, with currently no evidence for a superior effect of dual therapy compared to monotherapy with PD-1 blockers. Bevacizumab has resulted in partial response (PR) in few patients; tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus have generally not been useful. The effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is limited as well. Management of APT/PC is challenging and should be discussed within an expert team with consideration of clinical and pathological findings, age, and general condition of the patient. Considering that APT/PCs are rare, new therapies should preferably be evaluated in shared standardized protocols. Prognostic and predictive markers to guide treatment decisions are needed and are the scope of ongoing research.

Unveiling the identities of null cell tumours: Epigenomics corroborate subtle histological cues in pituitary neuroendocrine tumour/adenoma classification

AIMS

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumour (PitNET)/adenoma classification is based on cell lineage and requires immunopositivity for adenohypophysial hormones and/or transcription factors (TFs) steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1), T-box transcription factor TBX19 (TPIT) or pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1 (PIT1). PitNET/adenomas lacking lineage affiliation are termed 'null cell' tumours (NCTs). NCT diagnosis may be afflicted by methodological limitations and inconsistent diagnostic approaches. Previous studies have questioned the existence of true NCTs. In this study, we explore the epigenomic identities of PitNET/adenomas lacking clear TF immunopositivity.

METHODS

Seventy-four hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas were immunostained and scored for SF1, TPIT and PIT1 expression. All tumours were classified as gonadotroph, corticotroph, PIT1-positive or 'null cell'. NCTs were subjected to global DNA methylation analysis. Epigenomic profiles of NCTs were compared to reference tumours using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plotting and methylation-based classification.

RESULTS

TF immunostaining revealed definite lineage identity in 59 of 74 (79.7%) hormone-negative PitNET/adenomas. Of the remaining 15 NCTs, 13 demonstrated minimal and inconclusive nuclear SF1 or TPIT expression (5 and 8, respectively). Two NCTs were entirely immunonegative. UMAP plotting and methylation-based classification demonstrated that the epigenomes of NCTs with minimal SF1 or TPIT expression were adequately affiliated with gonadotroph or corticotroph lineages, respectively. The two immunonegative NCTs were located near the corticotroph PitNET/adenomas via UMAP, whereas the methylation classifier could not match these two cases to predefined tumour classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Epigenomic analyses substantiate lineage identification based on minimal TF immunopositivity in PitNET/adenomas. This strategy dramatically decreases the incidence of NCTs and further challenges the legitimacy of NCTs as a distinct PitNET/adenoma subtype. Our study may be useful for guiding diagnostic efforts and future considerations of PitNET/adenoma classification.

Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery outcomes in 514 nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma cases

Transsphenoidal surgery remains the preference choice for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary tumors at present, but the superiority of surgical modalities is still debated. Moreover, the efficacy of microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has not been fully studied. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the postoperative outcomes of the two widely used approaches worldwide. This retrospective study included 514 patients with the first transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection in Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2015 to July 2020 and compared the outcomes of microscope transsphenoidal surgery (MTSS) and endoscopy transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). A total of 514 patients were included in this study, of whom 210 received the ETSS and 304 received the MTSS. The patients in two groups were similar in terms of postoperative hyponatremia (p = 0.229), diabetes insipidus (p = 0.264), the recovery of hormonal axis (p < 0.05), and extent of resection (EOR) (p = 0.067). ETSS was more likely to cause cerebrospinal fluid leakage than MTSS (p = 0.017, 3.6% vs. 8.6%). CSF leakage might be related to tumor size (95% CI = 1.305-2.766, p = 0.001), and the surgeon's transsphenoidal surgery volume < 300 was also a risk factor (95% CI = 1.396-9.067, p = 0.008). The effect of different surgeries on postoperative vision improvement was statistically difference in univariate analysis (p = 0.048) but not after adjustment for confounders (p = 0.112). Furthermore, there were statistical difference in EOR between MTSS and ETSS when adenomas were performed suprasellar extension (p = 0.037) or optic chiasm compression (p = 0.045). Both techniques are valid for the treatment of nonfunctional adenomas. But CSF leakage is more likely after ETSS. In addition, ETSS is more conducive to resection of nonfunctional adenomas with suprasellar extension or optic chiasm compression.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors

This review summarizes the changes in the 5th Edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors that relate to the pituitary gland. The new classification clearly distinguishes anterior lobe (adenohypophyseal) from posterior lobe (neurohypophyseal) and hypothalamic tumors. Other tumors arising in the sellar region are also discussed. Anterior lobe tumors include (i) well-differentiated adenohypophyseal tumors that are now classified as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs; formerly known as pituitary adenomas), (ii) pituitary blastoma, and (iii) the two types of craniopharyngioma. The new WHO classification provides detailed histological subtyping of a PitNET based on the tumor cell lineage, cell type, and related characteristics. The routine use of immunohistochemistry for pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, and ERα) is endorsed in this classification. The major PIT1, TPIT, and SF1 lineage-defined PitNET types and subtypes feature distinct morphologic, molecular, and clinical differences. The "null cell" tumor, which is a diagnosis of exclusion, is reserved for PitNETs with no evidence of adenohypophyseal lineage differentiation. Unlike the 2017 WHO classification, mammosomatotroph and acidophil stem cell tumors represent distinct PIT1-lineage PitNETs. The diagnostic category of PIT1-positive plurihormonal tumor that was introduced in the 2017 WHO classification is replaced by two clinicopathologically distinct PitNETs: the immature PIT1-lineage tumor (formerly known as silent subtype 3 tumor) and the mature plurihormonal PIT1-lineage tumor. Rare unusual plurihormonal tumors feature multi-lineage differentiation. The importance of recognizing multiple synchronous PitNETs is emphasized to avoid misclassification. The term "metastatic PitNET" is advocated to replace the previous terminology "pituitary carcinoma" in order to avoid confusion with neuroendocrine carcinoma (a poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasm). Subtypes of PitNETs that are associated with a high risk of adverse biology are emphasized within their cell lineage and cell type as well as based on clinical variables. Posterior lobe tumors, the family of pituicyte tumors, include the traditional pituicytoma, the oncocytic form (spindle cell oncocytoma), the granular cell form (granular cell tumor), and the ependymal type (sellar ependymoma). Although these historical terms are entrenched in the literature, they are nonspecific and confusing, such that oncocytic pituicytoma, granular cell pituicytoma, and ependymal pituicytoma are now proposed as more accurate. Tumors with hypothalamic neuronal differentiation are classified as gangliocytomas or neurocytomas based on large and small cell size, respectively. This classification sets the standard for a high degree of sophistication to allow individualized patient management approaches.

Architects of Pituitary Tumour Growth

The pituitary is a master gland responsible for the modulation of critical endocrine functions. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) display a considerable prevalence of 1/1106, frequently observed as benign solid tumours. PitNETs still represent a cause of important morbidity, due to hormonal systemic deregulation, with surgical, radiological or chronic treatment required for illness management. The apparent scarceness, uncommon behaviour and molecular features of PitNETs have resulted in a relatively slow progress in depicting their pathogenesis. An appropriate interpretation of different phenotypes or cellular outcomes during tumour growth is desirable, since histopathological characterization still remains the main option for prognosis elucidation. Improved knowledge obtained in recent decades about pituitary tumorigenesis has revealed that this process involves several cellular routes in addition to proliferation and death, with its modulation depending on many signalling pathways rather than being the result of abnormalities of a unique proliferation pathway, as sometimes presented. PitNETs can display intrinsic heterogeneity and cell subpopulations with diverse biological, genetic and epigenetic particularities, including tumorigenic potential. Hence, to obtain a better understanding of PitNET growth new approaches are required and the systematization of the available data, with the role of cell death programs, autophagy, stem cells, cellular senescence, mitochondrial function, metabolic reprogramming still being emerging fields in pituitary research. We envisage that through the combination of molecular, genetic and epigenetic data, together with the improved morphological, biochemical, physiological and metabolically knowledge on pituitary neoplastic potential accumulated in recent decades, tumour classification schemes will become more accurate regarding tumour origin, behaviour and plausible clinical results.

Annotation of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with genome-wide expression analysis

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are common, generally benign tumors with complex clinical characteristics related to hormone hypersecretion and/or growing sellar tumor mass. PitNETs can be classified based on the expression pattern of anterior pituitary hormones and three main transcriptions factors (TF), SF1, PIT1 and TPIT that regulate differentiation of adenohypophysial cells. Here, we have extended this classification based on the global transcriptomics landscape using tumor tissue from a well-defined cohort comprising 51 PitNETs of different clinical and histological types. The molecular profiles were compared with current classification schemes based on immunohistochemistry. Our results identified three main clusters of PitNETs that were aligned with the main pituitary TFs expression patterns. Our analyses enabled further identification of specific genes and expression patterns, including both known and unknown genes, that could distinguish the three different classes of PitNETs. We conclude that the current classification of PitNETs based on the expression of SF1, PIT1 and TPIT reflects three distinct subtypes of PitNETs with different underlying biology and partly independent from the expression of corresponding hormones. The transcriptomic analysis reveals several potentially targetable tumor-driving genes with previously unknown role in pituitary tumorigenesis.

Current opinion on the diagnosis and management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas

INTRODUCTION

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are clinically silent tumors and the second most common pituitary adenoma. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment as there is, as yet, no effective medical treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We present current knowledge on the clinical diagnosis, histopathological classification, molecular data, and management strategies in NFPA.

EXPERT OPINION

NFPA is a heterogeneous group of tumors, in respect to their origin and clinical course. In recent years, research on pathology and molecular biology have advanced our knowledge of NFPA pathogenesis. NFPA exhibit, in the majority of cases, an indolent behavior, with satisfactory response to treatment. In aggressive cases, multimodal management is needed; however, even this approach may be insufficient, so the development of new treatments is warranted for better management. In this setting, the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the genesis and progression of NFPA is crucial for the identification and development of directed treatments with higher chances of response.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification

The classification of adenohypophysial neoplasms as "pituitary neuroendocrine tumors" (PitNETs) was proposed in 2017 to reflect their characteristics as epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms with a spectrum of clinical behaviors ranging from small indolent lesions to large, locally invasive, unresectable tumors. Tumor growth and hormone hypersecretion cause significant morbidity and mortality in a subset of patients. The proposal was endorsed by a WHO working group that sought to provide a unified approach to neuroendocrine neoplasia in all body sites. We review the features that are characteristic of neuroendocrine cells, the epidemiology and prognosis of these tumors, as well as further refinements in terms used for other pituitary tumors to ensure consistency with the WHO framework. The intense study of PitNETs has provided information about the importance of cellular differentiation in tumor prognosis as a model for neuroendocrine tumors in different locations.

Plurihormonal PIT-1-Positive Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Series

OBJECTIVE

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas identified the plurihormonal PIT-1-positive (PP1) adenoma as a distinct subtype. The reported data suggest that PP1 adenomas encompass the former class of silent subtype 3 (SS3) adenomas and might have an aggressive phenotype. In the present study, we summarized the current clinical data on PP1 and SS3 adenomas and compared the reported data with the data from a single institutional cohort.

METHODS

Medline and Google Scholar were searched from 1990 to 2020 for clinical series of PP1 and SS3 adenomas in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they had reported pituitary pathology as PP1 or SS3 adenomas and had reported the clinical outcomes after surgical intervention. To better define the PP1 phenotype compared with non-PP1 adenomas, we also reviewed the adenomas treated surgically at our institution from 2012 to 2019.

RESULTS

Of all the tumors reported in the studies as PP1 or SS3, 99% were macroadenomas and 18% were giant adenomas (>4 cm). Of the reported patients, 31.8% had received radiotherapy, and 22.9% had undergone multiple surgeries for their pituitary tumor. In our single-center experience, 20 patients had an adenoma that met the criteria for a PP1 adenoma. Compared with the 1146 non-PP1 tumors, the PP1 tumors did not show statistically significant differences in the extent of resection, size, number of previous surgeries, future reoperations, rate of radiotherapy, p53 staining, or MIB-1 labeling index.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from the present large, single-center study comparing PP1 and non-PP1 adenomas do not suggest that PP1 tumors are more aggressive. Further work is warranted to identify the pathologic subtypes of pituitary adenomas that are consistently more clinically aggressive.

Pituitary tumour types in dogs and cats

Pituitary tumours are common in dogs and are being increasingly recognized in cats. Pituitary tumours are usually classified as adenomas and should only be classified as carcinomas when there is evidence of metastatic spread of the tumour, which is rare. Despite the benign nature of most pituitary tumours, they can still compress or invade neighbouring tissues. Pituitary tumours can be functional (hormonally active) or non-functional (hormonally silent). The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the different pituitary tumour types in dogs and cats that have been reported in the literature. In dogs, the most common pituitary tumour type is the corticotroph adenoma, which can cause pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism. In cats, the most common pituitary tumour is the somatotroph adenoma, which can cause hypersomatotropism, and the second-most common is the corticotroph adenoma. A lactotroph adenoma has been described in one dog, while gonadotroph, thyrotroph and null cell adenomas have not been described in dogs or cats. Hormonally silent adenomas are likely underdiagnosed because they do not result in an endocrine syndrome. Tools used to classify pituitary tumours in humans, particularly immunohistochemistry for lineage-specific transcription factors, are likely to be useful to classify canine and feline pituitary tumours of unknown origin. Future studies are required to better understand the full range of pituitary adenoma pathology in dogs and cats and to determine whether certain adenoma subtypes behave more aggressively than others. Currently, the mechanisms that underlie pituitary tumorigenesis in dogs and cats are still largely unknown. A better understanding of the molecular background of these tumours could help to identify improved pituitary-targeted therapeutics.

TGFBR3L-An Uncharacterised Pituitary Specific Membrane Protein Detected in the Gonadotroph Cells in Non-Neoplastic and Tumour Tissue

Simple Summary

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours originate from the endocrine cells of the anterior pituitary gland and may develop from any of the cell lineages responsible for producing the different pituitary hormones. The details related to tumour differentiation and hormone production in these tumours are not fully understood. The aim of our study was to investigate an uncharacterised pituitary enriched protein, transforming growth factor beta-receptor 3 like (TGFBR3L). The TGFBR3L protein is highly expressed in the pituitary compared to other organs. We found the protein to be gonadotroph-specific, i.e., detected in the cells that express follicle-stimulating and luteinizing hormones (FSH/LH). The gonadotroph-specific nature of TGFBR3L, a correlation to both FSH and LH as well as an inverse correlation to membranous E-cadherin and oestrogen receptor β suggests a role in gonadotroph cell development and function and, possibly, tumour progression.

Abstract

Here, we report the investigation of transforming growth factor beta-receptor 3 like (TGFBR3L), an uncharacterised pituitary specific membrane protein, in non-neoplastic anterior pituitary gland and pituitary neuroendocrine tumours. A polyclonal antibody produced within the Human Protein Atlas project (HPA074356) was used for TGFBR3L staining and combined with SF1 and FSH for a 3-plex fluorescent protocol, providing more details about the cell lineage specificity of TGFBR3L expression. A cohort of 230 pituitary neuroendocrine tumours were analysed. In a subgroup of previously characterised gonadotroph tumours, correlation with expression of FSH/LH, E-cadherin, oestrogen (ER) and somatostatin receptors (SSTR) was explored. TGFBR3L showed membranous immunolabeling and was found to be gonadotroph cell lineage-specific, verified by co-expression with SF1 and FSH/LH staining in both tumour and non-neoplastic anterior pituitary tissues. TGFBR3L immunoreactivity was observed in gonadotroph tumours only and demonstrated intra-tumour heterogeneity with a perivascular location. TGFBR3L immunostaining correlated positively to both FSH (R = 0.290) and LH (R = 0.390) immunostaining, and SSTR3 (R = 0.315). TGFBR3L correlated inversely to membranous E-cadherin staining (R = −0.351) and oestrogen receptor β mRNA (R = −0.274). In conclusion, TGFBR3L is a novel pituitary gland specific protein, located in the membrane of gonadotroph cells in non-neoplastic anterior pituitary gland and in a subset of gonadotroph pituitary tumours.

Gonadotroph tumours with a low SF-1 labelling index are more likely to recur and are associated with enrichment of the PI3K-AKT pathway

AIMS

The gonadotroph tumour (GT) is the most frequently resected pituitary neuroendocrine tumour. Although many symptomatic GT are successfully resected, some recur. We sought to identify histological biomarkers that may predict recurrence and explore biological mechanisms that explain this difference in behaviour.

METHODS

SF-1 immunohistochemistry of 51 GT, a subset belonging to a longitudinal prospective cohort study (n = 25), was reviewed. Four groups were defined: Group 1-recently diagnosed GT (n = 20), Group 2-non-recurrent GT with long-term follow up (n = 11), Group 3-initial resections of GT that recur (n = 7) and Group 4-recurrent GT (n = 13). The percentage of SF-1 immunolabelling in the lowest staining fields (SF-1 labelling index (SLI)) was assessed and RNA sequencing was performed on 5 GT with SLI <80% and 5 GT with SLI >80%.

RESULTS

Diffuse, strong SF-1 immunolabelling was the most frequent pattern in Groups 1/2, whereas patchy SF-1 staining predominated in Groups 3/4. There was a lower median SLI in Groups 3/4 than 1/2. Overall, GT with SLI <80% recurred earlier than GT with SLI >80%. Differential expression analysis identified 89 statistically significant differentially expressed genes (FDR <0.05) including over-expression of pituitary stem cell genes (SOX2, GFRA3) and various oncogenes (e.g. BCL2, ERRB4) in patchy SF-1 GT. Gene set enrichment analysis identified significant enrichment of genes involved in the PI3K-AKT pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

We speculate that patchy SF-1 labelling in GT reflects intratumoural heterogeneity and are less differentiated tumours than diffusely staining GT. SF-1 immunolabelling patterns may have prognostic significance in GT, but confirmatory studies are needed for further validation.

Postoperative management of patients with pituitary tumors submitted to pituitary surgery. Experience of a Spanish Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence

There is a lack of evidence on timing, frequency, and duration of postoperative endocrine, radiologic, and ophthalmologic assessments that should be performed after pituitary surgery (PS). However, it is known that careful optimization of treatment and follow-up strategies as well as a multidisciplinary approach may have a significant impact on long-term outcomes, improving surgical results, minimize complications and facilitate their correct treatment if occurring, and optimize the hormonal, ophthalmological, and radiological reassessment throughout the follow-up. Considering that there are no specific guidelines on the postoperative management of patients with pituitary tumors (PT), we present our protocol for the postoperative management of patients with PT. It has been elaborated by the multidisciplinary team of a Spanish Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence (PTCE) that includes at least one neurosurgeon, ENT, neuroradiologist, neuro-ophthalmologist, endocrine pathologist and endocrinologist specialized in pituitary diseases. We elaborated this guideline with the aim of sharing our experience with other centers involved in the management of PT thereby facilitating the postoperative management of patients submitted to PS.

Clinicopathological analysis of 250 cases of pituitary adenoma under the new WHO classification

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are a common subtype of intracranial tumors. The aim of the present study was to analyse the clinical and pathological features of different types of pituitary adenomas (PAs) according to the 2017 World Health Organisation Endocrine Organ Tumor Classification guidelines. The clinical data of 250 patients with PAs were collected and analysed. Differences in the incidence of invasion, recurrence and apoplexy in patients between high- and low-risk PAs were compared, as were differences in the Ki-67 index between invasive and non-invasive PAs and between recurrent PAs and non-recurrent PAs. Of the 250 cases, 45 cases were diagnosed as somatotroph adenomas, 26 cases as lactotroph adenomas, 1 case as thyrotroph adenoma, 61 cases as corticotroph adenomas, 93 cases as gonadotropin adenomas, 15 cases as null cell adenomas and 9 cases as plurihormonal adenomas. There were 5 types of high-risk pituitary adenoma identified: 17 cases of sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma, 11 cases of lactotroph adenoma in men, 3 cases of plurihormonal PIT-1 positive adenoma and 42 cases of silent corticotroph adenoma. Crooke's cell adenoma was not identified. High-risk PAs had significantly higher rates of invasion, recurrence and apoplexy compared with that in low-risk types (P<0.001). Invasive PAs had a significantly higher Ki-67 index compared with that in non-invasive PAs (3.5±1.8 vs. 2.8±1.3; P<0.01). Recurrent PAs had a significantly higher Ki-67 index compared with that in non-recurrent PAs (3.9±1.9 vs. 2.8±1.3; P<0.001). According to the 2017 classification criteria, patients most frequently had gonadotrophin cell adenomas, followed by corticotroph adenomas and the proportion of null cell adenomas was reduced. Differences were noted in the proliferation, recurrence and apoplexy characteristics of high-risk PAs and low-risk PAs. The invasion and recurrence of PAs were found to be related to the Ki-67 index.