Current problems in screening, diagnosis and treatment of polyomavirus BK nephropathy

Routine immunohistochemistry study for polyomavirus BK nephropathy in transplanted kidney biopsies, is it recommended?

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and treatment of Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy (PVBKN) is a challenging issue in the management of patients with kidney transplantation. Currently, histopathologic diagnosis is the gold standard method for diagnosis of PVBKN. However, typical viral inclusions may not be found in early stages of the PVBKN and should, instead, be diagnosed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) study. There is no clear consensus about routine IHC tests in the pathologic evaluation of transplanted kidney biopsy samples.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current study was conducted on transplanted kidney biopsy samples, since 2016 to 2019. The patients who have presented with new onset of allograft dysfunction, at least 2 weeks after transplantation surgery, were included in our study. All these biopsy samples were evaluated with routine renal biopsy stains as well as IHC for SV40 (Simvian Virus 40) antigen. The identification of typical nuclear virus inclusion body and any nuclear positive staining on IHC (≥1+ positive result) were considered as definite evidence of PVBKN. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV and NPV) of histopathologic assessment without IHC study were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 275 included cases, 18 (6.5%) patients with PVBKN were diagnosed. In patients with PVBKN, typical viral inclusions were detected in 14 samples (77.7%), on primary histopathological examination. However, virus-infected cells were identified just after IHC study in 4 (22.2%) of patients. Sensitivity, Specifity, PPV and NPV of morphologic histopathological assay without IHC for detection of PVBKN was 77.7, 100, 100 and 98.4% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Routine IHC study for SV40 in all transplanted kidney biopsy samples with new onset of allograft dysfunction, will enhance the diagnostic sensitivity of early stage disease detection.

Immunosuppression, BK polyomavirus infections, and BK polyomavirus-specific T cells after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy increases risk of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). Outcomes of BKPyV viremia are various and prognostic markers are missing. The impact of different immunosuppressive regimens on BKPyV infections is currently under discussion.

METHODS

We analyzed immunosuppressive therapy and BKPyV-specific cellular immunity to distinguish patients at risk of BKPyVAN from those with self-limiting viremia for purposes of risk-stratified BKPyV management. In a retrospective analysis, 46 pediatric kidney recipients with BKPyV viremia were analyzed with regard to duration of BKPyV viremia and immunosuppressive therapy; in addition, in 37/46 patients, BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were measured.

RESULTS

Nine patients showed persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN, and required therapeutic intervention, while 37 patients had asymptomatic, self-limiting viremia. At onset of viremia, 78% of patients with persistent viremia and BKPyVAN were treated with tacrolimus, whereas tacrolimus therapy was significantly less frequent in patients with self-limiting viremia (14%). The majority of patients with transient, self-limiting viremia received cyclosporine A (81%) and/or mTOR inhibitors (81%). Patients with persistent BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN showed lack of BKPyV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells (6/6), whereas the majority of patients with self-limiting viremia (27/31) had detectable BKPyV-specific CD4 and/or CD8 T cells ≥ 0.5 cells/μl (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that tacrolimus enhances risk of BKPyVAN with need of therapeutic intervention, whereas under cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitors, the majority of pediatric kidney recipients showed self-limiting viremia. In patients at risk of BKPyV infections, combination of cyclosporine A and mTOR inhibitor may be advantageous.

Diagnostics, treatment, and immune response in BK polyomavirus infection after pediatric kidney transplantation

After pediatric kidney transplantation BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infections are associated with an increased risk of graft loss by BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BkPyVAN). However, suitable prognostic markers for the individual outcome of BKPyV infections are missing and the management of therapeutic interventions remains a challenge to the success of pediatric kidney transplantation. This review gives an overview on current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the field of BKPyV infections after pediatric kidney transplantation. Methods determining the individual immune response to BKPyV are described and their usability is discussed. There is growing evidence that BKPyV-specific T cells (BKPyV-Tvis) may serve as prognostic markers in order to steer immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric kidney recipients with BKPyV viremia in future. Prospective randomized trials in viremic kidney recipients comparing Tvis-steered therapeutic intervention with standard reduction of immunosuppression are needed before implementation of BKPyV-Tvis monitoring in routine care of BKPyV infections.

BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Background:

The epidemiology of BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients is poorly characterized. Kidney dysfunction after hematopoietic cell transplant is often attributed to treatment toxicities and kidney biopsies are rarely performed.

Methods:

We reviewed pathology-confirmed BK polyoma virus nephropathy cases in adult and pediatric patients who had undergone a hematopoietic cell transplant between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 at our institution. Plasma and urine BK polyoma virus was assessed by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay and were obtained at the clinician discretion. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. BK polyoma virus nephropathy was scored by the Banff Working Group Proposal.

Results:

Eight (7 adult and 1 pediatric) cases of BK polyoma virus nephropathy were identified among 685 hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 14 of whom had undergone a kidney biopsy. Five patients (62.5%) had received a CD34+-selected peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant; two had received a cord blood allograft and one an unmodified peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant. Two patients developed acute graft-versus-host disease grade II. Early post–hematopoietic cell transplant BK polyoma viruria was documented with onset at a median of 54 days (range, 6–91) post–hematopoietic cell transplant and median urine BK polyoma viral load was 9.6 log10 copies/mL (range, 8.6–10.0). BK polyoma virus nephropathy was diagnosed at a median of 267 days after hematopoietic cell transplant (range, 133–637). At BK polyoma virus nephropathy diagnosis, all patients had decreased renal function with glomerular filtration rate (median 29 mL/min/1.73 m2; range, 9–98 ) and creatinine (median 2.4 mg/dL; range, 0.8–7.5) ; median plasma BK polyoma viral load was 6.3 log10 copies/mL (range, 5.5–7.1) and median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 82 cell/mcL (range, 21–172).

Conclusions:

We report eight biopsy-proven BK polyoma virus nephropathies in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients from a single center. BK polyoma virus nephropathy should be considered in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with worsening kidney function and high BK polyoma viremia.

Viral infections directly involved in kidney allograft function

Modern immunosuppressive therapy has dramatically reduced the incidence of acute rejection and improved graft survival in kidney transplant patients. However, infectious complications remain an important issue. Amongst the various pathogens, viruses such as adenovirus and polyomavirus BK can directly cause acute or chronic graft dysfunction. Adenovirus mainly causes haemorrhagic cystitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis in kidney transplant patients. While patients show apparent clinical symptoms such as fever, dysuria, gross haematuria, frequency and urgency of urination, and most patients show acute graft dysfunction, these symptoms and graft dysfunction are reversible. Polyomavirus BK infection, however, is asymptomatic but graft outcome is poor if the patient develops tissue-invasive nephropathy confirmed by graft biopsy. Recently, an attempt to create a pathological classification for predicting the clinical course has been made by the Banff Working Group on Polyomavirus Nephropathy. With regards to treatment, the basic strategy is a reduction of calcineurin inhibitor and/or antimetabolites, and the effectiveness of several adjunct treatments has been investigated in several clinical trials. There are other unresolved issues, such as the diagnosis of subsequent acute rejection, the definition of remission, methods of resuming immunosuppression and long-term follow-up. Most of all, development of effective vaccines and novel drug discovery are necessary to prevent the development and progression of BKV-associated nephropathy.

Nucleic Acid Tests for BK Polyomavirus Is Critical in Renal Transplant Recipients

This study evaluates the incidence of BK polyomavirus (BKV) and prognosis of BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received transplantation in our hospital before and after regular BKV nucleic acid test (NAT) was implemented.

METHODS

The study included 74 KTRs who received a single kidney either from standard- or expanded-criteria deceased donor between March 2011 and March 2017. BKV NATs were regularly checked in 26 patients (group 1) in the first posttransplant year in accordance with current guidelines since NAT was implemented in our laboratory in 2014. We retrospectively compared 48 KTRs (group 2) who either received NAT when necessary in another laboratory or were not checked before 2014.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between groups. BKV viruria were confirmed in 8 of 26 (30.8%) group 1 patients, whereas only 2 of 48 (4.2%) BKV infections were confirmed in group 2. None of the BKV(+) KTRs in group 1 developed BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), whereas 2 BKV(+) patients (100%) of group 2 developed BKVAN, which indicates renal function deterioration and biopsy-validated nephropathy. There was no significant difference in graft survival and renal function between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of BKV infection is considerably higher in KTRs using NAT. Because there is no approval treatment, early diagnosis of BKV infection and early reduction of immunosuppression agents is critical for KTRs. Implementation of regular BKV NAT is mandatory before BKVAN and malignant neoplasms develop.

High-level viruria as a screening tool for BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Although early monitoring of BK virus infection in renal transplant patients has led to improved outcomes over the past decade, it remains unclear whether monitoring for viremia is the best screening tool for BK virus nephropathy (BKVN).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 368 renal transplant recipients who had a minimum of 18 months of posttransplantation follow-up. The relationship between the presence of BK viruria and a composite end point of BK viremia/BKVN was established, and the predictive value of high-grade BK viruria for development of viremia/BKVN was determined.

RESULTS

High grade of BK viruria was present in 110 (30.1%) of the renal transplant recipients. BK viremia/BKVN was present in 64 (17.4%) patients and was 50 times more likely to be present in patients with high-grade BK viruria. The risk of developing BK viremia/BKVN was 3 times higher in high-grade viruria patients, and viruria preceded viremia by nearly 7 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The presence of high-grade viruria is an early marker for developing BK viremia/BKVN. Detection of high-grade viruria should prompt early allograft biopsy and/or preemptive reduction in immunosuppression.

Banff 2013 update: Pearls and pitfalls in transplant renal pathology

The pathological classification of rejection in renal allografts (Banff classification) has undergone substantial evolution for more than 20 years, and has been the diagnostic gold standard in clinical practice. The 2013 updated Banff classification encompasses a revised scheme of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) that consists of donor-specific antibody (DSA) positivity, characteristic histological manifestations for both acute and chronic ABMR, and DSA-induced endothelial cell injury which is represented by either C4d positivity, microvascular inflammation or expression of activated endothelial gene transcripts. Other modified criteria include a C4d positivity threshold, and histological definition of transplant glomerulitis and transplant glomerulopathy. Morphologically, glomerulonephritis, either recurrent or de novo, can be challenging to differentiate from ABMR-mediated transplant glomerulitis. Endothelial arteritis by itself does not warrant the diagnosis of acute T-cell mediated rejection; ABMR should also be considered based on the DSA test results. With regard to polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy, immunohistochemical examination using anti-simian virus (SV) 40 antibody can be a promising method to assess the quantitative viral load of polyomavirus BK and graft survival. In summary, the 2013 updated Banff classification strictly defines ABMR with histopathological and serological criteria irrespective of C4d positivity. Inclusion of gene expression data relevant to ABMR highlights that the Banff criteria have entered the era of 'Seeing the Unseen' schemes, reflecting recent advances in understanding the molecular events in allograft injury.

The role of infection in miscarriage

BACKGROUND

Miscarriage is the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before 12 weeks (early miscarriage) or from 12 to 24 weeks (late miscarriage) of gestation. Miscarriage occurs in one in five pregnancies and can have considerable physiological and psychological implications for the patient. It is also associated with significant health care costs. There is evidence that potentially preventable infections may account for up to 15% of early miscarriages and up to 66% of late miscarriages. However, the provision of associated screening and management algorithms is inconsistent for newly pregnant women. Here, we review recent population-based studies on infections that have been shown to be associated with miscarriage.

METHODS

Our aim was to examine where the current scientific focus lies with regards to the role of infection in miscarriage. Papers dating from June 2009 with key words 'miscarriage' and 'infection' or 'infections' were identified in PubMed (292 and 327 papers, respectively, on 2 June 2014). Relevant human studies (meta-analyses, case-control studies, cohort studies or case series) were included. Single case reports were excluded. The studies were scored based on the Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

RESULTS

The association of systemic infections with malaria, brucellosis, cytomegalovirus and human immunodeficiency virus, dengue fever, influenza virus and of vaginal infection with bacterial vaginosis, with increased risk of miscarriage has been demonstrated. Q fever, adeno-associated virus, Bocavirus, Hepatitis C and Mycoplasma genitalium infections do not appear to affect pregnancy outcome. The effects of Chlamydia trachomatis, Toxoplasma gondii, human papillomavirus, herpes simplex virus, parvovirus B19, Hepatitis B and polyomavirus BK infections remain controversial, as some studies indicate increased miscarriage risk and others show no increased risk. The latest data on rubella and syphilis indicate increased antenatal screening worldwide and a decrease in the frequency of their reported associations with pregnancy failure. Though various pathogens have been associated with miscarriage, the mechanism(s) of infection-induced miscarriage are not yet fully elucidated.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required to clarify whether certain infections do increase miscarriage risk and whether screening of newly pregnant women for treatable infections would improve reproductive outcomes.

Fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) Positron Emission Tomography Coupled With Computed Tomography in Suspected Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Management of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected acute rejection (AR) ultimately relies on kidney biopsy; however, noninvasive tests predicting nonrejection would help avoid unnecessary biopsy. AR involves recruitment of leukocytes avid for fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) ((18) F-FDG), thus (18) F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) coupled with computed tomography (CT) may noninvasively distinguish nonrejection from AR. From January 2013 to February 2015, we prospectively performed 32 (18) F-FDG PET/CT scans in 31 adult KTRs with suspected AR who underwent transplant biopsy. Biopsies were categorized into four groups: normal (n = 8), borderline (n = 10), AR (n = 8), or other (n = 6, including 3 with polyoma BK nephropathy). Estimated GFR was comparable in all groups. PET/CT was performed 201 ± 18 minutes after administration of 3.2 ± 0.2 MBq/kg of (18) F-FDG, before any immunosuppression change. Mean standard uptake values (SUVs) of both upper and lower renal poles were measured. Mean SUVs reached 1.5 ± 0.2, 1.6 ± 0.3, 2.9 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1.2 for the normal, borderline, AR, and other groups, respectively. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference of mean SUVs among groups. A positive correlation between mean SUV and acute composite Banff score was found, with r(2)  = 0.49. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93, with 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity using a mean SUV threshold of 1.6. In conclusion, (18) F-FDG PET/CT may help noninvasively prevent avoidable transplant biopsies in KTRs with suspected AR.