Biologic agents in the treatment of glomerulonephritides

Complement factor H gene polymorphism rs6677604 and the risk, severity and progression of IgA nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Studies reporting the association between complement factor H gene rs6677604 polymorphism and susceptibility to IgA nephropathy (IgAN) had yielded inconsistent results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between rs6677604 and IgAN susceptibility, disease severity and chronic progression.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search was performed to identify eligible studies. Meta-analyses were performed for rs6677604 allele frequency, genotypes and the association with IgAN susceptibility.

RESULTS

10 studies were included in the systematic review. Among them, four studies containing 10 distinct datasets (15,617 cases and 31,957 controls) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled frequency of the minor allele (A) was significantly higher in Europeans than in Asians across both IgAN cases and controls, and the frequency of the minor allele (A) in IgAN cases was also significantly lower than that in controls across both European and Asian subgroups. Significant associations were detected between rs6677604 and risk of developing IgAN, when comparing allele A vs. G, genotype AA vs. GG, genotype AA vs. AG and genotype AG vs. GG. In analysis stratified by ethnicity, significant association was only observed in Europeans but not in Asians when comparing AA vs. GG or AA vs. AG.

CONCLUSION

Our pooled analysis showed a significant association between rs6677604-(A) allele and IgAN susceptibility, supporting the importance of complement activation in the pathogenesis of IgAN. The presence of rs6677604-(A) allele may be associated with a decreased the risk of IgAN in Europeans, but the association was not confirmed in Asians.

Rituximab for immunologic renal disease: What the nephrologist needs to know

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric, monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, is increasingly used in immune-mediated renal diseases. While licensed in the induction treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, it represents one of the most commonly prescribed off-label drugs. Much of the information regarding its safety has been drawn from experience in hematology and rheumatology. Ample evidence illustrates the safety of RTX, however, rare but serious adverse events have emerged that include progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and hepatitis B reactivation. Moderate to severe hypogammaglobulinemia and late-onset neutropenia following RTX therapy confer an increased infectious risk and factors predicting these side effects (i.e. a genetic basis) need to be identified. Nephrologists initiating RTX need to bear in mind that long-term risks and optimal dosing for many renal indications remain unclear. Special considerations must be given when RTX is used in women of childbearing age. We summarize practical aspects concerning the use of RTX. This review will provide nephrologists with information to guide their use of RTX alerting them to safety risks and the need for patient counselling.

Biologics for the treatment of autoimmune renal diseases

Biological therapeutics (biologics) that target autoimmune responses and inflammatory injury pathways have a marked beneficial impact on the management of many chronic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and ankylosing spondylitis. Accumulating data suggest that a growing number of renal diseases result from autoimmune injury - including lupus nephritis, IgA nephropathy, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis, autoimmune (formerly idiopathic) membranous nephropathy, anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis, and C3 nephropathy - and one can speculate that biologics might also be applicable to these diseases. As many autoimmune renal diseases are relatively uncommon, with long natural histories and diverse outcomes, clinical trials that aim to validate potentially useful biologics are difficult to design and/or perform. Some excellent consortia are undertaking cohort studies and clinical trials, but more multicentre international collaborations are needed to advance the introduction of new biologics to patients with autoimmune renal disorders. This Review discusses the key molecules that direct injurious inflammation and the biologics that are available to modulate them. The opportunities and challenges for the introduction of relevant biologics into treatment protocols for autoimmune renal diseases are also discussed.