Intraoperative biomarkers in renal transplantation

Unveiling the Hidden Power of Uromodulin: A Promising Potential Biomarker for Kidney Diseases

Uromodulin, also known as Tamm-Horsfall protein, represents the predominant urinary protein in healthy individuals. Over the years, studies have revealed compelling associations between urinary and serum concentrations of uromodulin and various parameters, encompassing kidney function, graft survival, cardiovascular disease, glucose metabolism, and overall mortality. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in uromodulin as a novel and effective biomarker with potential applications in diverse clinical settings. Reduced urinary uromodulin levels have been linked to an elevated risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery. In the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) of different etiologies, urinary uromodulin levels tend to decrease significantly and are strongly correlated with variations in estimated glomerular filtration rate. The presence of uromodulin in the serum, attributable to basolateral epithelial cell leakage in the thick ascending limb, has been observed. This serum uromodulin level is closely associated with kidney function and histological severity, suggesting its potential as a biomarker capable of reflecting disease severity across a spectrum of kidney disorders. The UMOD gene has emerged as a prominent locus linked to kidney function parameters and CKD risk within the general population. Extensive research in multiple disciplines has underscored the biological significance of the top UMOD gene variants, which have also been associated with hypertension and kidney stones, thus highlighting the diverse and significant impact of uromodulin on kidney-related conditions. UMOD gene mutations are implicated in uromodulin-associated kidney disease, while polymorphisms in the UMOD gene show a significant association with CKD. In conclusion, uromodulin holds great promise as an informative biomarker, providing valuable insights into kidney function and disease progression in various clinical scenarios. The identification of UMOD gene variants further strengthens its relevance as a potential target for better understanding kidney-related pathologies and devising novel therapeutic strategies. Future investigations into the roles of uromodulin and regulatory mechanisms are likely to yield even more profound implications for kidney disease diagnosis, risk assessment, and management.

Biological Role, Mechanism of Action and the Importance of Interleukins in Kidney Diseases

Each year, the number of patients who are diagnosed with kidney disease too late is increasing, which leads to permanent renal failure. This growing problem affects people of every age, sex and origin, and its full etiopathogenesis is not fully understood, although the involvement of genetic susceptibility, infections, immune disorders or high blood pressure is suggested. Difficulties in making a correct and quick diagnosis are caused by the lack of research on early molecular markers, as well as educational and preventive activities among the public, which leads to the late detection of kidney diseases. An important role in the homeostasis and disease progression, including kidney diseases, is attributed to interleukins, which perform several biological functions and interact with other cells and tissues of the body. The aim of this article was to systematize the knowledge about the biological functions performed by interleukins in humans and their involvement in kidney diseases development. In our work, we took into account the role of interleukins in acute and chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation.

Intraoperative Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring of Renal Allograft Reperfusion in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Feasibility and Proof-of-Concept Study

Conventional renal function markers are unable to measure renal allograft perfusion intraoperatively, leading to delayed recognition of initial allograft function. A handheld near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device that can provide real-time assessment of renal allograft perfusion by quantifying regional tissue oxygen saturation levels (rSO₂) was approved by the FDA. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of intraoperative NIRS monitoring of allograft reperfusion in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Intraoperative renal allograft rSO₂ and perfusion rates were measured in living (LDRT, n = 3) and deceased donor RTR (DDRT, n = 4) during the first 50 min post-reperfusion and correlated with renal function markers 30 days post-transplantation. Intraoperative renal allograft rSO₂ for the DDRT group remained significantly lower than the LDRT group throughout the 50 min. Reperfusion rates were significantly faster in the LDRT group during the first 5 min post-reperfusion but remained stable thereafter in both groups. Intraoperative rSO₂ were similar among the upper pole, renal hilum, and lower pole, and strongly correlated with allograft function and hemodynamic parameters up to 14 days post-transplantation. NIRS successfully detected differences in intraoperative renal allograft rSO₂, warranting future studies to evaluate it as an objective method to measure ischemic injury and perfusion for the optimization of preservation/reperfusion protocols and early prediction of allograft function.

Hepatic and renal expression of Oatp1 in obstructive uropathy. First detection of Oatp1 in urine, a potential biomarker

Obstructive renal diseases affect renal function and kidney integrity. Nevertheless, little is known about its systemic or extra-renal effects. The organic anion transporting polypeptide 1 (Oatp1) is a carrier expressed in liver and kidneys. In this study, the hepatic and renal expression of Oatp1 was evaluated in rats with obstructive nephropathy. Moreover, the urinary excretion of Oatp1 (Oatp1u ) was evaluated as a potential biomarker for this pathology. Male Wistar rats with bilateral ureteral obstruction for 5 hours (BUO5), 24 hours (BUO24) or sham operated were used. After 24 hours of ureteral releasing, liver and kidney functional parameters, histopathology, Oatp1 tissular expression and Oatp1u were evaluated. For Oatp1u evaluation two groups were added; BUO1 and BUO2 (1 and 2 hours of ureteral obstruction, respectively). Both liver and kidney functional parameters and histopathological studies showed alterations in BUO5 and BUO24. In hepatic homogenates, Oatp1 significantly decreased in BUO groups and in total liver membranes no modifications were observed. In renal homogenates, Oatp1 significantly decreased in BUO groups, but in apical kidney membranes, its expression was increased. Oatp1u was only detected in BUO groups, even in those (BUO1, BUO2) in which no alterations in the traditional parameters of renal function were observed. Modulations in liver and renal expression of Oatp1 could be an organism strategy to attenuate the effects of the disease and an attempt to maintain the complex organ cross-talk between liver and kidneys. Oatp1u could be a new, early and specific biomarker of obstructive nephropathy.

Pretransplant Serum Uromodulin and Its Association with Delayed Graft Function Following Kidney Transplantation-A Prospective Cohort Study

Delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation is associated with increased risk of graft failure, but biomarkers to predict DGF are scarce. We evaluated serum uromodulin (sUMOD), a potential marker for tubular integrity with immunomodulatory capacities, in kidney transplant recipients and its association with DGF. We included 239 kidney transplant recipients and measured sUMOD pretransplant and on postoperative Day 1 (POD1) as independent variables. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as need for dialysis within one week after transplantation. In total, 64 patients (27%) experienced DGF. In multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for recipient, donor and transplant associated risk factors each 10 ng/mL higher pretransplant sUMOD was associated with 47% lower odds for DGF (odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% confidence interval (95%-CI) 0.30–0.82). When categorizing pretransplant sUMOD into quartiles, the quartile with the lowest values had 4.4-fold higher odds for DGF compared to the highest quartile (OR 4.41, 95%-CI 1.54–13.93). Adding pretransplant sUMOD to a model containing established risk factors for DGF in multivariable receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, the area-under-the-curve improved from 0.786 [95%-CI 0.723–0.848] to 0.813 [95%-CI 0.755–0.871, p = 0.05]. SUMOD on POD1 was not associated with DGF. In conclusion, higher pretransplant sUMOD was independently associated with lower odds for DGF, potentially serving as a non-invasive marker to stratify patients according to their risk for developing DGF early in the setting of kidney transplantation.

Mannitol and renal graft injury in patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation - a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is associated with renal tissue damage during deceased donor renal transplantation. The effect of mannitol to reduce I/R injury during graft reperfusion in renal transplant recipients is based on weak evidence. We evaluated the effect of mannitol to reduce renal graft injury represented by 16 serum biomarkers, which are indicators for different important pathophysiological pathways. Our primary outcome were differences in biomarker concentrations between the mannitol and the placebo group 24 h after graft reperfusion. Additionally, we performed a linear mixed linear model to account biomarker concentrations before renal transplantation.

Methods

Thirty-four patients undergoing deceased donor renal transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either 20% mannitol or 0.9% NaCl placebo solution before, during, and after graft reperfusion. Sixteen serum biomarkers (MMP1, CHI3L1, CCL2, MMP8, HGF, GH, FGF23, Tie2, VCAM1, TNFR1, IGFBP7, IL18, NGAL, Endostatin, CystC, KIM1) were measured preoperatively and 24 h after graft reperfusion using Luminex assays and ELISA.

Results

Sixteen patients in each group were analysed. Tie2 differed 24 h after graft reperfusion between both groups (p = 0.011). Change of log2 transformed concentration levels over time differed significantly in four biomarkers (VCAM1,Endostatin, KIM1, GH; p = 0.007; p = 0.013; p = 0.004; p = 0.033; respectively) out of 16 between both groups.

Conclusion

This study showed no effect of mannitol on I/R injury in patients undergoing deceased renal transplantation. Thus, we do not support the routinely use of mannitol to attenuate I/R injury.

Trial registration

NCT02705573. Registered on 10th March 2016.

Delayed Graft Function, Predictive Factors, and 7-Year Outcome of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients With Different Immunologic Profiles

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is the major post-transplant cause of deleterious effects to the allograft and is associated with poor allograft survival. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of 236 kidney transplant recipients with different immunologic profiles.

METHODS

All patients underwent transplantation (2008-2016) with a deceased donor at the University Hospital of the Faculty of Medical Science, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to immunologic profiles: nonsensitized (NS), sensitized without donor-specific antibody (SDSA-), or sensitized with donor-specific antibody (SDSA+).

RESULTS

DGF was observed in 128 (54.24%), including 63 (49.22%) NS, 51 (39.84%) SDSA-, and 14 (10.94%) SDSA+ patients. The development of DGF was associated with dialysis for ≥49.25 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.30), donor age ≥42.25 years (OR 1.77), donor end creatinine level >1.22 mg/dL (OR 1.94), and cold ischemia time >12 hours (OR 2.45). Of the 55 patients with rejections, 37 (15.68%) had T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 18 (7.63%) had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Nine patients (16.36%) exhibited graft loss, 2 (0.85%) via TCMR in the SDSA- DGF+ group and 7 (2.97%) via AMR, including 2 NS DGF-, 2 SDSA- DGF-, 1 SDSA- DGF+, and 2 SDSA+ DGF+ patients. Graft survival significantly differed between the NSDGF- and SDSA- DGF+ groups (P = .014) and between the NS DGF- and SDSA+ DGF- groups (P = .036).

CONCLUSION

In the 7-year period following transplantation, TCMR was more prevalent than AMR among patients with DGF. Graft loss was less prevalent among patients with TCMR than among those with AMR.

Comparison of Two Different Inhalation Anesthetics on Grafted Kidney Function in Patients Undergoing Renal Transplantation Surgery: Desflurane or Sevoflurane?

BACKGROUND

Anesthetic management of patients during renal transplantation is vitally important for ensuring proper functioning of kidneys that have undergone ischemia-reperfusion damage. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the effects of 2 different inhalation agents (sevoflurane and desflurane) on grafted kidney function in renal transplantation surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients who were scheduled for living donor renal transplantation were enrolled in the study. General anesthesia was performed on all patients. Thirty-five pairs of recipients and donors were anesthetized with sevoflurane (group S) and 30 pairs of recipients and donors were anesthetized with desflurane (group D). Each patient's demographic characteristics, immunologic and clinical data, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated in the preoperative period and on postoperative days 1 and 7. The blood samples were collected before the operation and on postoperative days 1 and 7 for measurement of serum creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and interleukin 18.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or immunologic data between group D and group S. Intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure were the same between groups. Creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and interleukin 18 values did not differ between groups (P > .05) in the preoperative period and postoperative days 1 and 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane and desflurane had no adverse effects on grafted kidney functions according to short-term graft outcomes in patients undergoing living donor renal transplantation.

Prediction, prevention, and management of delayed graft function: where are we now?

Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a major barrier to improved outcomes after kidney transplantation. High-risk transplant recipients can be identified, but no definitive prediction model exists. Novel biomarkers to predict DGF in the first hours post-transplant, such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), are under investigation. Donor management to minimize the profound physiological consequences of brain death is highly complex. A hormonal resuscitation package to manage the catecholamine "storm" that follows brain death is recommended. Donor pretreatment with dopamine prior to procurement lowers the rate of DGF. Hypothermic machine perfusion may offer a significant reduction in the rate of DGF vs simple cold storage, but costs need to be evaluated. Surgically, reducing warm ischemia time may be advantageous. Research into recipient preconditioning options has so far not generated clinically helpful interventions. Diagnostic criteria for DGF vary, but requirement for dialysis and/or persistent high serum creatinine is likely to remain key to diagnosis until current work on early biomarkers has progressed further. Management centers on close monitoring of graft (non)function and physiological parameters. With so many unanswered questions, substantial reductions in the toll of DGF in the near future seem unlikely but concentrated research on many levels offers long-term promise.