Different faces of Nocardia infection in renal transplant recipients

Nocardiosis in kidney transplant recipients: A tertiary care center experience

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of opportunistic infections, including Nocardia. The incidence of nocardiosis in kidney transplant recipients is 0.4-1.3%. The data regarding its epidemiology and outcomes is limited.

METHODS

This was a 10-year retrospective observational study from January 2012 to December 2021 at a tertiary care center in northern India, in which all kidney transplant recipients with Nocardia infection were included and followed.

RESULTS

12 (1.1%) patients had a Nocardia infection among the 1108 kidney transplant recipients. All were living donor kidney transplant recipients, and the mean age at diagnosis was 48.67 ± 12.60 years. Nocardia infection occurred at a median of 26 months (range 4-235) post-transplantation, with 4 (33.1%) of the cases occurring within a year of transplant. Breakthrough infection occurred in 7 (58.3%) patients on cotrimoxazole prophylaxis. 41.7% (n = 5) cases had an episode of rejection in the preceding year of Nocardia diagnosis. Concurrent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was present in one (8.3%) case. The lung was the most frequently involved organ. Microscopy was positive in all the cases; while culture was positive in 10 cases, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were performed for these isolates. The majority (60%) of isolates were resistant to cotrimoxazole. All tested isolates remained susceptible to Amikacin, Imipenem, and Linezolid. No patients experienced Nocardia recurrence after completion of antibiotic therapy. The mortality at 12 months was 66.7% (n = 4), and only one death was Nocardia-related.

CONCLUSION

Nocardia may cause a late-manifesting infection beyond the traditional window. The cotrimoxazole prophylaxis may not be sufficient for Nocardia prevention.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole significantly reduces the risk of nocardiosis in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis prevents nocardiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of TMP-SMX in the prevention of nocardiosis after SOT, its dose-response relationship, its effect on preventing disseminated nocardiosis, and the risk of TMP-SMX resistance in case of breakthrough infection.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus up to 19 September 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

(a) Risk of nocardiosis between SOT recipients with and without TMP-SMX prophylaxis, or (b) sufficient details to determine the rate of TMP-SMX resistance in breakthrough nocardiosis.

PARTICIPANTS

SOT recipients.

INTERVENTION

TMP-SMX prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) for comparative studies; dedicated tool for non-comparative studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

For our primary outcome (i.e. to determine the effect of TMP-SMX on the risk of nocardiosis), a one-step mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the association between the outcome and the exposure. Univariate and multivariable unconditional regression models were used to adjust for the potential confounding effects. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Individual data from three case-control studies were obtained (260 SOT recipients with nocardiosis and 519 uninfected controls). TMP-SMX prophylaxis was independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of nocardiosis (adjusted OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.18-0.52, moderate certainty of evidence). Variables independently associated with an increased risk of nocardiosis were older age, current use of corticosteroids, high calcineurin inhibitor concentration, recent acute rejection, lower lymphocyte count, and heart transplant. Breakthrough infections (66/260, 25%) were generally susceptible to TMP-SMX (pooled proportion 98%, 95% CI 92-100).

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients, TMP-SMX prophylaxis likely reduces the risk of nocardiosis. Resistance appears uncommon in case of breakthrough infection.

Outcomes of transplant recipients with pretransplant Nocardia colonization or infection

BACKGROUND

Specific pretransplant infections have been associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. However, the impact of pretransplant Nocardia isolation has not been studied.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study from three centers in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota of patients with Nocardia infection or colonization who subsequently underwent solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from November 2011 through April 2022. Outcomes included posttransplant Nocardia infection and mortality.

RESULTS

Nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia were included. Two patients were deemed colonized with Nocardia, and the remaining seven had nocardiosis. These patients underwent bilateral lung (N = 5), heart (N = 1), heart-kidney (N = 1), liver-kidney (N = 1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (N = 1) at a median of 283 (interquartile range [IQR] 152-283) days after Nocardia isolation. Two (22.2%) patients had disseminated infection, and two were receiving active Nocardia treatment at the time of transplantation. One Nocardia isolate was resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and all patients received TMP-SMX prophylaxis posttransplant, often for extended durations. No patients developed posttransplant nocardiosis during a median follow-up of 1.96 (IQR 0.90-6.33) years. Two patients died during follow-up, both without evidence of nocardiosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not identify any episodes of posttransplant nocardiosis among nine patients with pretransplant Nocardia isolation. As patients with the most severe infections may have been denied transplantation, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better analyze any impact of pretransplant Nocardia on posttransplant outcomes. However, among patients who receive posttransplant TMP-SMX prophylaxis, these data suggest pretransplant Nocardia isolation may not impart a heightened risk of posttransplant nocardiosis.

Updates on Nocardia Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to their immunocompromised status, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at risk for Nocardia infections. These infections often necessitate early invasive diagnostics alongside prolonged, often combination antimicrobial therapy. This review summarizes the importance of this pathogen in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in SOT recipients inclusive of recently reported cases in the literature and an update on the epidemiology, diagnostics, and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Six studies with 13 isolated SSTIs due to Nocardia have been published in the last 5 years in SOT recipients. The most common underlying type of transplant was kidney and time from transplantation to infection varied from 6 months to 16 years. Misdiagnosis was frequent. Available identified species included N. brasiliensis (2), N. farcinica (2), N. flavorosea (1), N. abscessus (1), N. anaemiae (1), N. asteroides (1), N. nova (1), and N. vinacea (1). Treatment choice and duration varied widely, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was utilized most often with no documented infection relapse. Nocardia SSTIs can occur both in isolation and as a component of a disseminated infection. Overall, isolated Nocardia SSTIs are uncommon in SOT recipients and are often initially misdiagnosed. They present multiple challenges to the clinician including evaluation for potential co-pathogens and/or non-infectious processes and ruling out the presence of disseminated infection. While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remains the agent of choice for management of most isolated SSTIs, therapy must be tailored to the individual patient based on species-specific susceptibility patterns and formal susceptibility testing, site(s) of infection, and patient tolerability.

Isolated abdominal nocardiosis in a pediatric renal transplant recipient

Nocardia infection after RT is uncommon. The most common modes of exposure are inhalation of dust containing nocardia or contaminated soil/water and surgical instruments. Isolated abdominal nocardiosis following RT has not been reported. We report an 11-year-old female who developed nocardia abscesses of the abdomen post-RT. ESRD was secondary to FSGS and she had received multiple immunosuppressive agents prior to transplant. Induction immunosuppression consisted of thymoglobulin and maintenance was with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. There were construction activities in the hospital ward during her hospital stay. Due to immediate recurrence of FSGS in the allograft, she received plasma exchange, rituximab, and IVIG. Anti-infective prophylaxis consisted of TMP-SMX, valganciclovir, and nystatin. She developed multiple loculated fluid collections in the abdomen 6 weeks later. Histology of lesions demonstrated suppurative caseating granulomatous inflammation and the AFB culture showed Nocardia farcinica. With the reduction of immunosuppressive agents along with usage of TMP-SMX, imipenem-cilastatin, and linezolid, she had a partial recovery after 9 months with persistent small abscesses but remained asymptomatic clinically. There was no evidence of nocardia infection in lungs and brain. Repeat AFB culture from the lesions was negative. Allograft function remained stable throughout. She remains on oral TMP-SMX therapy. We postulated that she could have acquired nocardia either from the contaminated air particles in the hospital from the construction activities or reactivation of nocardia from prior colonization. Nocardia infection should be suspected in immunocompromised patients with unexplained fever and abdominal pain.