Protocol graft biopsy in kidney transplantation

The Importance of 1-Year Protocol Biopsy in the Long-Term Prognosis of Kidney Transplants-5-Years Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Protocol biopsies are performed to detect subclinical pathologies that may lead to future graft dysfunction. However, they are not routinely performed interventions in every transplant center. There is no established regimen for performing them.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate if protocol biopsies can improve long-term patient outcomes after detecting early disorders and modifying treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our observational study included 61 patients who underwent protocol biopsy 12 months after the transplantation. Based on the biopsy results, patients with abnormal histologic material (n = 37) were divided into 3 study groups as follows: patients with mild inflammatory lesions (n = 21), patients with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) grade II to III (n = 12), and patients with BK virus nephropathy (n = 4). The control group (n = 24) included kidney recipients with IFTA 0 to I grade. Outcomes after 5-year follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five years after the biopsy, patients in the control group had stable graft function (5-year change in serum creatinine was -0.09 mg/dL). An increase in serum creatinine levels was observed in patients with IFTA II to III compared with the control group (0.14 mg/dL, P = .04). Immunosuppressive treatment was modified in the group with mild inflammatory changes and in the BKV group after the biopsy result. In the group with mild inflammatory lesions, renal function was stable (change of serum creatinine was -0.01 mg/dL, P = .51). In the BKV nephropathy group, there was a significant reduction in serum creatine levels (-0.48 mg/dL, P = .016). The analysis showed no diagnostic value for serum creatinine concentration (95% CI 0.49-0.78, P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol biopsies are useful for detecting early pathologies and preventing allograft failure. They greatly benefit patients with detectable pathology that can be treated or in whom therapy modification is possible.

Transmission of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by a single multiorgan donor to two kidney transplant recipients: A case report

We present two cases of transmission of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma from a single donor to two kidney transplant recipients. Autopsy of the donor revealed a pancreatic adenocarcinoma that had already spread locally to the regional lymph nodes and had not been detected at the time of organ procurement. Both recipients were carefully monitored, as neither consented to graft nephrectomy. In one patient, the tumor was discovered on surveillance biopsy of the graft approximately 14 months after transplantation, and in the second patient, ultrasound-guided aspiration needle biopsy of a growing formation in the lower pole of the graft revealed poorly differentiated metastatic adenocarcinoma. Both patients were successfully treated with graft nephrectomy and complete discontinuation of immunosuppression. None of the follow-up imaging showed persistent or recurrent malignancy, and both patients were candidates for re-transplantation. These exceptional cases of donor-derived pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggest that removal of the donor organ and restoration of immunity may lead to complete recovery.

The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation

Many studies have reported that protocol biopsy (PB) may help preserve kidney function in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection may reduce the incidence of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure. However, no consensus has been reached regarding PB effectiveness, timing, and policy. This study aimed to evaluate the protective role of routine PB performed 2 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. We reviewed 854 kidney transplant recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2017, with PBs planned at 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the trends in graft function, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, new-onset CKD, infection, and patient and graft survival between the 504 patients who underwent PB and 350 who did not undergo PB. The PB group was again divided into 2 groups: the single PB group (n = 207) and the double PB group (n = 297). The PB group was significantly different from the no-PB group in terms of the trends in graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that PB did not significantly improve graft or overall patient survival. However, in the multivariate Cox analysis, the double PB group had advantages in graft survival, CKD progression, and new-onset CKD. PB can play a protective role in the maintenance of kidney grafts in kidney transplant recipients.

Protocol Biopsy After Kidney Transplant: Clinical Application and Efficacy to Detect Allograft Rejection

Background Kidney transplant rejection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and failure. In recent years, there has been increased interest in renal allograft protocol biopsies to allow earlier detection of acute or chronic graft dysfunction or rejection to improve long-term graft survival and reduce graft failure. This study aimed to determine if renal allograft protocol biopsies performed within the first 12 months after transplantation help detect subclinical graft dysfunction or rejection. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis utilizing SUNY Upstate University Hospital data from January 2016 to March 2022 to assess transplant outcomes and biopsies. The study population was divided into two subgroups: non-protocol biopsies and protocol biopsies within the 12 months post-transplant. Results A total of 332 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients were divided into two subgroups: 135 patients (40.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 197 patients (59.4%) with non-protocol indication biopsies during the first year after the transplant. The overall number of rejection episodes reported was eight episodes (4.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 56 episodes (18.3%) in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, which was significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.001). Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) diagnoses were significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.03 and P=0.03, respectively). We also mentioned a trend in terms of mixed antibody-mediated rejection and T-cell-mediated rejection diagnosis (P=0.07). One year after the rejection, the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 56.78 mL/min/1.73m² in the protocol biopsy group and 49.14 mL/min/1.73m² in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, and there was no significant difference anymore (P=0.11). The patient survival rate was not significantly higher in the protocol biopsy group compared to the non-protocol indication biopsy group (P=0.42). Conclusion This study suggests that performing protocol biopsies does not significantly benefit rejection rates, graft survival, or renal function within the first 12 months post-transplant. Given these results and the small but non-zero risk of complications associated with protocol biopsies, they should be reserved for those patients at high risk of rejection. It may be more feasible and beneficial to utilize less invasive tests, such as DSA and dd-cfDNA testing, for early diagnosis of a rejection episode.

Revisiting transplant immunology through the lens of single-cell technologies

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is the standard of care for end-stage organ disease. The most frequent complication of SOT involves allograft rejection, which may occur via T cell- and/or antibody-mediated mechanisms. Diagnosis of rejection in the clinical setting requires an invasive biopsy as there are currently no reliable biomarkers to detect rejection episodes. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to identify patients who exhibit operational tolerance and may be candidates for reduced or complete withdrawal of immunosuppression. Emerging single-cell technologies, including cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), imaging mass cytometry, and single-cell RNA sequencing, represent a new opportunity for deep characterization of pathogenic immune populations involved in both allograft rejection and tolerance in clinical samples. These techniques enable examination of both individual cellular phenotypes and cell-to-cell interactions, ultimately providing new insights into the complex pathophysiology of allograft rejection. However, working with these large, highly dimensional datasets requires expertise in advanced data processing and analysis using computational biology techniques. Machine learning algorithms represent an optimal strategy to analyze and create predictive models using these complex datasets and will likely be essential for future clinical application of patient level results based on single-cell data. Herein, we review the existing literature on single-cell techniques in the context of SOT.

Postoperative and Recurrent Hematuria after Pretransplant Core Needle Biopsy in Living Donor Kidney Transplant

Background

Core needle and wedge biopsies are the two main pathologic ways to determine the suitability of a kidney allograft and to have a baseline allograft biopsy in case of future rejection. Case Presentation. A 57-year-old patient developed a renal arteriovenous fistula causing postoperative and recurrent hematuria after allograft pretransplant renal core needle biopsy and treated with selective Interventional radiology coil embolization.

Conclusion

Delayed profound hematuria can be seen after pretransplant core needle renal biopsies and can recur again even after complete resolution, due to arteriovenous fistula formation in the renal calyceal system.

Risk factors for graft loss and death among kidney transplant recipients: A competing risk analysis

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is the best therapeutical option for CKD patients. Graft loss risk factors are usually estimated with the cox method. Competing risk analysis could be useful to determine the impact of different events affecting graft survival, the occurrence of an outcome of interest can be precluded by another. We aimed to determine the risk factors for graft loss in the presence of mortality as a competing event.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 1454 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between July 1, 2008, to May 31, 2019, in Colombiana de Trasplantes, were analyzed to determine risk factors of graft loss and mortality at 5 years post-transplantation. Kidney and patient survival probabilities were estimated by the competing risk analysis. The Fine and Gray method was used to fit a multivariable model for each outcome. Three variable selection methods were compared, and the bootstrapping technique was used for internal validation as split method for resample. The performance of the final model was assessed calculating the prediction error, brier score, c-index and calibration plot.

RESULTS

Graft loss occurred in 169 patients (11.6%) and death in 137 (9.4%). Cumulative incidence for graft loss and death was 15.8% and 13.8% respectively. In a multivariable analysis, we found that BKV nephropathy, serum creatinine and increased number of renal biopsies were significant risk factors for graft loss. On the other hand, recipient age, acute cellular rejection, CMV disease were risk factors for death, and recipients with living donor had better survival compared to deceased-donor transplant and coronary stent. The c-index were 0.6 and 0.72 for graft loss and death model respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed two prediction models for graft loss and death 5 years post-transplantation by a unique transplant program in Colombia. Using a competing risk multivariable analysis, we were able to identify 3 significant risk factors for graft loss and 5 significant risk factors for death. This contributes to have a better understanding of risk factors for graft loss in a Latin-American population. The predictive performance of the models was mild.

Effects of antirejection therapies for early subclinical acute rejection in renal transplant protocol biopsies

Background

Although recently strengthened immunosuppression protocols have decreased the incidence of clinical acute rejection of renal transplants, subclinical acute rejection and borderline changes remain problematic. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of antirejection therapies for early subclinical acute rejection and borderline changes.

Methods

In total, 269 renal transplant patients who received 3-month and 1-year protocol biopsies after renal transplantation were enrolled this study and divided into those with normal findings (Group A) and those with ≥ borderline changes (Group B) according to the 3-month pathological results. Pathological changes, graft function, and graft survival were evaluated at 1 year.

Results

The 3-month protocol biopsy revealed normal findings in 166 patients (Group A) and borderline changes and subclinical acute rejection in 103 patients (Group B). In Group A, 65.1% (n = 108) of the patients maintained normal findings at 1 year, while 30.1% (n = 50) deteriorated to ≥ borderline changes. In Group B, 52.4% (n = 54) of patients improved to normal. Among patients with subclinical acute rejection, 25.0% (n = 5) maintained subclinical acute rejection at 1 year despite antirejection therapy. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 60.4 ± 24.5 to 58.3 ± 19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group A and from 57.2 ± 28.2 to 53.7 ± 20.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group B (p = 0.417). The 3-, 5-, and 7-year graft survival rates were 99.4%, 99.4%, and 97.6% in Group A and 100.0%, 98.6%, and 98.6% in Group B, respectively (p = 0.709).

Conclusions

Subclinical acute rejection is likely to recur. However, intervention for subclinical acute rejection in the early period after transplantation may help to prevent subsequent histological changes.

The diagnostic role of PD-1+ CXCR5+ follicular helper CD8+ T cell in renal allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The roles of PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ follicular helper CD8⁺ T cell were reported in different disease conditions, but their roles in transplantation are unclear. In this study, the association between PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ follicular helper CD8⁺ T cell and renal allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was investigated.

METHODS

82 KTRs were enrolled in this study. 45 KTRs were included in the chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) group, and 37 KTRs were included in the stable recipients group. Among the CAD group, 12 cases of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 4 cases of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) were diagnosed by biopsy. The percentage of CXCR5⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and the co-expression of signal transducers and activators of transcription 4 (STAT4), STAT5, and PD-1 in peripheral blood were determined by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The expression of CXCR5 on CD3⁺ CD8⁺ T cells and the percentage of STAT5⁺ CXCR5⁺ cells in the CD3⁺ CD8⁺ T-cell population were significantly lower in the CAD group (p < 0.05), while the expression of PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ CD8⁺ T cells was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Through logistic regression analysis, we concluded that the percentage of PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ CD8⁺ T cells was an independent risk factor for renal dysfunction. Grouping by pathological type, PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ CD8⁺ T cells showed relatively good diagnostic efficacy for ABMR by ROC analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that PD-1⁺ CXCR5⁺ CD8⁺ T cells were a promising biomarker for distinguishing renal allograft dysfunction and different allograft pathological types. Also, our findings may provide new ways of identifying and treating allograft rejection.

Use of graft-derived cell-free DNA as a novel biomarker to predict allograft function after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between graft-derived cell-free DNA and pretransplantation clinical variables, and to determine whether the former could be used as a novel biomarker to predict renal function.

METHODS

A total of 87 recipients who underwent primary kidney transplantation were recruited to the study. For each recipient, 10 mL peripheral blood was collected on days 1, 7, 14-20, and 30-45 after transplantation. The fractional abundance of graft-derived cell-free DNA was determined using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

For most recipients, graft-derived cell-free DNA fraction values were significantly elevated on the first day after transplantation, followed by a rapid decline, and reaching baseline values of graft-derived cell-free DNA fraction in the range of <1% at 7 days. Statistical analysis showed that longer cold ischemia time was significantly associated with higher graft-derived cell-free DNA fraction values (P = 0.02). Moreover, we also found that graft-derived cell-free DNA fraction values among recipients with delayed graft function were significantly higher than those of recipients without delayed graft function on the first day after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that recipients who had a graft-derived cell-free DNA fraction value of <1% at 7 days had a significantly lower probability of an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m² at 90 days. Using a random forest regression model, the predicted values of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 90 days were almost the same as the actual values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that graft-derived cell-free DNA might be used as a novel biomarker to predict delayed graft function and renal function.

Urinary NGAL Measured after the First Year Post Kidney Transplantation Predicts Changes in Glomerular Filtration over One-Year Follow-Up

Currently, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) together with albuminuria or proteinuria are laboratory markers used in long-term monitoring of kidney transplant recipients. There is a need for more sensitive markers that could serve as early warning signs of graft dysfunction. Our aim was to assess the urinary concentrations of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a predictor of changes in kidney transplant function after the first year post-transplantation. We prospectively recruited 109 patients with functioning graft at least one year after the transplantation, with no acute conditions over the past three months, during their control visits in kidney transplant ambulatory. Urinary NGAL measured on recruitment was twice higher in patients with at least 10% decrease in eGFR over 1-year follow-up compared to those with stable or improving transplant function. Baseline NGAL significantly predicted the relative and absolute changes in eGFR and the mean eGFR during the follow-up independently of baseline eGFR and albuminuria. Moreover, baseline NGAL significantly predicted urinary tract infections during the follow-up, although the infections were not associated with decreasing eGFR. Additionally, we assessed urinary concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase 9-NGAL complex in a subgroup of 77 patients and found higher levels in patients who developed urinary tract infections during the follow-up but not in those with decreasing eGFR. High urinary NGAL in clinically stable kidney transplant recipients beyond the first year after transplantation may be interpreted as a warning and trigger the search for transient or chronic causes of graft dysfunction, or urinary tract infection.

HbA1c and Aortic Calcification Index as Noninvasive Predictors of Pre-Existing Histopathological Damages in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

We previously reported that allografts from living donors may have pre-existing histopathological damages, defined as the combination of interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and arteriolar hyalinosis (ah) scores of ≧1, according to the Banff classification. We examined preoperative characteristics to identify whether the degree of these damages was related to metabolic syndrome-related factors of donors. We conducted a single-center cross-sectional analysis including 183 living kidney donors. Donors were divided into two groups: chronic change (ci + ct ≧ 1 &cap; ah ≧ 1, n = 27) and control (n = 156). Preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), aortic calcification index (ACI), and psoas muscle index (PMI), were analyzed. Comparing the groups, the baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different; however, we observed a significant difference for ACI (p = 0.009). HbA1c (p = 0.016) and ACI (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors to predict pre-existing histopathological damages, whereas PMI was not. HbA1c correlated with ct scores (p = 0.035), and ACI correlated with ci (p = 0.005), ct (p = 0.021), and ah (p = 0.017). HbA1c and ACI may serve as preoperative markers for identifying pre-existing damages on the kidneys of living donors.

Preemptive HLA Antibody Screening Prior to Episodic Transplant Renal Biopsy Enables Early Diagnosis and Therapeutic Response in Asymptomatic Chronically Active Antibody-Related Rejection: A Case Report

Common management of renal transplant recipients includes episodic renal biopsy based on clinical findings such as an increase in proteinuria or serum creatinine. When antibody-related rejection is suspected from the renal biopsy, subsequent testing for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is performed. We instead performed preemptive screening of asymptomatic post-renal transplant recipients for DSAs prior to renal biopsy. In this case, a 30-year-old woman with a secondary transplant was positive for 61 anti-HLA antibodies of class I and class II, among which DQ2 was a DSA with a mean fluorescence index of 2039. The patient had a living kidney transplant 9 years earlier. She had never been diagnosed with rejection, her serum creatinine was around 1.0 mg/dL, and her proteinuria was negative. Following the positive DSA result, a renal biopsy was performed, and she was diagnosed as C4d-negative chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) with a Banff score of cg1b, (g + ptc) ≥ 2, and C4d 0. Intravenous steroid pulse, deoxyspagarin, antithymocyte globulin, rituximab, and oral everolimus were administrated. The treatment resulted in a gradual decrease in the DSA, which became negative 1 year later. The patient's serum creatinine remains around 1.0 mg/dL, and proteinuria remains negative. Treatments for advanced CAABMR are often expensive and ineffective. Our present case suggests that early detection and treatment through preemptive HLA antibody screening could improve the prognosis of renal transplants.

Recurrent Glomerulonephritis after Renal Transplantation: The Clinical Problem

Glomerulonephritis (GN) continues to be one of the main causes of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with an incidence rating from 10.5% to 38.2%. Therefore, recurrent GN, previously considered to be a minor contributor to graft loss, is the third most common cause of graft failure 10 years after renal transplantation. However, the incidence, pathogenesis, and natural course of recurrences are still not completely understood. This review focuses on the most frequent diseases that recur after renal transplantation, analyzing rate of recurrence, epidemiology and risk factors, pathogenesis and bimolecular mechanisms, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy, taking into consideration the limited data available in the literature. First of all, the risk for recurrence depends on the type of glomerulonephritis. For example, recipient patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease present recurrence rarely, but often exhibit rapid graft loss. On the other hand, recipient patients with C3 glomerulonephritis present recurrence in more than 50% of cases, although the disease is generally slowly progressive. It should not be forgotten that every condition that can lead to chronic graft dysfunction should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrence. Therefore, a complete workup of renal biopsy, including light, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy study, is essential to provide the diagnosis, excluding alternative diagnosis that may require different treatment. We will examine in detail the biomolecular mechanisms of both native and transplanted kidney diseases, monitoring the risk of recurrence and optimizing the available treatment options.

Interleukin 8 Is Overexpressed in Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Patients

The main complication associated with renal graft loss is immune rejection. The gold standard for the diagnosis of renal graft rejection is percutaneous renal biopsy, which is expensive and can lead to complications. Inflammation is one of the main pathogenic pathways in allograft rejection, and urine samples seem to be efficient windows to explore the allograft condition with a high cost-benefit ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) profile expression pattern for interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10; tumor necrosis factor alfa; gamma interferon; and transforming growth factor β1 in the urine renal cells of patients with a diagnosis of humoral rejection and patients with a diagnosis of normal biopsy. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional analytical study was performed. All kidney transplants were performed at the Organ Transplant Department between 2018 and 2019. Also, a healthy control with a normal blood test and no apparent infection was included. mRNA from urine samples and biopsies was isolated, and the expression of interleukins was analyzed in PCR real time. Data were analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The proinflammatory IL expression pattern in urine samples of kidney rejection group showed overexpression for IL-8 (P = .0001). No differences were observed in the rest of the interleukins analyzed. When we compared the results in the rejected versus not rejected transplanted patients with a group of apparently healthy subjects, the difference remains consistent. Thus, mRNA of IL-8 could function as a diagnostic tool in cases of chronic damage secondary to fibrosis.

Differences in Pathologic Features and Graft Outcomes of Rejection on Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

Rejection is still a barrier to long-term allograft survival, but there are not many reports of clinical outcomes according to rejection types. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in pathologic features and graft outcomes of rejection on kidney transplant (KT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 139 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed to rejection by allograft biopsy results between 2006 and 2018. We divided kidney transplant recipients into 3 groups as follows: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection, and mixed rejection. We investigated clinical characteristics, pathologic findings, death-censored graft survival rates, and patient survival rates among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 113.5 (SD, 80.6) months. The mixed rejection group was the youngest significantly. There were no significant differences of the proportion of sex, KT type, KT number, number of HLA mismatches, induction immunosuppressant, and maintenance immunosuppressant among the 3 groups. In pathologic findings, microvascular inflammation and C4d were significantly different among the 3 groups. Death-censored graft survival of mixed rejection was the least. In multivariate analysis, recipient age, TCMR, and positive C4d were the risk factors associated with graft failure. However, patient survival rates showed no significant differences among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that mixed rejection had poor prognosis in comparison with TCMR and antibody-mediated rejection groups, and TCMR and positive C4d were the most important risk factors for graft survival. Therefore, constant monitoring through allograft biopsy and early treatment for rejection are very important in post-transplant clinical outcomes.