Dialysis catheter management practices in Australia and New Zealand

Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Tip Design and Risk of Catheter Dysfunction: An Australian Nationwide Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Hemodialysis catheter dysfunction is an important problem for patients with kidney failure. The optimal design of the tunneled catheter tip is unknown. This study evaluated the association of catheter tip design with the duration of catheter function.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study using data from the nationwide REDUCCTION trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

4,722 adults who each received hemodialysis via 1 or more tunneled central venous catheters in 37 Australian nephrology services from December 2016 to March 2020.

EXPOSURE

Design of tunneled hemodialysis catheter tip, classified as symmetrical, step, or split.

OUTCOME

Time to catheter dysfunction requiring removal due to inadequate dialysis blood flow assessed by the treating clinician.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Mixed, 3-level accelerated failure time model, assuming a log-normal survival distribution. Secular trends, the intervention, and baseline differences in service, patient, and catheter factors were included in the adjusted model. In a sensitivity analysis, survival times and proportional hazards were compared among participants' first tunneled catheters.

RESULTS

Among the study group, 355 of 3,871 (9.2%), 262 of 1,888 (13.9%), and 38 of 455 (8.4%) tunneled catheters with symmetrical, step, and split tip designs, respectively, required removal due to dysfunction. Step tip catheters required removal for dysfunction at a rate 53% faster than symmetrical tip catheters (adjusted time ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33-0.67) and 76% faster than split tip catheters (adjusted time ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.11-0.51) in the adjusted accelerated failure time models. Only symmetrical tip catheters had performance superior to step tip catheters in unadjusted and sensitivity analyses. Split tip catheters were infrequently used and had risks of dysfunction similar to symmetrical tip catheters. The cumulative incidence of other complications requiring catheter removal, routine removal, and death before removal were similar across the 3 tip designs.

LIMITATIONS

Tip design was not randomized.

CONCLUSIONS

Symmetrical and split tip catheters had a lower risk of catheter dysfunction requiring removal than step tip catheters.

FUNDING

Grants from government (Queensland Health, Safer Care Victoria, Medical Research Future Fund, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia), academic (Monash University), and not-for-profit (ANZDATA Registry, Kidney Health Australia) sources.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ANZCTR with study number ACTRN12616000830493.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Central venous catheters are widely used to facilitate vascular access for life-sustaining hemodialysis treatments but often fail due to blood clots or other mechanical problems that impede blood flow. A range of adaptations to the design of tunneled hemodialysis catheters have been developed, but it is unclear which designs have the greatest longevity. We analyzed data from an Australian nationwide cohort of patients who received hemodialysis via a tunneled catheter and found that catheters with a step tip design failed more quickly than those with a symmetrical tip. Split tip catheters performed well but were infrequently used and require further study. Use of symmetrical rather than step tip hemodialysis catheters may reduce mechanical failures and unnecessary procedures for patients.

Clinical Adjudication of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Findings from the REDUCCTION Trial

Key Points

The inter-rater reliability of reporting hemodialysis catheter-related infectious events between site investigators and trial adjudicators in Australia and New Zealand was substantial. The high concordance level in reporting catheter infections improves confidence in using site-level bacteremia rates as a clinical metric for quality benchmarking and future pragmatic clinical trials. A rigorous adjudication protocol may not be needed if clearly defined criteria to ascertain catheter-associated bacteremia are used.

Background

Hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSI) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality among dialysis patients, but benchmarking remains difficult because of varying definitions of HD-CRBSI. This study explored the effect of clinical adjudication process on HD-CRBSI reporting.

Methods

The REDUcing the burden of Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach trial implemented an evidence-based intervention bundle using a stepped-wedge design to reduce HD-CRBSI rates in 37 Australian kidney services. Six New Zealand services participated in an observational capacity. Adult patients with a new hemodialysis catheter between December 2016 and March 2020 were included. HD-CRBSI events reported were compared with the adjudicated outcomes using the end point definition and adjudication processes of the REDUcing the burden of Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach trial. The concordance level was estimated using Gwet agreement coefficient (AC1) adjusted for service-level effects and implementation tranches (Australia only), with the primary outcome being the concordance of confirmed HD-CRBSI.

Results

A total of 744 hemodialysis catheter-related infectious events were reported among 7258 patients, 12,630 catheters, and 1.3 million catheter-exposure days. The majority were confirmed HD-CRBSI, with 77.9% agreement and substantial concordance (AC1=0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.81). Exit site infections have the highest concordance (AC1=0.85; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.91); the greatest discordance was in events classified as other (AC1=0.33; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.49). The concordance of all hemodialysis catheter infectious events remained substantial (AC1=0.80; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83) even after adjusting for the intervention tranches in Australia and overall service-level clustering.

Conclusions

There was a substantial level of concordance in overall and service-level reporting of confirmed HD-CRBSI. A standardized end point definition of HD-CRBSI resulted in comparable hemodialysis catheter infection rates in Australian and New Zealand kidney services. Consistent end point definition could enable reliable benchmarking outside clinical trials without the need for independent clinical adjudication.

Frailty predicts increased risk of reintervention in the 2 years after arteriovenous fistula creation

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is associated with adverse survival and increased hospital use in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Dialysis access failure is an important source of morbidity and mortality for these patients. There is limited evidence about the interactions between frailty and haemodialysis access failure. This population-based cohort study aimed to determine if haemodialysis access reintervention was predicted by frailty.

METHODS

Routinely-collected hospital data linked with death records were analyzed for all patients with ESKD who had a new arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF) created between 2010 and 2012 in New South Wales, Australia. Frailty risk was assigned by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for patient and procedural variables, quantified if frailty was prognostic for adverse haemodialysis access outcomes in the 2 years after AVF creation.

RESULTS

Almost one quarter of the 2302 patients who had a new AVF created during the study period were classified as high frailty risk (554, 24.1%). Compared to low frailty risk patients, patients with high frailty had a significantly greater risk of reintervention for AVF failure in the 2 years after creation (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.45-1.96), adjusted for age, sex and prior AVFs. Frailer patients were also more likely to have perioperative complications, longer hospital length of stay and readmission to hospital. Frailty was associated with a higher risk of mortality at 2 years after AVF creation (adjusted HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.72-4.10).

CONCLUSION

Frailty predicted adverse haemodialysis access outcomes, with frailer patients having higher rates of AVF reinterventions. These results can assist clinicians engaging in shared decision-making discussions about dialysis access risks and help personalize dialysis access decisions.

Haemodialysis vascular catheter-related blood stream infection: Organism types and clinical outcomes

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI) is an important complication of catheter use for haemodialysis, but it remains unclear whether clinical outcomes following CRBI are influenced by organism type. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes following CRBI from Gram-positive and non-Gram-positive organisms. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure receiving haemodialysis (HD) via vascular catheters who had a documented episode of CRBI in Western Australia between 2005 and 2018. The associations between organism type, likelihood of hospitalization, catheter removal and death from CRBI were examined using adjusted logistic regression models. There were 111 episodes of CRBI in 99 patients (6.1 episodes per 1000-catheter-days at risk). Of the study cohort, 53 (48%) were male and 38 (34%) identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. Gram-positive organisms were identified in 73 (66%) CRBI episodes, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus. Of those with non-Gram-positive CRBI, 9 (24%) were attributed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. One-hundred and two (92%) episodes of CRBI required hospitalization and 15 (13%) patients died from CRBI. Compared with non-Gram-positive CRBI, Gram-positive CRBI was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and catheter removal, with adjusted odds ratio of 9.34 (95% CI 1.28-68.03) and 3.47 (95% CI 1.25-9.67), respectively. There was no association between organism type and death from CRBI. Staphylococcus aureus remains the most common organism causing CRBI in HD patients. CRBI is associated with substantial morbidity, particularly CRBI attributed to Gram-positive organisms.

A Process Evaluation of the National Implementation of a Bundle for Central Venous Catheter Care for Hemodialysis

Key Points

Health professionals resisted practice change in environments of low infection where the perception of a need to change is small. Standardizing care of central venous catheters for hemodialysis requires breaking down silos of practice to benefit all patients. Knowledge of and adherence to guidelines, formal change management, and ongoing facilitation are required to implement standardized care.

Background

Implementation of a care bundle standardizing insertion, management, and removal practices to reduce infection related to central venous catheters (CVCs) used for hemodialysis was evaluated in a stepped wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial conducted at 37 Australian hospitals providing kidney services, with no reduction in catheter-related blood stream infection detected. This process evaluation explored the barriers, enablers, and unintended consequences of the implementation to explain the trial outcomes.

Methods

Qualitative process evaluation using pre-post semistructured interviews with 38 (19 nursing and 19 medical) and 44 (25 nursing and 19 medical) Australian health professionals involved in hemodialysis CVC management. Analysis was guided by the process implementation domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

Key influences on bundle uptake were that clinicians were open to change that was evidence-based and driven by guidelines and had a desire to improve practice and patient outcomes. However, resistance to change in environments of low infection, working in silos of practice, and a need for individualized delivery of patient education created barriers to uptake. Unintended effects of increased costs and lack of interoperability of systems for data collection were reported. Because the trial was in progress at the time of qualitative data collection, perceptions of the bundle may have been influenced by the fact that practices of participants were being observed as a part of the trial.

Conclusion

This national process evaluation revealed that health professionals who reported experiencing a benefit viewed the bundle positively. Those who already provided most of the recommended care or perceived that their patient population was not included in the research evidence that underpinned the interventions, resisted the implementation of the bundle. Potentially, formal change management processes using facilitation may improve implementation of evidence-based practice.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000830493 .

Multifaceted intervention to reduce haemodialysis catheter related bloodstream infections: REDUCCTION stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether multifaceted interventions, or care bundles, reduce catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) from central venous catheters used for haemodialysis.

DESIGN

Stepped wedge, cluster randomised design.

SETTING

37 renal services across Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

All adults (age ≥18 years) under the care of a renal service who required insertion of a new haemodialysis catheter.

INTERVENTIONS

After a baseline observational phase, a service-wide, multifaceted intervention bundle that included elements of catheter care (insertion, maintenance, and removal) was implemented at one of three randomly assigned time points (12 at the first time point, 12 at the second, and 13 at the third) between 20 December 2016 and 31 March 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

The primary endpoint was the rate of CRBSI in the baseline phase compared with intervention phase at the renal service level using the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

1.14 million haemodialysis catheter days of use were monitored across 6364 patients. Patient characteristics were similar across baseline and intervention phases. 315 CRBSIs occurred (158 in the baseline phase and 157 in the intervention phase), with a rate of 0.21 per 1000 days of catheter use in the baseline phase and 0.29 per 1000 days in the intervention phase, giving an incidence rate ratio of 1.37 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 2.21; P=0.20). This translates to one in 10 patients who undergo dialysis for a year with a catheter experiencing an episode of CRBSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who require a haemodialysis catheter, the implementation of a multifaceted intervention did not reduce the rate of CRBSI. Multifaceted interventions to prevent CRBSI might not be effective in clinical practice settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000830493.

Hospitalization in patients with dialysis in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based observational study

BACKGROUND

The hospitalization rate is higher in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) than in the general population. However, the national estimates in Taiwan remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the hospitalization rates of ESKD patients in a disease-specific manner from 2010 to 2018 in Taiwan.

METHODS

This population-based study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. We analyzed the hospitalization rates of patients with ESKD, defined as continuous dialysis for at least three successive months. The first diagnosis at discharge for each hospitalization was defined as the main diagnosis of hospitalization. The hospitalization rate in a certain year was calculated as the number of hospitalizations divided by the number of patients undergoing chronic dialysis in the respective year.

RESULTS

Hospitalization occurred in half of all prevalent ESKD patients, with an increasing trend over time. The hospitalization rate increased from 964.1 per 1000 person-years in 2010 to 1037.9 per 1000 person-years in 2018. ESKD patients who were male, aged over 75 years, and receiving hemodialysis had higher hospitalization rates. Infection-related hospitalization was the main cause of hospitalization, followed by cardiovascular disease. The 30-day re-admission rate was 19%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 9%.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalization rates continued to increase from 2010 to 2018. The high hospitalization rates for infection-related diseases and hemodialysis patients call for further strategies to be developed that reduce the hospitalization burden.

Microbial Repercussion on Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Outcome: A 2-Year Retrospective Study

Background

Albeit growing technical advances in the design of hemodialysis catheters, intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) still represents an utmost clinical challenge to the health-care workers (HCWs). Data regarding the influence of the culprit organism on the scenario of CRBSI in the literature are extremely lacking. Thereby, this research was carried out.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective cohort study over an interval of 2 years, involving patients who underwent regular hemodialysis via catheters in the Renal Dialysis Unit (RDU) of Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital (DSFH), Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The study enrolled 139 patients (56.8% females and 43.2% males), with mean age of 60.79 ± 11.45 years.

Results

The aggregate rate of CRBSI was 5.1/1000 catheter days. Amongst the 139 study candidates confirmed of having CRBSI, while 69.8% of CRBSIs were ascribed to Gram-positive cocci, about one-third of the infectious episodes were secondary to Gram-negative bacilli. Interestingly, fever was the most common presentation of S. aureus CRBSI compared to CoNS and Gram-negative bacilli CRBSIs (20.9% versus 12.9% versus 6.5%, p= 0.0001), whereas CRBSIs due to CoNS were presented mainly with rigors (19.4%). Of note, CRBSIs caused by Gram-negative bacilli had a tendency to manifest with unusual symptoms such as vomiting or hypotension. Besides, they were more prone to involve hospitalization or ICU admission. In this study, no mortality was attributed to CRBSIs.

Conclusion

Our study disclosed that the illicit organism has a repercussion on the clinical presentation as well as the fate of CRBSI among hemodialysis patients. This highlights the worth of identifying the infected cases in a periodic manner, to avoid the occurrence of devastating complications. A large body of work from various hemodialysis centers should take place in the near future so as to provide more insight in this perspective.

REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) - design and baseline results

Background

Patients with hemodialysis central venous catheters (HD CVCs) are susceptible to health care-associated infections, particularly hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (HD-CRBSI), which is associated with high mortality and health care costs. There have been few systematic attempts to reduce this burden and clinical practice remains highly variable. This manuscript will summarize the challenges in preventing HD-CRBSI and describe the methodology of the REDUcing the burden of dialysis Catheter ComplicaTIOns: a National approach (REDUCCTION) trial.

Methods

The REDUCCTION trial is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of a suite of clinical interventions aimed at reducing HD-CRBSI across Australia. It clusters the intervention at the renal-service level with implementation randomly timed across three tranches. The primary outcome is the effect of this intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. Patients who receive an HD CVC at a participating renal service are eligible for inclusion. A customized data collection tool allows near-to-real-time reporting of the number of active catheters, total exposure to catheters over time, and rates of HD-CRBSI in each service. The interventions are centered around the insertion, maintenance, and removal of HD CVC, informed by the most current evidence at the time of design (mid-2018).

Results

A total of 37 renal services are participating in the trial. Data collection is ongoing with results expected in the last quarter of 2020. The baseline phase of the study has collected provisional data on 5385 catheters in 3615 participants, representing 603,506 days of HD CVC exposure.

Conclusions

The REDUCCTION trial systematically measures the use of HD CVCs at a national level in Australia, accurately determines the rate of HD-CRBSI, and tests the effect of a multifaceted, evidence-based intervention upon the rate of HD-CRBSI. These results will have global relevance in nephrology and other specialties commonly using CVCs.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

Diabetes and left internal jugular vein insertion site were significantly associated with increased risk of a catheter-related bloodstream infection from a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Ex-smoker status was significantly associated with reduced risk.